Blackpill SCIENTIFIC PROOF that the order of importance is: Race > Height > Face > Money

Race > Height > Face > Money

Highlights:
- Being Asian costs you $247,000 extra per year compared to a white guy.
- Being 5'7" costs you $150,000 extra compared to a 5'11" guy, or $180,000 compared to a 6'2" guy.
- Being bottom 10% facially costs you $40,000 extra compared to an average guy or $186,000 compared to a top 10% guy.

1) Race

As noted, it costs an extra $247,000 for an Asian man to date a white girl. It costs an extra $154,000 for a black man to date a white girl.

On the other hand, white men can make up to $24,000 less to be considered equally attractive to Asian women. ie. Asian women will accept poor white men over average income Asians.

2) Height

At extremely low male height (eg. 5'0"), height becomes more important than even race, but for more moderate cases of shortness (eg. 5'6"), race is still more important. A 5'6" man must make an extra $175,000 to match a 5'11" guy.


3) Face

The maximum cost of facial ugliness is $186,000, and that's for a bottom 10% guy to match a top 10% guy. ie. To bring the ugliest 10% of men up to the performance of the top 10% most handsome men.

4) Money
If we tally up the cost, then we find being an ugly 5'7" Asian will then cost you an extra $437,000 income per year. ie. You need to make $499,500 annual income to match the attractiveness of an average white guy.

In America, this income represents the top 0.5%.

So the only way money can compensate for being physically unattractive is if you are in the top 0.5%, and this is just enough to bring you back to equal to an average white guy.

It still isn't enough to make you actually attractive, and you need to find a way to make sure girls know about the money for it to even matter in the first place.

So again, we can see the hierarchy is Race > Height > Face > Money.

Reference
http://home.uchicago.edu/~hortacsu/onlinedating.pdf

 

[basementLDARcel]

This thread is one of, if not the most, pseudointellectual threads in the must-read content section. For starters, it claims to be 'SCIENTIFIC PROOF' by using a single fucking study. OP also capitalizes this like it's some authority we must bow down to and kiss its feet, when he uses a single fucking study.

Secondly, his argument revolves around the fact that you have to use a certain amount of money to compensate for a bad trait, and since more money is need to compensate for a bad race than a bad face, somehow women care about race more. So are you telling me some ugly white dude will mog some Chadpreet?

you need to find a way to make sure girls know about the money for it to even matter in the first place.

Also, this point right here shows why this entire thread is complete fucking dogshit, because its revolves around a compensation tool (money) which is hard to show off.

I honestly can't believe such garbage is praised as must-read content.

 

[mentally lost cel 1]

Race > Height > Face > Money

Highlights:
- Being Asian costs you $247,000 extra per year compared to a white guy.
- Being 5'7" costs you $150,000 extra compared to a 5'11" guy, or $180,000 compared to a 6'2" guy.
- Being bottom 10% facially costs you $40,000 extra compared to an average guy or $186,000 compared to a top 10% guy.

1) Race

As noted, it costs an extra $247,000 for an Asian man to date a white girl. It costs an extra $154,000 for a black man to date a white girl.

On the other hand, white men can make up to $24,000 less to be considered equally attractive to Asian women. ie. Asian women will accept poor white men over average income Asians.

2) Height

At extremely low male height (eg. 5'0"), height becomes more important than even race, but for more moderate cases of shortness (eg. 5'6"), race is still more important. A 5'6" man must make an extra $175,000 to match a 5'11" guy.


3) Face

The maximum cost of facial ugliness is $186,000, and that's for a bottom 10% guy to match a top 10% guy. ie. To bring the ugliest 10% of men up to the performance of the top 10% most handsome men.

4) Money
If we tally up the cost, then we find being an ugly 5'7" Asian will then cost you an extra $437,000 income per year. ie. You need to make $499,500 annual income to match the attractiveness of an average white guy.

In America, this income represents the top 0.5%.

So the only way money can compensate for being physically unattractive is if you are in the top 0.5%, and this is just enough to bring you back to equal to an average white guy.

It still isn't enough to make you actually attractive, and you need to find a way to make sure girls know about the money for it to even matter in the first place.

So again, we can see the hierarchy is Race > Height > Face > Money.

Reference
http://home.uchicago.edu/~hortacsu/onlinedating.pdf

Money face height race

Idiot post

 

[yez]

High IQ thread

 

[Pugmalíōn12]

2d>3d why creating problems that shouldn't exist lol

 

[basementLDARcel]

High IQ thread

No it’s not

 

[wgod]

It is backed up by a study, anocdotes don't mean for point, no matter how much one like it.

