Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Experiment Using Normalfag Logic to justify the killings of ITfags and Normalfags themselves

Misogynist Vegeta

Misogynist Vegeta

The Prince of all Incels
★★★★
Joined
Feb 16, 2024
Posts
3,859
Disclaimer: This thread is not a call to arms, no matter what conclusion I come to I advice you to not physical harm any of the people or groups of people I mention in this thread

With that disclaimer out of the way this thread is a logical experiment to push normalfags logic to it's limit and to expose another hypocrisy of normalfags of which there are already many.

Enter Luigi Mangione, The chadlite that many a foids adore for gunning down and murdering Brian Thompson, a healthcare CEO. The man is not only celebrated by foids but by many normalfags as well as they believe this killing was justified, their logic? Brain Thompson was the CEO of a health insurance company that denied health insurance claims to patients that needed living saving care thus killing those patients. There are 2 things that are important to note, 1. Luigi Mangione was not a "victim" of these denials, he was never covered by UHC. 2. There is no specific evidence that the claims that were denied were that of live saving procedures or that the patients couldn't get live saving procedures elsewhere, Try as I might I couldn't even find credible story of how someone who was denied insurance coverage and then died as result of that, Maybe I didn't search hard enough but it's also possible such event never happened and that importantly would mean Luigi didn't kill based on an specific injustice but what he and many normalfags like him perceived as many injustices.

Regardless or not whether there is solid evidence for denied healthcare insurance claims leading to someone's death it doesn't matter because under normalfag logic it is already justifiable to kill someone if they "responsible" for someone's death, whether or not the pulled the trigger, and what the means is under there logic it is ok for incels to kill radical feminists, specifically the ones on twitter that encourage men to kill themselves or those who celebrate male suicide such as

View: https://x.com/fembian/status/1914778595102482827.
The murder of this individual and the 200k who liked this comment is justified because these comments are responsible for increased male suicide and because of point 2 on my previous paragraph I don't need to prove an specific case of this actually happening.

But wait there's more many normalfags advocate for the death of politicians they don't like simply because they don't like them
View: https://x.com/CantEverDie/status/1923115785070772555

In this case Elon Musk, What exactly are Elon's supposed crimes? Letting racist & sexist people exist on twitter and getting Donald Trump elected. They may argue that Donald Trump is killing people through his policies, There is no evidence for this but they will certainly argue it anyways claiming that policy X is getting people killed. Worse they may even argue that Elon not banning racist & sexist people from twitter is getting minorities and women killed because he's letting hate fester on his platform which might encourage someone to do violence, that same exact logic could justify the murder of literally every single normalfag, because incels kill themselves a lot due to rejection from society and therefore under this same logic normalfags are responsible for the deaths of thousands of incels and deserve to die for it.

When it comes to the latter I've seen many normalfags argue that Donald Trump banning trannies from the military and women's sports is getting them killed not through the specific policies that ban them from those things but the general negativity towards trannies is causing trannies to kill themselves, and thus Donald deserves to be assassinated, Under this logic every single person whose made a post to IT deserves to die because the general negativity they towards incels causes incels to kill themselves.

To conclude, Normalfags are hypocrites they love to chastise us for wishing death upon other human beings but do the exact same thing when it's someone they don't like. Some normalfags don't wish death on people just because they don't like them and may try to claim moral superiority of me and other incels, I don't either but they will try and argue that me associating with people that do makes me guilty by association completely ignoring the fact that normalfags do this shit on every single social media site thus also making them guilty under the same logic.
 
Disclaimer: This thread is not a call to arms, no matter what conclusion I come to I advice you to not physical harm any of the people or groups of people I mention in this thread

With that disclaimer out of the way this thread is a logical experiment to push normalfags logic to it's limit and to expose another hypocrisy of normalfags of which there are already many.

