Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion Rules Reform

Rhaast

Rhaast

Ill fucking murder you.
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 17, 2021
Posts
5,274
Online
18d 1h 7m
nice_try said:
Yes, or at least, make it more clear.

- Is somebody who goes to escorts an incel? Since he cleary isn't celibate. (celibate = someone who doesn't have sex)
- Is somebody who had sexual experience and gfs in the past an incel because he has been single for X amount of time?
- Can somebody who never made efforts to engage with women be an incel? Or doesn't that make him a Volcel (voluntary celibate) since he never even tried getting out of celibate?
- Is somebody who only wants a 8/10 virgin and refuses to engage with any woman lower than that still an incel? Or doesn't that make him a Volcel, since he voluntarily refuses to date anything below his ridiculous standards?
- Is somebody who receives interest from women, but for some reason cannot start a relationship with them an incel?
- Is somebody who is good looking and tall enough to attract women but for some reason can't get a gf an incel or just an idiot who is too dumb to utilize his assets?

Or is it all up for interpretation?
Can "being incel" even be defined?
This really is a tough one, since no matter how you define incel, there will always be somebody who disagrees with you.





We have to be careful here. Freedom of speech is the most important thing.
But:
Your freedom of speech ends, where personal rights of others begin.

I have no problem with people who want to discuss their violent/pedo/rape fantasy in a thoughtful and mannered way.
Talking about it is not illegal.
But if you just shit out a one-liner low effort thread into ID, in which you have nothing to say, but only encourage brainless violence/rape/pedophilia and bait others into posting brainless borderline illegal things, that's where I draw the line.
It puts all other incels in a bad spotlight and just gets us negative public attention, no mentally stable incel wants or deserves that.

So yes, low effort bait threads need to be forbidden, but I don't think you should forbid these topics in general.


That's already happening, lmao.


You're right, very true and very important.
We are currently more busy with argueing bluepillers about the blackpill than we are busy developing the blackpill.
I had a moment not to long ago, where I was linking the Incel Wiki to explain the dogpill to one of these bluepiled greycels and he literally said he doesn't believe in these "autistic incel articles", can you fucking believe that? :lul:
I'm tired of trying to explain basic blackpill 101 to all these 2021 infiltrators. I'm tired of explaining the dogpill, the heightpill, lookism to 2021 greyfags.
Wasn't there a rule "No bluepillers allowed" some time ago? Bring it back.
What do administrators want? A blackpilled forum or normie forum?



100%. You have to punish people who post in the wrong subforum or they'll never learn and you'll have to constantly waste ressources on moving their trash threads around. Posting in the correct subforum isn't difficult.


This forum is about not being able to have female interaction and we have to argue if talking about female interaction is bragging. What?


I would ban this greycel retard on the spot for this. Shitting his retarded troll oneliner into an important discussion.

Also this braindamaged 6'1 larper, who even encourages this retarded trolling.
USE THE FUCKIN BAN BUTTON MODS. WHY ARE YOU TOLERATING LOW IQ TROLL FAGS LIKE THESE??????????????



This should be a nobrainer, but I'm afraid it isn't :fuk:
Whatchu know about rolling down in the deep
 
U

unsettling

Demigod
★★★★★
Joined
Apr 27, 2019
Posts
87,409
Online
205d 5h 25m
iamsubhuman said:
posts: 80,000
creator of the thread with the most amount of posts in the sewers :feelshaha:

let me know when you expose somebody like mistersinister instead of just replying with :blackpill::redpill::whitepill:

i'm probably more incel than you are, retard
>thinks "exposing" a 2021 greycel is something to brag about.

here are are my credentials:


for all your neurotic obsession over hunting down each and every other fakecel, i contributed to the catch of a much bigger fish than you could ever manage.
 
