D
B
There you go, genius. He was banned a month before the rules got stricter. Now do you understand why I keep ignoring your seething and don't entertain any "arguments" justifying anything, you retard?
Fucking low IQcels.
D
I'm not a low IQcel, you are, you're the one defending the banning of a user who never broke any rules put in place.
He should have been told "new rules are coming, adjust behavior, that's what a just system does.
D
Keep playing dumb.
B
Do the math, you idiot. If he got banned when the rules were more lax, it means that the posts got that him banned then would have sent him to the asshole of the nether realm in the current state of the forum.
D
No, it means that the m0ds were planning on instating the new rules, and disposed of him earlier.
He never broke any rules. Fat Link himself said he was banned not for breaking rules, but because the mod team whined to him to ban him.
B
@Fat Link
No.
I was unaware of his existence until he was brought to my attention by my fellow staff members who then quickly informed me of his near almost total singular nature as a pedophile apologist.
Thus he was banned for breaking our pre-existing rule against trolling.
Though admittedly that was perhaps not the most accurate of rule violation terms to put forward as the overall justification for his banning.
We also have a long existing rule against “proselytizing” which perhaps would have served far better or at least as the most major part of his ban reasoning.
- Do not troll, bait, proselytize post misinformation or platitudes, mass tag users, or necropost (i.e., do not post in inactive threads older than ~1 month unless you have something to contribute - plain agreement, mere quoting, and meaningless one-liners don't qualify as contributing).
Last edited:
@Wizard32, what happen to this "Canadian" faggot?
I
Free @Intellau_Celistic at this millisecond or I will unleash hell on you.
According to my good friend and mod Komesarj he doxxed a ton of users and was posting their phone numbers and addresses.
According to my good friend and mod Komesarj he doxxed a ton of users and was posting their phone numbers and addresses.
B
The End.No.
I was unaware of his existence until he was brought to my attention by my fellow staff members who then quickly informed me of his near almost total singular nature as a pedophile apologist.
Thus he was banned for breaking our pre-existing rule against trolling.
Though admittedly that was perhaps not the most accurate of rule violation terms to put forward as the overall justification for his banning.
We also have a long existing rule against “proselytizing” which perhaps would have served far better or at least as the most major part of his ban reasoning.
- Do not troll, bait, proselytize post misinformation or platitudes, mass tag users, or necropost (i.e., do not post in inactive threads older than ~1 month unless you have something to contribute - plain agreement, mere quoting, and meaningless one-liners don't qualify as contributing).
Thanks for the clarification.
WTF. That's serious shit.According to my good friend and mod Komesarj he doxxed a ton of users and was posting their phone numbers and addresses.
Who are the people who got doxxed?
S
that's a huge concern is someone's able to do that
Unban him you gay niggers I want to read schizoposts about Shannon rose bosanac and Group therapy.According to my good friend and mod Komesarj he doxxed a ton of users and was posting their phone numbers and addresses.
D
First time I've ever seen the "proselytize" rule come into play.No.
I was unaware of his existence until he was brought to my attention by my fellow staff members who then quickly informed me of his near almost total singular nature as a pedophile apologist.
Thus he was banned for breaking our pre-existing rule against trolling.
Though admittedly that was perhaps not the most accurate of rule violation terms to put forward as the overall justification for his banning.
We also have a long existing rule against “proselytizing” which perhaps would have served far better or at least as the most major part of his ban reasoning.
- Do not troll, bait, proselytize post misinformation or platitudes, mass tag users, or necropost (i.e., do not post in inactive threads older than ~1 month unless you have something to contribute - plain agreement, mere quoting, and meaningless one-liners don't qualify as contributing).
I wish this could be the case too, man.
WtfAccording to my good friend and mod Komesarj he doxxed a ton of users and was posting their phone numbers and addresses.
He had been getting banned and unbanned like every other day for a while prior to that so I assumed he was just banned again for the usual inane SRB shit
@Komesarj89 Elab tbh, who did he doxx and why + how did he have their info?
Oh lmfao
He’s posted their irl social media accounts and shit before too, idk what his endgame is. Presumably he actively wants people to contact them
You know I'm liking this less and less the more I look into it.
D
I've already been called an alt in this thread, and if you read through the past few pages, you would see @shii410 and @Caesercel have attested to me being a former member here. Specifically @Deleted member 14805
Calling people alts is so fucking cringe, mate.
Not sure.
Tentatively however since this is intellau’s first “major” rule breaking offense, I believe Komesarj has decided to give him a two weeks long ban over it, with presumably any more violations of the same kind ending with a permanent one.
