Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

RageFuel Being religious in 2023 and believing in god has no use (high iq cels only)

You can answer this question with a single word @Copexodius Maximus, and forever prove your "knowledge of history"
Jfl, I can literally look at up in 2 seconds if I didn't know.

Not that easy. Answer the question or be forever proved to be a bag of hot air.
Jfl, if you really think that then I’ll tell you. It’s the gnostic group called the carpocratians.
 
That is not marxist in any way. This is an appearance of Marxism (because of the language used) spread over something else. You seem to be quite ignorant of Marxism
Marxism is a science not dogma it can be applied to any social and economic relation to obtain similar conclusions.
 
Jfl, I can literally look at up in 2 seconds if I didn't know.


Jfl, if you really think that then I’ll tell you. It’s the gnostic group called the carpocratians.
Nope. Wrong. It is the Mazdakists of Iran. The carpocratians were "licentious" (because they were antinomians) but they had no specific doctrine about the necessity to share women. Besides, they flourished in the 2nd century AD, not in the 3rd to 6th century

By contrasts, the Mazdakites of Iran (a dissident Zoroastrian faction) did flourish in that latter period and did have a proto-communist ethos that advocated the sharing of all "goods" including women.

Your "knowledge of history" has just been proved to be narrow, with an excessive focus on the Greek-Roman world.
 
Nope. Wrong. It is the Mazdakists of Iran. The carpocratians were "licentious" (because they were antinomians) but they had no specific doctrine about the necessity to share women. Besides, they flourished in the 2nd century AD, not in the 3rd to 6th century

By contrasts, the Mazdakites of Iran (a dissident Zoroastrian faction) did flourish in that latter period and did have a proto-communist ethos that advocated the sharing of all "goods" including women.

Your "knowledge of history" has just been proved to be narrow, with an excessive focus on the Greek-Roman world.
Mazdakites aren’t christians, that’s what I thought you were talking about. The literal word Mazda comes from Ahura Mazda, and they were some kind of offshoot of Zoroastrians from what I remember.

Regardless, many carpocratians did share wives and everything else and were condemned by the Pauline churches.
 
Marxism is a science not dogma it can be applied to any social and economic relation to obtain similar conclusions.
Marxism is a pseudo-science. In reality, it is a religion, like many other. It just promises you heaven on Earth ("socialism")

Most ancient pagan religions likewise promised earthly benefits and had no concept of the afterlife. Marxism is no different. It just has a pantheon that includes Marx-Engels-Lenin-(Stalin/Trotsky/Pol Pot/Mao/Kim, pick one according to your sub-sect). Marxism makes huge metaphysical claims about the direction of history (which are naturally unprovable). This is no better than claiming that there a sky daddy.
 
Marxism is a pseudo-science. In reality, it is a religion, like many other. It just promises you heaven on Earth ("socialism")

Most ancient pagan religions likewise promised earthly benefits and had no concept of the afterlife. Marxism is no different. It just has a pantheon that includes Marx-Engels-Lenin-(Stalin/Trotsky/Pol Pot/Mao/Kim, pick one according to your sub-sect). Marxism makes huge metaphysical claims about the direction of history (which are naturally unprovable). This is no better than claiming that there a sky daddy.
Stop sperging out lol.
 
Mazdakites aren’t christians, that’s what I thought you were talking about.
I never said that. I just said "a sect". I never said a sect of what.

The literal word Mazda comes from Ahura Mazda, and they were some kind of offshoot of Zoroastrians from what I remember.
Yes. I already said that

Regardless, many carpocratians did share wives and everything else and were condemned by the Pauline churches.
Absolutely but they were not communists like the Mazdakites were (I said "proto-communists"). Instead, they were just trying to piss off the Demiurge (YHWH, they thought), by breaking his rules. They did not care about "this world" (like communists do), they were just rying to escape it.