Komesarj89

Komesarj89

Sickcel
★★★
Joined
Apr 28, 2019
Posts
293
Online
8d 9h 14m
Fat Link said:
Highest IQ post I’ve seen this month probably. :hax:

With your permission I will add the relevant parts of it to our updated 2022 upcoming rule set?! :panties:

My issue with this definition is that it is a little too broad. By this definition my dad is an incel.

nice_try said:
You're right, very true and very important.
We are currently more busy with argueing bluepillers about the blackpill than we are busy developing the blackpill.
I had a moment not to long ago, where I was linking the Incel Wiki to explain the dogpill to one of these bluepiled greycels and he literally said he doesn't believe in these "autistic incel articles", can you fucking believe that? :lul:

We face the same issue with what is "the blackpill" as we do with what is an incel. Not only is the term not very clearly defined, but we have the added problem that people don't understand statistics. They think that the blackpill is a set of absolute immutable laws when they are all statistical inferences speaking about populations. People are unwilling to consider outliers or even to accept that in some cases someone who is tall will not do as well. And I say this as someone in the lower 15th percentile of height. Saying that there are outliers does not invalidate the height pill. By overly defining the blackpill and not talking about stats, we're just going to unleash massive ideological purity spiraling. We should try to have as general a definition as possible while still retaining the essence of the forum.
 
nice_try

nice_try

Chad always wins
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 26, 2018
Posts
6,445
Online
35d 16h 33m
Komesarj89 said:
Not only is the term not very clearly defined, but we have the added problem that people don't understand statistics. They think that the blackpill is a set of absolute immutable laws when they are all statistical inferences speaking about populations. People are unwilling to consider outliers or even to accept that in some cases someone who is tall will not do as well. And I say this as someone in the lower 15th percentile of height. Saying that there are outliers does not invalidate the height pill. By overly defining the blackpill and not talking about stats, we're just going to unleash massive ideological purity spiraling. We should try to have as general a definition as possible while still retaining the essence of the forum.
I think the blackpill is very well defined.
What you're correct about, and I already said that and it's also the point where I disagree with BlckPllPres, is that the blackpill is not the absolute truth and that there are exceptions. But it gives a good indication of what is true most of the time and I don't want to have to discuss bluepilled cherry picks and exceptions all the time.
 
iamsubhuman

iamsubhuman

Estuans interius Ira vehementi
Joined
Dec 3, 2020
Posts
3,554
Online
61d 2h 10m
unsettling said:
>thinks "exposing" a 2021 greycel is something to brag about.

here are are my credentials:


for all your neurotic obsession over hunting down each and every other fakecel, i contributed to the catch of a much bigger fish than you could ever manage.
you want me to go through 4 pages, nigga? how about you link and / or quote the exact parts?

that thread was made by somebody else and you're not even in any of those screenshots. you just said "eh, i kinda expected this guy to be fakecel." still, kudos for not postmaxxing :feelshaha:
 
U

unsettling

Demigod
★★★★★
Joined
Apr 27, 2019
Posts
87,409
Online
205d 5h 25m
iamsubhuman said:
you want me to go through 4 pages, nigga? how about you link and / or quote the exact parts?

that thread was made by somebody else and you're not even in any of those screenshots. you just said "eh, i kinda expected this guy to be fakecel." still, kudos for not postmaxxing :feelshaha:
i linked the post that was brought up against him in the ban appeals and resulted in the ban. i dont expect you to go through the thread because i already know that you're a clueless newfag that knows nothing about the event in the first place, thanks for further reinforcing my point that 2020+ nobodies shouldn't speak about forum rules when they dont even have the reference of past fakecel cases to go off of.
 
Komesarj89

Komesarj89

Sickcel
★★★
Joined
Apr 28, 2019
Posts
293
Online
8d 9h 14m
nice_try said:
I think the blackpill is very well defined.
What you're correct about, and I already said that and it's also the point where I disagree with BlckPllPres, is that the blackpill is not the absolute truth and that there are exceptions. But it gives a good indication of what is true most of the time and I don't want to have to discuss bluepilled cherry picks and exceptions all the time.

I'd say the blackpill was well defined if there was at least a manifesto of some sort. At the moment the blackpill is an amalgam of various statistical facts, anecdotes, and humor. I've been working on a book for a couple of years, but my better known co-author bailed. So I put it on pause.

