Ban Discussion Megathread

[Deleted member 41729]

@Fat Link


The guy started off posting as a pedo-sympathizer, then gradually revealed his hand.

I don't see what is wrong about his post, he argued against a study saying the statistics gathered were through flawed methods. Is he not allowed to question the methods of certain studies?

Well there you have it.

The Judge and the Arbiter ie the voice of the people have spoken.

@DeepSea stays banned.

As the voice of the people the Arbiters/Judge Dredd stand in forum regular users: @Uggo Mongo @based_meme and @Mentally lost cel may be called upon at times to judge certain situations where the official mod team’s decision is placed in some serious doubt.

Since two members of their team responded with the same answer MLC’s input is not required as a potential tie breaking vote thus the issue is now settled and resolved.

Edit: Also I’d just like to point out that their judgement stands on @rightfulcel too.


View: https://youtu.be/RM1LAsuYj48

Voice of the people? What are you even talking about? They're just an extension of the mod team, that aren't given official mod positions.

 

[based_meme]

I don't see what is wrong about his post, he argued against a study saying the statistics gathered were through flawed methods. Is he not allowed to question the methods of certain studies?

Why are you hugging his nuts so tightly, March 2022cel?

 

[Deleted member 41729]

Why are you hugging his nuts so tightly, March 2022cel?

So now you're just gonna ignore my question and switch the focus onto me?

I'm not hugging anyone's nuts, I'm just questioning things. But you're gonna be deceptive and say questioning a ban means hugging a user's nuts. BULLSHIT

 

[based_meme]

So now you're just gonna ignore my question and switch the focus onto me?

I'm not hugging anyone's nuts, I'm just questioning things. But you're gonna be deceptive and say questioning a ban means hugging a user's nuts. BULLSHIT

Look at his comments, nigger. That's not the only one. There were several borderline posts before that, but this one pushed it past the point of no return.

The focus is clearly on you, because you're a month old GrAYfag who's too heavily invested in why a certain user is banned. Who's alt are you?

 

[Deleted member 41729]

Look at his comments, nigger. That's not the only one. There were several borderline posts before that, but this one pushed it past the point of no return.

Yes but the rules were only changed recently, all his comments were before the rule change. That's like making a certain drug illegal and then punishing someone for using the drug before it became illegal.

The focus is clearly on you, because you're a month old GrAYfag who's too heavily invested in why a certain user is banned. Who's alt are you?

Oh now we get the classic "you are acting in a way I don't like so you must be an alt".

I already said it before, I'm a former deleted member, @Deleted member 14805

 

[ShiiOfTheSPLC]

Look at his comments, nigger. That's not the only one. There were several borderline posts before that, but this one pushed it past the point of no return.

The focus is clearly on you, because you're a month old GrAYfag who's too heavily invested in why a certain user is banned. Who's alt are you?

@TigerFestival’s fat black ass has been around forever he just deleted his old acc

https://incels.is/threads/where-is-tigerfestival.280782/

 

[ShiiOfTheSPLC]

@Intellau_Celistic

This nigga gets banned and unbanned with 0 explanation like three times a week

 

[based_meme]

This nigga gets banned and unbanned with 0 explanation like three times a week

 

[Caesercel]

Why are you hugging his nuts so tightly, March 2022cel?

If you knew this guy you wouldn't even question why he's defending @DeepSea

 

[based_meme]

If you knew this guy you wouldn't even question why he's defending @DeepSea

I'll take the tl;dr version, please.

 

[Caesercel]

I'll take the tl;dr version, please.

Lolilover/pedodefender

 

[Deleted member 41729]

Lolilover/pedodefender

Do you assume every dude with a female anime avi is some pedo? I notice that stereotype around this place a lot.

A point I made is this:

Yes but the rules were only changed recently, all his comments were before the rule change. That's like making a certain drug illegal and then punishing someone for using the drug before it became illegal.

 

[Caesercel]

Do you assume every dude with a female anime avi is some pedo? I notice that stereotype around this place a lot.

First of all , YES

Secondly, do you think I'd forget the people who got butthurt when I was unbanned? @Mainländer put me on ignore. I'm actually surprised you didn't. Anyway that was long ago.

I won't comment on the deepsea issue cuz I'm not aware of all the facts(besides that he exclusively pedoposts) and other mods are already dealing with it.

 

[epillepsy]

First of all , YES

That's not fair.
Is that really what you based it off of?
@TigerFestival is not a "pedocel," lol.
Where do you get that idea from?
Look at his comments regarding @DeepSea.
You can't say deepsea wasn't shafted by the new administration, the banning is extremely unfair by any standard.

 

[Caesercel]

That's not fair.

