![honorarycurry](/data/avatars/m/40/40605.jpg?1643399794)
honorarycurry
Veteran
★★★
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2022
- Posts
- 1,254
I’m not but also I only read the title because I lack dopamineYou're obviously not very good at picking up subtlety, are you?![]()
I’m not but also I only read the title because I lack dopamineYou're obviously not very good at picking up subtlety, are you?![]()
Fair enough.I’m not but also I only read the title because I lack dopamine
I wonder if the railroad workers will puss out, what's stopping them from just going on nationwide strike regardless of what the government says or decides? Would be pretty cool just to see Uncle Buffet suffer and break down.The United States, where you can't even go on a labor or general strike. Land of the fee, home of the slave.
[In a nation where almost all labor unions have been disbanded or destroyed, the very few remaining having almost no power and influence whatsoever.]
Once again, I would describe this nation as a corporate welfare police state in which state and federal government are more servants or enforcers of corporate entities rather than people who make up the national citizenry.
View attachment 681878
This is a question my mind has been wandering in lately, without reaching any suitable conclusion.The United States, where you can't even go on a labor or general strike. Land of the fee, home of the slave.
[In a nation where almost all labor unions have been disbanded or destroyed, the very few remaining having almost no power and influence whatsoever.]
Once again, I would describe this nation as a corporate welfare police state in which state and federal government are more servants or enforcers of corporate entities rather than people who make up the national citizenry.
View attachment 681878
Communism is the proletariat revolution of taking over the entire state which is exactly what I want, you force the corporations to become subservient to the people and the stability of the nation state itself. Better alternative compared to any other political solutions or lack of in my mind. Only communists address this, nobody else does.This is a question my mind has been wandering in lately, without reaching any suitable conclusion.
How can one make sure the state doesn't become controlled by corporation ?
And no communism is not a solution, jfl it's the absolute form of corporate taking over the state
How can one stop the wealthy from using their resources to modify state policy in their favor ?
Go tell that to the ruskis who had to make lines for a slice of bread using their rusty Lada.Communism is the proletariat revolution of taking over the entire state which is exactly what I want, you force the corporations to become subservient to the people and the stability of the nation state itself. Better alternative compared to any other political solutions or lack of in my mind. Only communists address this, nobody else does.![]()
I'll have a rebuttal for you in one hour but currently I am having fun, standby if you like.Go tell that to the ruskis who had to make lines for a slice of bread using their rusty Lada.
Commusnism was invented by Marx, Marx was a Jew. The bolshevik revolution is not a russian revolution, it was civil war between the jews of russia and catholic russians.
Lenin was a jew, Trotsky was a jew. Every communist state has failed, and no North Korea is a feudalist state
Once the revolution is over, the useful idiots will be put back in the cages by their new masters. Who now control everything, instead of most of things.
Soviet Russia collapsed in 1992, ironically it looks like the American libertine, that is to say a neoliberal corporate welfare police state that revolves around economic crony capitalism will collapse well before 2025, which one is the more superior political economic structure if one only survives a meager thirty three years afterward until it also collapses in the same manner?Go tell that to the ruskis who had to make lines for a slice of bread using their rusty Lada.
Commusnism was invented by Marx, Marx was a Jew. The bolshevik revolution is not a russian revolution, it was civil war between the jews of russia and catholic russians.
Lenin was a jew, Trotsky was a jew. Every communist state has failed, and no North Korea is a feudalist state
Once the revolution is over, the useful idiots will be put back in the cages by their new masters. Who now control everything, instead of most of things.
And how many Jews comprise of today's politically republican and libertarian movements? How many American western backed political and capitalist writers are Jews? Jews infiltrate everything whether it be socialist or capitalist ideologies. And of course Karl Marx was a Jew, however, if anybody reads his personal journals he was no choir boy whatsoever, in fact, he would probably find what makes up the bulk of today's socialists or communists as being completely revolting just as I myself find them to be disgusting.Go tell that to the ruskis who had to make lines for a slice of bread using their rusty Lada.