I would also point out that the debate over whether the black pill is absolute biological law instead of statistical reality is entirely where most of our debates come from. People who say BP is literally immutable think those who see it as statistical are bluepilled. While stupid bluepill shit like "Just take a shower bro!" should def be banned, overly defining the blackpill is going to be used as a sledgehammer by one camp to eviscerate the other.
 
iamsubhuman

iamsubhuman

Estuans interius Ira vehementi
Joined
Dec 3, 2020
Posts
3,554
Online
61d 2h 10m
unsettling said:
i linked the post that was brought up against him in the ban appeals and resulted in the ban. i dont expect you to go through the thread because i already know that you're a clueless newfag that knows nothing about the event in the first place, thanks for further reinforcing my point that 2020+ nobodies shouldn't speak about forum rules when they dont even have the reference of past fakecel cases to go off of.
why should i know in the first place? :feelshaha: just give attention to fakecels who are already banned theory.

just fucking lol @ using the excuse that i'm a newfag. nigga, i'm 5'4 and ugly. i belong here, watch you be some slightly below average dude or some shit.
 
Edmund_Kemper

Edmund_Kemper

Suicide is self-expression
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 26, 2019
Posts
23,564
Online
255d 14h 31m
Draestyn said:
no agecucks would be a great rule
Condemning molestation of girls who are 10 years old is NOT agecuckery

if you say that an 18 year old is a child that’s agecuckery though
 
Inn013c

Inn013c

Recruit
★★★
Joined
Aug 30, 2021
Posts
286
Online
6d 7h 34m
nice_try said:
Yes, or at least, make it more clear.
How about we define "Incel" in the broadest way, similar to the one I proposed, and then have many sub labels/categories? This would solve the issue, uniting all of us males more, and giving us a higher chance of getting approved and endorsed by society someday in the future.

nice_try said:
Yes, or at least, make it more clear.

- Is somebody who goes to escorts an incel? Since he cleary isn't celibate. (celibate = someone who doesn't have sex)
- Is somebody who had sexual experience and gfs in the past an incel because he has been single for X amount of time?
- Can somebody who never made efforts to engage with women be an incel? Or doesn't that make him a Volcel (voluntary celibate) since he never even tried getting out of celibate?
- Is somebody who only wants a 8/10 virgin and refuses to engage with any woman lower than that still an incel? Or doesn't that make him a Volcel, since he voluntarily refuses to date anything below his ridiculous standards?
- Is somebody who receives interest from women, but for some reason cannot start a relationship with them an incel?
- Is somebody who is good looking and tall enough to attract women but for some reason can't get a gf an incel or just an idiot who is too dumb to utilize his assets?

Or is it all up for interpretation?
Can "being incel" even be defined?
This really is a tough one, since no matter how you define incel, there will always be somebody who disagrees with you.
It seems to me that the simpler the main concept is, the better, otherwise people might get confused.

Also if someone feels to belong in here, acknowledging us as brocels, without nor bragging nor mocking but actually helping us... then why should we not welcome him? Imo, we should definitely greet him! It's exactly these people that we need!! The ones loving and caring, the ones capable of getting the sympathy of people and society.
 
Last edited:
Aadi

Aadi

Aadi#0656
★★★★
Joined
Dec 21, 2021
Posts
339
Online
2d 1h 0m
nice_try said:
I would ban this greycel retard on the spot for this. Shitting his retarded troll oneliner into an important discussion.
 
D

Damo the incel

Paragon
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 23, 2018
Posts
16,275
Online
336d 1h 56m
FrothySolutions said:
Crack down HARD on what it is to be a braggart/fakecel. At least so I know where we stand.
What do you consider bragging?
 
B

based_meme

I.N.C.E.L. High Command
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 11, 2019
Posts
12,002
Online
152d 18h 24m
Draestyn said:
no agecucks would be a great rule
Ban everyone who uses the words "agecuck" and "moralfag" to feign righteous indignation and veil their pedophilia. You fedposting turds will attract heat and doom the forum. Go talk about your love of sex with children elsewhere. Stop piggybacking on to incel forums like fucking parasites and viruses.

Fucking degenerates.

FrothySolutions said:
Crack down HARD on what it is to be a braggart/fakecel. At least so I know where we stand.
Braggart is pretty straightforward. Fakecel is going to depend on how the forum settles on the definition of incel.

BornToLose said:
Define incel for once and for all.
This is probably the most important order of business, first and foremost. This is, after all, an incel forum.

