Deleted member 27249
Full time... Winner? I'm undefeated
-
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2020
- Posts
- 24,479
Stfu faggot?
That's literally untrue, keep coping & fuming oldnigga
Stfu faggot?
That's literally untrue, keep coping & fuming oldnigga
Stfu faggot
Stfu faggotseethe harder
seethe harderStfu faggot
No let’s not have thati feel like there should he more mods
I'd literally rid this site from every homo and foid after just one hour of being a modi feel like there should he more mods
lol what race are uI am genuinely curious where you got the idea that I am curry.
I am smarter than you though. So if I were curry that would make you dumber than bricks
Just give one of the most dramafilled users who fights with half of the forum mod bro!I'd literally rid this site from every homo and foid after just one hour of being a mod
I wouldn't ban anyone who I fight with. I'd mainly ban faggots like familyguy and nirvana who literally post gaymaxxing threads and don't get banned, and bluepillers and tards like sillyJust give one of the most dramafilled users who fights with half of the forum mod bro!
I just don’t think there’s non controversial users to promote to mod which is why mods are holding out. Realistically a mod should be a user who’s never ever participated in drama, nor had warnings. Plus, I like the status quo right now. We currently have the best moderation balance between too strict and too lenient currently. They shouldn’t let anymore mods in, the forum is content and fine as it is. I’m pro status quo.I wouldn't ban anyone who I fight with. I'd mainly ban faggots like familyguy and nirvana who literally post gaymaxxing threads and don't get banned, and bluepillers and tards like silly
We have like 3 users who posted gay threads and didn't get banned. You like that leniency?I just don’t think there’s non controversial users to promote to mod which is why mods are holding out. Realistically a mod should be a user who’s never ever participated in drama, nor had warnings. Plus, I like the status quo right now. We currently have the best moderation balance between too strict and too lenient currently. They shouldn’t let anymore mods in, the forum is content and fine as it is. I’m pro status quo.
I’m not sure who/what you’re referring to but if it has merit the mods will get on it eventually. I’d rather have 3 (possible) incidents solved slowly if it means there’s less overall mod control. Sometimes you have to let the crackhead go in order to not get martial law. Homosexual content is clamped down here though. I’ve not seen a person admitting to being LGBTQmentalillnsssalphabet posting here, so it does get resolved quite quick.We have like 3 users who posted gay threads and didn't get banned. You like that leniency?
Someone who’s unbiased/uncontroversial is very important. Bias can lead to unfair bans and warnings because of how divided this community is, and to solve that divide through a controversial user who will ban the opposite would destroy the forums inactivity. A “clique” can take over, if you would, then the “clique” alienate everyone else and you have an unfair system and eventually a dead forum besides the small “clique”.Mods being non controversial just means they're diplomatic and honestly likely bluepilled to an extent.
Eh. That’s kind of subjective. A lot of “the blackpill” is controversial and fought over, but there’s been “blackpilled” threads mods have made, but usually they don’t create threads nor post period which I think is good because getting into arguments when you’re in a position of power can lead to bias and shit.When have you seen a mod post any blackpill???
Again, kind of subjective. “Anti blackpill” and “bluepill” can mean different things to different people. Objective women and homosexuals or transsexuals do get banned quite quickly though.We need a user strict on faggots, bluepillers, and any foid behavior or anti blackpill shit. The rest is allowed
Agreed.i feel like there should he more mods
FamilyGuy1999 posting "gaymaxxing" thread in inceldom discussion and only got a warning, nirvanafan first thread on the forum was "have you considered going gay" and there's one other greycel i forgot because he doesn't post as much that made a thread about trannies who look like women not being gay. The slow solving will lead to this place being outnumbered by r9k fags and you're a bigot because what did gay men ever do to you inkwell??? You'll see.I’m not sure who/what you’re referring to but if it has merit the mods will get on it eventually. I’d rather have 3 (possible) incidents solved slowly if it means there’s less overall mod control. Sometimes you have to let the crackhead go in order to not get martial law. Homosexual content is clamped down here though. I’ve not seen a person admitting to being LGBTQmentalillnsssalphabet posting here, so it does get resolved quite quick.
Except there would be a specific set of rules he would ban for. Not ban anyone for disagreements or insecure shit.Someone who’s unbiased/uncontroversial is very important. Bias can lead to unfair bans and warnings because of how divided this community is, and to solve that divide through a controversial user who will ban the opposite would destroy the forums inactivity. A “clique” can take over, if you would.
Yeah not suspicious at allbut usually they don’t create threads nor post period which I think is good
No they quite clearly do not get bannedObjective women and homosexuals or transsexuals do get banned quite quickly though.
Well if that did that they should get banned for sure, the mods looked at it even. I believe a no tolerance policy towards that is a good thing, but what you said made me think that they just never saw it period and were about to be looking into it.FamilyGuy1999 posting "gaymaxxing" thread in inceldom discussion and only got a warning, nirvanafan first thread on the forum was "have you considered going gay" and there's one other greycel i forgot because he doesn't post as much that made a thread about trannies who look like women not being gay. The slow solving will lead to this place being outnumbered by r9k fags and you're a bigot because what did gay men ever do to you inkwell??? You'll see.