Enter Luigi Mangione, The chadlite that many a foids adore for gunning down and murdering Brian Thompson, a healthcare CEO. The man is not only celebrated by foids but by many normalfags as well as they believe this killing was justified, their logic? Brain Thompson was the CEO of a health insurance company that denied health insurance claims to patients that needed living saving care thus killing those patients. There are 2 things that are important to note, 1. Luigi Mangione was not a "victim" of these denials, he was never covered by UHC. 2. There is no specific evidence that the claims that were denied were that of live saving procedures or that the patients couldn't get live saving procedures elsewhere, Try as I might I couldn't even find credible story of how someone who was denied insurance coverage and then died as result of that, Maybe I didn't search hard enough but it's also possible such event never happened and that importantly would mean Luigi didn't kill based on an specific injustice but what he and many normalfags like him perceived as many injustices.

Regardless or not whether there is solid evidence for denied healthcare insurance claims leading to someone's death it doesn't matter because under normalfag logic it is already justifiable to kill someone if they "responsible" for someone's death, whether or not the pulled the trigger, and what the means is under there logic it is ok for incels to kill radical feminists, specifically the ones on twitter that encourage men to kill themselves or those who celebrate male suicide such as

View: https://x.com/fembian/status/1914778595102482827.
The murder of this individual and the 200k who liked this comment is justified because these comments are responsible for increased male suicide and because of point 2 on my previous paragraph I don't need to prove an specific case of this actually happening.

But wait there's more many normalfags advocate for the death of politicians they don't like simply because they don't like them
View: https://x.com/CantEverDie/status/1923115785070772555

In this case Elon Musk, What exactly are Elon's supposed crimes? Letting racist & sexist people exist on twitter and getting Donald Trump elected. They may argue that Donald Trump is killing people through his policies, There is no evidence for this but they will certainly argue it anyways claiming that policy X is getting people killed. Worse they may even argue that Elon not banning racist & sexist people from twitter is getting minorities and women killed because he's letting hate fester on his platform which might encourage someone to do violence, that same exact logic could justify the murder of literally every single normalfag, because incels kill themselves a lot due to rejection from society and therefore under this same logic normalfags are responsible for the deaths of thousands of incels and deserve to die for it.

When it comes to the latter I've seen many normalfags argue that Donald Trump banning trannies from the military and women's sports is getting them killed not through the specific policies that ban them from those things but the general negativity towards trannies is causing trannies to kill themselves, and thus Donald deserves to be assassinated, Under this logic every single person whose made a post to IT deserves to die because the general negativity they towards incels causes incels to kill themselves.

To conclude, Normalfags are hypocrites they love to chastise us for wishing death upon other human beings but do the exact same thing when it's someone they don't like. Some normalfags don't wish death on people just because they don't like them and may try to claim moral superiority of me and other incels, I don't either but they will try and argue that me associating with people that do makes me guilty by association completely ignoring the fact that normalfags do this shit on every single social media site thus also making them guilty under the same logic.

Imagine if a man said yay to rape statistics
 
Didnt read but i agree
 
Been saying this nigga
 
Disclaimer: This thread is not a call to arms, no matter what conclusion I come to I advice you to not physical harm any of the people or groups of people I mention in this thread

With that disclaimer out of the way this thread is a logical experiment to push normalfags logic to it's limit and to expose another hypocrisy of normalfags of which there are already many.

Enter Luigi Mangione, The chadlite that many a foids adore for gunning down and murdering Brian Thompson, a healthcare CEO. The man is not only celebrated by foids but by many normalfags as well as they believe this killing was justified, their logic? Brain Thompson was the CEO of a health insurance company that denied health insurance claims to patients that needed living saving care thus killing those patients. There are 2 things that are important to note, 1. Luigi Mangione was not a "victim" of these denials, he was never covered by UHC. 2. There is no specific evidence that the claims that were denied were that of live saving procedures or that the patients couldn't get live saving procedures elsewhere, Try as I might I couldn't even find credible story of how someone who was denied insurance coverage and then died as result of that, Maybe I didn't search hard enough but it's also possible such event never happened and that importantly would mean Luigi didn't kill based on an specific injustice but what he and many normalfags like him perceived as many injustices.