Inn013c said:
It's probably done a little on purpose. The more rules you have, the more censorship and abuse associated with them... which throws people off. It's a delicate matter.


Personally, I believe it should encompass all males, and not just sex. The perfect definition imo would be: incels are males that don't have the affection/love of a woman, and cant seem to find it.

So involuntary single, or involuntary lonely, or something like that... it's a much better denotation. Sex does come naturally anyway, when there is a stable functioning relationship. By removing sex from the definition of who we are, we are taking away the power women have; they wont be able to attack us anymore!

And by moving the topic on love and affection, we make ourselves more sympathetic to the public.

+1

BUT, It would be better to cut down some bad stuff. In detail:
  • No more pedo, of any kind.
    • Personally, I'd include loli in the list... but idk. Maybe give them a dedicated subforum, if you really want
  • No more serious talks about raping this or that, but I'd allow rape jokes and humor
  • No at any kind of discussions about ER, killing, torturing, kidnapping...
Suicide, instead, I'd allow it as general discussion, but no promoting or directly helping (too risky).
Genius post. I don't say that lightly.

ERadicator said:
Straight up temp ban faggots for postmaxxing on ID instead of just moving their shit threads to the sewers and giving them slaps on the wrist, getting tired of weebcels shitting up the place. Also ban escortcel dicussion, period. Bragging about railing a cheap syphilis-infested whore after paying her is still bragging. Lastly, ban ANYONE who is proven or exposed to have anywhere near Chad/Chadlite-tier looks. Hell even ban the atheistically normie faggots, you know the ones who claim to be "invisible", those cunts have most likely never been touched by a bully. Those are not incels, they are NOT one of us
I agree with the general idea here. If we were to adopt the definiton of incel proposed by Inn013c @Inn013c , then it makes sense that males with the looks would get the attention and affection that the rest of us don't. This means that all the good looking faggots who are here just to mog us and feel better about themselves can fuck right off, because they aren't fooling anyone with their bullshit when they say they can't get female attention. It must be chad arrogance that they think they can get what they want, including feeling alpha amongst a group of subhumans, so they come here to feel superior.

This definition of incel, however, does not validate a revival of the escortcel discussion, since hookers are visited mostly because you have no options, and incels have no options, else they'd be out there getting laid and going from relationship to relationship (or lay to lay). I'm against escortceling in principle, but I understand it as a necessary cope for some.

SlayerSlayer said:
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE ban all IT and FDS discussion from Incel discussion and the lounge. It's sewer material
Abso-fucking-lutely.

It's extremely low IQ to be even talking about those morons. We live rent free in their heads. Why the fuck would you let them live rent free in yours by constantly making threads showcasing whatever retarded thread they make? Forget about those stupid troons. It's reddit aka pure fucking AIDS.

Blackpillapologist said:
One sentence: Remove the racebait rule and allow hate speech as long as the user doesn't threaten anything illegal or doesn't target a specific member.
Yes. Free speech is of paramount importance, especially in today's internet where speech is increasingly policed and censored in more and more online spaces. People should be free to say whatever they want, including anything stupid enough to incriminate themselves according to the laws of their land (e.g., England has misogyny laws, so UKcels should exercise discretion when posting about female hatred, but they should still be free to post).

There are obvious limitations on free speech, such as threats directed towards individuals. But if some retardcel wants to post about his plans to go ER, and if the utterances of such statements are not against the laws where the site is hosted, then have at it, buddy boyo. Just don't be surprised if tactical teams take a battering ram to your front door and go George Floyd on your dumb ass.

At the end of the day, though, it's an incel forum, so if expressing your frustrations in this way is how you want to vent, do so at your own risk.

