Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

why are girls so bad at video games

No, retarded take, if you play a fps your skill is obviously not dependent on pattern memorization
yes it is retard. In fps games you learn when to push and when not to push, which angles work better, when to jump or crouch etc. A guy who knows the game well will beat a guy who has better reaction time and aim. I have 1k+ hours on cod, apex, r6 etc i have played a shit ton of fps games and they’re more strategic than you think. The most brain dead fps game is cod and even they slowly transitioned from an arcade shooter to more of a tactical shooter.
 
This is very specific with the boss doing a predictable set of movements once you get very familiar with it
same can be said for online fps, most people do predictable strats (meta) and as you get better you learn how to counter it. Stop coping so hard.
 
Cuz w*men are cringe
 
same can be said for online fps, most people do predictable strats (meta) and as you get better you learn how to counter it. Stop coping so hard.
You're such a dumb fuck it's unbelievable. You could say that fighting against a human in real life is the same as fighting against a robot doing the same set of 5-10 movements, with same range, timing etc. :lul: There's just no discussion over this, you fucking idiot. FPS might have their limitations just as any game but they're not about EXACT pattern recognition, point blank period. Even a fighting game like SF with meta, predictable hitbox and a limited set of movements is still less about pattern recognition than Soul games, just cause it's more unpredictable.
 
Cucked take taking any merit from guys. Lots of women try to compete in vidya since it got so democratized but we're yet to see some female team dominating a game, even though it was already pushed on people i remember those reports about muh amazing all female teams just for them to get crushed. Next thing you'll be telling is that men dominance in sport is just cause women don't compete as hard :feelsseriously: just look at these sweaty Elden Ring or Souls girls (there are a few) to see that it's not true.
because woman don’t play nearly as much, simple as. Man do better in sports because there’s physical differences, there’s no physical differences in videogames. Imagine being so heated over videogames what a retard:feelskek:
 
because woman don’t play nearly as much, simple as. Man do better in sports because there’s physical differences, there’s no physical differences in videogames. Imagine being so heated over videogames what a retard:feelskek:
Lmao are there physical differences in chess you stupid son of a whore ? Kys right now :lul:
 
1. Foid
2. Gamer
 
because woman don’t play nearly as much, simple as. Man do better in sports because there’s physical differences, there’s no physical differences in videogames. Imagine being so heated over videogames what a retard:feelskek:
No! Decision making is a big factor in games or sports, especially if you're competing against others (many uncontrollable variables). Decision making depends on how well you can process the available info. Foids suck when it comes to it. That's why pro foid sports teams lose against a bunch of school kids in football.
 
You're such a dumb fuck it's unbelievable. You could say that fighting against a human in real life is the same as fighting against a robot doing the same set of 5-10 movements, with same range, timing etc.
huh? what’s your point you absolute moron?
:lul: There's just no discussion over this, you fucking idiot. FPS might have their limitations just as any game but they're not about EXACT pattern recognition, point blank period.
and neither are dark souls games retard, reaction time and decision making also play a part. If the dark souls games were merely pattern recognition then any retard could beat them (except for you apparently, you’re too retarded even for that :feelskek:)
Even a fighting game like SF with meta, predictable hitbox and a limited set of movements is still less about pattern recognition than Soul games, just cause it's more unpredictable.
yeah no shit, some games have less predictability than others, but all games have a pattern. If a player picks a certain fighting character then you know that he’s gonna do certain combos and to watch out for them. You’re an absolute moron, end of story.
 
No! Decision making is a big factor in games or sports, especially if you're competing against others. Foids suck when it comes to it. That's why foid sports teams lose against a bunch of school kids in football.
It's way beyond his comprehension, he really thinks there's no fundamental gameplay differences between games like souls and any other type :feelstastyman:
 
Lmao are there physical differences in chess you stupid son of a whore ? Kys right now :lul:
Like fr. Like how come barely any foid is available to crack that ceiling. Obviously, it's always muh smartest are men, but average foids smarter than average man.
 
Too busy moaning on voice chat to care
 
No! Decision making is a big factor in games or sports, especially if you're competing against others (many uncontrollable variables). Decision making depends on how well you can process the available info. Foids suck when it comes to it. That's why pro foid sports teams lose against a bunch of school kids in football.
do you have any research that man have better decision making? I have been playing fps games competitively for like 7 years and most man are retards. My teammates are brain dead like 90% of the time. Man and woman probably have the same decision making more or less. If man were calculating and smart then i wouldn’t be throwing my controller against a wall.
 
