Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

SuicideFuel why east asians are not better than whites at creating technologies and civilizations despite having a higher iq (EAST ASIANS DO NOT ENTER)

barcacel

barcacel

Vitantiheterodroidsexual Monk-mode MGTOW
-
Joined
Oct 16, 2022
Posts
1,906
in 1992 china had the same conomy as india (despite china having a bigger population at this time, 1.2b vs 900m):

View: https://youtu.be/HYG6sWJz7oI
then they started to copy many things from whites like the economic system and many other things and became rich, but before this they were very poor, all east asian countries became westernized, without this westernization east asian countries would still be very poor:
Screenshot 2023 04 17 120925Screenshot 2023 04 17 121433Screenshot 2023 04 17 121554Screenshot 2023 04 17 121855Screenshot 2023 04 17 122039Screenshot 2023 04 17 123113
before this also the chinese (also japan and korea) had lost some wars against whites because they had worse technology
let's start by differentiatiating the brain of whites and east asians, whites and east asians evolved in a very different way, east asians somehow evolved to have less affective empathy (and more cognitive empathy) than whites and whites have too much affective empathy:
"Northwest Europeans and East Asians are similar in having high levels of empathy but differ in the relative importance of cognitive empathy versus affective empathy. Affective empathy is much more key to prosocial behavior among Northwest Europeans than among East Asians."
"When Siu and Shek (2005) studied empathy in a Chinese sample ranging from 18 to 29 years of age, they found that the participants made little distinction between cognitive empathy and affective (emotional) empathy. These two components seemed to be weakly differentiated from each other. The authors attributed this finding to "cultural differences" "Chinese people might not perceive the items from the two dimensions as too different in nature." The authors went on to note that "there are still debates concerning the boundaries of emotional and cognitive processes underlying empathy" and that "the causal relationships between cognitive and emotional processing underlying empathy are not simple or unidirectional."
In short, the Chinese participants could see things from another person's perspective and understand how that person felt. There is much less indication, however, that they involuntarily experienced the feelings of other people, especially feelings of distress. This is not to say they were incapable of such emotion transference, but rather that it seems limited in scope, perhaps being confined to family members and not extended to strangers."
https://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2020/03/affective-empathy-double-edged-sword.html
"- When viewing a person suffering physical pain, British subjects report greater negative affect than do East Asian subjects.
- When viewing a person suffering social pain, British subjects show greater empathic concern but lower empathic accuracy than do East Asian subjects.
- British subjects report greater empathic concern, but lower empathic accuracy than do Chinese subjects. Emotional expressivity predicts British but not Chinese empathic concern.
- Empathic concern explains differences between the two groups in donating, a measure of prosocial behavior.
- American subjects, more so than Japanese subjects, feel more affective empathy for one friend over another when the two friends are engaged in an intense disagreement."
https://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2020/03/affective-empathy-double-edged-sword.html
there are 2 types of empathy:
cognitive empathy: the ability to imagine how another person feels without involuntarily making that feeling one's own
affective (emotional) empathy: you not only understand how others feel but also transfer those feelings to yourself, i.e., there is a greater tendency to feel the other person's pain.
For instance, sociopaths have a low affective empathy and high cognitive empathy. Wouldn't this eventually destroy social order in east asian societies? east asians have managed to offset this by having this gene called DRD4, it basically lowers your individualism and increases your social conformity:
"One might think that cognitive empathy would be worse than affective empathy as a basis for prosocial behavior. For instance, sociopaths are usually high in cognitive empathy: they know how another person feels in a given situation, but they use this knowledge to exploit and control that person. Wouldn't their resulting success eventually destroy social order? East Asian societies may have avoided this outcome through their low level of individualism and their correspondingly high level of social conformity. Kitayama et al. (2014) makes this point when discussing certain alleles of a gene, DRD4, that are associated with risk seeking and heavy drinking in the United States but not in East Asia. These alleles seem to increase the desire to emulate one's peers, and such emulation is more likely to favor dysfunctional behavior in the United States than in East Asia
These alleles seem to explain the weaker individualism and stronger social conformity of East Asians."
https://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2020/03/affective-empathy-double-edged-sword.html
"Testing Japanese and European Canadian undergraduates (n = 784), we succeeded in replicating these previous findings: the Canadian students were more independent, whereas the Japanese students were more interdependent."
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/psysoc/advpub/0/advpub_2021-B014/_pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/public...dent_Versus_Interdependent_Social_Orientation
how did whites evolve:
whites evolved to have high individualism, decreased conformism and high affective empathy to offset the last 2, if east asians had the same personality as whites they would be 100 times more technologically advanced than whites.