@PPEcel is the one to ask on that front as I tasked him personally with their creation, then my glorious co-admin and good buddy @Infinity added them to our existing rule set in simple, straight to the point fashion which is to say absent of being overly wordy.
Also I am not sure which of our staff members allowed @TigerFestival to even be approved to post since his IP check either shows him to be an alt of someone or somehow sharing the same IP address with a plethora of various users some of which are nefarious in their reputation ie referring to disgraced mod i_a_m_i here whose username pops up when performing a search on whose ip matches @TigerFestival.
What’s most odd about him @based_meme is other than his being a cheerleader for another pro pedophile cheerleader ie @DeepSea is that I fully expected him to be the alt of bitch ass nigger pedophile Wellington and he certainly could be but no IP match to prove it sadly.
Ol Wellington had been caught time and again on our forum for shitting the proverbial bed on the pedo issue before we implemented @PPEcel’s new anti pedo rules talking about how the sick fuck nigger pedophile that he is wanted to breed 12 year olds among other sick and depraved nigger pedo ravings.
In the past we’d just bench the silly black bastard for a week or two but chimp chops didn’t learn his lesson and eventually got his black ass perma’d over something else.
I just figured ol @TigerFestival was him back here on this alt attempting to extract some level of petty revenge even though I’d given that dumb nigger practically a billion chances to reform.
Ahhh some black bastards never learn.
Last edited:
@TigerFestival is in fact a former user AFAIKNot sure.
Tentatively however since this is intellau’s first “major” rule breaking offense, I believe Komesarj has decided to give him a two weeks long ban over it, with presumably any more violations of the same kind ending with a permanent one.
@PPEcel is the one to ask on that front as I tasked him personally with their creation, then my glorious co-admin and good buddy @Infinity added them to our existing rule set in simple, straight to the point fashion which is to say absent of being overly wordy.
Also I am not sure which of our staff members allowed @TigerFestival to even be approved to post since his IP check either shows him to be an alt of someone or somehow sharing the same IP address with a plethora of various users some of which are nefarious in their reputation ie referring to disgraced mod i_a_m_i here whose username pops up when performing a search on whose ip matches @TigerFestival.
What’s most odd about him @based_meme is other than his being a cheerleader for another pro pedophile cheerleader ie @DeepSea is that I fully expected him to be the alt of bitch ass nigger pedophile Wellington and he certainly could be but no IP match to prove it sadly.
Ol Wellington had been caught time and again on our forum for shitting the proverbial bed on the pedo issue before we implemented @PPEcel’s new anti pedo rules talking about how the sick fuck nigger pedophile that he is wanted to breed 12 year olds among other sick and depraved nigger pedo ravings.
In the past we’d just bench the silly black bastard for a week or two but chimp chops didn’t learn his lesson and eventually got his black ass perma’d over something else.
I just figured ol @TigerFestival was him back here on this alt attempting to extract some level of petty revenge even though I’d given that dumb nigger practically a billion chances to reform.
Ahhh some black bastards never learn.
D
Not sure.
Tentatively however since this is intellau’s first “major” rule breaking offense, I believe Komesarj has decided to give him a two weeks long ban over it, with presumably any more violations of the same kind ending with a permanent one.
@PPEcel is the one to ask on that front as I tasked him personally with their creation, then my glorious co-admin and good buddy @Infinity added them to our existing rule set in simple, straight to the point fashion which is to say absent of being overly wordy.
Also I am not sure which of our staff members allowed @TigerFestival to even be approved to post since his IP check either shows him to be an alt of someone or somehow sharing the same IP address with a plethora of various users some of which are nefarious in their reputation ie referring to disgraced mod i_a_m_i here whose username pops up when performing a search on whose ip matches @TigerFestival.
What’s most odd about him @based_meme is other than his being a cheerleader for another pro pedophile cheerleader ie @DeepSea is that I fully expected him to be the alt of bitch ass nigger pedophile Wellington and he certainly could be but no IP match to prove it sadly.
Ol Wellington had been caught time and again on our forum for shitting the proverbial bed on the pedo issue before we implemented @PPEcel’s new anti pedo rules talking about how the sick fuck nigger pedophile that he is wanted to breed 12 year olds among other sick and depraved nigger pedo ravings.
In the past we’d just bench the silly black bastard for a week or two but chimp chops didn’t learn his lesson and eventually got his black ass perma’d over something else.
I just figured ol @TigerFestival was him back here on this alt attempting to extract some level of petty revenge even though I’d given that dumb nigger practically a billion chances to reform.
Ahhh some black bastards never learn.