mahniqqa said:
I agree that inceldom should be considered a trait that can be had by any male, truecell or not. The prospect of muh "you're not incel if you haven't busted your ass off in every which way possible for ugly roastie pussy in a 80/20 gynocentrist dating scene" is pure retardation. It's like trying to say some skinny african kid isn't "really starving" cause they don't eat bugs and feces when they could.
The involuntary aspect of inceldom isn't just genes, or socio-economic status, but also the ridiculous bluepill double standard of men needing to slave away to be perfect if they even hope to get a looksmatch because gynocentric culture is slowly shifting women's already warped expectations.
No regular guy can individually determine what the rest of his peers see as "his duty" to perform physically, profesionally, and intelectually.
Those are norms imposed by societal culture, that is outside of individual control. Trying within reason is one thing(like taking decent care of yourself, showering and exercise and trying to have a decent job to be financially independent etc.), but chasing current day roastie's delusionally high bar is another thing entirely.
Saying someone is not an incel cause they refuse to give their all for every attention-whoring, mind-game playing, suddenly ghosting, delusional cow is basically like saying "just try harder bruh, she doesn't owe you anything, but you owe it to her to give 110% :feelstastyman:" and is paradoxically, pure Bluepill.
Everything you've said here is spot on, except this: inceldom is a state, not a trait.

iamsubhuman said:
rule 3: postmaxxers don't have a say in anything
Postmaxxers are a cancer of the forum.

Komesarj89 said:
My issue with this definition is that it is a little too broad. By this definition my dad is an incel.
As absurd as it sounds, incel = involuntary celibate. Your dad wasn't incel at one point, because you were born, but if he tries his hardest to get the affections of a woman and subsequently get laid (without paying for it) and fails, then yeah, he'd technically be incel. If we are being consistent, then this must follow.

Komesarj89 said:
We face the same issue with what is "the blackpill" as we do with what is an incel. Not only is the term not very clearly defined, but we have the added problem that people don't understand statistics. They think that the blackpill is a set of absolute immutable laws when they are all statistical inferences speaking about populations. People are unwilling to consider outliers or even to accept that in some cases someone who is tall will not do as well. And I say this as someone in the lower 15th percentile of height. Saying that there are outliers does not invalidate the height pill. By overly defining the blackpill and not talking about stats, we're just going to unleash massive ideological purity spiraling. We should try to have as general a definition as possible while still retaining the essence of the forum.
I've written about this and mentioned this already several times here. The "black pill" (TM) can be understood as a collection of scientific studies, facts (conclusions), and statistics spanning multiple disciplines, such as evolutionary psychology and biology, psychology, sociology, and economics even, that describes the realities pertaining to dating, male-female relations, attraction, and hypergamy/polygamy. The black pill, in more abstract and simple terms, refers to the fundamental, indivisible truth of something. The "black pill," as most users here understand it colloquially, is just lookism, but this is incomplete. Lookism i.e., the biases surrounding looks, and the resultant effects on dating and social life, and even professional life, is itself a black pill, but it is not the black pill.

The black pill is also not repackaged nihilism, as it is often misunderstood. "It's over" isn't some nihilistic mantra that's meant to encapsulate the nihilistic philosophical aspect of the black pill or whatever. It's just a catchy phrase that accurately and succinctly summarizes the practical everyday reality of being a black pilled incel and having the sobering awareness of our own inceldom and what that entails.
 
Last edited:
Draestyn

Draestyn

KHHV
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 18, 2021
Posts
4,012
Online
2d 17h 59m
Edmund_Kemper said:
Condemning molestation of girls who are 10 years old is NOT agecuckery

if you say that an 18 year old is a child that’s agecuckery though
if you think a 10 year old girl can have sex with 10 year old boys, but you also think a 16 year old guy cant fuck her, then you are an agecuck
 
FrothySolutions

FrothySolutions

Post like the FBI is watching.
★★★★★
Joined
May 6, 2018
Posts
17,252
Online
155d 14h 52m
based_meme said:
Braggart is pretty straightforward. Fakecel is going to depend on how the forum settles on the definition of incel.

Is it? Because people keep making excuses like "Oh, I'm sure she was just being polite." Whereas most of us don't even get that.
 
Edmund_Kemper

Edmund_Kemper

Suicide is self-expression
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 26, 2019
Posts
23,564
Online
255d 14h 31m
Draestyn said:
if you think a 10 year old girl can have sex with 10 year old boys, but you also think a 16 year old guy cant fuck her, then you are an agecuck
10 year olds shouldn’t have sex at all
 
B

based_meme

I.N.C.E.L. High Command
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 11, 2019
Posts
12,002
Online
152d 18h 24m
FrothySolutions said:
Is it? Because people keep making excuses like "Oh, I'm sure she was just being polite." Whereas most of us don't even get that.
@gymletethnicel :feelskek::feelshaha::feelsgah:

You're still sticking to your guns on what happened in that thread, aren't you? That you think it was a sincere compliment?
 
