Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Race And IQ

  • Thread starter rope infinity ♾️
  • Start date
@Confessor I read most of your posts and you're very correct in this thread.

@DarkStarDown since you tagged me in this thread

We don't need studies to see some races are just smarter than others, the same way we don't need studies to tell us women want tall men or that people like blue eyes. Anyone with eyes can observe these facts in reality. And when it comes to niggers, they have never, NOT ONCE, had any succes in civilization building. Sure, alot of coping niggers will point out sudan, somalia, or ethiopia, but then they need to remember that these Cushite populations are 40-60% West Eurasian on average, mostly Natufian, which is a CAUCASION-related group from the Levant. In other words, they are not fully Negroid. In fact, the average Cushite is CLOSER to an Arab than they are to a Bantu. The physical similarities between a Cushite and a Bantu is more a result of living in a similar enviroment as opposed to sharing genes.

View attachment 1154592View attachment 1154604

And then those same niggers will point out mali, marutania, or ghana as another example of "black civilization", but once again, these West African empires, which I will call Moorish for now, had significant Caucasion-related ancestory, this time mostly coming from contact with Amazighs and Sahrawi populations. Notice how all of these west african empires overlap with the blue area of West Eurasian map?

View attachment 1154605View attachment 1154606View attachment 1154607View attachment 1154610

And of course, that's not to mention these Moorish empires were EVEN LESS RELEVANT in history compared to the Cushite empires. At least Cushites have SOME things they've invented or built, at least Cushites actually HAVE large buildings and ruins of their achievements, at least Cushites had their own script, but Moorish empires have nothing to look at, Moorish empires in fact mostly sustained themselves off of gold, slaves, salt, and other resources abundant in Sub-Saharan Africa. And of course, this fits when you look at their genetics. The average Cushite, like I said, is 40-60% Caucasion, while the average Moor is 15-35% Caucasion.

Lastly, we see 2 observations constantly in reality:

1. Niggers are failures in any non-Black country they are in
2. Niggers are outperformed by non-Blacks even in their own countries.

We all see point 1. Be it Canada, America, UK, Egypt, Iraq, or Saudi, wherever niggers go, they always end up failures among which ever group they live among. Niggers never economically or intellectually outperform other groups, which is why they always end up at the bottom of the totem pole in ANY society, regardless of ideology, religion, or circumstances. They always end up chimping out and forming typical hooligan nigger tribal gangs. In America, the average niggers is 15-25% white, yet they're still such a MASSIVE criminal element. Imagine how much worse pure niggers must be.

View attachment 1154620View attachment 1154622

However, the 2nd point is more hilarious. Any non-nigger population that has the misfortune of living in Sub-Saharan Africa ends out outperforming the local nigger baboon population.

The most obvious example of this, of course, is the European population in countries like South Africa, Nambia, Zambia, Zimbabwe, and Botswana. Most of these countries have anywhere from 2% to 8%, yet these whites are the ruling class in these countries. There is often a clearly strong correlation between European blood in Europe and being economically succesful, even in North Africa, you can see Algeria is the best country because of all the White slaves they used to kidnap.

View attachment 1154645
View attachment 1154631

You also have some Arab populations in Niger, Sudan, Tanzania, and Mozambique, both in modern times and historically, that likewise, outperformed the local niggers, to the point that, in fact, the niggers in Tanzania in fact KILLED the Arabs due to them seething out of jealousy at the Arabs (and Indians) living better lives than them. This was in the 1960s, and we see how much more of a shithole the country is now without the Arabs.

View attachment 1154629View attachment 1154635



View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esVReZVGCSs&ab_channel=AlJazeeraEnglish


You also have plenty of Indians in East African countries, like Kenya or Uganda. In fact, Indians are so succesful in Africa, that despite being 1% of Kenya's population, they account for over 60% of the taxes in the country. That's fucking hilarious. And of course, there was an incident in Uganda where the nigger government expelled the Indians out of the country because they were assblasted at the Indians outperforming them, only for those retarded niggers to BEG the indians to come back due to the country going to shit. At lastly, the ONLY 1st world SUB-SAHRAN country, Mariturius, is 60% Indian.

View attachment 1154638View attachment 1154640

And LASTLY, I don't think I need to mention the sheer domination Chinese people are making in Sub-Saharan Africa in modern times. So whether it is Arabs, Europeans, Chinese, or EVEN FUCKING INDIANS, all of these people CONSTANTLY outperform the local niggers. Now ask yourself why. We all know why.

View attachment 1154641View attachment 1154642

Niggers gonna Nig.

View attachment 1154643

Good write. What do you suggest we do with these nigger now? These niggers bothered all of us Sandniggers, Chinks and Pajeets
 
Lol, only Tamil Brahmins have the highest IQ, rest all Tamils are wild niggers
Giga cope. Praggnanandhaa and Abdul Kalam aren't Brahmin for example. ALL Tamils are High IQ
 
Giga cope. If they stayed Independent they all would have turned out like Sri Lanka. We are stronger together
E4D0EACC BD13 4933 9CA7 1CCB5FB3E40F
3CA10C8D D995 4CBE 8EC3 49F2E9A3BA64

They’re richer.

@rope infinity ♾️ @Copexodius Maximus @Confessor is this the paper you were talking about?

Nigga found this pdf with 1 second yandex search :feelswhat::feelswhat:

He didn’t want to bypass it on purpose.
 
:feelstastyman::feelstastyman::feelstastyman::feelstastyman: Giga giga cope. They couldn't even conduct exams in their country because they were poor af and couldn't buy paper. They are now breathing only after our aid.