Lmao are there physical differences in chess you stupid son of a whore ? Kys right now :lul:
a woman was ranked 8th in the entire world and dominated most man. She even a beat former chess world champion. Keep coping. Woman play way less chess than man, simple as.
 
do you have any research that man have better decision making? I have been playing fps games competitively for like 7 years and most man are retards. My teammates are brain dead like 90% of the time. Man and woman probably have the same decision making more or less. If man were calculating and smart then i wouldn’t be throwing my controller against a wall.
Believe it or not most guys play games to chill. Shocker, I know, right? They have lives, unlike you.
Also, I gave one example anyway of Pro Australian Football Team, representing their highest level, losing to a bunch of kids. Football is a decision-making sport, especially in the midfield and of fine-margins.
 
do you have any research that man have better decision making?
:feelstastyman: We're soooo the same. Are you some damn leftist troon or something. Women with super high IQ from upper classes have been playing chess for such a long time and yet they just can't compete with guys. This is all i'm saying, it's very probable that it's the same with vidya at level but it can transpire even at mid level.
 
Believe it or not most guys play games to chill. Shocker, I know, right? They have lives, unlike you.
Also, I gave one example anyway of Pro Australian Football Team, representing their highest level, losing to a bunch of kids.
you have no proof that man have better decision making and so you changed the subject and started projecting your pathetic life onto me. They lost to a bunch of kids because man have physical advantages, we already went over this, how retarded are you?
 
He can't understand. I'll just let everyone see the idiot that he is, it gives me enough satisfaction :feelskek:
Also, did you notice how he linked performing in vidya well to IQ just to drag the same old point "average foids better than average guy". Pro-gamers and pro sportsball players are some of the dumbest people who happen have a circus skill that people are willing to pay big bucks for.
 
:feelstastyman: We're soooo the same. Are you some damn leftist troon or something. Women with super high IQ from upper classes have been playing chess for such a long time and yet they just can't compete with guys. This is all i'm saying, it's very probable that it's the same with vidya at level but it can transpire even at mid level.
didn’t say we are the same, you’re either putting words in my mouth or you’re too retarded to have proper reading comprehension. Either one work for me.

already went over the chess comment on my other reply :feelsokman: But let me say it again. If 10 woman play chess and 1000 man play chess, the man’s group is more likely to have a genius chess player in their group because there’s a larger sample. A woman (judit polger) was ranked 8th in the world and beat a former world champion. What’s your explanation for that?
 
They never had to fight for anything in their life.

The effort part of their brains is basically nonexistent.
 
Also, did you notice how he linked performing in vidya well to IQ just to drag the same old point "average foids better than average guy".
it is linked to iq, decision making plays a big role.
Pro-gamers and pro sportsball players are some of the dumbest people who happen have a circus skill that people are willing to pay big bucks for.
prove that they’re dumb.
 
didn’t say we are the same, you’re either putting words in my mouth or you’re too retarded to have proper reading comprehension. Either one work for me.

already went over the chess comment on my other reply :feelsokman: But let me say it again. If 10 woman play chess and 1000 man play chess, the man’s group is more likely to have a genius chess player in their group because there’s a larger sample. A woman (judit polger) was ranked 8th in the world and beat a former world champion. What’s your explanation for that?
What should be explained is the extremely small number of women at high levels, and it's not something you can explain by numbers cause many women play chess. 1% of women grandmasters is just very extreme. You know, your argument is just exactly the same as someone saying that men are not better fighters than women cause some woman happens to be able to beat a lot of men :feelskek: and yet you acknowledge the impact of physical difference, so that's a contradiction. No point talking with you cause you're just spewing some leftist garbage i could see on reddit.
 
Last edited:
you have no proof that man have better decision making and so you changed the subject and started projecting your pathetic life onto me. They lost to a bunch of kids because man have physical advantages, we already went over this, how retarded are you?
Moron, you claimed to competitive, obviously because you don't have a life. Don't bitch to me.

A pre puberty male doesn't have physical advantages over an athletic foid, you retard.
You're fucking drunk on that foid-worshipping kool-aid if you think this national foid team with athletic builds aren't physically equal to a bunch of 15-year-old boys.

This is for an example of U-15 boys track records. While women's at the elite level is 11.1.
Barely any difference.
 
A pre puberty male doesn't have physical advantages over an athletic foid, you retard.
True cause it's not unusual that even teenage foids team beat moids teenage teams due to the lack of physical differences (or even faster physical maturing for the girls). I'm quite surprised by this article :feelskek: they must be even worse than we think overal.
 
