Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Ban Discussion Megathread

posted too much tranny porn apparently
Isn't 1 tranny porn immediately bannable? And why Isn't @FamilyGuy1999 banned for his gaymaxxing thread in id??
 
Isn't 1 tranny porn immediately bannable? And why Isn't @FamilyGuy1999 banned for his gaymaxxing thread in id??

because i marked it as a thread everyone should ignore but kept getting bumps

also literally just don't comment on it/ignore it and it will fade away
 
because i marked it as a thread everyone should ignore but kept getting bumps

also literally just don't comment on it/ignore it and it will fade away
Shut the fuck up you made a gay thread, was told you were getting banned and pussied out. Fuck the mods for not banninh your r9k fag ass
 
Shut the fuck up you made a gay thread, was told you were getting banned and pussied out. Fuck the mods for not banninh your r9k fag ass

nope. posted in the wrong forum, realized my mistake, then told everyone to ignore the thread (not bannable) before the oldfags started seething and the mods warned me
 
nope. posted in the wrong forum, realized my mistake, then told everyone to ignore the thread (not bannable) before the oldfags started seething and the mods warned me
Gay posting isn't allowed in the sewers either faggot. You 100% are an r9k fag and know what you're doing. Lol at this shit
 
i feel like there should he more mods
I'd literally rid this site from every homo and foid after just one hour of being a mod
 
I am genuinely curious where you got the idea that I am curry.

I am smarter than you though. So if I were curry that would make you dumber than bricks
lol what race are u
 
I'd literally rid this site from every homo and foid after just one hour of being a mod
Just give one of the most dramafilled users who fights with half of the forum mod bro!
 
Just give one of the most dramafilled users who fights with half of the forum mod bro!
I wouldn't ban anyone who I fight with. I'd mainly ban faggots like familyguy and nirvana who literally post gaymaxxing threads and don't get banned, and bluepillers and tards like silly
 
I wouldn't ban anyone who I fight with. I'd mainly ban faggots like familyguy and nirvana who literally post gaymaxxing threads and don't get banned, and bluepillers and tards like silly
I just don’t think there’s non controversial users to promote to mod which is why mods are holding out. Realistically a mod should be a user who’s never ever participated in drama, nor had warnings. Plus, I like the status quo right now. We currently have the best moderation balance between too strict and too lenient currently. They shouldn’t let anymore mods in, the forum is content and fine as it is. I’m pro status quo.
 
I just don’t think there’s non controversial users to promote to mod which is why mods are holding out. Realistically a mod should be a user who’s never ever participated in drama, nor had warnings. Plus, I like the status quo right now. We currently have the best moderation balance between too strict and too lenient currently. They shouldn’t let anymore mods in, the forum is content and fine as it is. I’m pro status quo.
We have like 3 users who posted gay threads and didn't get banned. You like that leniency?
Mods being non controversial just means they're diplomatic and honestly likely bluepilled to an extent. When have you seen a mod post any blackpill???
We need a user strict on faggots, bluepillers, and any foid behavior or anti blackpill shit. The rest is allowed
 
We have like 3 users who posted gay threads and didn't get banned. You like that leniency?
I’m not sure who/what you’re referring to but if it has merit the mods will get on it eventually. I’d rather have 3 (possible) incidents solved slowly if it means there’s less overall mod control. Sometimes you have to let the crackhead go in order to not get martial law. Homosexual content is clamped down here though. I’ve not seen a person admitting to being LGBTQmentalillnsssalphabet posting here, so it does get resolved quite quick.
Mods being non controversial just means they're diplomatic and honestly likely bluepilled to an extent.
Someone who’s unbiased/uncontroversial is very important. Bias can lead to unfair bans and warnings because of how divided this community is, and to solve that divide through a controversial user who will ban the opposite would destroy the forums inactivity. A “clique” can take over, if you would, then the “clique” alienate everyone else and you have an unfair system and eventually a dead forum besides the small “clique”.
When have you seen a mod post any blackpill???
Eh. That’s kind of subjective. A lot of “the blackpill” is controversial and fought over, but there’s been “blackpilled” threads mods have made, but usually they don’t create threads nor post period which I think is good because getting into arguments when you’re in a position of power can lead to bias and shit.
We need a user strict on faggots, bluepillers, and any foid behavior or anti blackpill shit. The rest is allowed
Again, kind of subjective. “Anti blackpill” and “bluepill” can mean different things to different people. Objective women and homosexuals or transsexuals do get banned quite quickly though.
 
Last edited:
I’m not sure who/what you’re referring to but if it has merit the mods will get on it eventually. I’d rather have 3 (possible) incidents solved slowly if it means there’s less overall mod control. Sometimes you have to let the crackhead go in order to not get martial law. Homosexual content is clamped down here though. I’ve not seen a person admitting to being LGBTQmentalillnsssalphabet posting here, so it does get resolved quite quick.
FamilyGuy1999 posting "gaymaxxing" thread in inceldom discussion and only got a warning, nirvanafan first thread on the forum was "have you considered going gay" and there's one other greycel i forgot because he doesn't post as much that made a thread about trannies who look like women not being gay. The slow solving will lead to this place being outnumbered by r9k fags and you're a bigot because what did gay men ever do to you inkwell??? You'll see.