 

[basementLDARcel]

It is backed up by a study, anocdotes don't mean for point, no matter how much one like it.

JFL @ "backed up by a study". No, OP posted a study, which made no claims, and decided to interpret it a certain way, which we don't know is actually the best way to interpret it, and use his interpretation to assert his claims as "SCIENTIFIC PROOF". (Which it is not)

 

[xlirt]

facial ugliness is $186,000,

FAXXXX

 

[unique_freak]

The next time I see another JBW denier start talking about how being white doesn't matter, I want you to remember: your white skin alone is worth $247,000 per year to white women (and $271,000 per year to Asian women) so shut the fuck up.

My white skin is worth zilch to white women. No white women will touch me with a ten feet long pole, no matter what your studies say.

 

[bigantennaemay1]

No accounting for asperger's syndrome. Focuses on income rather than sexual attraction, and as we all know, those of us who are black pilled , money is not everything. Also, no information on the demographic this study took place on; if it's majority white demographics, such as in USA or Europe, of course whites will be better off, the majority always is. Perhaps in that case it should be taken as a lesson that all non-whites should go back to their native lands where they will be in the majority, and they'll have better career success, hm?

 

[City Incel]

It can't cost me any of those large figures, I've never even made $40k a year.

 

[Man]

Asian men + White women JFL. Nobody knows how to fucking read.

Bro being ethnic is as bad as being 5'4

yeah, if you're white-girl only.

Jesus Christ what an embarrassingly inaccurate claim that's still being used today, years later.
I'm not even particularly observant and I have never heard this statistic challenged by anyone.

 

[LincolnRockwell]

Race > Height > Face > Money

Highlights:
- Being Asian costs you $247,000 extra per year compared to a white guy.
- Being 5'7" costs you $150,000 extra compared to a 5'11" guy, or $180,000 compared to a 6'2" guy.
- Being bottom 10% facially costs you $40,000 extra compared to an average guy or $186,000 compared to a top 10% guy.

1) Race

As noted, it costs an extra $247,000 for an Asian man to date a white girl. It costs an extra $154,000 for a black man to date a white girl.

On the other hand, white men can make up to $24,000 less to be considered equally attractive to Asian women. ie. Asian women will accept poor white men over average income Asians.

2) Height

At extremely low male height (eg. 5'0"), height becomes more important than even race, but for more moderate cases of shortness (eg. 5'6"), race is still more important. A 5'6" man must make an extra $175,000 to match a 5'11" guy.


3) Face

The maximum cost of facial ugliness is $186,000, and that's for a bottom 10% guy to match a top 10% guy. ie. To bring the ugliest 10% of men up to the performance of the top 10% most handsome men.

4) Money
If we tally up the cost, then we find being an ugly 5'7" Asian will then cost you an extra $437,000 income per year. ie. You need to make $499,500 annual income to match the attractiveness of an average white guy.

In America, this income represents the top 0.5%.

So the only way money can compensate for being physically unattractive is if you are in the top 0.5%, and this is just enough to bring you back to equal to an average white guy.

It still isn't enough to make you actually attractive, and you need to find a way to make sure girls know about the money for it to even matter in the first place.

So again, we can see the hierarchy is Race > Height > Face > Money.

Reference
http://home.uchicago.edu/~hortacsu/onlinedating.pdf

Thanks!

 

[Nograsscel]

Brutal

 

[bEpRi]

Race is very very important in the west in my experience. Vast majority of western women don't want ethnics.

 

[Uninvited]

Broke Niggers are fucking prime high class white girls all the time.
African Niggers straight off the dingy will have a better chance with a European girl than the average white European man

 

[Paladin]

This thread is one of, if not the most, pseudointellectual threads in the must-read content section. For starters, it claims to be 'SCIENTIFIC PROOF' by using a single fucking study. OP also capitalizes this like it's some authority we must bow down to and kiss its feet, when he uses a single fucking study.

Secondly, his argument revolves around the fact that you have to use a certain amount of money to compensate for a bad trait, and since more money is need to compensate for a bad race than a bad face, somehow women care about race more. So are you telling me some ugly white dude will mog some Chadpreet?

Also, this point right here shows why this entire thread is complete fucking dogshit, because its revolves around a compensation tool (money) which is hard to show off.

I honestly can't believe such garbage is praised as must-read content.

This. Can't believe this is still in must-read. Glad the number of racepill copers on this forum has died. You are genuinely retarded if you think race is more important than facial attractiveness like as you said some ugly white guy would get more attention than a chadpreet.

