Yes, or at least, make it more clear.
- Is somebody who goes to escorts an incel? Since he cleary isn't celibate. (celibate = someone who doesn't have sex)
- Is somebody who had sexual experience and gfs in the past an incel because he has been single for X amount of time?
- Can somebody who never made efforts to engage with women be an incel? Or doesn't that make him a Volcel (voluntary celibate) since he never even tried getting out of celibate?
- Is somebody who only wants a 8/10 virgin and refuses to engage with any woman lower than that still an incel? Or doesn't that make him a Volcel, since he voluntarily refuses to date anything below his ridiculous standards?
- Is somebody who receives interest from women, but for some reason cannot start a relationship with them an incel?
- Is somebody who is good looking and tall enough to attract women but for some reason can't get a gf an incel or just an idiot who is too dumb to utilize his assets?
Or is it all up for interpretation?
Can "being incel" even be defined?
This really is a tough one, since no matter how you define incel, there will always be somebody who disagrees with you.
We have to be careful here. Freedom of speech is the most important thing.
But:
Your freedom of speech ends, where personal rights of others begin.
I have no problem with people who want to discuss their violent/pedo/rape fantasy in a thoughtful and mannered way.
Talking about it is not illegal.
But if you just shit out a one-liner low effort thread into ID, in which you have nothing to say, but only encourage brainless violence/rape/pedophilia and bait others into posting brainless borderline illegal things, that's where I draw the line.
It puts all other incels in a bad spotlight and just gets us negative public attention, no mentally stable incel wants or deserves that.
So yes, low effort bait threads need to be forbidden, but I don't think you should forbid these topics in general.
That's already happening, lmao.
You're right, very true and very important.
[UWSL]We are currently more busy with argueing bluepillers about the blackpill than we are busy developing the blackpill.[/UWSL]
[UWSL]I had a moment not to long ago, where I was linking the Incel Wiki to explain the dogpill to one of these bluepiled greycels and he literally said he doesn't believe in these "autistic incel articles", can you fucking believe that?
[/UWSL]
[UWSL]I'm tired of trying to explain basic blackpill 101 to all these 2021 infiltrators. I'm tired of explaining the dogpill, the heightpill, lookism to 2021 greyfags.[/UWSL]
Wasn't there a rule "No bluepillers allowed" some time ago? Bring it back.
What do administrators want? A blackpilled forum or normie forum?
100%. You have to punish people who post in the wrong subforum or they'll never learn and you'll have to constantly waste ressources on moving their trash threads around. Posting in the correct subforum isn't difficult.
This forum is about not being able to have female interaction and we have to argue if talking about female interaction is bragging. What?
I would ban this greycel retard on the spot for this. Shitting his retarded troll oneliner into an important discussion.
Also this braindamaged 6'1 larper, who even encourages this retarded trolling.
USE THE FUCKIN BAN BUTTON MODS. WHY ARE YOU TOLERATING LOW IQ TROLL FAGS LIKE THESE??????????????
This should be a nobrainer, but I'm afraid it isn't