Someone who’s unbiased/uncontroversial is very important. Bias can lead to unfair bans and warnings because of how divided this community is, and to solve that divide through a controversial user who will ban the opposite would destroy the forums inactivity. A “clique” can take over, if you would.
Except there would be a specific set of rules he would ban for. Not ban anyone for disagreements or insecure shit.

but usually they don’t create threads nor post period which I think is good
Yeah not suspicious at all
Objective women and homosexuals or transsexuals do get banned quite quickly though.
No they quite clearly do not get banned
 
@SillyTruecel you fucking femoid, cant wait to see you getting mentioned for real here. you fucking larper.
 
FamilyGuy1999 posting "gaymaxxing" thread in inceldom discussion and only got a warning, nirvanafan first thread on the forum was "have you considered going gay" and there's one other greycel i forgot because he doesn't post as much that made a thread about trannies who look like women not being gay. The slow solving will lead to this place being outnumbered by r9k fags and you're a bigot because what did gay men ever do to you inkwell??? You'll see.
Well if that did that they should get banned for sure, the mods looked at it even. I believe a no tolerance policy towards that is a good thing, but what you said made me think that they just never saw it period and were about to be looking into it.

I didn’t know they actually saw it and did something about it. For sure if you post “gaymaxxing” that’s a problem and you should be instabanned.
 
Well if that did that they should get banned for sure, the mods looked at it even. I believe a no tolerance policy towards that is a good thing, but what you said made me think that they just never saw it period and were about to be looking into it.

I didn’t know they actually saw it and did something about it. For sure if you post “gaymaxxing” that’s a problem and you should be instabanned.
The mods did see it. The threads were removed. Ask familyguy1999 he said "it's a joke bro" and the mods only give him a warning percent. Same with nirvafan, that was a month ago and his thread was removed but he still posts.
 
@nihilistic ????
 
@imsorry ?

Edit: Nevermind saw his title. So he's taking a break from here?
Time spent online 70:10

Taking a break after spending 70 hours here is a big fakecel trait ngl
 
Last edited:
@KING REIDYZ never even began for this troll
 
so sillytruecel is finally banned, we did it boys
 
It's over for SillyTruecel, they shouldn't have shit posted in my discussion of isosolis triangles thread.
 
@SillyTruecel Fucking finally. Hopefully its perm.
 
@your personality I assume requested but why
 
If @your personality isn't requested then free him or I will storm down your gates, cowards!!
 
Now you can see it dedsrs
good fuckin riddance.
FOIDS ARE NOT WELCOME HERE.
@SillyTruecel , go and OFF yourself , you worthless fucking foid. (in minecraft) (hypothetical)
 
users have been perma’d for way less and on any other website a person who does nothing but spam and harass people would have been banned a long time ago but I suppose this is just part of the site’s new PR campaign
 
I mean they've been warned for spamming, if they keep spamming they'll keep getting warned. Otherwise all I have is a claim that they're a foid, but no one has given solid proof so far so can't really ban them on baseless claims.
incel shaming (exact thing @GoyimWithAttitude was banned for and she does it frequently)
Dear manlet:

I'm a man, keep coping.
comments personal insults and shit on literally every single post I make including low blows on vent threads about serious shit (which is bs because @FullTimeLoser got a bunch of frivolous warnings for “harassing” PI)
never began for bitchycels
I remember @FullTimeLoser made some venting thread about his irl academic situation and she commented calling him “FullTimeCollegeDropout”. these are just three examples off the top of my head. really you can just look at their post history, it all fits in to one of 3 categories (spam, misused incel lingo, personal attacks). she’s not just infamous for being a foid, even Tahilia never acquired that kind of reputation while she was here
 
incel shaming (exact thing @GoyimWithAttitude was banned for and she does it frequently)

comments personal insults and shit on literally every single post I make including low blows on vent threads about serious shit (which is bs because @FullTimeLoser got a bunch of frivolous warnings for “harassing” PI)

I remember @FullTimeLoser made some venting thread about his irl academic situation and she commented calling him “FullTimeCollegeDropout”. these are just three examples off the top of my head. really you can just look at their post history, it all fits in to one of 3 categories (spam, misused incel lingo, personal attacks). she’s not just infamous for being a foid, even Tahilia never acquired that kind of reputation while she was here
The mod who kept banning me for arguments with PI is inactive rn. I still don't see the purpose of keeping SillyTruecel. You're absolutely right you will not find a single comment in his history that isn't just literally mocking incelsom situations. He never discusses his inceldom seriously ever
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

  • shape1
    shape2
    shape3
    shape4
    shape5
    shape6
    Back
    Top