What you are showing here is that you know a number of things but also that your familiarity with all this is still quite superficial, and overly narrow in scope
 
Last edited:
You’re clearly just making excuses now to suck Jay’s dick.
I am not. I never thought of a Christian sect. Also something you should be aware of; there were tons of non-Christian sects in late antiquity, competing with each other.

Until the Battle of the Milvian Bridge, in the early 4th century AD, Christianity did not have a privileged position.
 
Last edited:
I am not. I never thought of a Christian sect. Also something you should be aware of; there were tons of non-Christian sects in late antiquity, competing with each other.

Until the Battle of the Milvian Bridge, in the early 4th century AD, Christianity did not have a privileged position.
Me and Jay were specifically talking about Christianity and European history in general. You are just making excuses by saying “by sect I didn’t mean Christian sect I meant any tradition around in the world of anything”. Ok bro

View attachment 716486
Marxism Rodgerism

Juche (Korea)
BFE33CDD 335B 4868 B404 CC2955A9DF99
 
Me and Jay were specifically talking about Christianity and European history in general. You are just making excuses by saying “by sect I didn’t mean Christian sect I meant any tradition around in the world of anything”. Ok bro
Again, you are showing your overly narrow view of history. In the period of Christianity's early development, Iranian influence was strong in the Mediterranean basin. Examples: Mithraism, Manichaeism.

Furthermore, my question was not specifically in the context of your discussion with @JayGoptri. I just wanted to show you (and the rest of this forum) that your claims of historical knowledge in general were overblown. Be honest. Did you know about Mazdakism?
 
Are you friends with Jay?
Don't pretend to be naieve, I'm 95% certain you knew this cause half the forum might...and you did it to escape the fact you are unable to answer the question.
Dn rd, your responses are too long and frauding too big.
Because your shorter statements leave so much room for crap thinking, how can anyone respond, unless you just want insults? I can do that too.. you misanthropic Kike weirdo.
Marx clearly said to redistribute the means of (re)production.
LMAO Where?
Now I know you are a jay dick sucker who doesn’t understand memes like him either. Kys, I won’t answer your question at all. Besides, even if a person doesn’t know they can easily look it up.
This is the default position when y'all get blasted, "you must be autistic and gay since you don't agree with @Copexodius Maximus" LMAO
 
Last edited:
Yeah then why did he made woman slutty ???
Why is he shit testing us??
First woman was lilith second was eve. The first woman was the slut queen. The second woman fuck with lucifer or satan in the garden" eve ate his apple" and god got jealous because he wanted to smash eve behind adam's back.god got jealous and cursed all humanity.

Lmfao
 
Read
You dont understand capitalism or even communism.
Foids are not humans they are cattles hence they are out of the proletariat.
Bro. It's not what Marx believed. I'm not saying you can't believe in it or that it's not a good "Rogerism", even I agree that might be a good way to go about making it fair for Incels. But I was just saying it's not really Marxism. So you the one sperg'n out while accusing @K9Otaku of the same.
 
Don't pretend to be naieve, I'm 95% certain you knew this cause half the forum might...

Because your shorter statements leave so much room for crap thinking, how can anyone respond, unless you just want insults? I can do that too.. you misanthropic Kike weirdo.

LMAO Where?

This is the default position when y'all get blasted, "you must be autistic and gay since you don't agree with @Copexodius Maximus" LMAO
He’s just a part of your gay curry buttsex cult, so of course he’s going slurp your dick here.

Yeah, ... Marxism is "science". Lol
State of social science in 2023. Reproducibility crisis in a nutshell
 
Me and Jay were specifically talking about Christianity and European history in general.
Yeah and in that conversation you attributed all (or most) of the success of Western Europe and North America to Greek and Romans. I pointed out why that was wrong, and then you began to cry about that Bi-polar Schizoid MelchyMelchy's claims and some 3 year old N C U post which I didn't express myself well in. Shit I'm not always "On". People make mistypes or don't word things the best way they could, myself included. You aren't able to stick with the discussion so you shift to the "fakecel" insult instead of just admitting you are wrong or don't know much about the deeper meanings in the topics. And honestly I'm not even upset with you. If you just stop acting like a dick head to me, we could move on.
 
