Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Ban Discussion Megathread

Free @Intellau_Celistic , he's good peoples:fuk:

Oh it’s all contained in Rob’s screenshot a page back, that I asked him to re-post in this very thread for your and Lord Mongo’s perusal and ultimate user judgements. :feelshehe:

The cliff’s boil down to a Foid having @rightfulcel’s cock in her mouth but that @rightfulcel doesn’t feel that it should qualify as a blowjob or even a genuine intimate encounter I believe because he was being set up to be humiliated by others (and the girl herself) not to mention his noodle remained limp the entire time, so it’s not like he received the full on Belladonna, Gauge or Jenna Haze expert cocksmith knob polishing super enjoyable pornstar like experience here but again that’s up to you and Mongo to decide now not we humble staff members. :feelsclown:
Why don't women do these "pranks" to me tbh
 
Also free @DeepSea
The mod team decided to have me ban him permanently, after pointing out he was a one issue poster troll, since he only ever appeared to post in order to support pro pedophile topics and subjects. :feelshehe:
 
The mod team decided to have me ban him permanently, after pointing out he was a one issue poster troll, since he only ever appeared to post in order to support pro pedophile topics and subjects.

Can you explain what the above threads have to do with pedophilia? These are just 10 very quick threads I immediately found.

Quick question, by the mod team, are you mainly referring to @PPEcel @Komesarj89 and @MarquisDeSade, m0ds who are vocally anti-pedo? Did by any chance @Robtical not give a shit about these "muh pedo" posts? You really are being secretive here. Anyone with half a brain knows PPEcel was a huge advocate of anti-"pedo" posting. He's been this way for years.

after pointing out he was a one issue poster troll,
"troll"? What makes him a troll? How do you know he was a troll, and not a genuine believer in what he said. He would constantly provide his arguments with research and data. Meanwhile the average user here shitposts and you don't give two shits.

The irony of the blackpill is you worship scientific studies, but only when you think presenting them will benefit your cause in the long run. This is eerily similar of any academic who selectively uses science in a political manner.
since he only ever appeared to post in order to support pro pedophile topics and subjects.
Let me take a quick guess, @PPEcel dug through his posts and provided you links, and you skimmed through the cherrypicked links, without actually looking at all his posts, and then you decided to ban him.

At the end of this, you will say, "we don't have to be transparent", but by that you mean you don't have to intentionally be transparent, but any non idiot can see right through what happened here in this unjust banning
 

Can you explain what the above threads have to do with pedophilia? These are just 10 very quick threads I immediately found.

Quick question, by the mod team, are you mainly referring to @PPEcel @Komesarj89 and @MarquisDeSade, m0ds who are vocally anti-pedo? Did by any chance @Robtical not give a shit about these "muh pedo" posts? You really are being secretive here. Anyone with half a brain knows PPEcel was a huge advocate of anti-"pedo" posting. He's been this way for years.


"troll"? What makes him a troll? How do you know he was a troll, and not a genuine believer in what he said. He would constantly provide his arguments with research and data. Meanwhile the average user here shitposts and you don't give two shits.

The irony of the blackpill is you worship scientific studies, but only when you think presenting them will benefit your cause in the long run. This is eerily similar of any academic who selectively uses science in a political manner.

Let me take a quick guess, @PPEcel dug through his posts and provided you links, and you skimmed through the cherrypicked links, without actually looking at all his posts, and then you decided to ban him.

At the end of this, you will say, "we don't have to be transparent", but by that you mean you don't have to intentionally be transparent, but any non idiot can see right through what happened here in this unjust banning
Tell you what Tiger. :feelsclown:

Perhaps you have a point or perhaps you do not… :feelshehe:

Therefore I now call upon my three person strong non mod task force of trusted Judge Dredd and Halo Arbiter themed regular users/posters to come forward if they so desire and adjudicate this no doubt very important issue for you and perhaps the community in general. :feelsBox:

So Arbiters/Judges please step forward and make your voices known once again in the ban discussion thread here if the three of you are willing to investigate the user @DeepSea’s post history and determine whether he should stay banned as a sick fuck pedophile apologist troll or just your average every day good keed that dindu nuffin who done got hisself punished by those unfair rascally mods of da incels dot is government? :feelsbaton:

@based_meme @Uggo Mongo @Mentally lost cel:feelsstudy:

WE CALL UPON YOU 3 NOW IN OUR TIME OF NEED, USING THE THU’UM INCEL PEDO JUDGEMENT SHOUT! :feelsEhh: :feelsPop: :feelsgah:

FAG ROH DAH!! :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
 
Last edited:
Tell you what Tiger. :feelsclown:

Perhaps you have a point or perhaps you do not… :feelshehe:

Therefore I now call upon my three person strong non mod task force of trusted Judge Dredd and Halo Arbiter themed regular users/posters to come forward if they so desire and adjudicate this no doubt very important issue for you and perhaps the community in general. :feelsBox:

So Arbiters/Judges please step forward and make your voices known once again in the ban discussion thread here if the three of you are willing to investigate the user @DeepSea’s post history and determine whether he should stay banned as a sick fuck pedophile apologist troll or just your average every day good keed that dindu nuffin who done got hisself punished by those unfair rascally mods of da incels dot is government? :feelsbaton:

@based_meme @Uggo Mongo @Mentally lost cel:feelsstudy:

WE CALL UPON YOU 3 NOW IN OUR TIME OF NEED, USING THE THU’UM INCEL PEDO JUDGEMENT SHOUT! :feelsEhh: :feelsPop: :feelsgah:

FAG ROH DAH!! :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
@based_meme is an agecuck and fierecly anti-pedo, so this isn't gonna go well.

It would only be fair if we allowed him back under the agreement he didnt post pro pedo content. That seems a fair compromise under the new rules.

But let's just see how this goes.
 
Can I be a judge one day sir Fat Link
If @based_meme decides to recuse himself from this case then you shall be the interim Judge/Arbiter helping to adjudicate @DeepSea’s fate. :feelshehe:
 
Last edited:
@based_meme what is your verdict?
Sifting through 23 pages of post history is no lunch break task. Be patient.
 
banned as a sick fuck pedophile apologist troll
to preface this, I have not read all of his posts.

@DeepSea does not strike me as the kind of user to sexualize anyone, or anything, so If you banned him for being a pedophile apologist, or pro-pedophilia you need to update the rules.

Only sexualizing minors is against the rules, and I don't think saying "Kickball is more likely to hurt children than consensual safe sex with adults." is sexualizing them. So either you ban pedophilia discussion entirely (besides the pedo-hate which suits your narrative presumably) or unban him. I don't think he should be banned.
 
to preface this, I have not read all of his posts.

@DeepSea does not strike me as the kind of user to sexualize anyone, or anything, so If you banned him for being a pedophile apologist, or pro-pedophilia you need to update the rules.

Only sexualizing minors is against the rules, and I don't think saying "Kickball is more likely to hurt children than consensual safe sex with adults." is sexualizing them. So either you ban pedophilia discussion entirely (besides the pedo-hate which suits your narrative presumably) or unban him. I don't think he should be banned.
Postmaxxers have no say in this.
 
to preface this, I have not read all of his posts.

@DeepSea does not strike me as the kind of user to sexualize anyone, or anything, so If you banned him for being a pedophile apologist, or pro-pedophilia you need to update the rules.

Only sexualizing minors is against the rules, and I don't think saying "Kickball is more likely to hurt children than consensual safe sex with adults." is sexualizing them. So either you ban pedophilia discussion entirely (besides the pedo-hate which suits your narrative presumably) or unban him. I don't think he should be banned.
Did he say this? :feelswhere:
 
Clown shoes.

I vote ban :feelsUgh:
@Fat Link do you see what your committee does?

they make impulsive decisions by saying "clown shoes"

this isn't fair to determine a user's fate on
 
@Fat Link do you see what your committee does?

they make impulsive decisions by saying "clown shoes"

this isn't fair to determine a user's fate on
Advocating kiddy diddling.

That's a permanent sentence to the iso-cubes.

Com
 
to preface this, I have not read all of his posts.

@DeepSea does not strike me as the kind of user to sexualize anyone, or anything, so If you banned him for being a pedophile apologist, or pro-pedophilia you need to update the rules.

Only sexualizing minors is against the rules, and I don't think saying "Kickball is more likely to hurt children than consensual safe sex with adults." is sexualizing them. So either you ban pedophilia discussion entirely (besides the pedo-hate which suits your narrative presumably) or unban him. I don't think he should be banned.
1649611483837
 
1649547074372-jpeg.599111

<— ShiiLo on the left
Maozy and a huge Biplo on the right —>
 
@Fat Link

This is some incoherent drivel. All sex without the provision of consent is rape, right? If, as you say, children "can't consent", then who is raping whom when two children engage in mutual genital stimulation? Do they rape each other? Or do the rapes cancel out? Why or why not?



Kids can be just as manipulative as adults. In fact, I would argue that it can be easier for a kid to get another kid to have sex due to peer pressure.

