Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Ban Discussion Megathread

a Foid having @rightfulcel’s cock in her mouth
was it actually IN the mouth, or did the tongue protrude from mouth to flick the tip?

We know how picky and hypergamous women are. There's no way one would go so far as to take a subhuman's cock in her mouth, just for a humiliation prank.
Again we should question if it was "in" the mouth, tbh

and there could be more complex motives than humiliation at play here, like how foids use sex to manipulate people into doing things for them w/o being attracted to the person


Let's suppose it did happen. As an incel he should be rock-fucking-hard during the entire ordeal,
I don't agree, we don't know the length of time this ordeal took.
Erections do not happen instantaneously, there's at least a few second's delay for brain reactions to affect blood flow.
Also if he was terrified of her and thought she'd do something like bite it off then that could interfere with getting aroused.

so either he's a fag, or he's a chad who's had so much better and for whom this is a typical occurrence (i.e., getting blowjobs).
Or such a complete lack of experience and discomfort that a heterosexual male would be so terrified of a foid that he couldn't enjoy himself even if she had genuine intentions.
 
was it actually IN the mouth, or did the tongue protrude from mouth to flick the tip?


Again we should question if it was "in" the mouth, tbh

and there could be more complex motives than humiliation at play here, like how foids use sex to manipulate people into doing things for them w/o being attracted to the person



I don't agree, we don't know the length of time this ordeal took.
Erections do not happen instantaneously, there's at least a few second's delay for brain reactions to affect blood flow.
Also if he was terrified of her and thought she'd do something like bite it off then that could interfere with getting aroused.


Or such a complete lack of experience and discomfort that a heterosexual male would be so terrified of a foid that he couldn't enjoy himself even if she had genuine intentions.
Hyperdimensional mental gymnastics.
 
Hyperdimensional mental gymnastics.
not really, we should nto be calling any contact whatsoever between a penis and a tongue a 'blowjob' tbh

I say drop that phease entirely, there's more descriptive terms

1) "fellatio" when your dick is stationary and foid does all the movement​
2) "irrumatio" when a foid's head is stationary and your penis does all the movement (ie face-fucking)​
3) if the penis isn't actually going into the mouth and is only contacting the tongue outside of the mouth then a term like "tongue job" is probably closer IMO​

but I think that implies prolonged pleasureable contact

IE how if I get round-house kicked in the penis by an angry foid who wants to cause me suffering, that would not be the same as a "footjob"

so I think we need details regarding context and duration
 
was it actually IN the mouth, or did the tongue protrude from mouth to flick the tip?


Again we should question if it was "in" the mouth, tbh
No offense but I sometimes genuinely wonder how you come up with this completely arbitrary shit that no one would ever care about or consider in practice:feelskek:
 
not really, we should nto be calling any contact whatsoever between a penis and a tongue a 'blowjob' tbh

I say drop that phease entirely, there's more descriptive terms

1) "fellatio" when your dick is stationary and foid does all the movement​
2) "irrumatio" when a foid's head is stationary and your penis does all the movement (ie face-fucking)​
3) if the penis isn't actually going into the mouth and is only contacting the tongue outside of the mouth then a term like "tongue job" is probably closer IMO​

but I think that implies prolonged pleasureable contact

IE how if I get round-house kicked in the penis by an angry foid who wants to cause me suffering, that would not be the same as a "footjob"

so I think we need details regarding context and duration
Stop. Just stop.
 
No offense but I sometimes genuinely wonder how you come up with this completely arbitrary shit that no one would ever care about or consider in practice:feelskek:
whether or not the penis enters the mouth is not arbitrary and people do care about whether or not that is done, there's entirely different mental elements at play

Stop. Just stop.
BM can't keep up w/ dis IQ
 
whether or not the penis enters the mouth is not arbitrary and people do care about whether or not that is done, there's entirely different mental elements at play
It literally makes no difference in principle

Hypothetically we could introduce countless other arbitrary factors using this logic (did she enjoy it, what was her purported reason for being willing to do it, what are her views on sex and how much commitment does she personally think a blowjob needs, etc) but for the purposes of why this is actually relevant it makes no difference and no one gives a shit

The fact that he saw fit to go on the internet and say “I received a blowjob” means that any unprompted conversation regarding what technically constitutes a blowjob and did he receive one or not is unnecessary
 
It literally makes no difference in principle

It definitely makes a difference, it's like the difference between putting your penis past labia into a vagina vs just rubbing it perpendicularly across the labia and never putting the glans inside.