AAAAAAAAAAAcel

AAAAAAAAAAAcel

Theorizer
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Posts
16,169
Online
220d 16h 47m
For the love of god no more IT spam
 
FrothySolutions

FrothySolutions

Post like the FBI is watching.
★★★★★
Joined
May 6, 2018
Posts
17,252
Online
155d 14h 52m
based_meme said:
@gymletethnicel :feelskek::feelshaha::feelsgah:

You're still sticking to your guns on what happened in that thread, aren't you? That you think it was a sincere compliment?

I've stuck to "worse" guns. I don't know what world you guys are living in, but women just don't talk to me like that. Ever. EVER.
 
D

Deleted member 35428

Self-banned
-
Joined
Jul 6, 2021
Posts
4,191
Online
39d 3h 25m
ERadicator said:
ban ANYONE who is proven or exposed to have anywhere near Chad/Chadlite-tier looks. Hell even ban the atheistically normie faggots, you know the ones who claim to be "invisible", those cunts have most likely never been touched by a bully. Those are not incels, they are NOT one of us
 
PPEcel

PPEcel

Triggering soycucks since 2018 :D
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Posts
25,090
Online
201d 7h 24m
Maintain the current rules for now, though I would support more detailed guidance as to ensure the consistent application of those rules.

What we need to do is step up moderation of and monitor suspicious posters.
 
proudweeb

proudweeb

bluepilled retard
★★★★★
Joined
Feb 20, 2021
Posts
106,501
Online
64d 6m
open up the sewers for unlimited postmaxxing and drop the 10 second timer :smonk:
 
autisticghost

autisticghost

My birth was an error
★★
Joined
Jul 22, 2020
Posts
673
Online
31d 6h 14m
ban all kisshavers
 
AsianKungFao

AsianKungFao

Recruit
★★★★
Joined
Nov 23, 2021
Posts
367
Online
5d 5h 58m
disable post count in sewers
 
JoeBruhcel

JoeBruhcel

Overlord
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 14, 2021
Posts
6,545
Online
50d 2h 26m
Draestyn said:
no agecucks would be a great rule
Agree wholeheartedly with this.
 
Misanthropy1

Misanthropy1

Captain
★★★★
Joined
Nov 6, 2021
Posts
1,883
Online
27d 1h 25m
ban appeals shouldn't be given on specific cases like trolls, soycuck bluepillers, larpers, fakecels, etc.

post count in sewers shouldn't be given to new users, they have to get a good ammount of posts in ID/lounge before (2000? 5000?). or maybe make it based on join date (e.g having to wait for your account to be at least 1 year old before being able to have your posts count in the sewers
Aadi said:
IP ban India
welcome back nigga
 
Last edited:
Izayacel

Izayacel

Watcher of Recent "
★★★★★
Joined
May 5, 2018
Posts
9,514
Online
33d 16h 47m
I Like it how it Is so far there are less Warnings at play what IS good

In the Past you Got Warnings for the pettiest Shit . Anyways give greycel a Postlimit that They have to Resch in a month or They get banned. There are to many greycels infiltrating this Forum lately

Lets say They should reach 300 Posts in a month thats 10/D i think thats doable.
 
ThoughtfulCel

ThoughtfulCel

G.O.R.I.L.L.A _M.A.X.I.N.G
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Posts
20,164
Online
365d 13h 19m
Fat Link @Fat Link

Taking everything everyone said into account. If there's one thing you listen to, let it be this.

Allowing normies and chads onto the website will be the DEATH of this place. This place is callled INCELS.CO not BLACKPILL.CO.

Does it really make sense to have people who are capable of obtaining sex to post alongside people who can't? You see the fuckery that was looksmax?

Be warry of the 2021 "cels" who are pushing for us to just accept anyone with open arms. I've been seeing it a lot in these discussions.