Regardless or not whether there is solid evidence for denied healthcare insurance claims leading to someone's death it doesn't matter because under normalfag logic it is already justifiable to kill someone if they "responsible" for someone's death, whether or not the pulled the trigger, and what the means is under there logic it is ok for incels to kill radical feminists, specifically the ones on twitter that encourage men to kill themselves or those who celebrate male suicide such as

View: https://x.com/fembian/status/1914778595102482827.
The murder of this individual and the 200k who liked this comment is justified because these comments are responsible for increased male suicide and because of point 2 on my previous paragraph I don't need to prove an specific case of this actually happening.

But wait there's more many normalfags advocate for the death of politicians they don't like simply because they don't like them
View: https://x.com/CantEverDie/status/1923115785070772555

In this case Elon Musk, What exactly are Elon's supposed crimes? Letting racist & sexist people exist on twitter and getting Donald Trump elected. They may argue that Donald Trump is killing people through his policies, There is no evidence for this but they will certainly argue it anyways claiming that policy X is getting people killed. Worse they may even argue that Elon not banning racist & sexist people from twitter is getting minorities and women killed because he's letting hate fester on his platform which might encourage someone to do violence, that same exact logic could justify the murder of literally every single normalfag, because incels kill themselves a lot due to rejection from society and therefore under this same logic normalfags are responsible for the deaths of thousands of incels and deserve to die for it.

When it comes to the latter I've seen many normalfags argue that Donald Trump banning trannies from the military and women's sports is getting them killed not through the specific policies that ban them from those things but the general negativity towards trannies is causing trannies to kill themselves, and thus Donald deserves to be assassinated, Under this logic every single person whose made a post to IT deserves to die because the general negativity they towards incels causes incels to kill themselves.

To conclude, Normalfags are hypocrites they love to chastise us for wishing death upon other human beings but do the exact same thing when it's someone they don't like. Some normalfags don't wish death on people just because they don't like them and may try to claim moral superiority of me and other incels, I don't either but they will try and argue that me associating with people that do makes me guilty by association completely ignoring the fact that normalfags do this shit on every single social media site thus also making them guilty under the same logic.

@Misogynist Vegeta
Lmao look at this 17 year old foidlet

View: https://x.com/fembian/status/1914786259060576649

This is how most young women think. They can never be in the wrong. And look at this retard

View: https://x.com/agorakills/status/1914965340615848193

Id argue minecrafting these "people" would benefit soyciety 100x more than offing any healthcare ceo. And a large chunk of the masses are like this. Remember that these are the "people" you should feel sad about when mass shooting happen
 
Disclaimer: This thread is not a call to arms, no matter what conclusion I come to I advice you to not physical harm any of the people or groups of people I mention in this thread

With that disclaimer out of the way this thread is a logical experiment to push normalfags logic to it's limit and to expose another hypocrisy of normalfags of which there are already many.

Enter Luigi Mangione, The chadlite that many a foids adore for gunning down and murdering Brian Thompson, a healthcare CEO. The man is not only celebrated by foids but by many normalfags as well as they believe this killing was justified, their logic? Brain Thompson was the CEO of a health insurance company that denied health insurance claims to patients that needed living saving care thus killing those patients. There are 2 things that are important to note, 1. Luigi Mangione was not a "victim" of these denials, he was never covered by UHC. 2. There is no specific evidence that the claims that were denied were that of live saving procedures or that the patients couldn't get live saving procedures elsewhere, Try as I might I couldn't even find credible story of how someone who was denied insurance coverage and then died as result of that, Maybe I didn't search hard enough but it's also possible such event never happened and that importantly would mean Luigi didn't kill based on an specific injustice but what he and many normalfags like him perceived as many injustices.

Regardless or not whether there is solid evidence for denied healthcare insurance claims leading to someone's death it doesn't matter because under normalfag logic it is already justifiable to kill someone if they "responsible" for someone's death, whether or not the pulled the trigger, and what the means is under there logic it is ok for incels to kill radical feminists, specifically the ones on twitter that encourage men to kill themselves or those who celebrate male suicide such as

View: https://x.com/fembian/status/1914778595102482827.
The murder of this individual and the 200k who liked this comment is justified because these comments are responsible for increased male suicide and because of point 2 on my previous paragraph I don't need to prove an specific case of this actually happening.

