![svgmn1](/data/avatars/m/36/36573.jpg?1630727927)
svgmn1
Fat link fanboy
★★★★★
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2021
- Posts
- 11,854
sounds like a dick deal wtf fucking gay as fuck my niggerLets make a trade i give you 1 cm in dick you give me 5cm in height.
Ill add a 1000 robux to the deal![]()
![]()
sounds like a dick deal wtf fucking gay as fuck my niggerLets make a trade i give you 1 cm in dick you give me 5cm in height.
Ill add a 1000 robux to the deal![]()
![]()
no point in this we still not gonna ascendLets make a trade i give you 1 cm in dick you give me 5cm in height.
Ill add a 1000 robux to the deal![]()
![]()
ما فهمت كلمة
اقلك غير الموضوع كس اخت العرب و الصينين على بعض
تعال نتسمع عراگي
View: https://youtu.be/Wu2tLGdYTMU?si=SdsqCVxJJ5coSkJ6
ديلةسوري بيحكي بل الاصل. اصل الدمار والبهدلة للعرب كلها من وراء زعيمهم بشار الكلاب .وهن بيعبدو حتّى بالغربة![]()
nigga I swear on the battles Mohammed fought against jews I never heard about our government supporting india@svgmn1 What do Iraqis there think of Indians? Indians like Iraq because you supported us on Kashmir issue
fuck this arguing shit just give me one of your sisters dawg and we coolmy sisters all have extremely small button noses as do I. We are fully Arba. Maybe you're just a subhuman goblin
Pre 2003 maybenigga I swear on the battles Mohammed fought against jews I never heard about our government supporting india
wtf when did that happen
anyways I have a neutral take on indians and curries in general![]()
nigga I swear on the battles Mohammed fought against jews I never heard about our government supporting india
wtf when did that happen
anyways I have a neutral take on indians and curries in general![]()
Iraq had supported India's right to conduct nuclear tests following its tests of five nuclear weapons on May 11 and May 13, 1998.[13] In 2000, the then-Vice President of Iraq Taha Yassin Ramadan visited India, and on July 6, 2002 President Saddam Hussein conveyed Iraq's "unwavering support" to India over the Kashmir dispute with Pakistan.
6770002342 Dinar mahrfuck this arguing shit just give me one of your sisters dawg and we cool
العرب جرب فعلاديلة
و انتوا عالاساس احسن![]()
bro you can't be saved if you missed my point because that was exactly what I was trying to say>muh famine and wars
Yugoslavia had famine and countless brutal wars. Their average height is still 5'11" - 6'1". African niggers are not human and American niggers were specifically bred to be taller and stronger, but they're still shorter than White Humans.
Pre 2003 maybe
saddam was fucking desperate if he went this far dawg lmao![]()
India–Iraq relations - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
You don't know. It's like this meme
View attachment 1241825
Curries are very loyal, they never forget small gestures of friendship and goodwill and phull sapport people to the grave, it's been two decades since Saddam is dead and buried but random curries on an incel forum remember him for phull sapportsaddam was fucking desperate if he went this far dawg lmao
still kinda based ngl![]()
A lot of curries here are crazy about him heresaddam was fucking desperate if he went this far dawg lmao
still kinda based ngl![]()
fuck this arguing shit just give me one of your sisters dawg and we cool
A lot of curries here are crazy about him here
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/Kerala/comments/15od5g8/bruhh_palakkad_has_a_saddam_fans_association/
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/Dongistan/comments/19cbkyg/saddam_beach_kerala/
sorry bruv it s'over I can't engage in this dumbass shit argument with this retarded sperge anymore gonna play some assetto corsa and LDARArabs mog chinks @Made in Heaven won the argument.