He’s just a part of your gay curry buttsex cult, so of course he’s going slurp your dick here.
Yeah see what I mean in the post above. I mean really dude? You believe this crackwhore of a mental patient who was begging me to make him the sole leader of the "gay cult" for like two months.
 
Yeah and in that conversation you attributed all (or most) of the success of Western Europe and North America to Greek and Romans. I pointed out why that was wrong, and then you began to cry about that Bi-polar Schizoid MelchyMelchy's claims and some 3 year old N C U post which I didn't express myself well in. Shit I'm not always "On". People make mistypes or don't word things the best way they could, myself included. You aren't able to stick with the discussion so you shift to the "fakecel" insult instead of just admitting you are wrong or don't know much about the deeper meanings in the topics. And honestly I'm not even upset with you. If you just stop acting like a dick head to me, we could move on.
dn rd, too long

Yeah see what I mean in the post above. I mean really dude? You believe this crackwhore of a mental patient who was begging me to make him the sole leader of the "gay cult" for like two months.
It’s not just because of that. It’s the noncu post anime2dcel that pretty much sealed the deal for me. Your excuses of “muh kiss by friends who paid” is complete bullshit. No one calls a kiss being intimate.
 
dn rd, too long.
Retard.
It’s not just because of that. It’s the noncu post anime2dcel that pretty much sealed the deal for me. Your excuses of “muh kiss by friends who paid” is complete bullshit. No one calls a kiss being intimate.
They don't? If a girl kissed you, it's not an "intimate" touch? Well that's news to me. I think you mean "It's not sex". The act of "Sex" I believe is INCLUDED under the category of "intimacy", whilst just using the word intimacy by itself doesn't necessarily have to INCLUDE "sex".
 
Dude wtf are you talking about now?
I'm talking about seizing the means of reproduction and soocialising women

Yes, good so far..

Hmm, alright. But what about cheap Prostitution?

Huh? I mean, people not following Christianity leads to women being volcel actually, so not sure what you mean here.

What? Capitalism allows decent men to become unemployed? It's the opposite brother. Government jobs should be there as a healthy economy like the U.S. once shows the synergy between a strong private and public sector allows for benefit everyone and in almost every field, but..you are talking some other mess....

So no prostitute then eh?
Immigrant women can be prostitutes maybe, I don't know
 
Yes, good so far..

Hmm, alright. But what about cheap Prostitution?

Huh? I mean, people not following Christianity leads to women being volcel actually, so not sure what you mean here.

What? Capitalism allows decent men to become unemployed? It's the opposite brother. Government jobs should be there as a healthy economy like the U.S. once shows the synergy between a strong private and public sector allows for benefit everyone and in almost every field, but..you are talking some other mess....

So no prostitute then eh?
Christianity let's women be nuns and spinsters and governorneses. I would prevent that
 
Exactly! We've been warned by all prophets of God that during the end of times this shit will happen.
hence why desire is the root of all suffering
 
That may be "Rodgerism", but it sure ain't Marxism
If I want a resource to be shared equally in society, people accuse me of being a communist. Obviously nearly all communists are feminists, so you can consider Marxism Rodgerism to be an anti-feminist formof Marxism.
 
I want Universal Basic Pussy!
Lol. Sounds nice on paper for sure ! But...

What if my "Universal Basic Pussy" allowance from Govt ends up being looking better than yours..even though I'm an ugly face like you..?
 
Lol. Sounds nice on paper for sure ! But...