 

[Suigin Trismegistus]

It's mostly my face and penis length that destroy me. My height isn't that great (5'10"), but workable. How much does each inch missing on your dick size cost you?

 

[Verxis]

It's mostly my face and penis length that destroy me. My height isn't that great (5'10"), but workable. How much does each inch missing on your dick size cost you?

30k per inch from the average of 7 inches.

 

[TheJoker]

If this was true then why are most incels on forums WHITE with a tall population?

A fact: No incel has a attractive face. If height is the cause of your inceldom use height
increasers and become chad. It doesn't work. Its cope.

The REAL formula

FACE>STATUS>MONEY>HEIGHT>PERSONALITY

If you are on a forum you lack face, status or money.

Most incels have a entry level job or are studying.

 

[Paladin]

If this was true then why are most incels on forums WHITE with a tall population?

A fact: No incel has a attractive face. If height is the cause of your inceldom use height
increasers and become chad. It doesn't work. Its cope.

The REAL formula

FACE>STATUS>MONEY>HEIGHT>PERSONALITY

If you are on a forum you lack face, status or money.

Most incels have a entry level job or are studying.

Most incels on forums are white but most people in any online spaces are white. Doesn't really say much

 

[tandoorichickencel]

People often forget how race is a huge handicap. This is proven with geomaxxing evidence. Rice men do better in their home countries. Curry men do better in their homelands. White foids are dismissive of ethnics unless said ethnic is a black man or some good looking ethnic who is also tall and rich.

 

[aswellfella]

This is ridiculous.

If you go outside, you note:

Height > Face > Frame > Race

 

[Deathspell666]

I long for the times when foids were property :'), I wish I can be a slave owner so I can brutally fuck the shit out of my sexual slave foids in a morbidly ritualistic orgy.

 

[Verxis]

If this was true then why are most incels on forums WHITE with a tall population?

A fact: No incel has a attractive face. If height is the cause of your inceldom use height
increasers and become chad. It doesn't work. Its cope.

The REAL formula

FACE>STATUS>MONEY>HEIGHT>PERSONALITY

If you are on a forum you lack face, status or money.

Most incels have a entry level job or are studying.

There are plenty of incels with attractive faces. ER was one such incel.

 

[WhitePilledRage]

Race > Height > Face > Money

Highlights:
- Being Asian costs you $247,000 extra per year compared to a white guy.
- Being 5'7" costs you $150,000 extra compared to a 5'11" guy, or $180,000 compared to a 6'2" guy.
- Being bottom 10% facially costs you $40,000 extra compared to an average guy or $186,000 compared to a top 10% guy.

1) Race

As noted, it costs an extra $247,000 for an Asian man to date a white girl. It costs an extra $154,000 for a black man to date a white girl.

On the other hand, white men can make up to $24,000 less to be considered equally attractive to Asian women. ie. Asian women will accept poor white men over average income Asians.

2) Height

At extremely low male height (eg. 5'0"), height becomes more important than even race, but for more moderate cases of shortness (eg. 5'6"), race is still more important. A 5'6" man must make an extra $175,000 to match a 5'11" guy.


3) Face

The maximum cost of facial ugliness is $186,000, and that's for a bottom 10% guy to match a top 10% guy. ie. To bring the ugliest 10% of men up to the performance of the top 10% most handsome men.

4) Money
If we tally up the cost, then we find being an ugly 5'7" Asian will then cost you an extra $437,000 income per year. ie. You need to make $499,500 annual income to match the attractiveness of an average white guy.

In America, this income represents the top 0.5%.

So the only way money can compensate for being physically unattractive is if you are in the top 0.5%, and this is just enough to bring you back to equal to an average white guy.

It still isn't enough to make you actually attractive, and you need to find a way to make sure girls know about the money for it to even matter in the first place.

So again, we can see the hierarchy is Race > Height > Face > Money.

Reference
http://home.uchicago.edu/~hortacsu/onlinedating.pdf

this is for beta buxing, dumb fuck.

 

[WhereIsHamudi]

like as you said some ugly white guy would get more attention than a chadpreet.

There are always outliers. On average white guys are more romantically successful than any other race. It's just the facts. The white incels on this forum are simply outliers.

 

[TheJoker]

There are plenty of incels with attractive faces. ER was one such incel.

You think ER had a attractive face? If this is so why wasn't he a success on online
dating? It's like the cope when people say their height is the only thing which
is letting them down - you then say to them get height increasers and slay and
everything goes silent.

If you think everything BUT your face is holding you back - go on online dating
showing just your face and you still won't get matches.