extra:
you might say "but east asian countries have more patents per 1 million habitants than western countries", yes but they would still be very poor and would make no patents like they did before if they never copied the the cultural, economic, or political systems of whites, they wouldn't have been able to create these by themselves, it's like east asians need competition and someone to tell them to do things, for them to use their superior brains:
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/patent-applications-per-million?time=2015
i want to clarify that east asians have a superior intelligence to whites, and i believe they are the superior race, but they don't have the personality of whites to use it. Without whites, east asians would still be using swords and cultivating rice all day in villages.

by the way the jews are not evil, they just have much more empathy than normal whites and more iq because of having more individualism and less conformism

my theory on Elliot Rodger:
https://incels.is/threads/why-hapa-...tive-empathy-explained-using-an-study.461116/
 
Last edited:
both races iqmogg me



it’s over for my pp
 
High IQ post. Good content, read the whole thing
 
by the way the jews are not evil, they just have much more empathy than normal whites and more iq because of having more individualism and less conformism
jew exposed
 
Coping is a great strategy to avoid depression.
 
China gave europe some of its technology and it had less natural resources. That’s why :feelsjuice:
 
China gave europe some of its technology and it had less natural resources. That’s why :feelsjuice:
East asians have a much greater intelligence than whites, but they don't have the personality to use it naturally.
 
Last edited:
>jews are not evil
Hello jidf
 
cope. they were smart enough to infiltrate Africa
 
Last edited:
I think whites genetically have a higher IQ but the lifestyle isn’t conducive to reaching the potential.

If you control for even 1 variable that affects IQ like Iodine Intake, Family Earnings, Urbanization, Alcohol/Drug consumption, Culture then whites have a higher IQ and it’s really not even close.

Pic-related shows Hamburg Germany has an IQ of 113 and the only variable that accounts for is Urbanization because it’s such a small district, but it’s not even entirely urban.
IMG 7753

East Asia is the Urban capital of the world.
Regardless, the IQ of Germany as a whole is basically 1:1 or higher than East Asia even without accounting for the aforementioned variables.
 
Very high iq post. North east asians have average iq 105 , whites are at 100, our (((kazarian))) tribe friends have 115 iq.

east asians are very communitarian and deferential to higher authority, elders and structures, and they emphasise group harmonious relations(conformism), this can result in very stable safe and orderly places to live; east asian cities are remarkable places, ordered, clean and safe unlike american cities blighted by subsaharan african populations with 80 iq and prone to violence and impulsuve behaviour and low concientousness to their environment.

east asians dont value and emphasise individual risk taking, antagonist disagreement and combative dialectic of ideas and challenging authority if that authority is thought to be wrong like white westerners do unless in extreme cases. Eastern philosophy is all about harmony and balance think of confucious while western philosophy origin is based on socrates; challenging authority disagreement, combativeness.

Asians as individuals are less likely to strive to achieve great things for their own individual reputation, in the west we have a real cult of the individual. Asians are great at copying and will wait for whites to invent things, copy it refine it and make it better.
 
Culture is influenced by biology.
Biology is influenced by culture too.

The resources available to a Country such as Iodine, have an enormous effect on IQ (as large as 30-45 IQ points).
Japan has 10x the Iodine intake compared to the U.S. but the same IQ when accounting for Urbanization.

Middle East or East African countries have an IQ of like 60-80 (~70) because landlocked provinces have no access to Iodine and mental retardation is extremely prevalent.
 
Last edited:
Biology is influenced by culture too.

The resources available to a Country such as Iodine, have an enormous effect on IQ (as large as 30-45 IQ points).
Japan has 10x the Iodine intake compared to the U.S. but the same IQ when accounting for Urbanization.

Middle East or East African countries have an IQ of like 60-80 (~70) because landlocked provinces have no access to Iodine and mental retardation is extremely prevalent.
You need to stop believing that "socio-economic factors" meme.
 
You need to stop believing that "socio-economic factors" meme.
Never once mentioned socio-economic factors, only biological factors.

Socio-economic factors are a meme because of niggers, not because they don't exist for non-niggers.
I don't know enough about socio-economic factors to comment on them, hence why I haven't.
 
Never once mentioned socio-economic factors, only biological factors.

