Proving why Communism, not isolationism or cronyism, is the only logically sustained social organization

[Tesla]

Axiom A: all systems and their products must preserve the principles which compose them. Otherwise they're autophagic and, since the purpose of making axioms is to generate usefulness and permanence in time, meaningless;

Axiom B: the maxim axiom of any social organization is humans and the human race. Otherwise, there would be no need to create an organization based on human interactions, the 'social';

Conclusion: all logically defensable social organizations preserve human needs as a baseline. Communism proposes this, in spite of continuous interference from imperialism, and the only reason cronyists persist is because they hide in the shadows but will nevertheless suicide due to the system's inherent contradictions.

Does any of that ring a bell? Why are you disgusting cronyists bending the knee to the system instead of recreating it? I'm very disappointed, the only other option is suicide. Society can't do with mould around its borders.

 

[calimero]

ok if you think that is a proof

 

[Khanivore]

Yooooo commie bastards

I want to go in an frenzy which will prove that ussr was great

But! Nobody cares! and it is, frankly, quite boring subject to talk about

 

[PLA1092]

I'll always be wary of any type of leftist "revolution" because the main characters supporting it would be the current type of SJW degenerate foids and other bluepilled soys...

Though I guess if it were to ever happen, it certainly wouldn't be Twitter anarchists doing it.

 

[Ehwhatever]

Because human beings, as a species, are driven by logic and reason, right? Let's make a logically based system for them to follow. Makes sense.

 

[Tesla]

Because human beings, as a species, are driven by logic and reason, right? Let's make a logically based system for them to follow. Makes sense.

Yes, it does. Your sarcasm is so ineffective it's not even acerbic, you're just repeating the truth, being indifferent to reality. When did you learn most homo sapiens aren't human beings or even sided with humanity to begin with? Oh yeah never, because you are one of the animals as my past DM shows, so it doesn't even compute as a difference: all humans are the same as you, an animal, so of course logic doesn't work for them, because it doesn't for you! INDIFFERENT, right? Whatever. That's also why your sarcasm is so ineffective, you lack autonomy to be exclusive and oppose yourself from anything that strongly, it's all white and the same.

Stay like this, Mr. Mime. Your type is the least dangerous on its baseline stage. Unless you think this representation of it is anything but pathetic, of course.

ok if you think that is a proof

Because logic isn't proof, but social consensus and academicism. I don't give two shits for earthy bootlickers incapable of original thought.

 

[AsiaCel]

Marxism rosgerism is the only way

 

[tulasdanslos]

Don't bother replying to this moron, he will label you INFP Fe shadow Ti main in order not to type out an actual argument.

Ummm, actually that's such a Sagittarius thing to say

 

[Ehwhatever]

Yes, it does. Your sarcasm is so ineffective it's not even acerbic, you're just repeating the truth, being indifferent to reality. When did you learn most homo sapiens aren't human beings or even sided with humanity to begin with? Oh yeah never, because you are one of the animals as my past DM shows, so it doesn't even compute as a difference: all humans are the same as you, an animal, so of course logic doesn't work for them, because it doesn't for you! INDIFFERENT, right? Whatever. That's also why your sarcasm is so ineffective, you lack autonomy to be exclusive and oppose yourself from anything that strongly, it's all white and the same.

I'd say my sarcasm worked well enough if you felt the need to write me another textbook on why I'm the lowest form of life. Also, I'm not indifferent and never have been. No point in arguing with someone who thinks they have it all figured out though. That's just a waste of time. Maybe one day you'll develop humility. I think it would benefit you.

 

[calimero]

Yes, it does. Your sarcasm is so ineffective it's not even acerbic, you're just repeating the truth, being indifferent to reality. When did you learn most homo sapiens aren't human beings or even sided with humanity to begin with? Oh yeah never, because you are one of the animals as my past DM shows, so it doesn't even compute as a difference: all humans are the same as you, an animal, so of course logic doesn't work for them, because it doesn't for you! INDIFFERENT, right? Whatever. That's also why your sarcasm is so ineffective, you lack autonomy to be exclusive and oppose yourself from anything that strongly, it's all white and the same.

Stay like this, Mr. Mime. Your type is the least dangerous on its baseline stage. Unless you think this representation of it is anything but pathetic, of course.


Because logic isn't proof, but social consensus and academicism. I don't give two shits for earthy bootlickers incapable of original thought.

lmao, academics is where 95% of original thought comes from. your post means absolutely nothing empirically, anyone can make axioms. it's just a superfluous way of stating your opinion.