What should be explained is the extremely small number of women at high levels, and it's not something you can explain by numbers cause many women play chess. 1% of women grandmasters is just very extreme. You know, your argument is just exactly the same as someone saying that men are not better fighters than women cause some woman happens to be able to beat a lot of men :feelskek: and yet you acknowledge the impact of physical difference, so that's a contradiction. No point talking with you cause you're just spewing some leftist garbage i could see on reddit.
i already explained to you that more man play chess so there’s a higher chance of chess prodigies being man. You’re allowed to wilfully ignore what i said to stroke your own ego.
 
Moron, you claimed to competitive, obviously because you don't have a life. Don't bitch to me.
you’re projecting. I play piano and workout 6 times a week, and i’m also in education learning a trade. I guarantee that i have more of a life than you.
A pre puberty male doesn't have physical advantages over an athletic foid, you retard.
HOLY SHIT YOURE RETARDED THANKS FOR CONFIRMING IT. There’s no way you think a 15 yo is pre puberty.
You're fucking drunk on that foid-worshipping kool-aid if you think this national foid team with athletic builds aren't physically equal to a bunch of 15-year-old boys
they aren’t, and i’m not worshiping anyone. Me not spreading misinformation isn’t the same as me worshipping woman.
 
i already explained to you that more man play chess so there’s a higher chance of chess prodigies being man.
And i already said that it STILL doesnt explain the 1% and everyone knows it.
You’re allowed to wilfully ignore what i said to stroke your own ego.
I don't give a shit, i just really believe that the equality narrative is bullshit and that there are fundamental differences that affect genders. It doenst mean that a foid cant be super good at something but it's no reason to submit to cuked narratives but you got to be trolling, well i hope it for you. :feelshaha:
 
True cause it's not unusual that even teenage foids team beat moids teenage teams due to the lack of physical differences (or even faster physical maturing for the girls). I'm quite surprised by this article :feelskek: they must be even worse than we think overal.
He doesn't watch football. I analyze football from an Intellectual standpoint. Obviously, that argument wouldn't work against this pathetic excuse of a human being. Foids are just not decisive period.
 
Foids are just not decisive period.
That's something you can see a lot in female soccer. They do super weird shit all the time, especially the goallies.
 
I don't give a shit, i just really believe that the equality narrative is bullshit and that there are fundamental differences that affect genders. It doenst mean that a foid cant be super good at something but it's no reason to submit to cuked narratives.
we’re definitely not equal, we man have physical differences and we have different ways of thinking.
“no reason to submit to cucked narratives” nigga it’s just videogames we wouldn’t even be having this discussion right now if you didn’t make a big deal out of it. You started calling me retarded just because i said women play less and therefore they’re worse, which is a logical conclusion. You’re acting like i said woman are intellectually superior, which i don’t find to be true in the slightest.
 
No multiplayer for me. The last thing I want to do is listen to normies and annoying kids.

I only watch autistic girls on Retroachievements.
Throw them in a lava pit, Forget and go back to the game, Problem solved, No evidence will be left behind as theres nothing to revover :feelsdevil:
 
Grey matter % vs White matter %
(Women have more white matter than men, white matter is correlated with negative behaviours like lying among other things)
Men's brains are more efficient at learning than women while women are better at "social intelligence" aka they're fucking useless.
Women are status-oriented and motivated by clout and strategic relationships/alliances, none of which is helpful in a videogame.
 
As a chess nerd, I think the answer lies in between.

Look at Hou Yifan, the best female chess player for many years now. She was enthralled in chess at a young age, was a genius at the game, then when she reached puberty she cared less and is sadly known that she could be better than she is but has the desire to do other shit. This is the story for many young female chess players, they peak very early and fade away.

US players like Irina Krush and Nazi Paikidze that I've played before are further examples of this... they're obsessed with chess, but they're mid attractive and thus thousands of nerds simp for them and their priorities change, even if they want to be a filthy nerd forever like I know Irina does.

However, I believe there is something lacking in women's ability to battle in chess like Kasparov says. Chess is extremely taxing and games at the highest level are very long. Similar to all jobs and the entire reason behind the "wage gap", women aren't willing to slave away endless hours because they don't need to.

I don't know if there's a provable difference in chess acumen between the sexes, and I doubt there's a way to quantify that. Because, as always, simps ruin everything.
 
Look at Hou Yifan, the best female chess player for many years now. She was enthralled in chess at a young age, was a genius at the game, then when she reached puberty she cared less and is sadly known that she could be better than she is but has the desire to do other shit. This is the story for many young female chess players, they peak very early and fade away.

