Birthrates have a lot in common with attraction, that's why women are more attracted to more masculine and attractive men when they are ovulating then when they aren't. A normie woman might even tolerate sex with a subhuman if she's drunk and knows that she won't get pregnant, but when it comes to living with and having children with, women go for the best they can. I showed those stats because the way I've first noticed a link between those two things was in a similar conversation to this one, where currycels on Reddit believed that the marriage stats were overselling the amount of Indian men who have sex with white women, so they dug up the fertility stats to find a better proxy of who has how much sex with whom, and they found that, indeed, Indian men have more children with white American women than vice versa.
I will admit, as somebody from a country that loses way more women to foreigners than it gets, this is the kind of an argument that especially irks me. "Trust me bro, we might have your women but you are better looking than us, you're so white and beautiful, when we'll be spitroasting and impregnating your women they'll be only thinking about you


," that kind of stuff means nothing to me. It's the guys the women choose to be with and get fucked and impregnated by that enjoy their bodies, regardless of how much those women might've preferred somebody else.
True, but only up to a point. Ugliness is more objective and culturally universal than attractiveness, because evolutionarily, it's more important to avoid ugly mates than go solely after high-tier ones.
Thoughts on this theory?
Nicely fits with what I've linked above.
I'll be completely honest, I don't exactly get the point you're making here. Yeah, betabuxx relationships are often pretty shit when compared to what Chads and even many HTNs get, but very few things are perfect, and they are still relationships.
That's exactly the study you've posted before, just a differently structured graph. And tbh, that study also isn't all that bad for MENAs. Just like 90%+ of women with racial preferences exclude MENAs, so do 75% plus of men with racial preferences exclude MENA women, and yet, as I've shown, MENA guys still impregnate more non-MENA women than outsiders impregnate their women, and the exclusion is a double-edged sword, every guy that excludes your women from his dating pool is by definition someone that removes himself from the pool of your potential competition.
You do have a good point about the interracial obsession people here have. I'd argue that people should first and foremost care about how many of their own people prefer their own group above all others. However, when competing with other races, people start caring a lot about whether their race is ultimately being cucked or not, and in the West, that ultimately seems to be happening only to East Asians, while no one else seems to have much of a problem competing on a sort of equal ground.
Tbh, even the first image you've showed, the 50k people one, is nowhere near as devastating for MENAs as some of your comments make it seem. Lowest preference for Europeans out of all the groups, self-race preference overall just a few percentage points away from those of blacks, Latinos and Asians and well above that of Indians.
According to just about every study that has been done on the subject yet, MENAs and Central Asians are the two groups most closely related and similar to Europeans, both genetically and phenotypically. If Europeans are the best-looking race, as is clearly the majority opinion in most of the world, then those two groups should be right below them.
Also the Egyptian study which you've for some reason ignored, this being a repetition of what you've already posted once I've already mentioned, and the Guardian graph is based on official UK intermarriage data, which by definition looks at much bigger trends than any dating apps study

.