You also forgot to mention the civil war that took place for 25 years, similar insurgencies did not take place in India despite 1000x more diversity. Wonder why? Maybe because we were not majoritarian and Holding Together Federation instead?
 
Last edited:
MAIN ARGUMENT

As far as I know the main argument about Race and IQ that comes from white supremacits is that ethnics (excluding east asians even though they think they are also intellectually inferior to whites on the basis that they don't have creative intelligence) are too low iq to participate and contribute to a society more specifically western societies. Firstly they say that ethnics are low IQ and the reason is their genetics. They argue that the "race " of these ethnics is the reason, that non-white races are inherently low IQ. The whole argument is basically non-whites are low IQ. Let's address this:

ARGUMENT AGAINST THEIR RETARDED CLAIM

When we ask them for the evidence for their claim, they infamously shows the unscientific and skewed data, which is provided by Lynn and Becker, who are literally funded by the pioneer fund. There's a clear conflict of interest but for the sake of the argument let's take this data at face value. First let's see how IQs are often categorised :

130 and above: Very Superior
120–129: Superior
110–119: High Average
90–109: Average
80–89: Low Average
70–79: Borderline Intellectual Functioning
Below 70: Intellectual Disability (also known as mental retardation)

And now see how Lynn and Becker showed the IQ
of different countries


South Africa : 68
Greece : 90


So apparently according to Lynn and Becker average person in South Africa, is mentally retarded. That fact alone is enough to reject there bullshit data on IQ, jfl if you believe this. Let's comapre their GDP growth through out the years.


View attachment 1154048


[ https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/...&time=1960..latest&facet=none&country=ZAF~GRC ]

So, as we can see South Africa have better and continuos Gdp growth throughout the years. Which would be impossible if average South African was mentally retarded. Now, I know some of you SFcel retards are gonna say but Greece's Gdp per capita, well first we are not measuring these country's economic prosperity. Secondly their (South Africa) positive Gdp growth is a good indicator of their g factor. And its difficult to compete in terms of economic prosperity with a former colonizer who looted wealth from different countries, while your (South Africa) resources got drianed and looted and on top of that apartheid. And hence some common sense and a little bit of research can prove their data and research is bullshit. First we don't have any objective and accurate data on IQ. But with some basic reasoning we can conclude the fact that average IQ in Africa is at least 70 and above, which is reasonable looking at environmental and socioeconomic conditions of Africans and cultural biases in IQ tests.

Away from basic reasoning and common season and let's talk about what is IQ, genetics and stuff. First of all, genetic research has failed to discover any single genes that have a significant and striking effect on intelligence. If that was the case, it would be easy to check which populations carry that gene disproportionately. The problem is that there are hundreds of genes that affect IQ and on top of that environmental and socioeconomic factors. So even if we would be able in future to say "those are the ten most Important genes for IQ", having or not having those ten genes would barely make a difference for your IQ, the effect would be drowned in the influence of the other 100s genes, that's why research on iq genetics and different races is way more multifaceted and nuanced. And I know someone of you would say what about height, well it's retarded to compare height and iq and saying that if height could be different among different ethnicites why can't be IQ, cause alot less genes are at play in height as compared to IQ. And height can be measured objectively across the board, unlike intelligence which is affected by culutural and socioeconomic factors and your nurturing and can't be measured objectively.

IQ as a Latent Variable:

The first distinction I would like to make concerns the nature of IQ. Unlike height, a directly measurable physical property, IQ is a latent variable. We can only estimate it indirectly through assessments that are inherently influenced by cultural background.

The Interplay of Genes and Environment:

While genetic predisposition undoubtedly shapes our potential for various traits, it's crucial to avoid oversimplifying the relationship. Both genetic and environmental influences interact dynamically, with the environment sometimes overriding genetic potential. The detrimental effects of malnutrition and environmental toxins on cognitive development cannot be disregarded, as these are prevalent issues even in developing countries. High lead levels in blood have negative effects on the congnitive abilities.

Also, Plomin & Von Stumm (2018) delve deeper into this, highlighting the polygenic nature of intelligence, meaning numerous genes with small effects contribute to the overall picture. They also discuss the challenges of pinpointing specific genes due to environmental interactions and gene-environment correlations

Cultural Bias in IQ Tests:

Let's take an example let me show you how iq isn't genetic but rather more multifaceted and nuanced. Believing the hereditarian hypothesis, which is used by sfcels, Einstein would always achieve high IQ test.
The Idea of Einstein achieving a high IQ score irrespective of his environment and socio economic conditions deserves further scrutiny. Culture-free intelligence tests simply don't exist. Imagine, an alternate reality where Einstein(with the same genetic make up as in this reality) was born into the Saan Bushmen tribe, (South African hunter-gatherer society). While our "Saan Bushmen Einstein" might struggle with Western-constructed IQ tests, he would likely excel at tasks critical for survival in his environment – tasks at which a German-born Einstein might fail.
We know that IQ tests have culutural bias there's substantial research supporting this claim.

For example this study ( https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33604599/ ) clearly states this
"Our findings confirm that "culture-free" tests should be adapted to each culture and applied together with their culture's specific norms to prevent misclassification and allow for a better, unbiased neuropsychological assessment."

They removed cultural biases and adapted the test to Moroccan culture, and found that Moroccan kids performed better on this test as compared to other IQ tests.This proves that so called culuture free iq tests also have biases.

