Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill SCIENTIFIC PROOF that the order of importance is: Race > Height > Face > Money

Race > Height > Face > Money

Highlights:
- Being Asian costs you $247,000 extra per year compared to a white guy.
- Being 5'7" costs you $150,000 extra compared to a 5'11" guy, or $180,000 compared to a 6'2" guy.
- Being bottom 10% facially costs you $40,000 extra compared to an average guy or $186,000 compared to a top 10% guy.

1) Race
income-race.jpg

As noted, it costs an extra $247,000 for an Asian man to date a white girl. It costs an extra $154,000 for a black man to date a white girl.

On the other hand, white men can make up to $24,000 less to be considered equally attractive to Asian women. ie. Asian women will accept poor white men over average income Asians.

2) Height
income-height.jpg

At extremely low male height (eg. 5'0"), height becomes more important than even race, but for more moderate cases of shortness (eg. 5'6"), race is still more important. A 5'6" man must make an extra $175,000 to match a 5'11" guy.


3) Face
income-face.jpg

The maximum cost of facial ugliness is $186,000, and that's for a bottom 10% guy to match a top 10% guy. ie. To bring the ugliest 10% of men up to the performance of the top 10% most handsome men.

4) Money
If we tally up the cost, then we find being an ugly 5'7" Asian will then cost you an extra $437,000 income per year. ie. You need to make $499,500 annual income to match the attractiveness of an average white guy.

In America, this income represents the top 0.5%.

So the only way money can compensate for being physically unattractive is if you are in the top 0.5%, and this is just enough to bring you back to equal to an average white guy.

It still isn't enough to make you actually attractive, and you need to find a way to make sure girls know about the money for it to even matter in the first place.

So again, we can see the hierarchy is Race > Height > Face > Money.

Reference
http://home.uchicago.edu/~hortacsu/onlinedating.pdf
 
Last edited:
Face and height a close second, money a distant third. Race wise there will be a slight preference for you own.
 
>nigger foids want more money from white, superior men more than any other foid
LMFAO no thank you, you can keep your ape genes even if you would pay me to have sex with you.
 
Honestly the racepill destroys me. It's basically an all-encompassing facet of the blackpill that relates to everything else.
 
Not everybody lives in the US.
 
OVER-OVER-OVER from birth.

This is one reason people should need a license to reproduce AND adults should be entitled to check out.
 
height = face if race is same
 
This thread is one of, if not the most, pseudointellectual threads in the must-read content section. For starters, it claims to be 'SCIENTIFIC PROOF' by using a single fucking study. OP also capitalizes this like it's some authority we must bow down to and kiss its feet, when he uses a single fucking study. :feelshaha:

Secondly, his argument revolves around the fact that you have to use a certain amount of money to compensate for a bad trait, and since more money is need to compensate for a bad race than a bad face, somehow women care about race more. So are you telling me some ugly white dude will mog some Chadpreet?
you need to find a way to make sure girls know about the money for it to even matter in the first place.
Also, this point right here shows why this entire thread is complete fucking dogshit, because its revolves around a compensation tool (money) which is hard to show off.

I honestly can't believe such garbage is praised as must-read content.
 
Last edited:
Race > Height > Face > Money

Highlights:
- Being Asian costs you $247,000 extra per year compared to a white guy.
- Being 5'7" costs you $150,000 extra compared to a 5'11" guy, or $180,000 compared to a 6'2" guy.
- Being bottom 10% facially costs you $40,000 extra compared to an average guy or $186,000 compared to a top 10% guy.

1) Race
income-race.jpg

As noted, it costs an extra $247,000 for an Asian man to date a white girl. It costs an extra $154,000 for a black man to date a white girl.

On the other hand, white men can make up to $24,000 less to be considered equally attractive to Asian women. ie. Asian women will accept poor white men over average income Asians.

2) Height
income-height.jpg

At extremely low male height (eg. 5'0"), height becomes more important than even race, but for more moderate cases of shortness (eg. 5'6"), race is still more important. A 5'6" man must make an extra $175,000 to match a 5'11" guy.


3) Face
income-face.jpg

The maximum cost of facial ugliness is $186,000, and that's for a bottom 10% guy to match a top 10% guy. ie. To bring the ugliest 10% of men up to the performance of the top 10% most handsome men.

