I still don't understand why so many of us hate Women

Ranny

Ranny

Blackpilled again
★★
Joined
Mar 23, 2021
Posts
109
Online
2d 8h 33m
I think, at the end of the day, chads don't make women truly happen. Nor do they find peace by or happiness by whoring out. Men will continue to be lonely and women will continue to be treated like whores. Everyone is deceived, and there is only defeat and misery.
tbh
 
Dr. Dicklet

Dr. Dicklet

Simps are the disease....and I am the cure
★★★
Joined
Oct 20, 2020
Posts
1,271
Online
8d 18h 44m
Darkleet

Darkleet

L337cel
★★
Joined
Sep 15, 2020
Posts
603
Online
5d 17h 59m
@K9Otaku your logic is extremely flawed. The most simple way to explain it, even though I really hate the method, by comparison.

For instance imagine you’re living in Ancient Egypt with pharaohs and shieet. Now you’re a Jew and you can (TBH EGYPTIANS WERE BASED) only work as a slave and get only bread and water to eat. When you’re used up you die. Now the pharaoh and Egyptian cucks have an abundancy of food but they won’t share. So what did the Jews do? They literally made a bandit group led by Moses and they fought the pharaoh and escaped and got their own land with crisp pussy. I hope you understood this extremely high IQ story.

If you didn’t understand - there are enough women for everyone, but since monogamy isn’t enforced anymore by any standards, nature goes like Egypt and 20% of males fuck 90% of females. So what happens, goyboy? We rebel like the Jew cucks in order to restore God order and everything with it.

If you don’t rebel you will die a slave building pointless pyramids (reference to wageslaving) till you die, while the elite (bosses) will enjoy their ass. If you’re fine with this, you should definitely consider killing yourself because your life is pointless by all standards.
 
i Miss My Innocence

i Miss My Innocence

constant strive to be different
Joined
Feb 17, 2021
Posts
92
Online
4d 7h 46m
I agree with this post. Many people on this sub just can't control their anger because they've been rejected so many times in their life. And I can't blame them for that. I don't hate women, I hate their actions and the cucked society that supports them. It's in their nature that they act this way. They are naturally impulsive, emotional, and deceptive. There is literally no benefit to hating women, it'll only make you feel worse for your current situation imo. I don't want to be a burden to anybody but myself, that's why I find it humorous and stupid when someone goes ER on foids. There is no point. The best thing we can do is work with what we got and cope till we rope. Half of the people on this forum (including myself) aren't even completely black pilled lmao. I'm just a red pill coper who can't get laid.

So yeah, nice job OP. The majority of your posts have been really based. Keep up the good work and hopefully you won't get banned lmao.
 
Last edited:
K9Otaku

K9Otaku

Officer
★★★★
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Posts
846
Online
15d 14h 49m
I agree with this post. Many people on this sub just can't control their anger because they've been rejected so many times in their life. And I can't blame them for that. I don't hate women, I hate their actions and the cucked society that supports them. It's in their nature that they act this way. They are naturally impulsive, emotional, and deceptive. There is literally no benefit to hating women, it'll only make you feel worse for your current situation imo. I don't want to be a burden to anybody but myself, that's why I find it humorous and stupid when someone goes ER on foids. There is no point. The best thing we can do is work with what we got and cope till we rope. Half of the people on this forum (including myself) aren't even completely black pilled lmao. I'm just a red pill coper who can't get laid.

So yeah, nice job OP. The majority of your posts have been really based. Keep up the good work and hopefully you won't get banned lmao.
Thanks.
 
MarquisDeSade

MarquisDeSade

$The Price For Pussy Is Too Damn High$
★★★★
Joined
Feb 11, 2021
Posts
2,376
Online
21d 5h 44m
It's true that sexual hypergamy has always existed, what isn't true is the kind that we have today, the sexual hypergamy of today might as well be called super sexual hypergamy. In past history maybe something like 25% of the male population was incels, versus 60% we have today well on its way to becoming 85% of men.

It's the kind of sexual hypergamy that exists today that I hate and I hate how a majority of females go along with that.

It will destroy itself as an inevitability I think, you don't get to live comfortably and in happiness reducing a majority of men's lives into nothingness, there are irreversible consequences for this kind of condoned social behavior that will be felt in all segments of society eventually. Pissing all over the lives of a majority of males in any historical era generally is a bad idea as the results tend to be very incendiary, but that's exactly what today's structure of society is doing where the results undoubtedly will be destructive overall.
 
Last edited:
K9Otaku

K9Otaku

Officer
★★★★
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Posts
846
Online
15d 14h 49m
It's true that sexual hypergamy has always existed, what isn't true is the kind that we have today, the sexual hypergamy of today might as well be called super sexual hypergamy. In past history maybe something like 25% of the male population was incels, versus 60% we have today well on its way to becoming 85% of men.

It's the kind of sexual hypergamy that exists today that I hate and I hate how a majority of females go along with that.