Hypothetically we could introduce countless other arbitrary factors using this logic (did she enjoy it, what was her purported reason for being willing to do it, what are her views on sex and how much commitment does she personally think a blowjob needs, etc) but for the purposes of why this is actually relevant it makes no difference and no one gives a shit

This is relevant given we give escortcels a pass, IMO that's an open door to considering criteria of context no matter what.

Money is not the only form of currency.

The fact that he saw fit to go on the internet and say “I received a blowjob” means that any unprompted conversation regarding what technically constitutes a blowjob and did he receive one or not is unnecessary
I don't agree because a lot of people casually use phrases in different ways w/ different implications.

IE a lot of people call BJs "sex" even though fellatio/irrumatio are not in any way sexual intercourse, which can only happen with a vagina.

We can see that regarding other phrases too.

IE if a foid decided to crush some guy's testicles to injure him he might joke "guess I got a handjob" but he really didn't.
 
@Robtical habe mercy on @rightfulcel's soul ples :cryfeels:

BM can't keep up w/ dis IQ
u go Rocky!

15094407568471.gif
 
BM can't keep up w/ dis IQ
No, I'm just not interested in your pedantry, mental gymnastics, and concocting weird scenarios to excuse what happened.
 
Last edited:
That whole story sounds like bullshit. We know how picky and hypergamous women are. There's no way one would go so far as to take a subhuman's cock in her mouth, just for a humiliation prank. There are many other ways she could humiliate him that doesn't involve taking his cock in her mouth.

Let's suppose it did happen. As an incel he should be rock-fucking-hard during the entire ordeal, so either he's a fag, or he's a chad who's had so much better and for whom this is a typical occurrence (i.e., getting blowjobs).

iu
Agreed. That sob story won't save him from the iso cubes.

ISO-CUBES! Permanent sentence.

9329
 
Oh it’s all contained in Rob’s screenshot a page back, that I asked him to re-post in this very thread for your and Lord Mongo’s perusal and ultimate user judgements. :feelshehe:

The cliff’s boil down to a Foid having @rightfulcel’s cock in her mouth but that @rightfulcel doesn’t feel that it should qualify as a blowjob or even a genuine intimate encounter I believe because he was being set up to be humiliated by others (and the girl herself) not to mention his noodle remained limp the entire time, so it’s not like he received the full on Belladonna, Gauge or Jenna Haze expert cocksmith knob polishing super enjoyable pornstar like experience here but again that’s up to you and Mongo to decide now not we humble staff members. :feelsclown:
That whole story sounds like bullshit. We know how picky and hypergamous women are. There's no way one would go so far as to take a subhuman's cock in her mouth, just for a humiliation prank. There are many other ways she could humiliate him that doesn't involve taking his cock in her mouth.

Let's suppose it did happen. As an incel he should be rock-fucking-hard during the entire ordeal, so either he's a fag, or he's a chad who's had so much better and for whom this is a typical occurrence (i.e., getting blowjobs).

iu
was it actually IN the mouth, or did the tongue protrude from mouth to flick the tip?


Again we should question if it was "in" the mouth, tbh

and there could be more complex motives than humiliation at play here, like how foids use sex to manipulate people into doing things for them w/o being attracted to the person



I don't agree, we don't know the length of time this ordeal took.
Erections do not happen instantaneously, there's at least a few second's delay for brain reactions to affect blood flow.
Also if he was terrified of her and thought she'd do something like bite it off then that could interfere with getting aroused.