Rules need to be made to keep bullshit people out, and if we keep broadening the rules for who's allowed like serge did, were going to get a shittier state of what the site is today
 
Alone75

Alone75

Admiral
★★
Joined
Nov 16, 2017
Posts
2,657
Online
34d 15h 24m
Ban escortcel cucks for shaming incels for not being like them.
Ban pedocels at the first instance of discussing underage girls sexually.
Higher the minimum age of members allowed to make accounts to 18.
 
Honeypot

Honeypot

Wizard
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 11, 2018
Posts
4,449
Online
28d 13h 6m
Infinity said:
Over the past few days, I have given the rules a look. While they seem solid, it seems like it leaves a lot undefined. Don't know if this is on purpose, or left up to interpretation by the staff. I'd like to see some changes to rules that better complement the culture of the forum.

If you have any good ideas for any changes to the rules, please post them below.
Remove any illegal comment or post so we don't go to jail pls? Sometimes is hard to control ourselves in some mattERs.

Remove illegal stuff but don't ban the users, only ban users who spam illegal stuff willingly.
 
B

based_meme

I.N.C.E.L. High Command
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 11, 2019
Posts
12,002
Online
152d 18h 24m
ThoughtfulCel said:
Fat Link @Fat Link

Taking everything everyone said into account. If there's one thing you listen to, let it be this.

Allowing normies and chads onto the website will be the DEATH of this place. This place is callled INCELS.CO not BLACKPILL.CO.

Does it really make sense to have people who are capable of obtaining sex to post alongside people who can't? You see the fuckery that was looksmax?

Be warry of the 2021 "cels" who are pushing for us to just accept anyone with open arms. I've been seeing it a lot in these discussions.

Rules need to be made to keep bullshit people out, and if we keep broadening the rules for who's allowed like serge did, were going to get a shittier state of what the site is today
The seeds of that fuckery have already been planted. Go check the ban discussion thread. Fakecels and their friends backing them up.
 
ThoughtfulCel

ThoughtfulCel

G.O.R.I.L.L.A _M.A.X.I.N.G
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Posts
20,164
Online
365d 13h 19m
based_meme said:
The seeds of that fuckery have already been planted. Go check the ban discussion thread. Fakecels and their friends backing them up.
I honestly hope they can see through the bullshit. Serge was a lost cause, but i have hope for these two
 
Mainländer

Mainländer

Songwritercel
★★★★★
Joined
May 2, 2018
Posts
37,395
Online
158d 2h 1m
Draestyn said:
no agecucks would be a great rule
No feminists/whiteknights would already take care of that.

Fat Link @Fat Link Infinity @Infinity I would like to bring to your attention the fact that almost 90% of the userbase voted that agecucking is whiteknighting (which has been against the rules already for most of this site's history).

The previous administration rejected threads I did on the suggestions section about that.

 
Last edited:
Draestyn

Draestyn

KHHV
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 18, 2021
Posts
4,012
Online
2d 17h 59m
Mainländer said:
No feminists/whiteknights would already take care of that.

Fat Link @Fat Link Infinity @Infinity I would like to bring to your attention the fact that almost 90% of the userbase voted that agecucking is whiteknighting (which has been against the rules already for most of this site's history).

The previous administration ignored threads I did on the suggestions section about that.

im gonna make a thread similar to that, as new userbase, more up to date results
 
Mainländer

Mainländer

Songwritercel
★★★★★
Joined
May 2, 2018
Posts
37,395
Online
158d 2h 1m
Draestyn said:
im gonna make a thread similar to that, as new userbase, more up to date results
Tag me please.
 
kampman

kampman

The finder of lost children
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Posts
6,784
Online
177d 5h 57m
Mountainbikecel said:
the less censorship the better.
Emba said:
It's fine the way it is now.

There's no need to do much of anything. Just maybe make some adult areas and cut down on postnaxx spam.

Just clean the shit off the floor before. It gets stained.

Right now it's a game here. Keep it serious but fun. Obvious retards should be kicked.

Pretty much my opinion on the matter.
 
SchrodingersDick

SchrodingersDick

Better incel than jestermaxxing for scraps
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 7, 2018
Posts
8,282
Online
56d 13h 58m
Mountainbikecel said:
the less censorship the better.
Agreed. But foids and bluepillers need to be BTFO immediately. They have nothing new to say that we haven’t heard before, and will probabaly start unironically memeing the various empty platitudes that we meme about.
 