Child-adult sex does not ruin children's lives—this is a myth disproven by meticulous scientific research. Society's hysterical reaction does sometimes ruin children's lives. Case in point: [goes on to cite study about sexual ABUSE. :feelskek:]




In 1999, a massive peer-reviewed meta-analysis of the effects of "child sexual abuse" was published in the most prestigious psychological journal in America. It reached the following conclusion:

"Many lay persons and professionals believe that child sexual abuse (CSA) causes intense harm, regardless of gender, pervasively in the general population. The authors examined this belief by reviewing 59 studies based on college samples. Meta-analyses revealed that students with CSA were, on average, slightly less well adjusted than controls. However, this poorer adjustment could not be attributed to CSA because family environment (FE) was consistently confounded with CSA, FE explained considerably more adjustment variance than CSA, and CSA-adjustment relations generally became non-significant when studies controlled for FE. Self-reported reactions to and effects from CSA indicated that negative effects were neither pervasive nor typically intense, and that men reacted much less negatively than women. The college data were completely consistent with data from national samples. Basic beliefs about CSA in the general population were not supported."


Because young children, like teenagers and adults, are sexual beings who enjoy and desire sexual activity- they are not asexual.



This is a non sequitor. A fully developed mind is not a necessary prerequisite for understanding what sex is.

There are no immediate consequences of sex other than pleasure and orgasm. Assuring a lack of negative outcomes like STDs, pregnancy, etc, should be the responsibility of the father or guardian of the child. Much like, although a child is not aware of the possible ramifications of riding a vehicle (injury, death), this does not mean they should not ride vehicles—it just means their guardian should ensure that these ramifications do not occur.


Even fucking mole rats "understand" what sex is, and you're saying kids don't? What exactly is so incredibly complex about sex- i.e. mutually pleasurable bodily touching- that kids are unable to understand?
The guy started off posting as a pedo-sympathizer, then gradually revealed his hand.

iu
 
Well there you have it. :feelshehe:

The Judge and the Arbiter ie the voice of the people have spoken. :feelsthink:

@DeepSea stays banned. :feelsUgh:

As the voice of the people the Arbiters/Judge Dredd stand in forum regular users: @Uggo Mongo @based_meme and @Mentally lost cel may be called upon at times to judge certain situations where the official mod team’s decision is placed in some serious doubt. :feelsugh:

Since two members of their team responded with the same answer MLC’s input is not required as a potential tie breaking vote thus the issue is now settled and resolved. :feelsclown:

Edit: Also I’d just like to point out that their judgement stands on @rightfulcel too. :feelsjuice:


View: https://youtu.be/RM1LAsuYj48
 
Last edited:
Well there you have it. :feelshehe:

The Judge and the Arbiter ie the voice of the people have spoken. :feelsthink:

@DeepSea stays banned. :feelsUgh:

As the voice of the people the Arbiters/Judge Dredd stand in forum regular users: @Uggo Mongo @based_meme and @Mentally lost cel may be called upon at times to judge certain situations where the official mod team’s decision is placed in some serious doubt. :feelsugh:

Since two members of their team responded with the same answer MLC’s input is not required as a potential tie breaking vote thus the issue is now settled and resolved. :feelsclown:

Edit: Also I’d just like to point out that their judgement stands on @rightfulcel too. :feelsjuice:


View: https://youtu.be/RM1LAsuYj48

Hail omega
 
Well there you have it. :feelshehe:

The Judge and the Arbiter ie the voice of the people have spoken. :feelsthink:

@DeepSea stays banned. :feelsUgh:

As the voice of the people the Arbiters/Judge Dredd stand in forum regular users: @Uggo Mongo @based_meme and @Mentally lost cel may be called upon at times to judge certain situations where the official mod team’s decision is placed in some serious doubt. :feelsugh:

Since two members of their team responded with the same answer MLC’s input is not required as a potential tie breaking vote thus the issue is now settled and resolved. :feelsclown:

Edit: Also I’d just like to point out that their judgement stands on @rightfulcel too. :feelsjuice:


View: https://youtu.be/RM1LAsuYj48

So I’m a judge? Or arbiter?
 
@Fat Link


The guy started off posting as a pedo-sympathizer, then gradually revealed his hand.

iu
I don't see what is wrong about his post, he argued against a study saying the statistics gathered were through flawed methods. Is he not allowed to question the methods of certain studies?
Well there you have it. :feelshehe:

The Judge and the Arbiter ie the voice of the people have spoken. :feelsthink:

@DeepSea stays banned. :feelsUgh:

As the voice of the people the Arbiters/Judge Dredd stand in forum regular users: @Uggo Mongo @based_meme and @Mentally lost cel may be called upon at times to judge certain situations where the official mod team’s decision is placed in some serious doubt. :feelsugh:

Since two members of their team responded with the same answer MLC’s input is not required as a potential tie breaking vote thus the issue is now settled and resolved. :feelsclown:

Edit: Also I’d just like to point out that their judgement stands on @rightfulcel too. :feelsjuice:


View: https://youtu.be/RM1LAsuYj48

Voice of the people? What are you even talking about? They're just an extension of the mod team, that aren't given official mod positions.
 