 

[Nava]

> “Communism proposes…”

 

[Tesla]

lmao, academics is where 95% of original thought comes from. your post means absolutely nothing empirically, anyone can make axioms. it's just a superfluous way of stating your opinion.

huh, I don't remember seeing this one comment, but of course you just had to be defending academics, whose sole authority are bought diplomas and mass maneuver by the elites: so long as people are perpetually divided and overspecialized, they don't have to have time for original thought and should delegate it to those in academia, who are supposedly 'specialized in thinking' so more apt to propose valid ideas solutions. No wonder our civilization is shimmering and there's no misery at all, which is to be expected since they're parasites who get state money and promise to solve problems with said money, right? (This is sarcasm done right, @Ehwhatever. See how value is starkly defined? Only a fool would think we don't have any problems)

Oh, and don't even get me started with 'everyone can do axioms'. You say that as if it was a demerit, as if only academics should have the right to make axioms, which isn't even the case since they're incompetent groupthinkers who cling over the same dialogs because of their "historical value", aka fossil worshipping. How does it feel knowing you delegate your cognition to fucking archeologists? You disgust me, how dare you waste your life and cognition like this and then gang up on others as if it was only natural to snuff personalities. Burn in hell.

> “Communism proposes…”

Yes, it's a doctrine so must propose action.

 

[calimero]

huh, I don't remember seeing this one comment, but of course you just had to be defending academics, whose sole authority are bought diplomas and mass maneuver by the elites: so long as people are perpetually divided and overspecialized, they don't have to have time for original thought and should delegate it to those in academia, who are supposedly 'specialized in thinking' so more apt to propose valid ideas solutions. No wonder our civilization is shimmering and there's no misery at all, which is to be expected since they're parasites who get state money and promise to solve problems with said money, right? (This is sarcasm done right, @Ehwhatever. See how value is starkly defined? Only a fool would think we don't have any problems)

Oh, and don't even get me started with 'everyone can do axioms'. You say that as if it was a demerit, as if only academics should have the right to make axioms, which isn't even the case since they're incompetent groupthinkers who cling over the same dialogs because of their "historical value", aka fossil worshipping. How does it feel knowing you delegate your cognition to fucking archeologists? You disgust me, how dare you waste your life and cognition like this and then gang up on others as if it was only natural to snuff personalities. Burn in hell.


Yes, it's a doctrine so must propose action.

Bought diplomas? I am not sure what your perception of the academic world is but I worked very hard for my degrees. Maybe your lack of education causes you to hate on academics. You act like you are an intelligent and original thinker, but the only things I see from you are borrowing some terms from mathematics and computer science, and put them into sentences in which they have no meaning. I'm not sure if you understand the context of those terms in the first place. You can't test and validate your axioms, and you don't support them with anything, so you can't even derive a thesis from it. Maybe you have interesting thoughts, but if you want to convey them you shouldn't call it axioms. It is better if you pose a research question and write an essay about it, and also relate it to literature of the problem. Else you are trying to invent the wheel, and as a result you don't end up with anything. You also need to ask the "so what?" question, i.e. what is the practical value and societal value of your thesis. These are all very basic things on taking the route to joining the academic discussion on a topic.

You come across as narcissistic who inflates his sense of intelligence for some reason. It's easy to devalue others and proclaim yourself as superior, but it isn't based on anything concrete, because you don't dare to enter discussion, critique the ideas of others and conduct thorough analysis with scientific integrity. Maybe you would do well in academics because you have the ambition of proposing original thought, but this would only work if you humble yourself. Right now you vastly overestimate your own intellectual competence, and underestimate that of others. Do you know they call this the Dunning-Kruger effect?

Btw. it's easy to hate on specialists when you aren't one yourself. There is a trade-off between depth of knowledge and breadth of knowledge. You can't gather both because you have limited time, this is why people gather depth on a specific topic. The alternative is getting some knowledge on a lot of topics, but that's almost the same as knowing a little about everything, though there isn't a single thing that you know lot about.

 

[Glerforpus]

Capitalism is still the most reliable system

 

[Tesla]

Capitalism is still the most reliable system

The most reliable system which assusmes 5% of people dying when it could easily be prevented through group actions are 'outliers'. Supporting capitalism is actually anti-incel, since the same elitist logic applied to defend that is used to condemn incels.

Now for the idiot:

Bought diplomas? I am not sure what your perception of the academic world is but I worked very hard for my degrees. Maybe your lack of education causes you to hate on academics

Jesus, your snideness and passive-aggression are so repulsive. Titles earned through a flawed system mean nothing but permanence on said system. Anyone can get degrees assuming you live on a civilized country, which is barely good to make a living nowadays, but none of it matters if you can't see beyond the step-by-step bureaucratic methods laid by them to understand why the system is the way it is. That requires independent thought, which goes beyond the representational, mediatic level towards the assertive level.

That is, you're level 5 now. You can't conceive of original thought coming somewhere else than media and the establishment, and can't dissociate your social status (a representation) from individuality. Marx was a level 10 Tauri (the same species as you AND same archetype, 001), so you should look up to him if academics make up so much of your personality.