What if my "Universal Basic Pussy" allowance from Govt ends up being looking better than yours..even though I'm an ugly face like you..?
Volcel
 
I'm talking about seizing the means of reproduction and soocialising women..
Yeah I know what you meant. Was just correcting you.
Immigrant women can be prostitutes maybe, I don't know
Immigrant women to where? To the U.S.? So let's say you and I are born in the U.S. Then, at age 18, I'm given a Indian-American subsidy foid and you are given a foid who immigrates to U.S. Let's say yours is prettier than mine. Is that okay under your system?
Christianity let's women be nuns and spinsters and governorneses. I would prevent that
Spinster prevention I can understand, Governor, fine to prevent I guess, but a Nun? Wouldn't your subsidy program be even better constructed if all the bitch and ugly women were made to take the white cloak and be Nuns?
 
Dude. Do you even understand what we are talking about? How is that Volcel? LOL. We are getting a subsidy from Govt and I'm asking him how we navigate if his is better or mine is better looking. Who decides..?
 
Lol. Sounds nice on paper for sure ! But...

What if my "Universal Basic Pussy" allowance from Govt ends up being looking better than yours..even though I'm an ugly face like you..?
If the woman is kept in a harem, I would never see her face

The Blackpool Department would objectively rank women and assign them to people who contribute the most to society
 
Dude. Do you even understand what we are talking about? How is that Volcel? LOL. We are getting a subsidy from Govt and I'm asking him how we navigate if his is better or mine is better looking. Who decides..?
Guys who are doctors, engineers, etc, should get the best pussy. Scientists, etc.
 
@Copexodius Maximus

Now, you probably understand why neither @JayGoptri nor I will ever be banned from this forum.

Provided we stay reasonably low on @Fat Link's radar and don't make any fuss, we will always be allowed here because we are high-quality posters. There aren't many of those on this forum.

Just look at your post count compared to mine. You will immediately understand what it means.
 
Last edited:
If the woman is kept in a harem, I would never see her face.
Okay.
The Blackpool Department would objectively rank women and assign them to people who contribute the most to society.
Wtf. Dude I'm so confused. So you are now saying "Yes" to capitalism-type approach to for the distribution of the Harem Lot? I suggested the same. Yet at the same time you are you advocating for the Marxist approach in economy for these Wife hand-outs? And wtf is the Blackpool department? Like the town?
Guys who are doctors, engineers, etc, should get the best pussy. Scientists, etc.
Man wtf is happening? This was my reply to @Pajeetsingh cause he wrote "Volcel" .
 
Okay.

Wtf. Dude I'm so confused. So you are now saying "Yes" to capitalism-type approach to for the distribution of the Harem Lot? I suggested the same. Yet at the same time you are you advocating for the Marxist approach in economy for these Wife hand-outs? And wtf is the Blackpool department? Like the town?

Man wtf is happening? This was my reply to @Pajeetsingh cause he wrote "Volcel" .
Blackpilll department will be a government department. We are currently living in sexual capitalism. Its time for sexual socialism. Free women for each man!
 
Blackpilll department will be a government department. We are currently living in sexual capitalism. Its time for sexual socialism. Free women for each man!
Ahhhhh. You are kill'n me bruh. You JUST said that the foids will be distributed by how much money we make. So if I make more than you I get a better looking foid? How is that sexual socialism... I have no clue what you are trying to say my fellow curry. Which position are taking?...it's all a bit cloudy..:feelswhere:
 
Last edited:
Ahhhhh. You are kill'n me bruh. You JUST said that the foids will be distributed by how much money we make. So if I make more than you I get a better looking foid? How is that sexual socialism... I have no clue what you are trying to say my fellow curry. Which position are taking?...it's all a bit cloudy..:feelswhere:
Not money. Financial parasites and used care salesmen will not get the best pussy. Without cloning and artificial wombs, we will need to decide who gets the best foids, and it will be based on intellectual achievement or contribution to society. Not measured in dollars.
 