As we see here svgmn1 quit the fight and tried to run away by slipping a cringe joke:
@svgmn1 stats after this fight:
.-100000 aura
.-1cm dick
.Nationality change to curry for a week
.only allowed to post in sewers for a year
.Is gay
![]()
Based, i will LDAR on Saddam beachsorry bruv it s'over I can't engage in this dumbass shit argument with this retarded sperge anymore gonna play some assetto corsa and LDAR![]()
Birthrates have a lot in common with attraction, that's why women are more attracted to more masculine and attractive men when they are ovulating then when they aren't. A normie woman might even tolerate sex with a subhuman if she's drunk and knows that she won't get pregnant, but when it comes to living with and having children with, women go for the best they can. I showed those stats because the way I've first noticed a link between those two things was in a similar conversation to this one, where currycels on Reddit believed that the marriage stats were overselling the amount of Indian men who have sex with white women, so they dug up the fertility stats to find a better proxy of who has how much sex with whom, and they found that, indeed, Indian men have more children with white American women than vice versa.besides the fact that the stat you posted has nothing related with marriage or MENA vs Asian as a criteria (it shows the racial dynamics of all other races though) you missed my point by a mile. marriage rates and birth rates mean literally nothing. if marriage is the standard for attraction, curries and chinks would be the apex species, but even if we limit this argument to the context of inter-racial marriage then niggers and latinos would be the apex species. I do believe it is possible for other races to marry other races including marrying white women, even MENAs, but in such arguments background dynamics play a huge roll mainly depending on what you have to be as a mena and what you get, when I said "menas get nothing" I meant the average mena immigrant/resident in western countries, who isn't someone like safir or a model and would get a harem of chicks orbiting him like you guys are trying to portray mena males.
this stat shows the extremely usurping rates of interracial marriage despite the lack of inclusion or MENA males in the study, which means with or without MENAmales, the rates are usurping in similar rates.
True, but only up to a point. Ugliness is more objective and culturally universal than attractiveness, because evolutionarily, it's more important to avoid ugly mates than go solely after high-tier ones.as for your point about standards (even though I mentioned nothing about standards difference, I just pointed that asian males are obsessed with white foids) I do realize I'm being dragged but it is real, races have different level of standards. this stems from the basic ideas of lookism and regular, intra-racial attraction, which serves as one of the levels to determine one races' standards. this can be seen clearly about normie niggers choosing to marry landwhiles or curries and menas simply simping for anything with a lightskin.
Nicely fits with what I've linked above.to make a proper analogy of this: suppose an abo or a curry fucks a 1 rated abo foid in psl, then comes by a chance with a nerdy, malnourished foid from any other race whom is considered ugly "femcel" by other races standards. what makes you think he wouldn't prefer that foid in contrast with the amount of deformed abo foids and the answer to that question, he would gladly take it, while people from other races, wouldn't oblige at all and would view this as a dumpsterdive/juggernaut. kind of the same way you view a disfigured foid unfuckable.
I'll be completely honest, I don't exactly get the point you're making here. Yeah, betabuxx relationships are often pretty shit when compared to what Chads and even many HTNs get, but very few things are perfect, and they are still relationships.problems with what you're stating here: many betabux cases are well-off, like far well off you would consider them being here. the average betabuxer is a LTN at best. which is not "well off" but leaves a playground for a massive slice that doesn't get what they want or the satisfactiom they want even with betabux and their real problem is not busting their ass to satisfy their wives financial "wants" their real problem is that they can't satisfy their wives or their OTHER "wants" and this is the real turning point for richcels here, not the fact that they would waste their money to fuck, but the fact is their "fuck" isn't even guaranteed or comes with major major sacrifices, this also makes the broke ones to have hopes, copes or be blackpilled and give up entirely. I know I can relate to the former point you mentioned, because im broke and ashy. but there's more than one side to the betabux.
That's exactly the study you've posted before, just a differently structured graph. And tbh, that study also isn't all that bad for MENAs. Just like 90%+ of women with racial preferences exclude MENAs, so do 75% plus of men with racial preferences exclude MENA women, and yet, as I've shown, MENA guys still impregnate more non-MENA women than outsiders impregnate their women, and the exclusion is a double-edged sword, every guy that excludes your women from his dating pool is by definition someone that removes himself from the pool of your potential competition.if you just scroll and skim the incelwiki submission of the scientific bp, you would find this:
View attachment 1241674
which conforms with the studies I posted
According to just about every study that has been done on the subject yet, MENAs and Central Asians are the two groups most closely related and similar to Europeans, both genetically and phenotypically. If Europeans are the best-looking race, as is clearly the majority opinion in most of the world, then those two groups should be right below them.this is the reason why I made this thread. I'm telling asians that they constantly complain about their looks, while the average curry or mena looks like an ayyy lmao shitskin alien.