Finally, Narcissists do not care about spreading knowledge, they start off in life as Forrest Gump ffs. Forcefulness is not narcissism, and as I said here, perceived intellectuality without three factors that could make it fake = true, forceful intellectuality that hurts the inferiors.
Oh, should I also mention that Humble by Kendrick Lamar is T111 "Charismatic man of duty"? and that you're acting *exactly* like the song lyrics, a figurehead who thinks his salary defines his power? On the frontpage of 72archetypes.com, it's also mentioned how Tauri like to humble people to the lowest common denominator as well.

 

[calimero]

The most reliable system which assusmes 5% of people dying when it could easily be prevented through group actions are 'outliers'. Supporting capitalism is actually anti-incel, since the same elitist logic applied to defend that is used to condemn incels.

Now for the idiot:


Jesus, your snideness and passive-aggression are so repulsive. Titles earned through a flawed system mean nothing but permanence on said system. Anyone can get degrees assuming you live on a civilized country, which is barely good to make a living nowadays, but none of it matters if you can't see beyond the step-by-step bureaucratic methods laid by them to understand why the system is the way it is. That requires independent thought, which goes beyond the representational, mediatic level towards the assertive level.

That is, you're level 5 now. You can't conceive of original thought coming somewhere else than media and the establishment, and can't dissociate your social status (a representation) from individuality. Marx was a level 10 Tauri (the same species as you AND same archetype, 001), so you should look up to him if academics make up so much of your personality.

Finally, Narcissists do not care about spreading knowledge, they start off in life as Forrest Gump ffs. Forcefulness is not narcissism, and as I said here, perceived intellectuality without three factors that could make it fake = true, forceful intellectuality that hurts the inferiors.
Oh, should I also mention that Humble by Kendrick Lamar is T111 "Charismatic man of duty"? and that you're acting *exactly* like the song lyrics, a figurehead who thinks his salary defines his power? On the frontpage of 72archetypes.com, it's also mentioned how Tauri like to humble people to the lowest common denominator as well.

I'm not being snide. You are condescending about academics and real-world research while you claim to have free independent thought, and all you offer as evidence for that is your psychotic site with short incomprehensible ramblings

Atleast be honest and admit that you are not educated. Getting a degree also requires being well-rounded. If you are "above the system" you can join the drop outs that are too cool to conform.

 

[Tesla]

I'm not being snide. You are condescending about academics and real-world research while you claim to have free independent thought, and all you offer as evidence for that is your psychotic site with short incomprehensible ramblings

Atleast be honest and admit that you are not educated. Getting a degree also requires being well-rounded. If you are "above the system" you can join the drop outs that are too cool to conform.

I have a degree, do you magically respect me more now? You fucking bootlicker <spit>.
Yes, I'm strictly above the system, no scare-quotes. These are my wings, something earthy terrorists such as yourself can never dream off and historically tried to snuff and demolish anyone who had them. That's why academia won, no wonder they have strict historical ties with the Church and orthodoxy. Let's not forget Galileo who (sorta) had wings to see far up above and almost got murdered for it.

 

[Khanivore]

ye mad bro

 

[oldcel75]

I actually lived in USSR. I don't want back, sorry.

 

[Tesla]

I actually lived in USSR. I don't want back, sorry.

Not everyone will enjoy the system, more so because after Stalin died, the opposing liberal party changed USSRs' politics entirely, and yet Socialism still had a stable moment between the 60s and 70s there. Unless you were born previously, it's unlikely you had experienced the increase in life quality early soviets did. Another reason people may not like a Good system is because they aren't good themselves, a nihilistic sociopath who doesn't care about anyone will not want to live or contribute with civilization. That must be respected and they should kill themselves or fuck off to their own planets.

 

[Tesla]

I don't care about social organization
I don't care about the system
I don't care about normalfags
I don't care about society
I don't care about humanity

I rather live alone in the woods. Fuck sharing, and fuck communism.

btw, communism is impossible because of human nature

You're not made for this world, as your presentation tells, what kind of authority you have to define human nature? Not academic authority, but real species authority. You're just like roughly 80% of the population who don't care about or are antagonic towards humanity, therefore not a human. Proof: you think nature defines humanity when true humans were the reason Homo Sapiens prevailed instead of acting like cannibalistic infanticidal savages back on the ages.

 

[calimero]

I have a degree, do you magically respect me more now? You fucking bootlicker <spit>.
Yes, I'm strictly above the system, no scare-quotes. These are my wings, something earthy terrorists such as yourself can never dream off and historically tried to snuff and demolish anyone who had them. That's why academia won, no wonder they have strict historical ties with the Church and orthodoxy. Let's not forget Galileo who (sorta) had wings to see far up above and almost got murdered for it.

No, I don't respect you for being condescending. So what's your story? You did a bachelor degree or college degree and then went insane from loneliness? Or do you mean highschool degree and you are NEET and have too much free time?

 

[Khanivore]

I don't care about social organization
I don't care about the system
I don't care about normalfags
I don't care about society
I don't care about humanity

I rather live alone in the woods. Fuck sharing, and fuck communism.

You are anarchist