Based.@SillyTruecel you fucking femoid, cant wait to see you getting mentioned for real here. you fucking larper.
The mods did see it. The threads were removed. Ask familyguy1999 he said "it's a joke bro" and the mods only give him a warning percent. Same with nirvafan, that was a month ago and his thread was removed but he still posts.Well if that did that they should get banned for sure, the mods looked at it even. I believe a no tolerance policy towards that is a good thing, but what you said made me think that they just never saw it period and were about to be looking into it.
I didn’t know they actually saw it and did something about it. For sure if you post “gaymaxxing” that’s a problem and you should be instabanned.
Why were you banned?@nihilistic ????
Dude said he isn't incelLast seen 26 minutes ago · Engaged in conversation
Thank God.so sillytruecel is finally banned, we did it boys
Thank God.
so sillytruecel is finally banned, we did it boys
Now you can see it dedsrs@SillyTruecel you fucking femoid, cant wait to see you getting mentioned for real here. you fucking larper.
@your personality I assume requested but why
@your personality I assume requested but why
Going to piggyback off this and request a ban soon too.
Should things get as bad as they did earlier this year and there's new things to discuss I might come back.
good fuckin riddance.Now you can see it dedsrs
users have been perma’d for way less and on any other website a person who does nothing but spam and harass people would have been banned a long time ago but I suppose this is just part of the site’s new PR campaigntemp
incel shaming (exact thing @GoyimWithAttitude was banned for and she does it frequently)I mean they've been warned for spamming, if they keep spamming they'll keep getting warned. Otherwise all I have is a claim that they're a foid, but no one has given solid proof so far so can't really ban them on baseless claims.
comments personal insults and shit on literally every single post I make including low blows on vent threads about serious shit (which is bs because @FullTimeLoser got a bunch of frivolous warnings for “harassing” PI)Dear manlet:
I'm a man, keep coping.
I remember @FullTimeLoser made some venting thread about his irl academic situation and she commented calling him “FullTimeCollegeDropout”. these are just three examples off the top of my head. really you can just look at their post history, it all fits in to one of 3 categories (spam, misused incel lingo, personal attacks). she’s not just infamous for being a foid, even Tahilia never acquired that kind of reputation while she was herenever began for bitchycels
The mod who kept banning me for arguments with PI is inactive rn. I still don't see the purpose of keeping SillyTruecel. You're absolutely right you will not find a single comment in his history that isn't just literally mocking incelsom situations. He never discusses his inceldom seriously everincel shaming (exact thing @GoyimWithAttitude was banned for and she does it frequently)
comments personal insults and shit on literally every single post I make including low blows on vent threads about serious shit (which is bs because @FullTimeLoser got a bunch of frivolous warnings for “harassing” PI)
I remember @FullTimeLoser made some venting thread about his irl academic situation and she commented calling him “FullTimeCollegeDropout”. these are just three examples off the top of my head. really you can just look at their post history, it all fits in to one of 3 categories (spam, misused incel lingo, personal attacks). she’s not just infamous for being a foid, even Tahilia never acquired that kind of reputation while she was here
You're using "they" here. So that means you yourself believe that SillyTruecel can be a female?I mean they've been warned for spamming, if they keep spamming they'll keep getting warned. Otherwise all I have is a claim that they're a foid, but no one has given solid proof so far so can't really ban them on baseless claims.
10k posts in one month. Yup that's a troll.I still don't see the purpose of keeping SillyTruece
I’ve mentioned this before but that user has not mentioned a single irl experience relevant to inceldom, or anything involving their race/height/age/facial features/etc, and has expressed no strong personal opinions about incel related topics. everything they post could very easily be written by a bored BPD foid with a basic idea of what incels are. one of the tell tale signs of a LARP and everyone knows itThe mod who kept banning me for arguments with PI is inactive rn. I still don't see the purpose of keeping SillyTruecel. You're absolutely right you will not find a single comment in his history that isn't just literally mocking incelsom situations. He never discusses his inceldom seriously ever
She also seemingly adopts the personality of the last user she talked to. Literally just copies everyone here and doesn't understand half the vocabularyI’ve mentioned this before but that user has not mentioned a single irl experience relevant to inceldom, or anything involving their race/height/age/facial features/etc, and has expressed no strong personal opinions about incel related topics. everything they post could very easily be written by a bored BPD foid with a basic idea of what incels are. one of the tell tale signs of a LARP and everyone knows it
Weak.Senada was a different case, knajjd suspected it based on their google email having a womans name so we at least had something there
could just be an altWeak.
He sent his vocaroo right away, no "figuring out" bullshit for 2 hours.
And he was an active member on r/Incelwithouthate.
SillyTruecel has 10k posts in such short time. All of their posts are in the sewers.
It's a female at worst and a troll at best.
@towncel@Harvester Who's alt was this?
@towncel@Harvester Who's alt was this?