Or such a complete lack of experience and discomfort that a heterosexual male would be so terrified of a foid that he couldn't enjoy himself even if she had genuine intentions.
It literally makes no difference in principle

Hypothetically we could introduce countless other arbitrary factors using this logic (did she enjoy it, what was her purported reason for being willing to do it, what are her views on sex and how much commitment does she personally think a blowjob needs, etc) but for the purposes of why this is actually relevant it makes no difference and no one gives a shit

The fact that he saw fit to go on the internet and say “I received a blowjob” means that any unprompted conversation regarding what technically constitutes a blowjob and did he receive one or not is unnecessary
@Robtical habe mercy on @rightfulcel's soul ples :cryfeels:


u go Rocky!

15094407568471.gif
Agreed. That sob story won't save him from the iso cubes.

ISO-CUBES! Permanent sentence.

View attachment 598781
If @rightfulcel is banned for that foid touching his soft cock then how is @-BrettyBoy- unbanned for getting footjobs where he orgasmed and sleeping naked next to a foid?

One seems like a more significant experience than the other, yet the user with the smaller experience is banned?

I'm not saying to do anything specific I just think there should be some sort of consistency.
 
If @rightfulcel is banned for that foid touching his soft cock then how is @-BrettyBoy- unbanned for getting footjobs where he orgasmed and sleeping naked next to a foid?

One seems like a more significant experience than the other, yet the user with the smaller experience is banned?

I'm not saying to do anything specific I just think there should be some sort of consistency.
He should be banned for being Bri'ish, not for nearly shagging a disgusting hag slag. Simple as.

Rightfulcel should stay banned for cobbling together a shabby sob story.

You should be banned for being an uppity darkie, case closed.
 
You should be banned for being an uppity darkie, case closed.
up·pi·ty
[ˈəpədē]

ADJECTIVE
informal
  1. self-important; arrogant:
So I'm self important and arrogant for asking questions in ban discussion megathread? Combine that with me being black and I should be banned? JFL
 
If @rightfulcel is banned for that foid touching his soft cock then how is @-BrettyBoy- unbanned for getting footjobs where he orgasmed and sleeping naked next to a foid?
One seems like a more significant experience than the other, yet the user with the smaller experience is banned?
I'm not saying to do anything specific I just think there should be some sort of consistency.
where is a screenshot of BrettyBoy saying that stuff?
also was it an escort?

I think we need to acknowledge that female whoredom extends beyond an exchange of cash, they also get paid in social currency and shit and fuck males they're not attracted to for reasons like that, which shouldn't be any more ascenciony than escorts
 
free @Intellau_Celistic
he a gud boi, he dindu nuffin!
 
@XDressCel :lul:

obvious @SocialzERo alt
 
Probably this one

That is bannable? To talk about how a professor challenged society's views and lost his job despite supposed academic freedom? Sheesh.
 
Free @Intellau_Celistic , he's good peoples:fuk:

Oh it’s all contained in Rob’s screenshot a page back, that I asked him to re-post in this very thread for your and Lord Mongo’s perusal and ultimate user judgements. :feelshehe:

The cliff’s boil down to a Foid having @rightfulcel’s cock in her mouth but that @rightfulcel doesn’t feel that it should qualify as a blowjob or even a genuine intimate encounter I believe because he was being set up to be humiliated by others (and the girl herself) not to mention his noodle remained limp the entire time, so it’s not like he received the full on Belladonna, Gauge or Jenna Haze expert cocksmith knob polishing super enjoyable pornstar like experience here but again that’s up to you and Mongo to decide now not we humble staff members. :feelsclown:
Why don't women do these "pranks" to me tbh
 
Also free @DeepSea
The mod team decided to have me ban him permanently, after pointing out he was a one issue poster troll, since he only ever appeared to post in order to support pro pedophile topics and subjects. :feelshehe:
 
The mod team decided to have me ban him permanently, after pointing out he was a one issue poster troll, since he only ever appeared to post in order to support pro pedophile topics and subjects.

Can you explain what the above threads have to do with pedophilia? These are just 10 very quick threads I immediately found.