But wait there's more many normalfags advocate for the death of politicians they don't like simply because they don't like them
View: https://x.com/CantEverDie/status/1923115785070772555

In this case Elon Musk, What exactly are Elon's supposed crimes? Letting racist & sexist people exist on twitter and getting Donald Trump elected. They may argue that Donald Trump is killing people through his policies, There is no evidence for this but they will certainly argue it anyways claiming that policy X is getting people killed. Worse they may even argue that Elon not banning racist & sexist people from twitter is getting minorities and women killed because he's letting hate fester on his platform which might encourage someone to do violence, that same exact logic could justify the murder of literally every single normalfag, because incels kill themselves a lot due to rejection from society and therefore under this same logic normalfags are responsible for the deaths of thousands of incels and deserve to die for it.

When it comes to the latter I've seen many normalfags argue that Donald Trump banning trannies from the military and women's sports is getting them killed not through the specific policies that ban them from those things but the general negativity towards trannies is causing trannies to kill themselves, and thus Donald deserves to be assassinated, Under this logic every single person whose made a post to IT deserves to die because the general negativity they towards incels causes incels to kill themselves.

To conclude, Normalfags are hypocrites they love to chastise us for wishing death upon other human beings but do the exact same thing when it's someone they don't like. Some normalfags don't wish death on people just because they don't like them and may try to claim moral superiority of me and other incels, I don't either but they will try and argue that me associating with people that do makes me guilty by association completely ignoring the fact that normalfags do this shit on every single social media site thus also making them guilty under the same logic.

Kill all ITfags
 
:bigbrain:
Deserves to be pinned tbh. Magnificent post
 
Normies are extremely hypocritical when it comes to murder
 
Back when the Healthcare CEO killing occurred I remember seeing some posts from foids about how if only E.R. and some of those other guys had killed CEOs instead of random foids. So yeah, normies are hypocrites, is not exactly a ground breaking development. Practically anyone’s opinion on whether or not muder is justified is entirely dependent on who is being murdered.
 
Feminist ideolo
Back when the Healthcare CEO killing occurred I remember seeing some posts from foids about how if only E.R. and some of those other guys had killed CEOs instead of random foids. So yeah, normies are hypocrites, is not exactly a ground breaking development. Practically anyone’s opinion on whether or not muder is justified is entirely dependent on who is being murdered.
 
Disclaimer: This thread is not a call to arms, no matter what conclusion I come to I advice you to not physical harm any of the people or groups of people I mention in this thread

With that disclaimer out of the way this thread is a logical experiment to push normalfags logic to it's limit and to expose another hypocrisy of normalfags of which there are already many.

Enter Luigi Mangione, The chadlite that many a foids adore for gunning down and murdering Brian Thompson, a healthcare CEO. The man is not only celebrated by foids but by many normalfags as well as they believe this killing was justified, their logic? Brain Thompson was the CEO of a health insurance company that denied health insurance claims to patients that needed living saving care thus killing those patients. There are 2 things that are important to note, 1. Luigi Mangione was not a "victim" of these denials, he was never covered by UHC. 2. There is no specific evidence that the claims that were denied were that of live saving procedures or that the patients couldn't get live saving procedures elsewhere, Try as I might I couldn't even find credible story of how someone who was denied insurance coverage and then died as result of that, Maybe I didn't search hard enough but it's also possible such event never happened and that importantly would mean Luigi didn't kill based on an specific injustice but what he and many normalfags like him perceived as many injustices.

Regardless or not whether there is solid evidence for denied healthcare insurance claims leading to someone's death it doesn't matter because under normalfag logic it is already justifiable to kill someone if they "responsible" for someone's death, whether or not the pulled the trigger, and what the means is under there logic it is ok for incels to kill radical feminists, specifically the ones on twitter that encourage men to kill themselves or those who celebrate male suicide such as

View: https://x.com/fembian/status/1914778595102482827.
The murder of this individual and the 200k who liked this comment is justified because these comments are responsible for increased male suicide and because of point 2 on my previous paragraph I don't need to prove an specific case of this actually happening.