Commusnism was invented by Marx, Marx was a Jew. The bolshevik revolution is not a russian revolution, it was civil war between the jews of russia and catholic russians.
Lenin was a jew, Trotsky was a jew. Every communist state has failed, and no North Korea is a feudalist state
Once the revolution is over, the useful idiots will be put back in the cages by their new masters. Who now control everything, instead of most of things.
Go tell that to the ruskis who had to make lines for a slice of bread using their rusty Lada.
Commusnism was invented by Marx, Marx was a Jew. The bolshevik revolution is not a russian revolution, it was civil war between the jews of russia and catholic russians.
Lenin was a jew, Trotsky was a jew. Every communist state has failed, and no North Korea is a feudalist state
Once the revolution is over, the useful idiots will be put back in the cages by their new masters. Who now control everything, instead of most of things.
This guy wasn't a Jew
![]()
Friedrich Engels - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
This guy wasn't a Jew
![]()
Mao Zedong - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
This guy wasn't a Jew
![]()
Fidel Castro - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
This guy wasn't a Jew
![]()
Ho Chi Minh - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
This guy wasn't a Jew
![]()
William Z. Foster - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
While Lenim had Jewish ancestry, he wasn't aware of it until after the revolution, etc. The idea that Communism is a Jo0wish CoNsPiRaCy is idiotic. Especially when the same people accuse Marx of antisemitism.
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rZh01xRO_Qg
Karl Marx was antisemitic, racist, and sexist, I find it funny how today's so called leftists try to rewrite history to fit their politically woke narratives.![]()
There's no proof of that, he literally called a black man a nigger, was married or divorced multiple times, and his writing that book to Bauer might as well be a public admission spectacle of noticing.Marx wasn't especially any in of those things. "On The Jewish Question" was written in response to a real anti-Semite, Bruno Bauer, and Mars used some intemperate language on the subject, but what Marx wanted was for all minorities including Jews to lose their special cultural characteristics and be assimilated, not out of hatred but because it wouldn make the world revolution easier. Marx called people "niggers" occasionally, but not in any kind of Naziesque or eliminatory way. He was probably as egalitarian on racial shit as a white Northern American from the late 1960s or 70s.
There's no proof of that, he literally called a black man a nigger, was married or divorced multiple times, and his writing that book to Bauer might as well be a public admission of noticing.![]()
Probably of a darker swarthy complexion, and Poles, well, there's no helping them at all.He called Ferdinand Lassalle a nigger. Ferdinand Lassalle was a Polish Jew.
Probably of a darker swarthy complexion, and Poles, well, there's no helping them at all.![]()
Even in the 18th century everybody was familiar with the connotations of the word nigger, Karl Marx included.
Well, that was his whole problem with the whole dialectic materialism thing, it tends to overlook religious, racial, ethnic, and cultural divisions which then becomes trivialized under ideological idealism. I don't make that same mistake in my own views because I interpret things in a more natural or biological manner, I call it my dialectic naturalism because for me human nature is way too complex for materialism alone to explain. Economic class as always is the top of issues concerning class conflict, but it's not the only one concerning destabilizing problems within society.My point is that Marx wasn't "based" in any kind of 4chan sense. The ideal outcome, for Marx, would have been for every working class minority to integrate voluntarily into the working class majority, and then to make revolution as a class.
Marx thinks that the development of capitalism slowly intrgrates everyone into a common world civilization anyway.Well, that was his whole problem with the whole dialectic materialism thing, it tends to overlook religious, racial, ethnic, and cultural divisions which then becomes trivialized under ideological idealism. I don't make that same mistake in my own views because I interpret things in a more natural or biological manner, I call it my dialectic naturalism because for me human nature is way too complex for materialism alone to explain.![]()
And as in material, so also in intellectual production. The intellectual creations of individual nations become common property. National one-sidedness and narrow-mindedness become more and more impossible, and from the numerous national and local literatures, there arises a world literature.