Not money. Financial parasites and used care salesmen will not get the best pussy. Without cloning and artificial wombs, we will need to decide who gets the best foids, and it will be based on intellectual achievement or contribution to society. Not measured in dollars.
it should be based on class, proletariat and peasants must have access to dozens of pussies for lifetime, while bourgeoisie must be allowed one wife per life , a communist state is a dictatorship of proletariat, for oppressing the bourgeoisie.
 
Projection

They don't? If a girl kissed you, it's not an "intimate" touch? Well that's news to me. I think you mean "It's not sex". The act of "Sex" I believe is INCLUDED under the category of "intimacy", whilst just using the word intimacy by itself doesn't necessarily have to INCLUDE "sex".
Non-paid intimacy clearly means sex. Who tf pays for a kiss? Stop with your larping on here and get banned.

@Copexodius Maximus

Now, you probably understand why neither @JayGoptri nor I will ever be banned from this forum.

Provided we stay reasonably low on @Fat Link's radar and don't make any fuss, we will always be allowed here because we are high-quality posters. There aren't many of those on this forum.

Just look at your post count compared to mine. You will immediately understand what it means.
Cope, idek who you are. I only know Jay.
 
Projection


Non-paid intimacy clearly means sex. Who tf pays for a kiss? Stop with your larping on here and get banned.
Hundreds of people actually dumbass. Lap dances, massages, (kisses not usually even part of it cause they consider than even more as "sexual intimacy"). But people do. I should have written "paid intimacy" because of what I found out later but I believe at the time I wrote it that way so I could go back and explain it if members related.
 
Hundreds of people actually dumbass. Lap dances, massages, (kisses not usually even part of it cause they consider than even more as "sexual intimacy"). But people do. I should have written "paid intimacy" because of what I found out later but I believe at the time I wrote it that way so I could go back and explain it if members related.
You mean you wish you could rewrite it so people who actually understand what you wrote can’t criticize and expose you like many do now. So instead are relying on making up new meanings for words instead of what it obviously means. Who tf pays for kissing? No one, you are just a liar. By saying non-paid intimacy, it obviously means sex.
 
You mean you wish you could rewrite it so people who actually understand what you wrote can’t criticize.
Up till here, yes you are correct...
and expose you like many do now. So instead are relying on making up new meanings for words instead of what it obviously means. Who tf pays for kissing? No one, you are just a liar. By saying non-paid intimacy, it obviously means sex.
No dude.

I mean that you are a low IQ, drama causing moron like Melchy, and that's your real religion. You know that guy Melchizdek desperately wants to be a white women's "cuck" right? Except one thing though, what he is really wishing for is that if everyone (normies/Chad's included of course) behaved more like beta males in the Protestant Christian sense (when it worked), then perhaps we may have less of an issue to deal with. He just doesn't know how to say it and so he erupts in these spurts of mania. This is the real conversation should be trying to have, but instead you enjoy almost behaving like a Chad and harassing me. It's also why you got hit hard on failing to answer points, because you don't know how to handle it and instead revert to fighting about something different. Today we all have a major wall between us and an earnest conversation because we have so many "back-logged" problems to deal with.
 
Last edited:
You mean you wish you could rewrite it so people who actually understand what you wrote can’t criticize.
And infact, you have said it perfectly. The way it's written can leave room for misinterpretation by assholes (like you) as a result, people who DO understand will not misuse it. Meanwhile people like you (and of course Sir-Ban-alot aka Indracel who is banned almost as often as we take showers) twist the meaning to match whatever boogie man inside your closet. You can't manipulate the forum into thinking whatever your wild imagination and your demons allow you to.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

AsiaCel
Replies
18
Views
828
slavcel11
slavcel11
SlayerSlayer
Replies
3
Views
444
ResidentHell
ResidentHell
Retardfuel
Replies
44
Views
2K
Julaybib
Julaybib
Babylon Oh Babalyon
Replies
19
Views
721
Rabbi Schneerson
R
lonelysince2006
Replies
39
Views
2K
Julaybib
Julaybib

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top