US players like Irina Krush and Nazi Paikidze that I've played before are further examples of this... they're obsessed with chess, but they're mid attractive and thus thousands of nerds simp for them and their priorities change, even if they want to be a filthy nerd forever like I know Irina does.
I'd say it's being too charitable to foids and shifting all the blames to 'simps'. Athletes make banks that can support multiple generations by 20 and have access to a lot of foids and fan worshipping but they don't stop competing even though they can sit out their contract. Foids probably aren't prone to adaptability and are content with relying on their natural talent and textbook knowledge. I know in Chess you have to adapt very frequently too. In football, if players like Messi and Ronaldo didn't accept they were losing their physical abilities and didn't adapt they wouldn't have as many titles and individual accolades.

Edit: Also, there was a (LONG) period before the recent internet simps.
 
Last edited:
we’re definitely not equal, we man have physical differences and we have different ways of thinking.
“no reason to submit to cucked narratives” nigga it’s just videogames we wouldn’t even be having this discussion right now if you didn’t make a big deal out of it. You started calling me retarded just because i said women play less and therefore they’re worse, which is a logical conclusion. You’re acting like i said woman are intellectually superior, which i don’t find to be true in the slightest.
No i'm just acting like you said men and women were completely equal ability wise when physicality is out of the equation, which you did and i dont think it's totally true. And you are the one that started calling me retarded, i just said you had a retarded take. But yeah sorry for telling you to kys and all that i didn't mean it :feelsbadman:
As a chess nerd, I think the answer lies in between.

Look at Hou Yifan, the best female chess player for many years now. She was enthralled in chess at a young age, was a genius at the game, then when she reached puberty she cared less and is sadly known that she could be better than she is but has the desire to do other shit. This is the story for many young female chess players, they peak very early and fade away.

US players like Irina Krush and Nazi Paikidze that I've played before are further examples of this... they're obsessed with chess, but they're mid attractive and thus thousands of nerds simp for them and their priorities change, even if they want to be a filthy nerd forever like I know Irina does.

However, I believe there is something lacking in women's ability to battle in chess like Kasparov says. Chess is extremely taxing and games at the highest level are very long. Similar to all jobs and the entire reason behind the "wage gap", women aren't willing to slave away endless hours because they don't need to.

I don't know if there's a provable difference in chess acumen between the sexes, and I doubt there's a way to quantify that. Because, as always, simps ruin everything.
It's been acknowledged that men have different ways of thinking than women many times and that they're more prone to develop a more extreme, specialized kind of intelligence. Even the disparity in some mental illnesses like the tism confirms it. Not to even mention boys being better at science even at a young age, why ? So i don't know why it's so controversial to say that some things are for guys and other for girls. Saying that it all boils down to women just not wanting or needing to be the best does not explain everything imo.

But listen, my take on this is that even if a woman managed to be number 1 for some time, it would not change my opinion on the essentialism of the sexes. The trap of soy world is to take exceptions to the rule and using them as some kind of proof, which is just beating men into submission by powerful foids. I say FUCK THEM. Otto Weininger said that even the lowest of men was ontologically superior to the highest of foids and he was completely right.

I'm such a sexist asshole. :cryfeels: But i'm so sick of the mayhem women unleash on society and feminism. :feelsseriously:
 
Last edited:
Probably because most of them don't actually like videogames and if they play anything whatsoever its that low quality mobile shit on their ifags like Candy Crush or whatever.
 
Saying that it all boils down to women just not wanting or needing to be the best does not explain everything imo.
It's just bluepilled infighting and making excuses. Instead of holding foids accountable, just blame other men or just say 'hur dur they did not want to be the best because no motivation or whatnot'. As if male chess streamers haven't had their abilities affected by their online popularity (Hikaru for example), yet Magnus despite having other sources of revenues, popularity, and streaming still was competing at the highest level last I knew a year ago.

Again, this internet simping is a recent phenomenon.

And men didn't need to play chess at the highest level even two decades ago because it paid like shit unless you were a marketable name like Viswanathan Anand was in India. Also, men in chess have insane ego when it comes to losing to foid chess players. So, I very much doubt the 'simping', and the simping revenue before internet, and thus see it as a projection.