What exactly do IQ tests even measure? In practice, they aim to quantify a specific set of cognitive skills valued in modern industrialised (Western) societies. Ideally, they assess something that is called or is close to "objective intelligence." But the concept of intelligence itself is a topic of ongoing debate, which is acknowledged by Ulric Neisser (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulric_Neisser) and by (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence:_Knowns_and_Unknowns) he chaired in 1995 (No so called "wokeness" back then) to investigate the state of research on the topic.

We try to define and organize intelligence, a complex concept, achieving complete clarity remains difficult and elusive. Despite progress in some areas, no single explanation has been guven that answers all the key questions, nor is there universal agreement on what intelligence truly is. This is further proved by the fact that when two dozen prominent theorists were recently asked to define it, they provided two dozen somewhat different definitions (https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-32525-010
Sternberg & Detterman, 1986).

Things have not changed, as more recently observed by cognitive psychologist Ken Richardson (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Richardson_(psychologist)) (2017) in a more critical fashion:

" Intelligence is viewed as the most important ingredient of human potential. But there is no generally accepted theoretical model of what it is (in the way that we have such models of other organic functions). Instead, psychologists have adopted physical metaphors: mental speed, energy, power, strength, and so on, together with simple genetic models of how it is distributed in society. The IQ test was invented to create scores that correspond with such metaphors, with the distribution— who is more or less intelligent— already presumed."

"This circularity in IQ testing must not be forgotten or overlooked. IQ tests do not have what is called “construct” validity, in the way that a breathalyzer is calibrated against a model of the passage of alcohol in the bloodstream. They are constructed on the basis of prior beliefs of who is or is not intelligent. But by creating a numerical surrogate of a social class system, they make that system appear to spring from biological rather than social forces. Such ideas are dangerous, because they demean the real mental abilities and true potential of most people in everyday social situations."

And I can quote many more cognitive psychologist and psychometrician, who explains how IQ are first culuturally biased and don't measure the "objective intelligence" which many people believe. Intelligence is alot more complicated than. Let's talk about epigenetics ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epigenetics ) well put in simple words it's when certain parts of genes are rearranged without changing the structure of genes in respect to your environment. (Like imagine gene like a bus in which there are three seats at back and four seats at front if we would exchange their position it wouldn't really affect the bus much but there would be considerable change in the bus to it's regular users.) This is the easiest explanation I could come up with at this time. So let's see it's practical use as we already know that many 100s of genes affect intelligence. Imagine you're born into a hunter-gatherer tribe like the San Bushmen. Your environment constantly interacts with your genes, influencing how they're expressed. This is epigenetics in action. While you have genes for both spatial reasoning (great for navigating the wilderness) and mathematical ability, epigenetics might favor the former. Your daily life – tracking animals, identifying edible plants – strengthens the neural pathways related to spatial skills. This doesn't mean your math genes disappear, but their expression might be dampened. Now, consider someone born in a modern, industrialized society. Their environment would likely favor the use of different genes. Regular exposure to numbers, problem-solving, and abstract concepts could strengthen neural pathways related to math skills. Epigenetics wouldn't erase their survival or spatial reasoning/awareness genes, but their expression might be less pronounced. But if members of the San tribe were to integrate into an industrialized society for several generations, their descendants will show a gradual shift in gene expression. The environment would continue to favor skills like math, potentially leading to a slight increase in the expression of those genes, while damping the genes for spatial reasoning/awareness.

Here's the main point: epigenetics doesn't rewrite your genes, but it can influence how well-equipped you are to handle your environment. It's a interplay between your genes, your environment and your experiences. We know almost everyone have genes for intelligence but due to environment, spatial intelligence genes are preferred or mathematical intelligence genes are preferred.

Impacts on intelligence due to socioeconomic factors:

We know that there are negative effects on intelligence with bad socioeconomic conditions and vice versa. Let's first look at the average IQ measured of Italians in 1920s.
(https://www.jstor.org/stable/6403?seq=1)

According to this average IQ of Italians (And other southern Europeans ) is in the high 70s to low 80s, and they are summed up with Blacks and Hispanics, (as far as I remember from the last time i read it )


View attachment 1154049


As southern European's, socioeconomic conditions improved so did their IQ. Let's look at another example of a black person because the example of Italian and southern Europeans wouldn't satisfy SFcels copes. It is a well documented fact that Micheal Oher's IQ increased 20-30 points within his lifetime just because his socioeconomic conditions improved. Michael Oher lived in deprivation and then in wealth with supervision and intensive care. His IQ tested 30 points higher:

https://scienceblogs.com/cortex/2007/02/09/the-iq-test-plasticity-and-lef

Even though IQ tests are supposed to test your native potential they frequently actually reflect your environment. As proven by the following graph

View attachment 1154051

View attachment 1154052

View attachment 1154053View attachment 1154054

[ Source:https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FS/visualize ]

We can also see that Africans g factor increases as they have better quality of life, for example in UK they outperform native white Brits in GCSE( tests are great indicators for g factor ). Which according to Lynn are at least 20-30 points below in IQ.

(https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures...or-children-aged-14-to-16-key-stage-4/latest/)

So from this we can conclude that IQ between races isn't genetic but rather it depends upon socioeconomic, environmental and cultural factors.