Also the Egyptian study which you've for some reason ignored, this being a repetition of what you've already posted once I've already mentioned, and the Guardian graph is based on official UK intermarriage data, which by definition looks at much bigger trends than any dating apps studythe exception, couple of bar charts you posted, which sources the guardian (Idk how can you consider this a credible source vs a university study with over 50k sampled mined data) shows that menas are chads. but we know what menas really are irl and which study conforms with reality the most though.
Bruh, don't forget me wasting my time with this instead of reading the book I've wanted to or watching the videos I've had prepared for a few days alreadyBunch of sandniggers arguing lol.
He's obviously rich
Brutal worthyslavicshit came for the fatality.Birthrates have a lot in common with attraction, that's why women are more attracted to more masculine and attractive men when they are ovulating then when they aren't. A normie woman might even tolerate sex with a subhuman if she's drunk and knows that she won't get pregnant, but when it comes to living with and having children with, women go for the best they can. I showed those stats because the way I've first noticed a link between those two things was in a similar conversation to this one, where currycels on Reddit believed that the marriage stats were overselling the amount of Indian men who have sex with white women, so they dug up the fertility stats to find a better proxy of who has how much sex with whom, and they found that, indeed, Indian men have more children with white American women than vice versa.
I will admit, as somebody from a country that loses way more women to foreigners than it gets, this is the kind of an argument that especially irks me. "Trust me bro, we might have your women but you are better looking than us, you're so white and beautiful, when we'll be spitroasting and impregnating your women they'll be only thinking about you," that kind of stuff means nothing to me. It's the guys the women choose to be with and get fucked and impregnated by that enjoy their bodies, regardless of how much those women might've preferred somebody else.
True, but only up to a point. Ugliness is more objective and culturally universal than attractiveness, because evolutionarily, it's more important to avoid ugly mates than go solely after high-tier ones.
Thoughts on this theory?
Nicely fits with what I've linked above.
I'll be completely honest, I don't exactly get the point you're making here. Yeah, betabuxx relationships are often pretty shit when compared to what Chads and even many HTNs get, but very few things are perfect, and they are still relationships.
That's exactly the study you've posted before, just a differently structured graph. And tbh, that study also isn't all that bad for MENAs. Just like 90%+ of women with racial preferences exclude MENAs, so do 75% plus of men with racial preferences exclude MENA women, and yet, as I've shown, MENA guys still impregnate more non-MENA women than outsiders impregnate their women, and the exclusion is a double-edged sword, every guy that excludes your women from his dating pool is by definition someone that removes himself from the pool of your potential competition.
You do have a good point about the interracial obsession people here have. I'd argue that people should first and foremost care about how many of their own people prefer their own group above all others. However, when competing with other races, people start caring a lot about whether their race is ultimately being cucked or not, and in the West, that ultimately seems to be happening only to East Asians, while no one else seems to have much of a problem competing on a sort of equal ground.
Tbh, even the first image you've showed, the 50k people one, is nowhere near as devastating for MENAs as some of your comments make it seem. Lowest preference for Europeans out of all the groups, self-race preference overall just a few percentage points away from those of blacks, Latinos and Asians and well above that of Indians.
According to just about every study that has been done on the subject yet, MENAs and Central Asians are the two groups most closely related and similar to Europeans, both genetically and phenotypically. If Europeans are the best-looking race, as is clearly the majority opinion in most of the world, then those two groups should be right below them.
Also the Egyptian study which you've for some reason ignored, this being a repetition of what you've already posted once I've already mentioned, and the Guardian graph is based on official UK intermarriage data, which by definition looks at much bigger trends than any dating apps study.
What bookBruh, don't forget me wasting my time with this instead of reading the book I've wanted to or watching the videos I've had prepared for a few days already.