Edit: The motivation excuse doesn't work either because there are other sports where foids compete for long years despite being paid like shit or without getting much attention. In chess, if they are "quitting" that only reinforces the fact that competition from men is too much to handle for them. (btw, I mean in the pre-internet simping era context)
 
Last edited:
I'm more surprised that women actually play multiplayer fps
 
there’s no physical differences in videogames
But things like memorization/reaction speed/strategizing/eye-to-hand coordination IS a physical difference, it depends on your brain and there are differences between male and female brains, what they are good at and what not. Men and women are better or worse at navigating spaces in different ways for example.
Why I haven't seen any prominent female e-sport teams or even players? In e-sport you get fame and money out of tryharding so "having a life" is not an explanation there.
I play piano and workout 6 times a week, and i’m also in education learning a trade. I guarantee that i have more of a life than you.
JFL, classic normiecel
Let me guess, you have tonne of friends, insane physique, giant dick and you're an expert at martial arts and poised to be next steve jobs or something too but somehow women don't like and you don't get any sex in spite of your amazing SMV and achievements so you haunt an incel forum with your shit takes spread out over 1000+ posts? How does that happen?
 
Last edited:
It's just bluepilled infighting. Instead of holding foids accountable, just blame other men. As if male chess streamers haven't had their abilities affected by their online popularity (Hikaru for example), yet Magnus despite having other sources of revenues, popularity, and streaming still was competing at the highest level last I knew a year ago.
Again, this internet simping is a recent phenomenon.

And men didn't need to play chess at the highest level even two decades ago because it paid like shit unless you were a marketable name like Viswanathan Anand was in India. Also, men in chess have insane ego when it comes to losing to foid chess players. So, I very much doubt the 'simping', and the simping revenue before internet, and thus see it as a projection.
Yeah seems more like justifications. It's sad that men are so conservative with their male pride/essentialism. I really think the modern man is beaten into psychological submission by powerful foids. I mean just that, he's beat and abdicated. An incarnation of this is Kasparov saying sexist stuff but backing down after Polgar beat him. I get it, he got beat by a girl so he'd look like a fool if he kept his opinions. But in the grand scheme of things it doesn't change much, just like my 1% example. It's just like saying that men are not more suited to fighting or hard labor than women, just cause some women can beat some men or lift heavier. This is individuality taking precedence over a natural order and it's a perversion that can only bring hurt and confusion, i think that's why real patriarchy keeps women down and it's not being a sore loser or a coward to do so, americans with the strongest military in the world got their shit pushed in by the talibans and i wouldn't call them cowards for putting restrictions on women. But to be honest, i'm just rambling here. I wouldn't even really want to apply it, deep down, idk man, i'm just pissed at the way men and women relate to each other nowadays with their muh empowerment and all that. Maybe i just don't like humanity. :feelsseriously:
 
No i'm just acting like you said men and women were completely equal ability wise when physicality is out of the equation, which you did and i dont think it's totally true. And you are the one that started calling me retarded, i just said you had a retarded take. But yeah sorry for telling you to kys and all that i didn't mean it
if you call what i say retarded you’re basically saying i’m retarded but let’s just put it behind us. I’m sorry for insulting you as well. I don’t believe woman can be as good as top percentage of man in thinks like videogames or chess, i believe they can be good but not top tier except for some exceptions. I kinda started saying things i don’t believe just to win the argument cuz i got annoyed
 
As a chess nerd, I think the answer lies in between.
what’s your rating?

Look at Hou Yifan, the best female chess player for many years now. She was enthralled in chess at a young age, was a genius at the game, then when she reached puberty she cared less and is sadly known that she could be better than she is but has the desire to do other shit. This is the story for many young female chess players, they peak very early and fade away.

US players like Irina Krush and Nazi Paikidze that I've played before are further examples of this... they're obsessed with chess, but they're mid attractive and thus thousands of nerds simp for them and their priorities change, even if they want to be a filthy nerd forever like I know Irina does.

However, I believe there is something lacking in women's ability to battle in chess like Kasparov says. Chess is extremely taxing and games at the highest level are very long. Similar to all jobs and the entire reason behind the "wage gap", women aren't willing to slave away endless hours because they don't need to.

I don't know if there's a provable difference in chess acumen between the sexes, and I doubt there's a way to quantify that. Because, as always, simps ruin everything
i believe the same as well, i don’t believe a woman could ever become world champion but a small amount of woman could reach a high level if they tried enough.
 
powerful foids
Who needs powerful foids when you have their cronies (backstabbing simps) like the ones above to do their bidding.

I just get passionate about this stuff to make sure if younger men come across these reality-distorting foid-excuses they at least will have someone countering these excuses.
 

Similar threads

AsakangaHalo
Replies
4
Views
253
Epedaphic
Epedaphic
Stupid Clown
Replies
10
Views
745
Maikowski
Maikowski
Stupid Clown
Replies
33
Views
1K
tehgymcel420
tehgymcel420
ihatefemcels
Replies
29
Views
538
Astronomycel11
Astronomycel11

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top