And I know this would not satisfy SFcels you need a research that clearly states that IQ gap between races is not genetic, so here it is:
( https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ajpa.24216 )
And you can also watch this video about it, if you don't have a attention span of a butterfly


View: https://youtu.be/UBc7qBS1Ujo?feature=shared


CONCLUSION:

In conclusion, we can easily say that IQ gap between races isn't genetic but it depends upon socioeconomic conditions, environment factors and cultural biases of IQ tests. And all the research that have said otherwise is surprisingly funded by pioneer fund and have a minority of scientists on their payroll who say that. While majority of scientists disagree with race and iq bullshit. And most humans have with good environmental conditions have a IQ between 85-100.

@WorthlessSlavicShit @anandkonda @DarkStarDown these are the only ones I can remember from the conversation anyways.

And I didn't go into way more details, and nitty gritties of it. But this enough evidence to convince someone who thinks rationally and not with his little SFcel feelings.
Retards should avoid entering and writing dnr.

90-109 "Average" holy shit. I used to rage over being 105 now I am confused. you think a 90 is close to me in anyway JFL.
 
:feelstastyman::feelstastyman::feelstastyman::feelstastyman: Giga giga cope. They couldn't even conduct exams in their country because they were poor af and couldn't buy paper. They are now breathing only after our aid.
The stats are the stats, and clearly Sri Lankans are richer than Indians lol

You also forgot to mention the civil war that took place for 25 years, similar insurgencies did not take place in India despite 1000x more diversity. Wonder why? Maybe because we were not majoritarian and Holding Together Federation instead?
Civil war happens when there is 2 big opposing sides. In India, there is no majority opposition because they’re all pulling apart in different directions and an opposing force can’t become a big enough force to unite in the same way compared to the Indian government.

Continue your debate then. Tell me the conclusion.
Already gave my conclusion. That guy is just being disingenuous and repeats the same shit over and over again. No point of talking with someone like him (at least on this topic specifically).
 
The stats are the stats, and clearly Sri Lankans are richer than Indians lol
They are "richer" by begging loans from China and India. They have zero sovereignty or sustainability. Wouldn't have happened if Tamils were ruling the state. Hopefully they regain power there.
Civil war happens when there is 2 big opposing sides. In India, there is no majority opposition because they’re all pulling apart in different directions and an opposing force can’t become a big enough force to unite in the same way compared to the Indian government.
None of the insurgencies gathered general public support. They were all considered fringe groups.

Also cope. Then how could Bangladesh successfully divide and but Punjab and other North-Eastern insurgencies didn't? Only because we were a Holding Together Federation unlike all our neighbors.
Already gave my conclusion. That guy is just being disingenuous and repeats the same shit over and over again. No point of talking with someone like him (at least on this topic specifically).
Still continue. What was the conclusion?

Do we have any evidence to show that cumskins have genetically the highest IQ potential, and that curries, chinks and sands wouldn't perform better than them in similar socio-economic conditions?

Not asking about niggers because for them clearly no lol
 
Last edited:
Addressed to OP:

Core argument: Unbiased experimental data shows that blacks tend to have lower IQ than whites even when cultural and socioeconomic factors are not at play. (Scarr & Weinberg, 1976) (Weinberg et al., 1992)

Secondary statements: First, the results of the Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study as cited above serve as strong evidence that there is a gap in average IQ between races due to genetics. The study also refutes your argument that the IQ gap is caused by socioeconomic factors and a cultural bias in IQ tests. While the aforementioned study only demonstrated this effect among White Americans, Indigenous Americans, Asian-Americans and African-Americans, it's extremely likely a similar study would prove most tawny races in the world have a lower IQ than European races.

Second, a lower average IQ does not mean swarthy and tawny people have less inherent worth than Europeans. They are still human beings. However, modern society fails to address the fact that they are of lower intelligence and thus are more likely to commit crime and have less economic worth than native Europeans.

Third, national IQ averages cited by /pol/ racists are extremely erroneous indeed. Most African nations couldn't function as modern societies if their IQ average really was what was claimed.

References:
Scarr, S., & Weinberg, R. A. (1976). "IQ test performance of black children adopted by white families." American Psychologist, 31(10), 726. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.31.10.726
Weinberg, R. A., Scarr, S., & Waldman, I. D. (1992). "The Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study: A follow-up of IQ test performance at adolescence." Intelligence, 16(1), 117-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2896(92)90028-p
 
im a nigger with a low iq :cryfeels:
 
Addressed to OP:

Core argument: Unbiased experimental data shows that blacks tend to have lower IQ than whites even when cultural and socioeconomic factors are not at play. (Scarr & Weinberg, 1976) (Weinberg et al., 1992)

Secondary statements: First, the results of the Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study as cited above serve as strong evidence that there is a gap in average IQ between races due to genetics. The study also refutes your argument that the IQ gap is caused by socioeconomic factors and a cultural bias in IQ tests. While the aforementioned study only demonstrated this effect among White Americans, Indigenous Americans, Asian-Americans and African-Americans, it's extremely likely a similar study would prove most tawny races in the world have a lower IQ than European races.

Second, a lower average IQ does not mean swarthy and tawny people have less inherent worth than Europeans. They are still human beings. However, modern society fails to address the fact that they are of lower intelligence and thus are more likely to commit crime and have less economic worth than native Europeans.

Third, national IQ averages cited by /pol/ racists are extremely erroneous indeed. Most African nations couldn't function as modern societies if their IQ average really was what was claimed.

References:
Scarr, S., & Weinberg, R. A. (1976). "IQ test performance of black children adopted by white families." American Psychologist, 31(10), 726. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.31.10.726
Weinberg, R. A., Scarr, S., & Waldman, I. D. (1992). "The Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study: A follow-up of IQ test performance at adolescence." Intelligence, 16(1), 117-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2896(92)90028-p
Niggers aren't human, they are just homo erectus. The debate is about other races of chinks, curries and sands, would they outperform whites in similar socioeconomic conditions.