I don't see what is wrong about his post, he argued against a study saying the statistics gathered were through flawed methods. Is he not allowed to question the methods of certain studies?
Why are you hugging his nuts so tightly, March 2022cel?
 
Why are you hugging his nuts so tightly, March 2022cel?
So now you're just gonna ignore my question and switch the focus onto me?

I'm not hugging anyone's nuts, I'm just questioning things. But you're gonna be deceptive and say questioning a ban means hugging a user's nuts. BULLSHIT
 
So now you're just gonna ignore my question and switch the focus onto me?

I'm not hugging anyone's nuts, I'm just questioning things. But you're gonna be deceptive and say questioning a ban means hugging a user's nuts. BULLSHIT
Look at his comments, nigger. That's not the only one. There were several borderline posts before that, but this one pushed it past the point of no return.

The focus is clearly on you, because you're a month old GrAYfag who's too heavily invested in why a certain user is banned. Who's alt are you?
 
Look at his comments, nigger. That's not the only one. There were several borderline posts before that, but this one pushed it past the point of no return.
Yes but the rules were only changed recently, all his comments were before the rule change. That's like making a certain drug illegal and then punishing someone for using the drug before it became illegal.
The focus is clearly on you, because you're a month old GrAYfag who's too heavily invested in why a certain user is banned. Who's alt are you?
Oh now we get the classic "you are acting in a way I don't like so you must be an alt".

I already said it before, I'm a former deleted member, @Deleted member 14805
 
Look at his comments, nigger. That's not the only one. There were several borderline posts before that, but this one pushed it past the point of no return.

The focus is clearly on you, because you're a month old GrAYfag who's too heavily invested in why a certain user is banned. Who's alt are you?
@TigerFestival’s fat black ass has been around forever he just deleted his old acc
 
Why are you hugging his nuts so tightly, March 2022cel?
If you knew this guy you wouldn't even question why he's defending @DeepSea
 
Lolilover/pedodefender
Do you assume every dude with a female anime avi is some pedo? I notice that stereotype around this place a lot.

A point I made is this:
Yes but the rules were only changed recently, all his comments were before the rule change. That's like making a certain drug illegal and then punishing someone for using the drug before it became illegal.
 
Do you assume every dude with a female anime avi is some pedo? I notice that stereotype around this place a lot.
First of all , YES

Secondly, do you think I'd forget the people who got butthurt when I was unbanned? @Mainländer put me on ignore. I'm actually surprised you didn't. Anyway that was long ago.

I won't comment on the deepsea issue cuz I'm not aware of all the facts(besides that he exclusively pedoposts) and other mods are already dealing with it.
 
First of all , YES
That's not fair.
Is that really what you based it off of?
@TigerFestival is not a "pedocel," lol.
Where do you get that idea from?
Look at his comments regarding @DeepSea.
You can't say deepsea wasn't shafted by the new administration, the banning is extremely unfair by any standard.
 
That's not fair.
That was a joke. I'm really basing it off of my prior experience with him. Just like I'm basing your defense of his on my prior experience with you. Its funny how you can always tell what kind of users would choose to die on which hills.

And I've already stated that I have no opinion on the deepsea issue. If you have any query take it up with the mods who banned him.
 
That was a joke. I'm basing it off of my prior experience with him. Just like I'm basing your defense of his on my prior experience with you. Its funny how you can always tell what kind of users would choose to die on what hills.

who says i'm trying to die on this hill?
surely it doesn't warrant a ban (death) to disagree with unfair mod decisions.
 
surely it doesn't warrant a ban (death) to disagree with unfair mod decisions.
No it doesn't. Notice how neither of you have been banned for it. Disagree away for all I care
 
*Starts rapping*
Harassing girls is an epic fail:foidSoy:
Leave em alone or its straight TO JAIL:feelsbaton:
 
That's not fair.
Is that really what you based it off of?
@TigerFestival is not a "pedocel," lol.
Where do you get that idea from?
Look at his comments regarding @DeepSea.
You can't say deepsea wasn't shafted by the new administration, the banning is extremely unfair by any standard.
Reminder that you wanted Napoleon de Gayso unbanned. You pedofags really do stick together.
 
Reminder that you wanted Napoleon de Gayso unbanned. You pedofags really do stick together.
jfl at calling me a "pedofag."
you don't know shit about my post history
 
jfl at calling me a "pedofag."
you don't know shit about my post history
You don't need to look at all of your posts on the forum, you just need to look at your behavior. You faggots jump out of the bushes whenever one your ilk is under fire.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • NeverEvenBegan
shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top