Yes...about @Broken&BeyondRepair ?
He was punished for six months over a very minor joke, despite having a consistent history of high-quality posts.
Yes...about @Broken&BeyondRepair ?
He was punished for six months over a very minor joke, despite having a consistent history of high-quality posts.
Never free @YuiIsMyCope
Do free @YuiIsMyCope
He was permabanned by Komesarj for fag posting.
Didn’t seem like he was joking at all with it either but perhaps a mod team vote is in order?
Though unless he makes a ban appeal I hardly see the point.
Just reviewed the thread that did him in. There's no way a mod vote would change his fateHe was permabanned by Komesarj for fag posting.
Didn’t seem like he was joking at all with it either but perhaps a mod team vote is in order?
Though unless he makes a ban appeal I hardly see the point.
@Marius Eglinskas I didn't see anything bannable
Ban evasion alt@Marius Eglinskas I didn't see anything bannable
Trust me, his existence on this forum is an insult to your inceldom
@ThinTinyDickCel
What is he doing to get banned?
What is he doing to get banned?
To stop you there, if a staff member is deleted why should we put any stock in their claims?
I actually would not call that normal. It's normal for 14yo girls to give BJs but not normal for 14yo boys to receive them, that's territory for 14yo Chads/Brads
That said, I'm curious what evidence we're looking at here that a 'blowjob' happened.
I don't even know why we would list notes like this.
I think it's universally accepted that we have varying degrees of hatred of female tendencies mixed with varying degrees of lust for women.
I don't think anyone here can realistically hate them 100% or 100% lack any sort of hate.
Or similarly lust for them 100% (some disgust must exist) or lack lust for them (some lust must exist).
How stuff comes about matters IMO. Chain of custody on evidence and how it's interpreted/applied and so on.the revelation of that however it came about effectively ended his illustrious posting career on incels.is.
Even assuming something crazy like rightful ten years ago had five girlfriends simultaneously and creampied inside pussies thrice each day, if that hasn't happened for the past decade then "A man who desires a romantic relationship but is unable to enter one." definition of incel in the rules should still apply.
I assume this falls under the "Discussion of personal romantic/sexual experiences outside of the forum may result in a warning or ban." rule but IMO blowjobs aren't necessarily "sexual" because sexual intercourse is PIV sex not penis in a vagina substitute like an onahole/hand/mouth.
Plus obviously escortcels can get blowjobs so the context of this matters.
If money did not change hands IMO we should consider contexts besides escortcel which are an exception.
Like for example if a foid did not consent to something sexual and you do it to her then that isn't any closer to foid affirmation than escorts doing stuff to you.
So unless The Arbiter @Uggo Mongo and Judge @based_meme for whatever wacky reason should ask to have the little guy back and give him a second chance he’s staying gone.
neither of them are a deleted user though, did this deleted user contact one of them?
I want to see what he posted, someone should PM me what Broken posted.
JFL was he really him? I somewhat seriously considered making a thread asking mods why the fuck was he allowed back but you were faster than me. Good riddance.Ban evasion alt
Trust me, his existence on this forum is an insult to your inceldom
After a few tags,PMs and further investigation we were able to confirm it was him
I dug into my old file of screenshots of his now deleted FB to make sure I would have a 100% indisputable verdict, and noticed that the imbecile had used his IRL name for his alt
I wonder what the thought process inside his head was, surely he wouldn't think that people would just forget about him? Or that people would just give him a pass? Or did he just want to play a prank for a few days before the inevitable banhammer? Or the plain old brain rot from cooooooooming to gay stuff and "loli waifus of culture"?I dug into my old file of screenshots of his now deleted FB to make sure I would have a 100% indisputable verdict, and noticed that the imbecile had used his IRL name for his alt
@Fat Link @rightfulcel wants to be let back in.
He's a bonafide dumbass for sure. We're talking about someone who isn't actually incel and wants to be here on the merits of volceldom.
An absolute backwards piece of work with a peter pan syndrome
Nah, I believe he seriously thought he would get a pass
Wasn't he one of persoanlityinkwell's cronies?
B
Please give me the rundown, brocel. Spare no details.Well Judge @Uggo Mongo and Arbiter @based_meme?
Well Judge @Uggo Mongo and Arbiter @based_meme?