Quick question, by the mod team, are you mainly referring to @PPEcel @Komesarj89 and @MarquisDeSade, m0ds who are vocally anti-pedo? Did by any chance @Robtical not give a shit about these "muh pedo" posts? You really are being secretive here. Anyone with half a brain knows PPEcel was a huge advocate of anti-"pedo" posting. He's been this way for years.

after pointing out he was a one issue poster troll,
"troll"? What makes him a troll? How do you know he was a troll, and not a genuine believer in what he said. He would constantly provide his arguments with research and data. Meanwhile the average user here shitposts and you don't give two shits.

The irony of the blackpill is you worship scientific studies, but only when you think presenting them will benefit your cause in the long run. This is eerily similar of any academic who selectively uses science in a political manner.
since he only ever appeared to post in order to support pro pedophile topics and subjects.
Let me take a quick guess, @PPEcel dug through his posts and provided you links, and you skimmed through the cherrypicked links, without actually looking at all his posts, and then you decided to ban him.

At the end of this, you will say, "we don't have to be transparent", but by that you mean you don't have to intentionally be transparent, but any non idiot can see right through what happened here in this unjust banning
 

Can you explain what the above threads have to do with pedophilia? These are just 10 very quick threads I immediately found.

Quick question, by the mod team, are you mainly referring to @PPEcel @Komesarj89 and @MarquisDeSade, m0ds who are vocally anti-pedo? Did by any chance @Robtical not give a shit about these "muh pedo" posts? You really are being secretive here. Anyone with half a brain knows PPEcel was a huge advocate of anti-"pedo" posting. He's been this way for years.


"troll"? What makes him a troll? How do you know he was a troll, and not a genuine believer in what he said. He would constantly provide his arguments with research and data. Meanwhile the average user here shitposts and you don't give two shits.

The irony of the blackpill is you worship scientific studies, but only when you think presenting them will benefit your cause in the long run. This is eerily similar of any academic who selectively uses science in a political manner.

Let me take a quick guess, @PPEcel dug through his posts and provided you links, and you skimmed through the cherrypicked links, without actually looking at all his posts, and then you decided to ban him.

At the end of this, you will say, "we don't have to be transparent", but by that you mean you don't have to intentionally be transparent, but any non idiot can see right through what happened here in this unjust banning
Tell you what Tiger. :feelsclown:

Perhaps you have a point or perhaps you do not… :feelshehe:

Therefore I now call upon my three person strong non mod task force of trusted Judge Dredd and Halo Arbiter themed regular users/posters to come forward if they so desire and adjudicate this no doubt very important issue for you and perhaps the community in general. :feelsBox:

So Arbiters/Judges please step forward and make your voices known once again in the ban discussion thread here if the three of you are willing to investigate the user @DeepSea’s post history and determine whether he should stay banned as a sick fuck pedophile apologist troll or just your average every day good keed that dindu nuffin who done got hisself punished by those unfair rascally mods of da incels dot is government? :feelsbaton:

@based_meme @Uggo Mongo @Mentally lost cel:feelsstudy:

WE CALL UPON YOU 3 NOW IN OUR TIME OF NEED, USING THE THU’UM INCEL PEDO JUDGEMENT SHOUT! :feelsEhh: :feelsPop: :feelsgah:

FAG ROH DAH!! :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
 
Last edited:
Tell you what Tiger. :feelsclown:

Perhaps you have a point or perhaps you do not… :feelshehe:

Therefore I now call upon my three person strong non mod task force of trusted Judge Dredd and Halo Arbiter themed regular users/posters to come forward if they so desire and adjudicate this no doubt very important issue for you and perhaps the community in general. :feelsBox:

So Arbiters/Judges please step forward and make your voices known once again in the ban discussion thread here if the three of you are willing to investigate the user @DeepSea’s post history and determine whether he should stay banned as a sick fuck pedophile apologist troll or just your average every day good keed that dindu nuffin who done got hisself punished by those unfair rascally mods of da incels dot is government? :feelsbaton:

@based_meme @Uggo Mongo @Mentally lost cel:feelsstudy:

WE CALL UPON YOU 3 NOW IN OUR TIME OF NEED, USING THE THU’UM INCEL PEDO JUDGEMENT SHOUT! :feelsEhh: :feelsPop: :feelsgah:

FAG ROH DAH!! :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
@based_meme is an agecuck and fierecly anti-pedo, so this isn't gonna go well.