Using public VPNs may make it seem like I share an account. That's what happens when you use VPNs.
Check my initial IP, that shouldn't have any shared IPs.
I just read the last few pages of this thread. @Fat Link @Caesercel @Uggo Mongo @based_meme @TigerFestival @epillepsy
As I recall, DeepSea was banned over this post:
This is pseudo-intellectual bullshit, like every single one of his posts. "Gay kids"? "Straight kids"? Children aren't sexual objects. Period. Pedophiles—gay or not—don't care about "seeking consent"; they're sadistic. Raping a small child is per se sadistic. Saying that "consensual adult-child sex" should be legal to appease gay pedophiles is no different than saying that burglary or pickpocketing should be made legal to appease career criminals so that they don't escalate and commit bank robbery or kidnap-for-ransom.
We have a longstanding anti-faggotry rule. Any user who unironically suggests that gay pedophilia should be legal and that we should cater to the desires of gay pedophiles will be unceremoniously drummed out. The correct response to gay pedophiles isn't to promote the idea that they should be allowed to engage in degeneracy, it's to line them up against a wall and cure them of their desires with a bullet. Needless to say, it is also highly suspicious that he arrived at a "gay pedophilia" tangent out of the blue.
When we noticed this post, the moderation team had a discussion as to how long he would be banned. We quickly noticed that he was a troll who engaged only to promote pro-pedophilia viewpoints. He was permanently banned.
This issue will not be reconsidered.
As I recall, DeepSea was banned over this post:
This is pseudo-intellectual bullshit, like every single one of his posts. "Gay kids"? "Straight kids"? Children aren't sexual objects. Period. Pedophiles—gay or not—don't care about "seeking consent"; they're sadistic. Raping a small child is per se sadistic. Saying that "consensual adult-child sex" should be legal to appease gay pedophiles is no different than saying that burglary or pickpocketing should be made legal to appease career criminals so that they don't escalate and commit bank robbery or kidnap-for-ransom.
We have a longstanding anti-faggotry rule. Any user who unironically suggests that gay pedophilia should be legal and that we should cater to the desires of gay pedophiles will be unceremoniously drummed out. The correct response to gay pedophiles isn't to promote the idea that they should be allowed to engage in degeneracy, it's to line them up against a wall and cure them of their desires with a bullet. Needless to say, it is also highly suspicious that he arrived at a "gay pedophilia" tangent out of the blue.
When we noticed this post, the moderation team had a discussion as to how long he would be banned. We quickly noticed that he was a troll who engaged only to promote pro-pedophilia viewpoints. He was permanently banned.
This issue will not be reconsidered.
Last edited:
S
Why was @faded banned?
If it was for bragging, you can ban @PPEcel too
If it was for bragging, you can ban @PPEcel too
S
Cringe
Paedophilia is bad. So is vigilantism.
Not sure why this is such an absurd take to have. I'm completely convinced that if a government was comprised exclusively of Redditors, a Redditocracy, it would be the worst and most authoritarian form of government ever conceived. And the second-worst form of government ever conceived would...
incels.is
@SoloAlex just lol
(btw everyone I don't support gay pedos)
Last edited:
S
You didn’t get it. I was just making fun of @Komesarj89. I don’t give a shit about pedos here as long as bragging about cucking for escorts is common here. Just a little reminder that leftis support sexwork too
No I was just pointing out hypocrisy of saying murder is bad except when its against pedos.
S
Yeah. It’s the same argument IT use against Incels. -> Murdering Incels is ok.
It is nothing but virtue signaling what the mods are doing
Too bad for @Intellau_Celistic, he was a relatable manlet truecel, i really like him but dude couldnt respect others privacy for the life of him.
Free autism bro @Intellau_Celistic
Who did he dox
Paedophilia is bad. So is vigilantism.
Not sure why this is such an absurd take to have. I'm completely convinced that if a government was comprised exclusively of Redditors, a Redditocracy, it would be the worst and most authoritarian form of government ever conceived. And the second-worst form of government ever conceived would...
Nothing I wrote is inconsistent. Vigilantism is bad because, by definition, it involves ordinary citizens who assume legal authority where they have none; it corrodes the rule of law. But it's not vigilantism if gay pedophiles are afforded due process, found guilty, and punished, however harshly, by the state.
S
Ban all sexwork-supporting leftis.
They can go to Reddit.
They can go to Reddit.
S
@Wizard32 is back!