I'm still making my way through this short story collection:What book
read something joyful for once mangI'm still making my way through this short story collection:
Right now I've been stuck for like a week at a story about a guy whose three-year-old daughter can see his wife's dead aunt in family photos made after her death, I just didn't have time to finish it yet and it's frankly hard to read because it's writeen in second-person POV, and those stories are just weird mang.
The shortest story there was about a guy who ordered a hot new drug off of the dark web, ate what he got delivered, and afterwards temporarily incarnated into his neighbour's vacuum cleaner and the story made it clear that he got sexual pleasure from her using that cleaner. It was pretty funny mangread something joyful for once mang
Concession accepted.fuck this arguing shit
Most of that isn't true to begin with. Arabs arent uglier, darker (that much), shorter than Asians, and Arab noses are considered highly attractive to asiansEven if Arabs are uglier, darker, shorter, uglier nose, lower IQ than east asians
Honestly, this point alone is enough to debunk his nonsese. If europeans look the best, then who looks the most similar to Europeans? Arabs and Iranians. End of argument.According to just about every study that has been done on the subject yet, MENAs and Central Asians are the two groups most closely related and similar to Europeans, both genetically and phenotypically. If Europeans are the best-looking race, as is clearly the majority opinion in most of the world, then those two groups should be right below them.
Birthrates have a lot in common with attraction, that's why women are more attracted to more masculine and attractive men when they are ovulating then when they aren't. A normie woman might even tolerate sex with a subhuman if she's drunk and knows that she won't get pregnant, but when it comes to living with and having children with, women go for the best they can. I showed those stats because the way I've first noticed a link between those two things was in a similar conversation to this one, where currycels on Reddit believed that the marriage stats were overselling the amount of Indian men who have sex with white women, so they dug up the fertility stats to find a better proxy of who has how much sex with whom, and they found that, indeed, Indian men have more children with white American women than vice versa.
I will admit, as somebody from a country that loses way more women to foreigners than it gets, this is the kind of an argument that especially irks me. "Trust me bro, we might have your women but you are better looking than us, you're so white and beautiful, when we'll be spitroasting and impregnating your women they'll be only thinking about you," that kind of stuff means nothing to me. It's the guys the women choose to be with and get fucked and impregnated by that enjoy their bodies, regardless of how much those women might've preferred somebody else.
True, but only up to a point. Ugliness is more objective and culturally universal than attractiveness, because evolutionarily, it's more important to avoid ugly mates than go solely after high-tier ones.
Thoughts on this theory?
Nicely fits with what I've linked above.
I'll be completely honest, I don't exactly get the point you're making here. Yeah, betabuxx relationships are often pretty shit when compared to what Chads and even many HTNs get, but very few things are perfect, and they are still relationships.
That's exactly the study you've posted before, just a differently structured graph. And tbh, that study also isn't all that bad for MENAs. Just like 90%+ of women with racial preferences exclude MENAs, so do 75% plus of men with racial preferences exclude MENA women, and yet, as I've shown, MENA guys still impregnate more non-MENA women than outsiders impregnate their women, and the exclusion is a double-edged sword, every guy that excludes your women from his dating pool is by definition someone that removes himself from the pool of your potential competition.
You do have a good point about the interracial obsession people here have. I'd argue that people should first and foremost care about how many of their own people prefer their own group above all others. However, when competing with other races, people start caring a lot about whether their race is ultimately being cucked or not, and in the West, that ultimately seems to be happening only to East Asians, while no one else seems to have much of a problem competing on a sort of equal ground.
Tbh, even the first image you've showed, the 50k people one, is nowhere near as devastating for MENAs as some of your comments make it seem. Lowest preference for Europeans out of all the groups, self-race preference overall just a few percentage points away from those of blacks, Latinos and Asians and well above that of Indians.
According to just about every study that has been done on the subject yet, MENAs and Central Asians are the two groups most closely related and similar to Europeans, both genetically and phenotypically. If Europeans are the best-looking race, as is clearly the majority opinion in most of the world, then those two groups should be right below them.