That was a joke. I'm really basing it off of my prior experience with him. Just like I'm basing your defense of his on my prior experience with you. Its funny how you can always tell what kind of users would choose to die on which hills.

And I've already stated that I have no opinion on the deepsea issue. If you have any query take it up with the mods who banned him.

 

[epillepsy]

That was a joke. I'm basing it off of my prior experience with him. Just like I'm basing your defense of his on my prior experience with you. Its funny how you can always tell what kind of users would choose to die on what hills.

who says i'm trying to die on this hill?
surely it doesn't warrant a ban (death) to disagree with unfair mod decisions.

 

[Caesercel]

surely it doesn't warrant a ban (death) to disagree with unfair mod decisions.

No it doesn't. Notice how neither of you have been banned for it. Disagree away for all I care

 

[ShiiOfTheSPLC]

*Starts rapping*
Harassing girls is an epic fail
Leave em alone or its straight TO JAIL

 

[Caesercel]

View attachment 599484
muh "no sexualizing of minors" rule was most retarded decision this forum could ever make

卐 Loli enjoyer, certified lolicon/pedophile 卐

 

[Caesercel]

dats me
View attachment 599486
View attachment 599487

 

[based_meme]

That's not fair.
Is that really what you based it off of?
@TigerFestival is not a "pedocel," lol.
Where do you get that idea from?
Look at his comments regarding @DeepSea.
You can't say deepsea wasn't shafted by the new administration, the banning is extremely unfair by any standard.

Reminder that you wanted Napoleon de Gayso unbanned. You pedofags really do stick together.

 

[epillepsy]

Reminder that you wanted Napoleon de Gayso unbanned. You pedofags really do stick together.

jfl at calling me a "pedofag."
you don't know shit about my post history

 

[based_meme]

jfl at calling me a "pedofag."
you don't know shit about my post history

You don't need to look at all of your posts on the forum, you just need to look at your behavior. You faggots jump out of the bushes whenever one your ilk is under fire.

 

[epillepsy]

You don't need to look at all of your posts on the forum, you just need to look at your behavior. You faggots jump out of the bushes whenever one your ilk is under fire.

instead of casting accusations without proof, why don't you come up with some arguments against anything @TigerFestival said concerning @DeepSea's ban?
banned for breaking a rule that didn't exist when he made the posts?
banned for being a "troll" when he clearly put a lot of thought and effort into what he said?
and called a one-topic poster when he made posts on all kinds of subjects?
none of this has been answered, only calling anyone who calls this out a "pedofag," with nothing to back it up.

 

[based_meme]

instead of casting accusations without proof, why don't you come up with some arguments against anything @TigerFestival said concerning @DeepSea's ban?
banned for breaking a rule that didn't exist when he made the posts?
banned for being a "troll" when he clearly put a lot of thought and effort into what he said?
and called a one-topic poster when he made posts on all kinds of subjects?
none of this has been answered, only calling anyone who calls this out a "pedofag," with nothing to back it up.

You're clearly invested and putting a lot of effort into this. I don't need to come up with any arguments, because this isn't up for debate. Like @Caesercel said, it's funny how you pedofags are willing to die on this hill defending one of your own, while claiming not be to be pedofags.

 

[epillepsy]

You're clearly invested and putting a lot of effort into this. I don't need to come up with any arguments, because this isn't up for debate. Like @Caesercel said, it's funny how you pedofags are willing to die on this hill defending one of your own, while claiming not be to be pedofags.

what a weak response
i guess i have nothing to say then

 

[based_meme]

what a weak response
i guess i have nothing to say then

You only ever seem to have anything to say when it's about this topic.

 

[epillepsy]

You only ever seem to have anything to say when it's about this topic.

about which topic?
i post on a lot of different things.

 

[based_meme]

about which topic?
i post on a lot of different things.

Pedofags/pedophilia/etc.

 

[epillepsy]

Pedofags/pedophilia/etc.

that's not actually true at all.
i post mostly on ricecel issues.

 

[based_meme]

that's not actually true at all.
i post mostly on ricecel issues.

You're quite vocal about it here.

View attachment 599496
Pedophilia is completely normal and there's not a single thing wrong about it

You're mentally ill.

 

[epillepsy]

You're quite vocal about it here.

maybe in ban discussion specifically, but not in general.

 

[based_meme]

maybe in ban discussion specifically, but not in general.

Yeah, but why are you so vociferously speaking out against a pedofag's ban?

 

[Deleted member 41729]

You're clearly invested and putting a lot of effort into this. I don't need to come up with any arguments, because this isn't up for debate. Like @Caesercel said, it's funny how you pedofags are willing to die on this hill defending one of your own, while claiming not be to be pedofags.

what a weak response
i guess i have nothing to say then

It's @based_meme who has nothing to say, he just sidesteps arguments he can't answer like a coward, and just instead gives a condescending remark, very much like IncelTear.