(iso cubes means banned)
TBH let based meme decide, I just wanted to say iso cubes.
Oh it’s all contained in Rob’s screenshot a page back, that I asked him to re-post in this very thread for your and Lord Mongo’s perusal and ultimate user judgements.
The cliff’s boil down to a Foid having @rightfulcel’s cock in her mouth but that @rightfulcel doesn’t feel that it should qualify as a blowjob or even a genuine intimate encounter I believe because he was being set up to be humiliated by others (and the girl herself) not to mention his noodle remained limp the entire time, so it’s not like he received the full on Belladonna, Gauge or Jenna Haze expert cocksmith knob polishing super enjoyable pornstar like experience here but again that’s up to you and Mongo to decide now not we humble staff members.
Last edited:
@Intellau_Celistic
What happened
What happened
Free @Intellau_Celistic
B
That whole story sounds like bullshit. We know how picky and hypergamous women are. There's no way one would go so far as to take a subhuman's cock in her mouth, just for a humiliation prank. There are many other ways she could humiliate him that doesn't involve taking his cock in her mouth.Oh it’s all contained in Rob’s screenshot a page back, that I asked him to re-post in this very thread for your and Lord Mongo’s perusal and ultimate user judgements.
The cliff’s boil down to a Foid having @rightfulcel’s cock in her mouth but that @rightfulcel doesn’t feel that it should qualify as a blowjob or even a genuine intimate encounter I believe because he was being set up to be humiliated by others (and the girl herself) not to mention his noodle remained limp the entire time, so it’s not like he received the full on Belladonna, Gauge or Jenna Haze expert cocksmith knob polishing super enjoyable pornstar like experience here but again that’s up to you and Mongo to decide now not we humble staff members.
Let's suppose it did happen. As an incel he should be rock-fucking-hard during the entire ordeal, so either he's a fag, or he's a chad who's had so much better and for whom this is a typical occurrence (i.e., getting blowjobs).
was it actually IN the mouth, or did the tongue protrude from mouth to flick the tip?
Again we should question if it was "in" the mouth, tbh
and there could be more complex motives than humiliation at play here, like how foids use sex to manipulate people into doing things for them w/o being attracted to the person
I don't agree, we don't know the length of time this ordeal took.
Erections do not happen instantaneously, there's at least a few second's delay for brain reactions to affect blood flow.
Also if he was terrified of her and thought she'd do something like bite it off then that could interfere with getting aroused.
Or such a complete lack of experience and discomfort that a heterosexual male would be so terrified of a foid that he couldn't enjoy himself even if she had genuine intentions.
B
Hyperdimensional mental gymnastics.
not really, we should nto be calling any contact whatsoever between a penis and a tongue a 'blowjob' tbh
I say drop that phease entirely, there's more descriptive terms
1) "fellatio" when your dick is stationary and foid does all the movement
2) "irrumatio" when a foid's head is stationary and your penis does all the movement (ie face-fucking)
3) if the penis isn't actually going into the mouth and is only contacting the tongue outside of the mouth then a term like "tongue job" is probably closer IMO
but I think that implies prolonged pleasureable contact
IE how if I get round-house kicked in the penis by an angry foid who wants to cause me suffering, that would not be the same as a "footjob"
so I think we need details regarding context and duration
No offense but I sometimes genuinely wonder how you come up with this completely arbitrary shit that no one would ever care about or consider in practice
B
Stop. Just stop.
whether or not the penis enters the mouth is not arbitrary and people do care about whether or not that is done, there's entirely different mental elements at playNo offense but I sometimes genuinely wonder how you come up with this completely arbitrary shit that no one would ever care about or consider in practice
BM can't keep up w/ dis IQ
It literally makes no difference in principle
Hypothetically we could introduce countless other arbitrary factors using this logic (did she enjoy it, what was her purported reason for being willing to do it, what are her views on sex and how much commitment does she personally think a blowjob needs, etc) but for the purposes of why this is actually relevant it makes no difference and no one gives a shit
The fact that he saw fit to go on the internet and say “I received a blowjob” means that any unprompted conversation regarding what technically constitutes a blowjob and did he receive one or not is unnecessary
It definitely makes a difference, it's like the difference between putting your penis past labia into a vagina vs just rubbing it perpendicularly across the labia and never putting the glans inside.