It would only be fair if we allowed him back under the agreement he didnt post pro pedo content. That seems a fair compromise under the new rules.

But let's just see how this goes.
 
Can I be a judge one day sir Fat Link
If @based_meme decides to recuse himself from this case then you shall be the interim Judge/Arbiter helping to adjudicate @DeepSea’s fate. :feelshehe:
 
Last edited:
@based_meme what is your verdict?
Sifting through 23 pages of post history is no lunch break task. Be patient.
 
banned as a sick fuck pedophile apologist troll
to preface this, I have not read all of his posts.

@DeepSea does not strike me as the kind of user to sexualize anyone, or anything, so If you banned him for being a pedophile apologist, or pro-pedophilia you need to update the rules.

Only sexualizing minors is against the rules, and I don't think saying "Kickball is more likely to hurt children than consensual safe sex with adults." is sexualizing them. So either you ban pedophilia discussion entirely (besides the pedo-hate which suits your narrative presumably) or unban him. I don't think he should be banned.
 
to preface this, I have not read all of his posts.

@DeepSea does not strike me as the kind of user to sexualize anyone, or anything, so If you banned him for being a pedophile apologist, or pro-pedophilia you need to update the rules.

Only sexualizing minors is against the rules, and I don't think saying "Kickball is more likely to hurt children than consensual safe sex with adults." is sexualizing them. So either you ban pedophilia discussion entirely (besides the pedo-hate which suits your narrative presumably) or unban him. I don't think he should be banned.
Postmaxxers have no say in this.
 
to preface this, I have not read all of his posts.

@DeepSea does not strike me as the kind of user to sexualize anyone, or anything, so If you banned him for being a pedophile apologist, or pro-pedophilia you need to update the rules.

Only sexualizing minors is against the rules, and I don't think saying "Kickball is more likely to hurt children than consensual safe sex with adults." is sexualizing them. So either you ban pedophilia discussion entirely (besides the pedo-hate which suits your narrative presumably) or unban him. I don't think he should be banned.
Did he say this? :feelswhere:
 
Clown shoes.

I vote ban :feelsUgh:
@Fat Link do you see what your committee does?

they make impulsive decisions by saying "clown shoes"

this isn't fair to determine a user's fate on
 
@Fat Link do you see what your committee does?

they make impulsive decisions by saying "clown shoes"

this isn't fair to determine a user's fate on
Advocating kiddy diddling.

That's a permanent sentence to the iso-cubes.

Com
 
to preface this, I have not read all of his posts.

@DeepSea does not strike me as the kind of user to sexualize anyone, or anything, so If you banned him for being a pedophile apologist, or pro-pedophilia you need to update the rules.

Only sexualizing minors is against the rules, and I don't think saying "Kickball is more likely to hurt children than consensual safe sex with adults." is sexualizing them. So either you ban pedophilia discussion entirely (besides the pedo-hate which suits your narrative presumably) or unban him. I don't think he should be banned.
1649611483837
 
1649547074372-jpeg.599111

<— ShiiLo on the left
Maozy and a huge Biplo on the right —>
 
@Fat Link

This is some incoherent drivel. All sex without the provision of consent is rape, right? If, as you say, children "can't consent", then who is raping whom when two children engage in mutual genital stimulation? Do they rape each other? Or do the rapes cancel out? Why or why not?



Kids can be just as manipulative as adults. In fact, I would argue that it can be easier for a kid to get another kid to have sex due to peer pressure.