EyesAreSoCold

EyesAreSoCold

Overlord
★★★★★
Joined
Feb 23, 2018
Posts
6,328
Online
190d 1h 8m
Rules are fine, don't change anything.
 
MarquisDeSade

MarquisDeSade

$The price for pussy is too damn high$
★★★★★
Joined
Feb 11, 2021
Posts
7,701
Online
80d 3h 43m
Infinity said:
Over the past few days, I have given the rules a look. While they seem solid, it seems like it leaves a lot undefined. Don't know if this is on purpose, or left up to interpretation by the staff. I'd like to see some changes to rules that better complement the culture of the forum.

If you have any good ideas for any changes to the rules, please post them below.
If it's not a rule already, remove any uploaded videos of any users committing violence against others themselves or promoting the future act of doing so at a later time. We don't want this forum to be associated with promoting or endorsing violence so they can utilize that against us as a part of their latest political propaganda campaigns. That's the last thing this forum needs right now. :feelsthink::yes:
 
Last edited:
U

unsettling

Demigod
★★★★★
Joined
Apr 27, 2019
Posts
87,409
Online
205d 5h 25m
iamsubhuman said:
rule 3: postmaxxers don't have a say in anything
rule 4: banned users don't have a say in anything

ez win
 
PPEcel

PPEcel

Triggering soycucks since 2018 :D
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Posts
25,090
Online
201d 7h 24m
MarquisDeSade said:
If it's not a rule already, remove any uploaded videos of any users committing violence against others themselves or promoting the future act of doing so at a later time. We don't want this forum to be associated with promoting or endorsing violence so they can utilize that against us as a part of their latest political propaganda campaigns. That's the last thing this forum needs right now. :feelsthink::yes:
That in itself is very contentious
 
Misanthropy1

Misanthropy1

Captain
★★★★
Joined
Nov 6, 2021
Posts
1,883
Online
27d 1h 25m
another thing. GrAYcels shouldn't be allowed to make retarded datamining poll threads. It's not rare to see 50 sub post GrAYFAGS making multiple threads asking generic questions with polll included, while at the same time not providing anything of value to the forum such as posting history about thier lives as incels or even discussing blackpill. They just come here and post glownigger polls.
 
PPEcel

PPEcel

Triggering soycucks since 2018 :D
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Posts
25,090
Online
201d 7h 24m
Over f
Misanthropy1 said:
another thing. GrAYcels shouldn't be allowed to make retarded datamining poll threads. It's not rare to see 50 sub post GrAYFAGS making multiple threads asking generic questions with polll included, while at the same time not providing anything of value to the forum such as posting history about thier lives as incels or even discussing blackpill. They just come here and post glownigger polls.
for paranoiacels
 
B

based_meme

I.N.C.E.L. High Command
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 11, 2019
Posts
12,002
Online
152d 18h 24m
PPEcel said:
Over f

for paranoiacels
We all know it's true. It's quite fucking obvious, especially when there's a known history of people coming to this site for research purposes.
 
Misanthropy1

Misanthropy1

Captain
★★★★
Joined
Nov 6, 2021
Posts
1,883
Online
27d 1h 25m
PPEcel said:
Over f

for paranoiacels
you haven't seen anyone doing what i described? i just saw someone doing that today. i think i've seen at least 4 graycels doing this in total
 
B

based_meme

I.N.C.E.L. High Command
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 11, 2019
Posts
12,002
Online
152d 18h 24m
Misanthropy1 said:
you haven't seen anyone doing what i described? i just saw someone doing that today. i think i've seen at least 4 graycels doing this in total
The guy you're quoting did it at one point.

 
B

based_meme

I.N.C.E.L. High Command
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 11, 2019
Posts
12,002
Online
152d 18h 24m
Misanthropy1 said:
Yeah. The lesson is simple: trust no one, least of all randoms on the internet.
 
DepravedAndDeprived

DepravedAndDeprived

And then one day, for no reason at all...
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 27, 2020
Posts
5,404
Online
49d 12h 48m
Only White people should be allowed on .is. :smonk:
 

Similar threads

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape7
shape8
Top