His face was the reason. The man drove around in a expensive car with expensive
clothes. He looked like a cat was shoved into the vessel of a human. Women were
judging him on his face, and he began hating them.

Your face is all. Incels originally decoded rather than debunked. We decode
actions and causes/effects.

 

[Paladin]

There are always outliers. On average white guys are more romantically successful than any other race. It's just the facts. The white incels on this forum are simply outliers.

It's still completely retarded to believe that race is more important than facial attractiveness.

You think ER had a attractive face? If this is so why wasn't he a success on online
dating? It's like the cope when people say their height is the only thing which
is letting them down - you then say to them get height increasers and slay and
everything goes silent.

ER was MTN imo. I think being non-NT was what was mainly holding him back

 

[TheJoker]

It's still completely retarded to believe that race is more important than facial attractiveness.

ER was MTN imo. I think being non-NT was what was mainly holding him back

Cope.

Autistic chads slay.

 

[Paladin]

Cope.

Autistic chads slay.

No shit nigger. Any version of chad slays. But a NT normie can at least get something while a non-NT normie is incel.

Things are more nuanced than "muh chad"

 

[TheJoker]

No shit nigger. Any version of chad slays. But a NT normie can at least get something while a non-NT normie is incel.

Things are more nuanced than "muh chad"

You sound like incel tear member.

 

[Paladin]

You sound like incel tear member.

>no argument

 

[Verxis]

You think ER had a attractive face? If this is so why wasn't he a success on online
dating? It's like the cope when people say their height is the only thing which
is letting them down - you then say to them get height increasers and slay and
everything goes silent.

If you think everything BUT your face is holding you back - go on online dating
showing just your face and you still won't get matches.

His face was the reason. The man drove around in a expensive car with expensive
clothes. He looked like a cat was shoved into the vessel of a human. Women were
judging him on his face, and he began hating them.

Your face is all. Incels originally decoded rather than debunked. We decode
actions and causes/effects.

ER proved that face means nothing.

 

[TheJoker]

ER proved that face means nothing.

He never proved nothing. In 2014 things were a lot different. We hadn't seen appearance
discrimination take such a massive hold like it does now. In 2014, it was possible for a average
guy to find a date on POF. Nowadays its almost impossible. E.R was pre-appearance discrimination
peroid.

 

[DieVoGel]

Race > Height > Face > Money

Highlights:
- Being Asian costs you $247,000 extra per year compared to a white guy.
- Being 5'7" costs you $150,000 extra compared to a 5'11" guy, or $180,000 compared to a 6'2" guy.
- Being bottom 10% facially costs you $40,000 extra compared to an average guy or $186,000 compared to a top 10% guy.

1) Race

As noted, it costs an extra $247,000 for an Asian man to date a white girl. It costs an extra $154,000 for a black man to date a white girl.

On the other hand, white men can make up to $24,000 less to be considered equally attractive to Asian women. ie. Asian women will accept poor white men over average income Asians.

2) Height

At extremely low male height (eg. 5'0"), height becomes more important than even race, but for more moderate cases of shortness (eg. 5'6"), race is still more important. A 5'6" man must make an extra $175,000 to match a 5'11" guy.


3) Face

The maximum cost of facial ugliness is $186,000, and that's for a bottom 10% guy to match a top 10% guy. ie. To bring the ugliest 10% of men up to the performance of the top 10% most handsome men.

4) Money
If we tally up the cost, then we find being an ugly 5'7" Asian will then cost you an extra $437,000 income per year. ie. You need to make $499,500 annual income to match the attractiveness of an average white guy.

In America, this income represents the top 0.5%.

So the only way money can compensate for being physically unattractive is if you are in the top 0.5%, and this is just enough to bring you back to equal to an average white guy.

It still isn't enough to make you actually attractive, and you need to find a way to make sure girls know about the money for it to even matter in the first place.

So again, we can see the hierarchy is Race > Height > Face > Money.

Reference
http://home.uchicago.edu/~hortacsu/onlinedating.pdf

If you don't date at all you don't have to pay shit and instead enjoy the money for yourself. Way of the incel for life!

 

[Ericfffc]

Race is cope

 

[Verxis]

Race is cope

Tell that to black guys.

 

[Captvic]

If height was so important there wouldn't be any tall incels on this forum yet we have several. Why? Because we are UGLY. FACE >>>>>>

 

[Eremetic]

If height was so important there wouldn't be any tall incels on this forum yet we have several. Why? Because we are UGLY. FACE >>>>>>

If face was so important there wouldn't be any non subhuman incels yet we have several. Why? Because of our PERSONALITY. PERSONALITY >>>>>

 

[Eremetic]

sarcasm