This is relevant given we give escortcels a pass, IMO that's an open door to considering criteria of context no matter what.
Money is not the only form of currency.
I don't agree because a lot of people casually use phrases in different ways w/ different implications.
IE a lot of people call BJs "sex" even though fellatio/irrumatio are not in any way sexual intercourse, which can only happen with a vagina.
We can see that regarding other phrases too.
IE if a foid decided to crush some guy's testicles to injure him he might joke "guess I got a handjob" but he really didn't.
B
No, I'm just not interested in your pedantry, mental gymnastics, and concocting weird scenarios to excuse what happened.
Last edited:
Agreed. That sob story won't save him from the iso cubes.That whole story sounds like bullshit. We know how picky and hypergamous women are. There's no way one would go so far as to take a subhuman's cock in her mouth, just for a humiliation prank. There are many other ways she could humiliate him that doesn't involve taking his cock in her mouth.
Let's suppose it did happen. As an incel he should be rock-fucking-hard during the entire ordeal, so either he's a fag, or he's a chad who's had so much better and for whom this is a typical occurrence (i.e., getting blowjobs).
ISO-CUBES! Permanent sentence.
D
Oh it’s all contained in Rob’s screenshot a page back, that I asked him to re-post in this very thread for your and Lord Mongo’s perusal and ultimate user judgements.
The cliff’s boil down to a Foid having @rightfulcel’s cock in her mouth but that @rightfulcel doesn’t feel that it should qualify as a blowjob or even a genuine intimate encounter I believe because he was being set up to be humiliated by others (and the girl herself) not to mention his noodle remained limp the entire time, so it’s not like he received the full on Belladonna, Gauge or Jenna Haze expert cocksmith knob polishing super enjoyable pornstar like experience here but again that’s up to you and Mongo to decide now not we humble staff members.
That whole story sounds like bullshit. We know how picky and hypergamous women are. There's no way one would go so far as to take a subhuman's cock in her mouth, just for a humiliation prank. There are many other ways she could humiliate him that doesn't involve taking his cock in her mouth.
Let's suppose it did happen. As an incel he should be rock-fucking-hard during the entire ordeal, so either he's a fag, or he's a chad who's had so much better and for whom this is a typical occurrence (i.e., getting blowjobs).
@Robtical habe mercy on @rightfulcel's soul ples
u go Rocky!
If @rightfulcel is banned for that foid touching his soft cock then how is @-BrettyBoy- unbanned for getting footjobs where he orgasmed and sleeping naked next to a foid?
One seems like a more significant experience than the other, yet the user with the smaller experience is banned?
I'm not saying to do anything specific I just think there should be some sort of consistency.
He should be banned for being Bri'ish, not for nearly shagging a disgusting hag slag. Simple as.
Rightfulcel should stay banned for cobbling together a shabby sob story.
You should be banned for being an uppity darkie, case closed.
D
So I'm self important and arrogant for asking questions in ban discussion megathread? Combine that with me being black and I should be banned? JFL
where is a screenshot of BrettyBoy saying that stuff?
also was it an escort?
I think we need to acknowledge that female whoredom extends beyond an exchange of cash, they also get paid in social currency and shit and fuck males they're not attracted to for reasons like that, which shouldn't be any more ascenciony than escorts
Asking the real questions here
if we distinguish whether the glans pass the labia of the vulva why not acknowledge the distinction for the face?
free @Intellau_Celistic
he a gud boi, he dindu nuffin!
he a gud boi, he dindu nuffin!
@XDressCel
obvious @SocialzERo alt
obvious @SocialzERo alt
D
Do you know the exact reason for his ban?
D
I wonder what post did him in.
D
That is bannable? To talk about how a professor challenged society's views and lost his job despite supposed academic freedom? Sheesh.Probably this one
Fredonia University Professor Dr. Stephen Kershnar defends sex between adult men and 12-year old foids.
View: https://youtu.be/QFrCHJJqETo?t=16 Dr. Stephen Kershnar is a distinguished teaching professor in the philosophy department at the State University of New York at Fredonia and an attorney. He is also the department chairperson. He focuses on applied ethics and political philosophy...
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
- lefty-zoomer
- NeverEvenBegan
- Grim_Reaper
- Fallout
- tayhrdl