Would only apply if they had acted on their desires, and were chomos. If they merely had urges but didn't act on them, this would be a 1984 style policy.
hey @based_meme and @TigerFestival if you two are going to have like a dozen consecutive back-and-forths about a banned user can you repeat their name more often? Had to go back a full page to see this was about @DeepSea it was very confusing to jump into the middle of it
like maybe there could be some threshold where big ongoing discussions in the Megathread can be collectively exported into a spinoff thread?
We could even have a ban discussion subforum where each new discussion is a separate thread.
Lesson learned, next time when I post comics I'll use bigger censorship
It is important that we do not sexualize minors here, I hope I have prevented that with my new approach to Shadman's art
Please meet FatLinkle, she is Link's twin sister Linkle who became a landwhale to help block more lolis from view, appreciate her sacrifice.
like maybe there could be some threshold where big ongoing discussions in the Megathread can be collectively exported into a spinoff thread?
We could even have a ban discussion subforum where each new discussion is a separate thread.
@Wizard32 is back!
Lesson learned, next time when I post comics I'll use bigger censorship
It is important that we do not sexualize minors here, I hope I have prevented that with my new approach to Shadman's art
Please meet FatLinkle, she is Link's twin sister Linkle who became a landwhale to help block more lolis from view, appreciate her sacrifice.
D
I'm confused. As far as I was concerned, the anti-faggotry policy, was to not allow gay users on the forum (or post stuff like gay porn).
If a user were to say "homosexuality should be stigmatized but not illegal", would that warrant a ban?
What about saying gays deserve the right to get married?
What about saying gays deserve the right to adopt if financially stable?
Do users have to think "all fags should be stoned", in general? What exactly does this no faggotry rule entail? @Wizard32 thoughts?
One thing you two share in common is you both are under the illusion that it is appropriate to use the term pedophilia to refer to an attraction toward females.
I remember when I used to talk that way, back when I was still in the thrall of the Jewish cuckoldry of my mind.
I hope you two escape from that and realize that this is a word historically applying only to the "boylovers" and they have tricked you into identifying heterosexual korephiles and parthenophiles as one of them so they can camouflage in the shade of superior numbers.
The only way "heterosexual pedophilia" can exist is when we are talking about adult women interested in little boys.
It is impossible for an adult man to be a heterosexual pedophile, that's oxymoronic.
The first step to an honest discussion of rules would be to look at the actual language. Mods do not use term 'faggot', for example, in rules.
I could've sworn it was "no gay content" but I can't find that either...
*stares like an idiot at rules page a moment*
Okay I'm seeing "Females and LGBT Individuals" being banned on sight.
This is the only place I can see anything like this mentioned...
wtf happened to the 'no gay content' rule?
THIS mods is why I'm saying you should stop re-editing the same post and make new posts (w/ numbering system) any time you update the rules.
I don't want to have to whip out archive.org every time I want to figure out wtf changed and when.
This new rule phrasing is strange as fuck... so what, a straight man can post gay porn?
I'm pretty sure posting gay porn here is banned but I can't see the 'no gay content' anymore so it seems like it would be technically allowed.
@Fat Link wtf is going on here what happened to the no gay content rule? Did someone remove it by accident?
This is why stop editing the same post and make new post =/
Last edited:
what happened to my thread talking to @based_meme ?
looks to be deleted
not even just moved to sewers or bunker, deleted =/
looks to be deleted
not even just moved to sewers or bunker, deleted =/
Wizard32 said:
It’s appropriate albeit perhaps not being technically so because it’s become a pop culture term that basically everyone readily and easily recognizes and understands what it means or rather the intent behind using said word.
No one but a turbo autist is going to care to learn to use the correct word when the existing go to de facto word used for ALL child fuckers or desires to fuck children type individuals works well enough as is Wizbro.
This reminds me of a time I saw a gamer on a forum who just did not get it in regards to why the Halo series would continue moving forward with the name “Halo” even if a particular game in that franchise no longer featured any Halo named ring worlds.
What that dummy didn’t understand is that name Halo has all those years and millions of dollars of marketing behind it and has essentially acheived house hold name recognition so it’d be utterly retarded in the extreme to drop the “Halo” name branding entirely and go with an altogether new name for subsequent games as people would be confused and people who don’t follow any forms of news regularly gaming or otherwise would likely miss out on the next game in the series release due to it dropping the well known “Halo” name branding simply for accuracy purposes.
To drop a readily well known cultural moniker for a new and unknown one is perhaps the ultimate act of shooting oneself in the foot Wiz little buddy.
Page 666
Page 666
I
@SellingGf10k ???
B
Sold his last gf.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
- ItsTrulyOver
- Lazyandtalentless
- BasedKoalaCel
- Animecel2D
- Begonebeearth