 

[epillepsy]

Yeah, but why are you so vociferously speaking out against a pedofag's ban?

i liked @DeepSea as a user.
i don't have a burning hatred of "pedofags" like you seem to do.
if they are good users, then they are good.

and seeing the number of followers he amassed within such a small number of posts, other users liked him as well.
look at how many are speaking up for such a lowly graycel.

he was very high iq, always supporting his position and providing insight into ancient traditions.
was interesting addition to the forum, and no one was even complaining about him.

don't even think im being that vociferous.
and it seems like @TigerFestival is being very reasonable in his comments.

 

[Caesercel]

@SellingGf10k

 

[Schery6]

@SellingGf10k

He's truecel

 

[based_meme]

It's @based_meme who has nothing to say, he just sidesteps arguments he can't answer like a coward, and just instead gives a condescending remark, very much like IncelTear.

i liked @DeepSea as a user.
i don't have a burning hatred of "pedofags" like you seem to do.
if they are good users, then they are good.

and seeing the number of followers he amassed within such a small number of posts, other users liked him as well.
look at how many are speaking up for such a lowly graycel.

he was very high iq, always supporting his position and providing insight into ancient traditions.
was interesting addition to the forum, and no one was even complaining about him.

don't even think im being that vociferous.
and it seems like @TigerFestival is being very reasonable in his comments.

Cope, seethe, dilate.

 

[Deleted member 41729]

Cope, seethe, dilate.

AKA "I don't have any argument so I'll just act like a prick and not back up my stance"

 

[based_meme]

AKA "I don't have any argument so I'll just act like a prick and not back up my stance"

The posts speak for themselves, you dumb nigger. You just love to keep sucking deepsea's dick.

 

[Deleted member 41729]

The posts speak for themselves, you dumb nig. You just love to keep sucking deepsea's dick.

Nah, your posts speak for themselves.

You are creating a false dischotomy, where if anyone's ban is questioned, whoever questions that ban is "sucking their dick", when in reality, they are just trying to ask questions and get clarification. Meanwhile, all you do is evade questions and insult people, or call people alts when they don't agree with you, which is absolutely pathetic.

Everyone can see how full of shit you are, being hostile towards anyone who questions a ban. For some reason @Fat Link gives you some sort of authority, and you showcase it with your smug attitude and refusal to argue in good faith, because you know you're in the wrong.

 

[the.oracle]

please free @Intellau_Celistic he makes good coping content for me to pass the day by

 

[based_meme]

Nah, your posts speak for themselves.

You are creating a false dischotomy, where if anyone's ban is questioned, whoever questions that ban is "sucking their dick", when in reality, they are just trying to ask questions and get clarification. Meanwhile, all you do is evade questions and insult people, or call people alts when they don't agree with you, which is absolutely pathetic.

Everyone can see how full of shit you are, being hostile towards anyone who questions a ban. For some reason @Fat Link gives you some sort of authority, and you showcase it with your smug attitude and refusal to argue in good faith, because you know you're in the wrong.

Cope, seethe, dilate, pedofag. I sifted through and read at least 15 pages of his posts and ignored several other questionable ones, because they weren't blatant, you fucking pedo cocksucker. Not that I have to explain myself to you. kys

 

[Deleted member 41729]

Cope, seethe, dilate, pedofag. I sifted through and read at least 15 pages of his posts and ignored several other questionable ones, because they weren't blatant, you fucking pedo cocksucker. Not that I have to explain myself to you. kys

Anyone who disagrees with you is a pedofag.

You still haven't addressed why he was banned for making those posts before the new rules came into place. And you won't answer because you're a fucking coward whose cope is to just shit on muh pedos.

 

[based_meme]

Anyone who disagrees with you is a pedofag.

No, pedofags and pedofag defenders are pedofags.

You still haven't addressed why he was banned for making those posts before the new rules came into place. And you won't answer because you're a fucking coward whose cope is to just shit on muh pedos.

Keep crying for us, pedofag.

 

[Deleted member 41729]

No, pedofags and pedofag defenders are pedofags.

So if some dude gets banned unjustly, and you call it out, and that user was a pedofag, now you are automatically a pedofag?

Retard logic.

Keep crying for us, pedofag.

Typical evasion of the point, coward.

 

[ShiiOfTheSPLC]

This nigga gets banned and unbanned with 0 explanation like three times a week

>he's already banned again within hours of me posting this

 

[Caesercel]

He's truecel

 

[Dregster]

He's truecel

View: https://youtu.be/pZg1pW1sCDY&t=3m53s

 

[based_meme]

@Fat Link Boss man, when did the pedo rules go into effect?