Also is higher IQ of cumskins just due to genetics?
 
Niggers aren't human, they are just homo erectus.
You have to back up such an outrageous claim with a source. Otherwise, I'll just assume you're a clown and disregard anything you have to say.

anandkonda said:
The debate is about other races of chinks, curries and sands, would they outperform whites in similar socioeconomic conditions.
Please read my secondary statements again. Specifically the first one. And look at the results my references show.
 
You have to back up such an outrageous claim with a source. Otherwise, I'll just assume you're a clown and disregard anything you have to say.
This thread convinced me. Please correct me, I don't know much about biology. Hated it since school

 
This thread convinced me. Please correct me, I don't know much about biology. Hated it since school

1715490611866
1715490615772
 
This thread convinced me. Please correct me, I don't know much about biology. Hated it since school

The post you linked is far from reputable academic research. The fool's only two arguments fall flat on their faces. He says Orcas and Dolphins can mix and produce viable offspring, completely disregarding the fact that "dolphin" is not a species and orcas are dolphins themselves. The other argument is similarly invalid.

The definition of "species" is "a group of living beings in which individuals of appropriate mating types can produce viable offspring." According to this, niggers are human since they can interbreed with every other human race in the world.
 
Too ignorant about Biology to understand the graphs :feelsrope::feelsrope::feelsrope:. It says that niggers are the closest to apes right?
They're genetically the furthest away from other human races. Even different canine species are genetically closer to each other than nigger are to us.
 
The post you linked is far from reputable academic research. The fool's only two arguments fall flat on their faces. He says Orcas and Dolphins can mix and produce viable offspring, completely disregarding the fact that "dolphin" is not a species and orcas are dolphins themselves. The other argument is similarly invalid.

The definition of "species" is "a group of living beings in which individuals of appropriate mating types can produce viable offspring." According to this, niggers are human since they can interbreed with every other human race in the world.
What about this? Niggers also never built a functioning society. They never out performed other races in any countries

1715491031295
 
They're genetically the furthest away from other human races. Even different canine species are genetically closer to each other than nigger are to us.
All humans are equal bigot :soy::soy::soy:
 
What about this? Niggers also never built a functioning society. They never out performed other races in any countries

View attachment 1158156
Their genetic divergence from other races is great, yes. This still doesn't prove them being non-human, though.
They did have functioning monarchic societies even before the Arabs or the Europeans arrived. Examples are the Benin Empire, the Kanem-Bornu Empire, and the Kongo Kingdom. And even though it rarely ever happened, sometimes niggers did make innovations that greatly outmatched the technologies of other civilizations. For example, the earliest evidence of steelworking was found in Tanzania, from about 900 BC. (Schmidt & Avery, 1979)

Reference:
Schmidt, P., Avery, D.H. (1979). "Complex Iron Smelting and Prehistoric Culture in Tanzania." Science, 201(4361), 1085-1089. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/201/4361/1085
 
Their genetic divergence from other races is great, yes. This still doesn't prove them being non-human, though.
They did have functioning monarchic societies even before the Arabs or the Europeans arrived. Examples are the Benin Empire, the Kanem-Bornu Empire, and the Kongo Kingdom. And even though it rarely ever happened, sometimes niggers did make innovations that greatly outmatched the technologies of other civilizations. For example, the earliest evidence of steelworking was found in Tanzania, from about 900 BC. (Schmidt & Avery, 1979)

Reference:
Schmidt, P., Avery, D.H. (1979). "Complex Iron Smelting and Prehistoric Culture in Tanzania." Science, 201(4361), 1085-1089. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/201/4361/1085
@Confessor is this true?
 
They're genetically the furthest away from other human races. Even different canine species are genetically closer to each other than nigger are to us.
But I though Tamils would be closer to niggers. No?
 
Didn't you say South curries are basically abos? Sorry I know jack shit about of this topic
They have more Australoid Aboriginal DNA than North Indians, but not by a large margin.
 
They are "richer" by begging loans from China and India. They have zero sovereignty or sustainability. Wouldn't have happened if Tamils were ruling the state. Hopefully they regain power there.
If I remember correctly, the leader was corrupt af and collapsed the economy by banning GMO farming, which destroyed crop yield. Idek what to say tbh.

None of the insurgencies gathered general public support. They were all cons true of the regions they represent.
Maybe not on the whole country (obviously), but they were supported more locally.

Also cope. Then how could Bangladesh successfully divide and but Punjab and other North-Eastern insurgencies didn't? Only because we were a Holding Together Federation unlike all our neighbors.
Pakistan is a completely failed state that is geographically isolated from Pakistan. The curry government has direct access to Punjabi and North Eastern states as it’s geographically connected, and they just butchering people there as brown people typically do in their own country.
View attachment 879F2520-F1E4-4FFA-8E01-379E723D063A.webp
Look at this amazing planning
Still continue. What was the conclusion?

Do we have any evidence to show that cumskins have genetically the highest IQ potential, and that curries, chinks and sands wouldn't perform better than them in similar socio-economic conditions?
What I linked specifically showed that him you can use genetics to map people’s ancestral heritage. He retreated to completely denying differences between races at all, and could not explain how genetic tests can determine your ancestry.

As for IQ, rice seem to have a higher IQ than mayos. But this is all I had to say about IQ of different races.
I do agree environmental factors (like nutrition) are important, but even with that I expect different groups to still have different IQs when it’s controlled for. Asians not being genetically creative is one of the biggest copes I’ve ever read though jfl.
 