But wait there's more many normalfags advocate for the death of politicians they don't like simply because they don't like them
View: https://x.com/CantEverDie/status/1923115785070772555

In this case Elon Musk, What exactly are Elon's supposed crimes? Letting racist & sexist people exist on twitter and getting Donald Trump elected. They may argue that Donald Trump is killing people through his policies, There is no evidence for this but they will certainly argue it anyways claiming that policy X is getting people killed. Worse they may even argue that Elon not banning racist & sexist people from twitter is getting minorities and women killed because he's letting hate fester on his platform which might encourage someone to do violence, that same exact logic could justify the murder of literally every single normalfag, because incels kill themselves a lot due to rejection from society and therefore under this same logic normalfags are responsible for the deaths of thousands of incels and deserve to die for it.

When it comes to the latter I've seen many normalfags argue that Donald Trump banning trannies from the military and women's sports is getting them killed not through the specific policies that ban them from those things but the general negativity towards trannies is causing trannies to kill themselves, and thus Donald deserves to be assassinated, Under this logic every single person whose made a post to IT deserves to die because the general negativity they towards incels causes incels to kill themselves.

To conclude, Normalfags are hypocrites they love to chastise us for wishing death upon other human beings but do the exact same thing when it's someone they don't like. Some normalfags don't wish death on people just because they don't like them and may try to claim moral superiority of me and other incels, I don't either but they will try and argue that me associating with people that do makes me guilty by association completely ignoring the fact that normalfags do this shit on every single social media site thus also making them guilty under the same logic.

ChatGPT:

Skip to content

Chat history​



New chat


Search chats
Ctrl K

Library


GPTs

Today​

Logical fallacy analysis

Change directory in bash

Pacman Clone in .NET

Morality and Group Survival

Incels.is ChatGPT Analysis

Reddit HTML Analysis

Webpage Content Summary



Upgrade plan
More access to the best models

ChatGPT
Share
LM

You said:​


incel6.html
File
Original poster summary and logical fallacies?

ChatGPT said:​

The post titled “Using Normalfag Logic to Justify the Killings of ITfags and Normalfags Themselves” from the forum Incels.is is a disturbing and provocative “thought experiment” by a user named Misogynist Vegeta. The author claims the thread is not a call to violence but proceeds to use inflammatory and violent rhetoric in an attempt to demonstrate what they consider hypocrisy in mainstream or "normalfag" logic.

Summary of Original Poster’s Argument:​

  1. Framing:
    • The author asserts that this is a “logical experiment,” not an incitement to violence.
    • The goal is to “push normalfag logic to its limit” and highlight perceived double standards.
  2. Case Example – Luigi Mangione:
    • The poster discusses a fictional (or obscure) example of a man celebrated for killing a health insurance CEO (Brian Thompson).
    • They argue this killing was praised by some as justifiable due to the CEO’s indirect role in healthcare denial.
  3. Inversion Argument:
    • The author uses this scenario to claim that by the same logic, it would be justified for incels to murder:
      • Feminists who encourage men to commit suicide,
      • Social media users who celebrate male suicide,
      • Politicians like Donald Trump or Elon Musk, who they claim indirectly contribute to incel suicides or suffering.
  4. Conclusion:
    • The user accuses society (“normalfags”) of hypocrisy: condemning incels for wishing death on others while allegedly doing the same themselves.
    • They conclude that social rejection and online rhetoric against incels could justify retaliatory violence under the same "logic."