Child-adult sex does not ruin children's lives—this is a myth disproven by meticulous scientific research. Society's hysterical reaction does sometimes ruin children's lives. Case in point: [goes on to cite study about sexual ABUSE. :feelskek:]




In 1999, a massive peer-reviewed meta-analysis of the effects of "child sexual abuse" was published in the most prestigious psychological journal in America. It reached the following conclusion:

"Many lay persons and professionals believe that child sexual abuse (CSA) causes intense harm, regardless of gender, pervasively in the general population. The authors examined this belief by reviewing 59 studies based on college samples. Meta-analyses revealed that students with CSA were, on average, slightly less well adjusted than controls. However, this poorer adjustment could not be attributed to CSA because family environment (FE) was consistently confounded with CSA, FE explained considerably more adjustment variance than CSA, and CSA-adjustment relations generally became non-significant when studies controlled for FE. Self-reported reactions to and effects from CSA indicated that negative effects were neither pervasive nor typically intense, and that men reacted much less negatively than women. The college data were completely consistent with data from national samples. Basic beliefs about CSA in the general population were not supported."


Because young children, like teenagers and adults, are sexual beings who enjoy and desire sexual activity- they are not asexual.



This is a non sequitor. A fully developed mind is not a necessary prerequisite for understanding what sex is.

There are no immediate consequences of sex other than pleasure and orgasm. Assuring a lack of negative outcomes like STDs, pregnancy, etc, should be the responsibility of the father or guardian of the child. Much like, although a child is not aware of the possible ramifications of riding a vehicle (injury, death), this does not mean they should not ride vehicles—it just means their guardian should ensure that these ramifications do not occur.


Even fucking mole rats "understand" what sex is, and you're saying kids don't? What exactly is so incredibly complex about sex- i.e. mutually pleasurable bodily touching- that kids are unable to understand?
The guy started off posting as a pedo-sympathizer, then gradually revealed his hand.

iu
 
Well there you have it. :feelshehe:

The Judge and the Arbiter ie the voice of the people have spoken. :feelsthink:

@DeepSea stays banned. :feelsUgh:

As the voice of the people the Arbiters/Judge Dredd stand in forum regular users: @Uggo Mongo @based_meme and @Mentally lost cel may be called upon at times to judge certain situations where the official mod team’s decision is placed in some serious doubt. :feelsugh:

Since two members of their team responded with the same answer MLC’s input is not required as a potential tie breaking vote thus the issue is now settled and resolved. :feelsclown:

Edit: Also I’d just like to point out that their judgement stands on @rightfulcel too. :feelsjuice:


View: https://youtu.be/RM1LAsuYj48
 
Last edited:
Well there you have it. :feelshehe:

The Judge and the Arbiter ie the voice of the people have spoken. :feelsthink:

@DeepSea stays banned. :feelsUgh:

As the voice of the people the Arbiters/Judge Dredd stand in forum regular users: @Uggo Mongo @based_meme and @Mentally lost cel may be called upon at times to judge certain situations where the official mod team’s decision is placed in some serious doubt. :feelsugh:

Since two members of their team responded with the same answer MLC’s input is not required as a potential tie breaking vote thus the issue is now settled and resolved. :feelsclown:

Edit: Also I’d just like to point out that their judgement stands on @rightfulcel too. :feelsjuice:


View: https://youtu.be/RM1LAsuYj48

Hail omega
 
Well there you have it. :feelshehe:

The Judge and the Arbiter ie the voice of the people have spoken. :feelsthink:

@DeepSea stays banned. :feelsUgh:

As the voice of the people the Arbiters/Judge Dredd stand in forum regular users: @Uggo Mongo @based_meme and @Mentally lost cel may be called upon at times to judge certain situations where the official mod team’s decision is placed in some serious doubt. :feelsugh:

Since two members of their team responded with the same answer MLC’s input is not required as a potential tie breaking vote thus the issue is now settled and resolved. :feelsclown:

Edit: Also I’d just like to point out that their judgement stands on @rightfulcel too. :feelsjuice:


View: https://youtu.be/RM1LAsuYj48

So I’m a judge? Or arbiter?
 

Similar threads

Justanotherbloke
Replies
18
Views
486
iRespectLeFrenchCel
iRespectLeFrenchCel
Leonardo Part V
Replies
17
Views
575
manletcel1488
manletcel1488
DefeatedIncel
Replies
25
Views
725
TooSomething
TooSomething
Ryo_Hazuki
Replies
58
Views
3K
Negroid Berber
Negroid Berber

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Ghostface
shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top