Also the Egyptian study which you've for some reason ignored, this being a repetition of what you've already posted once I've already mentioned, and the Guardian graph is based on official UK intermarriage data, which by definition looks at much bigger trends than any dating apps study.
Brutal worthyslavicshit came for the fatality.
@svgmn1
Add -1cm to the dick mang
We're both 0/10 to females, chinks may be a little more desirable if they have money.@tehgymcel420 Do you think chinks look better than Arabs? Or have higher SMV in Egypt?
Curries cope by saying Arabs are on their level.He argues like a pajeet. And tbh, even if he is iraqi, I will need a DNA test to verify
Birth isn't exclusively marriage though especially considering the first graph you posted, where it mentioned "parents", many of whom can be cucked and cheated on, and those aren't small percentage cases. I went with you and supposed that birth is tied with marriage up to 90%, that in turns direct us towards the subject of marriage and betabux/oofydoofy/cuckolds again.Birthrates have a lot in common with attraction, that's why women are more attracted to more masculine and attractive men when they are ovulating then when they aren't. A normie woman might even tolerate sex with a subhuman if she's drunk and knows that she won't get pregnant, but when it comes to living with and having children with, women go for the best they can. I showed those stats because the way I've first noticed a link between those two things was in a similar conversation to this one, where currycels on Reddit believed that the marriage stats were overselling the amount of Indian men who have sex with white women, so they dug up the fertility stats to find a better proxy of who has how much sex with whom, and they found that, indeed, Indian men have more children with white American women than vice versa.
I too felt irritated about seeing the pic in the og post. it's relatable. I do think that this happens more in european countries, globohomo is also one reason why that happens, I believe if europe was gatekept probably it wouldn't dissappear but it would be less.I will admit, as somebody from a country that loses way more women to foreigners than it gets, this is the kind of an argument that especially irks me. "Trust me bro, we might have your women but you are better looking than us, you're so white and beautiful, when we'll be spitroasting and impregnating your women they'll be only thinking about you," that kind of stuff means nothing to me. It's the guys the women choose to be with and get fucked and impregnated by that enjoy their bodies, regardless of how much those women might've preferred somebody else.
interracial marriage muttifies humans and worsens racial and sexual dynaamics. but I think I'm doing the same thing in this thrid, Idk if this is rage bait anymore with all the amount of text I postedYou do have a good point about the interracial obsession people here have. I'd argue that people should first and foremost care about how many of their own people prefer their own group above all others. However, when competing with other races, people start caring a lot about whether their race is ultimately being cucked or not, and in the West, that ultimately seems to be happening only to East Asians, while no one else seems to have much of a problem competing on a sort of equal ground.
Tbh, even the first image you've showed, the 50k people one, is nowhere near as devastating for MENAs as some of your comments make it seem. Lowest preference for Europeans out of all the groups, self-race preference overall just a few percentage points away from those of blacks, Latinos and Asians and well above that of Indians.
.
turanid central asian countries have a percentage of PURE white phenotypes and hablogroups, it's different when conparing it to middle eastern countries or curries, when it comes to mena, turks fit that category more than arabian middle eastern country in which they have noticable percentage of pure white hablogroups, besides that both asians and arabs have sparse genes of mixed white roots and sparse percentage of white haplogroups. I found more nigger m Ls and es within arabian penisula during my research phase than I found hs and Is. in the end turkey is just one country. thats fine. (idk why the font is italic, its not going back to regular
According to just about every study that has been done on the subject yet, MENAs and Central Asians are the two groups most closely related and similar to Europeans, both genetically and phenotypically. If Europeans are the best-looking race, as is clearly the majority opinion in most of the world, then those two groups should be right below them.
they are relationships with bux condition and abiding that condition has a huge percentage of not being satisfied. keep in mind we're supposing that dumpsterdiving is inexistent as you suggested, betabux and oofydoofy and cheating still do exist, in large numbers.
I'll be completely honest, I don't exactly get the point you're making here. Yeah, betabuxx relationships are often pretty shit when compared to what Chads and even many HTNs get, but very few things are perfect, and they are still relationships.
I quoted uk marraige data directly above, even though its a topic that I still question its relevancy due to off-factors that render it's conclusions questionable as well.