4) Money
If we tally up the cost, then we find being an ugly 5'7" Asian will then cost you an extra $437,000 income per year. ie. You need to make $499,500 annual income to match the attractiveness of an average white guy.

In America, this income represents the top 0.5%.

So the only way money can compensate for being physically unattractive is if you are in the top 0.5%, and this is just enough to bring you back to equal to an average white guy.

It still isn't enough to make you actually attractive, and you need to find a way to make sure girls know about the money for it to even matter in the first place.

So again, we can see the hierarchy is Race > Height > Face > Money.

Reference
http://home.uchicago.edu/~hortacsu/onlinedating.pdf
Money face height race

Idiot post
 
2d>3d why creating problems that shouldn't exist lol
 
It is backed up by a study, anocdotes don't mean for point, no matter how much one like it.
 
It is backed up by a study, anocdotes don't mean for point, no matter how much one like it.
JFL @ "backed up by a study". No, OP posted a study, which made no claims, and decided to interpret it a certain way, which we don't know is actually the best way to interpret it, and use his interpretation to assert his claims as "SCIENTIFIC PROOF". (Which it is not)
 
The next time I see another JBW denier start talking about how being white doesn't matter, I want you to remember: your white skin alone is worth $247,000 per year to white women (and $271,000 per year to Asian women) so shut the fuck up.

My white skin is worth zilch to white women. No white women will touch me with a ten feet long pole, no matter what your studies say.
 
No accounting for asperger's syndrome. Focuses on income rather than sexual attraction, and as we all know, those of us who are black pilled :blackpill: , money is not everything. Also, no information on the demographic this study took place on; if it's majority white demographics, such as in USA or Europe, of course whites will be better off, the majority always is. Perhaps in that case it should be taken as a lesson that all non-whites should go back to their native lands where they will be in the majority, and they'll have better career success, hm? :feelsjuice:
 
It can't cost me any of those large figures, I've never even made $40k a year.
 
Cope

Asian men + White women JFL. Nobody knows how to fucking read.
Bro being ethnic is as bad as being 5'4
yeah, if you're white-girl only.

Jesus Christ what an embarrassingly inaccurate claim that's still being used today, years later.
I'm not even particularly observant and I have never heard this statistic challenged by anyone.
 
Race > Height > Face > Money

Highlights:
- Being Asian costs you $247,000 extra per year compared to a white guy.
- Being 5'7" costs you $150,000 extra compared to a 5'11" guy, or $180,000 compared to a 6'2" guy.
- Being bottom 10% facially costs you $40,000 extra compared to an average guy or $186,000 compared to a top 10% guy.

1) Race
income-race.jpg

As noted, it costs an extra $247,000 for an Asian man to date a white girl. It costs an extra $154,000 for a black man to date a white girl.

On the other hand, white men can make up to $24,000 less to be considered equally attractive to Asian women. ie. Asian women will accept poor white men over average income Asians.

2) Height
income-height.jpg

At extremely low male height (eg. 5'0"), height becomes more important than even race, but for more moderate cases of shortness (eg. 5'6"), race is still more important. A 5'6" man must make an extra $175,000 to match a 5'11" guy.


3) Face
income-face.jpg

The maximum cost of facial ugliness is $186,000, and that's for a bottom 10% guy to match a top 10% guy. ie. To bring the ugliest 10% of men up to the performance of the top 10% most handsome men.

4) Money
If we tally up the cost, then we find being an ugly 5'7" Asian will then cost you an extra $437,000 income per year. ie. You need to make $499,500 annual income to match the attractiveness of an average white guy.

In America, this income represents the top 0.5%.

So the only way money can compensate for being physically unattractive is if you are in the top 0.5%, and this is just enough to bring you back to equal to an average white guy.

It still isn't enough to make you actually attractive, and you need to find a way to make sure girls know about the money for it to even matter in the first place.

So again, we can see the hierarchy is Race > Height > Face > Money.

Reference
http://home.uchicago.edu/~hortacsu/onlinedating.pdf
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

screwthefbi
Replies
13
Views
421
To koniec
To koniec
S
Replies
49
Views
2K
Logic55
Logic55
SupremeFroggy
Replies
7
Views
313
BricABrac
BricABrac
Efiliste
Replies
31
Views
4K
yeetbender_
yeetbender_
Spice
Replies
30
Views
769
Spice
Spice

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top