❗ Logical Fallacies and Flaws in the Argument:​

  1. False Equivalence:
    • Equates passive social commentary or online speech with direct acts of violence or systemic policy decisions.
    • Suggests that online users "deserve" death in the same way the author claims others justify real-world killings.
  2. Straw Man:
    • Misrepresents “normalfag” logic by cherry-picking extreme internet posts and treating them as universally held positions.
    • Constructs a flawed version of the opposing argument to more easily attack it.
  3. Appeal to Hypocrisy (Tu Quoque):
    • Claims that if others express support for violence, it justifies incels doing the same.
    • Ignores the immorality of promoting harm simply because others allegedly do so.
  4. Slippery Slope:
    • Suggests that if some people defend one controversial act of violence, it must logically follow that all similar (or even dissimilar) acts are defensible.
  5. Red Herring:
    • Uses emotionally charged examples (e.g., male suicide, rejection, hate speech) to distract from the core issue: incitement to violence is unjustifiable.
  6. No True Scotsman:
    • The author attempts to distance themselves from violent rhetoric while participating in and validating it, framing their involvement as purely analytical.

Ethical & Social Context:​

This post is dangerous because it attempts to rationalize violent thought by misappropriating real-world pain and suffering (e.g., male mental health issues) to justify extremist views. Regardless of how “hypocritical” others may be, advocating for harm is not ethically defensible.

If you need a reformatted version for academic or legal purposes (e.g., summarizing online extremist rhetoric), I can provide that too.






“titled”





Tools





ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.
 
1.Case Example – Luigi Mangione:
  • The poster discusses a fictional (or obscure) example of a man celebrated for killing a health insurance CEO (Brian Thompson).
Stupid AI Luigi Mangione isn't a fictional character

❗ Logical Fallacies and Flaws in the Argument:​

  1. False Equivalence:
    • Equates passive social commentary or online speech with direct acts of violence or systemic policy decisions.
    • Suggests that online users "deserve" death in the same way the author claims others justify real-world killings.
  2. Straw Man:
    • Misrepresents “normalfag” logic by cherry-picking extreme internet posts and treating them as universally held positions.
    • Constructs a flawed version of the opposing argument to more easily attack it.
  3. Appeal to Hypocrisy (Tu Quoque):
    • Claims that if others express support for violence, it justifies incels doing the same.
    • Ignores the immorality of promoting harm simply because others allegedly do so.
  4. Slippery Slope:
    • Suggests that if some people defend one controversial act of violence, it must logically follow that all similar (or even dissimilar) acts are defensible.
  5. Red Herring:
    • Uses emotionally charged examples (e.g., male suicide, rejection, hate speech) to distract from the core issue: incitement to violence is unjustifiable.
  6. No True Scotsman:
    • The author attempts to distance themselves from violent rhetoric while participating in and validating it, framing their involvement as purely analytical.
1. Telling people to kill themselves isn't "social commentary" neither is praising the death of people you don't like, I never suggested that some online users deserve death I implied that under normalfag logic that the praising of killing others was justified and that under their logic it would hypocritical to imply that we are bad for doing the same to people we don't like

2. This is not cherrypicking at all a significant amount of young normalfags approve of what Luigi Mangione did (41% to be exact) [https://www.axios.com/2024/12/17/united-healthcare-ceo-killing-poll]

3. That is the purpose of this logical experiment, yes AI bravo

4. I didn't imply that at all

5. Again stupid ass AI, the point of this logical experiment to point out the hypocrisy of normalfag logic

6. I will use this 6th point instead of repeating what I have said for the past 2 points to instead remind everybody that pointing out fallacies to suggest an argument is wrong is a fallacy in it's self. (The Fallacy Fallacy)
 
Luigi mangione was a bluepilled retard who will now get his asshole massaged in prison by 50 iq BBC thugs.Stupid idiot had it all-money,looks but decided to end it all by a stupid decision he made thinking it would matter to jewish Soyciety anyway.A few more CEO murders(most CEOs are jewish) and these normturds would now have the FBI nearing in on their asses.They would be the next targets on the jewish witchhunts:feelskek::feelshaha:
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
20
Views
2K
To koniec
To koniec
Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
12
Views
806
Emba
Emba
Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
18
Views
866
Indari
Indari
Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
22
Views
1K
Kamanbert
Kamanbert

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top