Socio-economic factors are a meme because of niggers, not because they don't exist for non-niggers.
I don't know enough about socio-economic factors to comment on them, hence why I haven't.
FirstWorldMapHdiScreenshot 2023 05 17 164533
 
in 1992 china had the same conomy as india (despite china having a bigger population at this time, 1.2b vs 900m):

View: https://youtu.be/HYG6sWJz7oI
then they started to copy many things from whites like the economic system and many other things and became rich, but before this they were very poor, all east asian countries became westernized, without this westernization east asian countries would still be very poor:
View attachment 739197View attachment 739201View attachment 739202View attachment 739206View attachment 739207View attachment 739213
before this also the chinese (also japan and korea) had lost some wars against whites because they had worse technology
let's start by differentiatiating the brain of whites and east asians, whites and east asians evolved in a very different way, east asians somehow evolved to have less affective empathy (and more cognitive empathy) than whites and whites have too much affective empathy:
"Northwest Europeans and East Asians are similar in having high levels of empathy but differ in the relative importance of cognitive empathy versus affective empathy. Affective empathy is much more key to prosocial behavior among Northwest Europeans than among East Asians."
"When Siu and Shek (2005) studied empathy in a Chinese sample ranging from 18 to 29 years of age, they found that the participants made little distinction between cognitive empathy and affective (emotional) empathy. These two components seemed to be weakly differentiated from each other. The authors attributed this finding to "cultural differences" "Chinese people might not perceive the items from the two dimensions as too different in nature." The authors went on to note that "there are still debates concerning the boundaries of emotional and cognitive processes underlying empathy" and that "the causal relationships between cognitive and emotional processing underlying empathy are not simple or unidirectional."
In short, the Chinese participants could see things from another person's perspective and understand how that person felt. There is much less indication, however, that they involuntarily experienced the feelings of other people, especially feelings of distress. This is not to say they were incapable of such emotion transference, but rather that it seems limited in scope, perhaps being confined to family members and not extended to strangers."
https://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2020/03/affective-empathy-double-edged-sword.html
"- When viewing a person suffering physical pain, British subjects report greater negative affect than do East Asian subjects.
- When viewing a person suffering social pain, British subjects show greater empathic concern but lower empathic accuracy than do East Asian subjects.
- British subjects report greater empathic concern, but lower empathic accuracy than do Chinese subjects. Emotional expressivity predicts British but not Chinese empathic concern.
- Empathic concern explains differences between the two groups in donating, a measure of prosocial behavior.
- American subjects, more so than Japanese subjects, feel more affective empathy for one friend over another when the two friends are engaged in an intense disagreement."
https://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2020/03/affective-empathy-double-edged-sword.html
there are 2 types of empathy:
cognitive empathy: the ability to imagine how another person feels without involuntarily making that feeling one's own
affective (emotional) empathy: you not only understand how others feel but also transfer those feelings to yourself, i.e., there is a greater tendency to feel the other person's pain.
For instance, sociopaths have a low affective empathy and high cognitive empathy. Wouldn't this eventually destroy social order in east asian societies? east asians have managed to offset this by having this gene called DRD4, it basically lowers your individualism and increases your social conformity:
"One might think that cognitive empathy would be worse than affective empathy as a basis for prosocial behavior. For instance, sociopaths are usually high in cognitive empathy: they know how another person feels in a given situation, but they use this knowledge to exploit and control that person. Wouldn't their resulting success eventually destroy social order? East Asian societies may have avoided this outcome through their low level of individualism and their correspondingly high level of social conformity. Kitayama et al. (2014) makes this point when discussing certain alleles of a gene, DRD4, that are associated with risk seeking and heavy drinking in the United States but not in East Asia. These alleles seem to increase the desire to emulate one's peers, and such emulation is more likely to favor dysfunctional behavior in the United States than in East Asia
These alleles seem to explain the weaker individualism and stronger social conformity of East Asians."
https://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2020/03/affective-empathy-double-edged-sword.html
"Testing Japanese and European Canadian undergraduates (n = 784), we succeeded in replicating these previous findings: the Canadian students were more independent, whereas the Japanese students were more interdependent."
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/psysoc/advpub/0/advpub_2021-B014/_pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/public...dent_Versus_Interdependent_Social_Orientation
how did whites evolve:
whites evolved to have high individualism, decreased conformism and high affective empathy to offset the last 2, if east asians had the same personality as whites they would be 100 times more technologically advanced than whites.