Also the Egyptian study which you've for some reason ignored, this being a repetition of what you've already posted once I've already mentioned, and the Guardian graph is based on official UK intermarriage data, which by definition looks at much bigger trends than any dating apps study.
persians mog arabs to death on average btw so thats yet another subtype you subtracted from MENA group but added to the list of ethnic groups that mog arabsConcession accepted.
Most of that isn't true to begin with. Arabs arent uglier, darker (that much), shorter than Asians, and Arab noses are considered highly attractive to asians
Honestly, this point alone is enough to debunk his nonsese. If europeans look the best, then who looks the most similar to Europeans? Arabs and Iranians. End of argument.
View attachment 1241882View attachment 1241880View attachment 1241881
However, the thing I was arguing was that Arab SMV is negatively affected by normies thinking we look like Pajeets. Which he constantly wanted to deny
please proceed to question my ethnicity ياCurries cope by saying Arabs are on their level.
I don't care enough to debate since we all subhumans in the end.please proceed to question my ethnicity يا
ابن الكحاب يا كواد يا ديوث
يا كميتي
just like the last guy![]()
You shouldn't. I'll be honest with you nigga I know you don't care but I never liked the likes of you, matter of fact I hate the likes of you, and there's quite a few things I actually hate on the forum because I'm not easily pissed off. I have grudges on any user with an old joindate (the ones who hopped on this forum when it started and refugee'd from the sub) since a huge portion of them turned out to be fakecels and ascended. most of the old posts, all striked out usernames with the ban text underneath. so understand that my insult wasn't personal, it was also because of that. idc if you're my own race or even from my own country.I don't care enough to debate since we all subhumans in the end.
Ya, I'm no fakecel. I'm almost a wizard and a hideous sand nigger fesikhcel, I'm the the furthest thing from a fakecel.since a huge portion of them turned out to be fakecels and ascended
my apologies If that's trueYa, I'm no fakecel. I'm almost a wizard and a hideous sand nigger fesikhcel, I'm the the furthest thing from a fakecel.
Persians and Arabs are genetically the same race, just as identical as a Russian is to a Spanish JFL look at this dumbass talking like he knows what he's saying. Only bedouins and some saudis/yemenis are genetically differentpersians mog arabs to death on average btw so thats yet another subtype you subtracted from MENA group but added to the list of ethnic groups that mog arabs![]()
Yes, that's why I suspect OP is a pajeet. Every time on this forum someone pretends to be an arab, they get exposed as a jeet or a chink, which I think has happened 2 or 3 timesCurries cope by saying Arabs are on their level.
so do arab countries, dumbass. Arabs look more pure white on average than Turkics doTuranid central asian countries have a percentage of PURE white phenotypes
Look at the PCA i posted above. Most anatolians are genetically identical to iranians, iraqis, and levantines JFL., it's different when conparing it to middle eastern countries or curries, when it comes to mena, turks fit that category more than arabian middle eastern country in which they have noticable percentage of pure white hablogroups,
No one cares about your genetics autism. We are talking about physical appearancebesides that both asians and arabs have sparse genes of mixed white roots and sparse percentage of white haplogroups. I found more nigger m Ls and es within arabian penisula during my research phase than I found hs and Is. in the end turkey is just one country. thats fine. (idk why the font is italic, its not going back to regular)
Yea just show some chaddams to prove itJFL at this delusional nigger. Even brown-skinned arabs have facial morpohology closer to whites, and are usually no where near as dark as Jeets.
View attachment 1241742View attachment 1241743View attachment 1241745View attachment 1241746View attachment 1241748View attachment 1241749
View attachment 1241750View attachment 1241751
Why would I post ugly people to prove it? Also, this is just a fact. Arabs have phenotypicsl overlap with europeans so even a chad brown arab will look more European than a chad brown indianYea just show some chaddams to prove it
LolWhy would I post ugly people to prove it? Also, this is just a fact. Arabs have phenotypicsl overlap with europeans so even a chad brown arab will look more European than a chad brown indian
Didn't say they did. Learn to readLol
Neither look white