If I remember correctly, the leader was corrupt af and collapsed the economy by banning GMO farming, which destroyed crop yield. Idek what to say tbh.
Buddhist Sinhalese destroyed the country. Funny how Buddhists have problem of majoritarianism in all countries
Maybe not on the whole country (obviously), but they were supported more locally.
No they weren't. That's why they didn't succeed
Pakistan is a completely failed state that is geographically isolated from Pakistan. The curry government has direct access to Punjabi and North Eastern states as it’s geographically connected, and they just butchering people there as brown people typically do in their own country.
View attachment 1158170
Look at this amazing planning
I am talking about support from public. There was uprising from Bangla people against Pakistan, unlike Indian insurgences. Even Naxals here later surrendered
What I linked specifically showed that him you can use genetics to map people’s ancestral heritage. He retreated to completely denying differences between races at all, and could not explain how genetic tests can determine your ancestry.

As for IQ, rice seem to have a higher IQ than mayos. But this is all I had to say about IQ of different races.
Ok.
 
Last edited:
Buddhist Sinhalese destroyed the country. Funny how Buddhists have problem of majoritarianism in all countries
Those damn Buddhists and their non-GMO farming.

No they weren't. That's why they didn't succeed
They didn’t succeed because non-whites don’t respect minority rights. They just classify dissent groups as terrorists, and bring in the media blackouts. You country is especially notorious for it, but it’s all ethnics. Only white government ever actually had morals in recent times for minorities

I am talking about support from public. There was uprising from Bangla people against Pakistan, unlike Indian insurgences. Even Naxals there later surrendered

I’m sure if you could ask the others in curryland as well, it would be the same answer. No government wants to lose land and power, so they just lie and control the narrative that it’s just a minority. It’s no different than what happens with China and the minorities of Tibet and the Muslim province there or even Spain with Catalonia tbh.
 
Those damn Buddhists and their non-GMO farming.
Buddhists marginalized other religions in Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Japan, Myanmar. Even Asoka is supposed to have done the same. Seems to be a pattern. Only Pallavas were good Buddhists

Not saying Hindus in North are any better in India, but South Indians never had any problems with religions like them
They didn’t succeed because non-whites don’t respect minority rights. They just classify dissent groups as terrorists, and bring in the media blackouts. You country is especially notorious for it, but it’s all ethnics.
"Non-whites" what are talking? All of us are non-whites.

Also media blackouts are necessary to prevent misinformation being spread like in case of Manipur, the woman was paraded naked because of a fake whatsapp forward

Only white government ever actually had morals in recent times for minorities
I am sure they did in all their genocides and colonizations

I’m sure if you could ask the others in curryland as well, it would be the same answer. No government wants to lose land and power, so they just lie and control the narrative that it’s just a minority. It’s no different than what happens with China and the minorities of Tibet and the Muslim province there or even Spain with Catalonia tbh.
August 13, 20076:03 AM UTCUpdated 17 years ago

Even if this is true out dated. Kashmiris now want to be with India from what I have heard. I don't bother much with North politics though

Maybe @illumizoldyck can tell
 
Last edited:
I’m sure if you could ask the others in curryland as well, it would be the same answer. No government wants to lose land and power, so they just lie and control the narrative that it’s just a minority. It’s no different than what happens with China and the minorities of Tibet and the Muslim province there or even Spain with Catalonia tbh.
The difference is that these minorities and contest in free and fair elections and become leaders in Parliaments, Assemblies and Municipalities.

Also our constitution has many special provisions for minorities
 
Buddhists marginalized other religions in Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Japan, Myanmar. Even Asoka is supposed to have done the same. Seems to be a pattern. Only Pallavas were good Buddhists
Bhutan seems to have Buddhism as its national religion, and Hinduism is accepted. But other religions can’t build public worship places and missionary work is not allowed. It doesn’t seem these other places suppressed other religions, other than stopping missionary Christians from spreading. Sri Lanka’s anti-Hindu rhetoric is a result of ethnic conflict with the Hindu Tamils.

Ashoka one is mythology by Sri Lankans Buddhists probably to justify fighting the Hindu Tamils. The Ashokan edicts contradict this and are made during his lifetime.

Not saying Hindus in North are any better in India, but South Indians never had any problems with religions like them
North Indian was mostly religiously tolerant throughout its history, although not always. But as you say, North Indians today just seem like low iq violent lolcows for the rest of the world to mock.

"Non-whites" what are talking? All of us are non-whites.
Treating ethnic minority groups and respecting their culture is mostly something whites do. It’s not usually an ethnic trait.

Also media blackouts are necessary to prevent misinformation being spread like in case of Manipur, the woman was paraded naked because of a fake whatsapp forward
That’s mostly just an excuse for your government when they conduct human rights violations. But the fact your public is doing stuff like that is brutal jfl.

I am sure they did in all their genocides and colonizations
Better record than ethnics, who do the same thing to this day. They are just failed versions of whites in the game of empire, but they treat minorities in their own regions much better than ethnics do.

August 13, 20076:03 AM UTCUpdated 17 years ago

Even if this is true out dated. Kashmiris now want to be with India from what I have heard. I don't bother much with North politics though

Maybe @illumizoldyck can tell
from what you heard of your government propaganda jfl. I know a kashmiri irl in university and he was telling me that Kashmiris don’t want to be associated with Indians or Pakistanis because they are brown while Kashmiris are better looking. although @RREEEEEEEEE told me long ago that only a small number of them look better.
 