extra:
you might say "but east asian countries have more patents per 1 million habitants than western countries", yes but they would still be very poor and would make no patents like they did before if they never copied the the cultural, economic, or political systems of whites, they wouldn't have been able to create these by themselves, it's like east asians need competition and someone to tell them to do things, for them to use their superior brains:
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/patent-applications-per-million?time=2015
i want to clarify that east asians have a superior intelligence to whites, and i believe they are the superior race, but they don't have the personality of whites to use it. Without whites, east asians would still be using swords and cultivating rice all day in villages.

by the way the jews are not evil, they just have much more empathy than normal whites and more iq because of having more individualism and less conformism

my theory on Elliot Rodger:
https://incels.is/threads/why-hapa-...tive-empathy-explained-using-an-study.461116/

affective empathy is gay
 
affective empathy is gay
Sometimes it's not:

 
Last edited:
Why are you still talking about socioeconomic factors?

I mentioned Iodine intake, which is cultural, not socioeconomic, and urbanization, which is also not socioeconomic.
Socio-economic factors are affected by culture. When you say "culture", you are saying "socio-economic factors"
 
Socio-economic factors are affected by culture. When you say "culture", you are saying "socio-economic factors"
Eating Fish and Seaweed has more to do with culture than money, fish and seaweed have been eaten before currency existed in Asia.
 
Eating Fish and Seaweed has more to do with culture than money, fish and seaweed have been eaten before currency existed in Asia.
You need to stop coping that food cope.
 
You need to stop coping that food cope.
It’s not a cope it’s a well known fact that is unfortunately neglected in discussions of IQ

Compared with that of children whose mothers were persistently exposed to ID, the total effect size of the 21 entries was an increase of 0.58 SIQP (8.7 IQ points) in the group receiving iodine supplementation during pregnancy. Furthermore, there was an increase on 1.15 SIQP of Binet or 0.8 SIQP on Raven Scale (17.25 or 12 IQ points) for children born more than 3.5 years after iodine supplementation program was introduced.
Iodine-deficient people may forfeit 15 IQ points, and nearly 50 million people suffer from some degree of iodine deficiency-related brain damage.
The dominant producers of iodine today are Chile and Japan
Chile is uncharacteristically developed compared to the rest of South America. You can even see it in the picture you posted, and Japan has the highest national average IQ.
As of 2000, the median intake of iodine from food in the United States was 240 to 300 μg/day for men and 190 to 210 μg/day for women.[111] The general US population has adequate iodine nutrition,[118][119] with women of childbearing age and pregnant women having a possible mild risk of deficiency.[119] In Japan, consumption was considered much higher, ranging between 5,280 μg/day to 13,800 μg/day from dietary seaweed or kombukelp,[109] often in the form of kombu umamiextracts for soup stock and potato chips. However, new studies suggest that Japan's consumption is closer to 1,000–3,000 μg/day.[120] The adult UL in Japan was last revised to 3,000 µg/day in 2015.[121]
Japan consumes at least 10 times more iodine than the U.S.

The economists found that in the lowest-iodine areas — the bottom quarter of the study population — the introduction of iodized salt had stark effects. Men from these regions born in 1924 or later were significantly more likely to get into the Air Force and had an average IQ that was 15 points higher than their predecessors.

Iodine deficiency is the leading cause of preventable mental retardation,
Iodine deficiency is also a problem in certain areas of Europe. In Germany it has been estimated to cause a billion dollars in health care costs per year.
 
Last edited:
It’s not a cope it’s a well known fact that is unfortunately neglected in discussions of IQ




Chile is uncharacteristically developed compared to the rest of South America. You can even see it in the picture you posted, and Japan has the highest national average IQ.

Japan consumes at least 10 times more iodine than the U.S.



Culture is not influenced by environment, and there is nothing that can say to prove otherwise.
 
Last edited:
Culture is not influenced by environment, and there is nothing that can say to prove otherwise.
Tobey Maguire Lol GIF

The environment is like half of culture you spazz.

Hunter gather cultures couldn’t exist without game to hunt or traversable territory.

Farming cultures couldn’t exist without fertile ground or vegetation.

Monsoon culture wouldn’t exist without the weather.

Fishing culture wouldn’t exist without access to water.

Britain wouldn’t have had a Navy if they weren’t on an island.

Skiing wouldn’t exist without snow.

Ice-skating wouldn’t exist without ice.

Are you iodine deficient @barcacel ?
 
Last edited:
The NPC gene strikes again

Also inventing technology is the most fundamental display of intelligence. Retards depend on copy pasting inventions made by geniuses.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top