Bhutan seems to have Buddhism as its national religion, and Hinduism is accepted. But other religions can’t build public worship places and missionary work is not allowed.
Bhutan Hindu exodus, more like ethnic cleansing
It doesn’t seem these other places suppressed other religions, other than stopping missionary Christians from spreading.
Every place I mentioned had Buddhists kill other religions
Sri Lanka’s anti-Hindu rhetoric is a result of ethnic conflict with the Hindu Tamils.
Sri Lanka could have had a government policy like Belgium. Instead Sinhalese destroyed the country with their shit
Ashoka one is mythology by Sri Lankans Buddhists probably to justify fighting the Hindu Tamils.
Whatever the case, Sinhaleses were niggers in both the cases
The Ashokan edicts contradict this and are made during his lifetime.
That is probably his propaganda. He killed 99 of his brothers, why would you even trust him. He was literally called Chandashoka.
North Indian was mostly religiously tolerant throughout its history, although not always.
I don't think so. There was some Hindu king who killed Buddhists. Even Asoka was a North Indian
Treating ethnic minority groups and respecting their culture is mostly something whites do. It’s not usually an ethnic trait.
:soy::soy::soy::soy: Reading pommy writing says otherwise. What now? Should we thank the whites for sunshine lol
That’s mostly just an excuse for your government when they conduct human rights violations. But the fact your public is doing stuff like that is brutal jfl.
Showed you an example in which blackouts would have not caused violence. "That's an excuse :soy::soy::soy:" Yes a valid excuse

Typical Marxist talk. Don't you want to reduce conflicts and violence? India is most prone for misinformation
Better record than ethnics, who do the same thing to this day. They are just failed versions of whites in the game of empire, but they treat minorities in their own regions much better than ethnics do.
:soy::soy::soy:
from what you heard of your government propaganda jfl. I know a kashmiri irl in university and he was telling me that Kashmiris don’t want to be associated with Indians or Pakistanis because they are brown while Kashmiris are better looking. although @RREEEEEEEEE told me long ago that only a small number of them look better.
Again don't know shit about Kashmir. All I have heard is that violence and terrorism reduced there after removal of Article 370. Maybe even @Confessor can tell anything.

And some political groups who were against BJP are now in support
 
Last edited:
Treating ethnic minority groups and respecting their culture is mostly something whites do. It’s not usually an ethnic trait.
Showed you verses from 2300 year old Arthashastra. Were Chanakya and Chandra Gupta Maurya white then? :lul: :lul: :lul:

From Arthasastra

A conquering king should reassure a defeated people that not much, excepttheir rulers, will change. The king who has triumphed "should adopt asimilar character, dress, language and behavior (as the subjects). Andhe should show the same devotion in festivals in honour of deities ofthe country, festive gatherings and sportive amusements."154 He should keep his promises, especially to those who helped him win, he should honor the local "deities," and he should make grants of land and money to men distinguished in wisdom and piety.155 And the conquering king should show his goodwill toward the defeated by instituting "a righteous custom, not initiated before."156 While the victorious king is reassuring the general population with generous policies, he must continue to kill anyone who is dangerous and those who are disgruntled: "He should put down by silent punishment those capable of injuring [him] or those brooding on the master's destruction."157 In what might be a surprising observation about those whom the king has killed, Kautilya commented that if one must kill a dangerous person, the king must leave his[End Page 32]property untouched and "shall not covet the land, property, sons orwives of the slain one."158 Kautilya had the same insight into human emotions that Machiavelli had nearly eighteen hundred years later. Said Machiavelli, "And when [the prince] is obliged to take the life of any one, . . . he must abstain from taking the property of others, for men forget more easily the death of their father than the loss of their patrimony."

154.Kautilya, Arthasastra, 13.5.7-8: 491.

155.Kautilya, Arthasastra, 13.5.11, 6: 491-92.

156.Kautilya, Arthasastra, 13.5.24: 493.

157.Kautilya, Arthasastra, 13.5.17: 492.

158.Kautilya, Arthasastra, 7.16.26: 374.
 
there was a gorilla that knew sign language that had an estimated IQ which was about 20 points higher than that of the average darkskined african
 
there was a gorilla that knew sign language that had an estimated IQ which was about 20 points higher than that of the average darkskined african
You're referring to Koko. Her IQ point estimate of 70-90 is based on infant IQ scales, not adult. IQ is not a fixed constant, the average of every group is 100. If an average negro took one of the infant IQ tests Koko took, he'd score above 200.
 
Bhutan Hindu exodus, more like ethnic cleansing

Every place I mentioned had Buddhists kill other religions
Only one I know about is the 969 movement where the Buddhists want to stop Muslims from spreading and expanding.

Sri Lanka could have had a government policy like Belgium. Instead Sinhalese destroyed the country with their shit

Whatever the case, Sinhaleses were niggers in both the cases
Brutal. I heard the Sinhalese say they’re natives while the Tamils are colonizers, but I think the Sinhalese are originally from North India ironically.

That is probably his propaganda. He killed 99 of his brothers, why would you even trust him. He was literally called Chandashoka.
There is no mention of him killing other religion in any Buddhist texts from any tradition except from Sri Lanka that was written almost half a millennia afterwards. So it’s considered apocryphal.

I don't think so. There was some Hindu king who killed Buddhists. Even Asoka was a North Indian

:soy::soy::soy::soy: Reading pommy writing says otherwise. What now? Should we thank the whites for sunshine lol
Thank them for the internet, not exterminating ethnics, treating ethnics infinitely better than they have treated their own people, etc.

Showed you an example in which blackouts would have not caused violence. "That's an excuse :soy::soy::soy:" Yes a valid excuse

Typical Marxist talk. Don't you want to reduce conflicts and violence? India is most prone for misinformation

:soy::soy::soy:
Muh misinformation. Your government spreads more misinformation than any of these folks jfl. Btw it’s similar here, as our governments spread more misinformation than any groups ever have. We found out the CIA and other organizations were telling social medias like twitter what to do, who to ban, and what content to censor (like Hunter Biden). General rule of thumb is any evil western governments do, ethnics do 100x worse.

Again don't know shit about Kashmir. All I have heard is that violence and terrorism reduced there after removal of Article 370. Maybe even @Confessor can tell anything.

And some political groups who were against BJP are now in support
Exterminated all their enemies (anti-Indian nationalists) by declaring them as terrorists. No different than what China did with Hong Kong.
 
Showed you verses from 2300 year old Arthashastra. Were Chanakya and Chandra Gupta Maurya white then? :lul: :lul: :lul:
Yes, that was common practice among pagan peoples. And why I said North India wasn’t as bad in ancient times. I meant in modern times it’s pretty much just whites who respect ethnic minorities, while ethnics want to emulate what whites did in the past when they conquered their lands and in a pathetic attempt to try to compete with western soft power.
 
Brutal. I heard the Sinhalese say they’re natives while the Tamils are colonizers, but I think the Sinhalese are originally from North India ironically.
No. Both Tamils and Sinhaleses are closest to each other on that island genetically according to Wikipedia
There is no mention of him killing other religion in any Buddhist texts from any tradition except from Sri Lanka that was written almost half a millennia afterwards. So it’s considered apocryphal.
Yeah but he was for sure not a good person. Also why did Karavella defeat Patliputra and revive Jain idols then? How do you explain that?
Thank them for the internet, not exterminating ethnics, treating ethnics infinitely better than they have treated their own people, etc.
Giga cope. I only thank you jews for making them extinct
Muh misinformation. Your government spreads more misinformation than any of these folks jfl. Btw it’s similar here, as our governments spread more misinformation than any groups ever have. We found out the CIA and other organizations were telling social medias like twitter what to do, who to ban, and what content to censor (like Hunter Biden). General rule of thumb is any evil western governments do, ethnics do 100x worse.


Exterminated all their enemies (anti-Indian nationalists) by declaring them as terrorists. No different than what China did with Hong Kong.
What the basis for your assumptions lol? You belive everything you read off your Jew media
 
No. Both Tamils and Sinhaleses are closest to each other on that island genetically according to Wikipedia
Yes, they mixed with one another now. But originally it says they’re originally from North India.

Yeah but he was for sure not a good person. Also why did Karavella defeat Patliputra and revive Jain idols then? How do you explain that?
He was a better person than most kings because he changed his ways and spread Buddhism all the way to Egypt and central asia. Ascetic practices that came all over the Middle East (especially Egypt) later on probably originate from its influences.

As for Kharavela it says this from the wiki “He brought back Jina idol from Mathurawhich was taken by Nanda king.[25]”. But violence and wars seem to be mentioned in his inscription, so idk how Jain he was.

Giga cope. I only thank you jews for making them extinct
Why? Wouldn’t you rather be white? Even your own women would rather want them if they had the choice.

What the basis for your assumptions lol? You belive everything you read off your Jew media
Talking to curries (especially Kashmiri) irl, reading about it, and knowing some history of many other ethnic countries
 
He was a better person than most kings because he changed his ways and spread Buddhism
That's his narrative. These Kings weren't dumb. Arthashastra talks about various propaganda techniques.
As for Kharavela it says this from the wiki “He brought back Jina idol from Mathurawhich was taken by Nanda king.[25]”. But violence and wars seem to be mentioned in his inscription, so idk how Jain he was.
Yeah he seems to follower of many religions or something
Why? Wouldn’t you rather be white? Even your own women would rather want them if they had the choice.
Only white I would want be is Slav for those hot Slavic foids :ahegao::ahegao::ahegao:. But talking to Slavs on this forum looks like being a sub 5 nigger you will have more chance of banging them than a chad Slav. Brutal JBB pill
Talking to curries (especially Kashmiri) irl
Talk to anyone who lived there since last 5 years. I have shown you how BJP improved many thing here. I am guessing they would say better thing
 
What about Hindus in Hyderabad? My city has like 40% mullas and no riots happen here
Wasn’t that one of the princely states that got taken over by curryland after India was made?
 
Wasn’t that one of the princely states that got taken over by curryland after India was made?
Yeah, that's my city. There was a communist peasant uprising against the mulla rulers before joining India

Today for some reason Hindus and mullas don't fight here at all like all other places.


Also JFL look at me derail threads again. Let's get back to the topic

@rope infinity ♾️ here is that paper which is publicly available. What do you have to say?

 
Last edited:
iq doesn't get you bitches
 
I think the race vs IQ thing is real, but the IQ difference is less pronounced.
 

Similar threads

Jason Voorhees
Replies
56
Views
1K
Quarantined
Quarantined
ReadyPlayerOne
Replies
29
Views
452
edgelordcel
edgelordcel
ethniccel1
Replies
6
Views
150
AngryUbermensch
AngryUbermensch
Destroyed lonely
Replies
207
Views
3K
Hatred0603
Hatred0603

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top