It will destroy itself as an inevitability I think, you don't get to live comfortably and in happiness reducing a majority of men's lives into nothingness, there are irreversible consequences for this kind of condoned social behavior that will be felt in all segments of society eventually. Pissing all over the lives of a majority of males in any historical era generally is a bad idea as the results tend to be very incendiary, but that's exactly what today's structure of society is doing where the results undoubtedly will be destructive overall.
Absolutely
 
MarquisDeSade

MarquisDeSade

$The Price For Pussy Is Too Damn High$
★★★★
Joined
Feb 11, 2021
Posts
2,376
Online
21d 5h 44m
Man we should start banning philosophy schizos.
:feelsUnreal::feelsrope::feelsUgh:
I do understand why we are angry. I am angry. We have been lied to and made to hold the short end of the stick. No doubt about that. We have plenty of reasons to be angry.

But Why are we angry at women? The blackpill tells us that:
  1. Women are hypergamous. They go for the best genes. That is their genetically determined instinct.
  2. Chads have the best genes.
  3. We have the worst genes (being ugly is proof of that)
  4. Therefore, Women have sex with Chad and not with us.
If all that is true, then it is normal for women to behave like that. There is no reason for us to be angry at them.

Now, of course, we have been told when we were growing up that things would be different and that we would have a shot at a relationship. That was a lie. So we have every reason to be angry at the people who have lied to us. However, we have been lied to by just as many men as women. First and foremost, our dads. Then male teachers, then male psychiatrists, then male RomCom directors, etc etc. So among the people who lied to us there were many men, no only women; not even a majority of women.

In general, we tend to be angry at young women, like those that have an Onlyfans. This is even more absurd because when you are young, you don't know anything on your own. You believe what you have been told. So if young women are being told it is ok to have an Onlyfans, and they make money that way. And no one comes to seize the money like it is ill-gotten gains. Then why not have an Onlyfans? Again, this is normal behavior.

There is a problem here. We pretend to believe in the blackpill and yet our behavior is not consistent with it. This is the skeleton in the closet of Inceldom. We say one thing (the blackpill) and yet we act not according to what we say (we hate women). We are like normies and bluepillers in that respect.

TL;DR: We pretend to believe in the blackpill and yet our behavior is not consistent with it.
You sound very young and naive in my opinion, your views will change overtime. It's alright, we were all young and naive at one point in our lives.

You sound reasonably intelligent however, not trying to be mean or dissuade you here.
That is nature.

That is culture.

Be angry at the culture. Do something to change it. Don't wast your time hating powerlessly
Ah, I see now, you are what I use to be in my youth, the naive idealist.

Tell me, what do you do with the things you can't change? More importantly, how do you confront a world that actively despises you? I sense you're young, you will figure these things out overtime. In the real world happy thoughts are quite useless, meaningless, and do absolutely nothing.
 
Last edited:
B

based_meme

I.N.C.E.L. High Command
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 11, 2019
Posts
9,758
Online
117d 1h 26m
:feelsUnreal::feelsrope::feelsUgh:

You sound very young and naive in my opinion, your views will change overtime. It's alright, we were all young and naive at one point in our lives.

You sound reasonably intelligent however, not trying to be mean or dissuade you here.
Bro, OP is very sus.

OP is just some IT infiltrator trying to stop us from becoming school shooters.

Ban OP.
You again?

To everyone reading this: K9Otaku is 100% a fucking foid. Don't reply to her. Avoid all her fucking threads. A dude could never write all the bluepilled cuck garbage she wrote, let alone an incel.

Just leave us fucking alone you fucking cunt.
tbh ngl ded srslossus.

OP's been biding his(her?) time here and finally playing their hand.
 
MarquisDeSade

MarquisDeSade

$The Price For Pussy Is Too Damn High$
★★★★
Joined
Feb 11, 2021
Posts
2,376
Online
21d 5h 44m
Bro, OP is very sus.



tbh ngl ded srslossus.

OP's been biding his(her?) time here and finally playing their hand.
He could be one of those religiouscels trying to cope the best way he can or knows how to, hasn't quite figured out yet that he is a part of the damned and that God for all intents or purposes hates him. Just as the rest of us are damned and condemned as well.
 
Diocel

Diocel

˙ǝsɐǝld 'ǝuo ɹoɟ dnoS ∀
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 5, 2019
Posts
47,111
Online
237d 19h 36m
:cryfeels:

Don't lump me together with this fool, brocel.
Nah im not talking about people who read philosophy, i'm talking about people like OP who thinks they are hot shit because they read a wikipedia page and know how to use the word inherently in a sentence, i bet OP thought he was really clever by making this thread with this title. "well achually it's not women fault but society and culta see how out of the box i am?" nigga who cares they are still whores and fuck em.

But hey idk last time i talked philosophy a guy said im too "simple" for it when i gave him my thoughts in the ship of thesus.
 
MarquisDeSade

MarquisDeSade

$The Price For Pussy Is Too Damn High$
★★★★
Joined
Feb 11, 2021
Posts
2,376
Online
21d 5h 44m
Wannabe Chads circling the wagons ...

Greycels unite! Revolt against the tyranny of the ersatz Chads! Fuck them all!!!!!

That is already trying to change the culture.

There is zero chance that our current culture will lock-up thugs. Look at what they are doing to the Police in the US. That is not a "minor" change. Just for this thing to be done the whole basis of the culture must change.

Moving to a shithole is a based move if you want to start something new. I know a couple of people who have done it and I am considering it very seriously.

I did not admit to jack shit. I am just making an observation about your powerlessness and your irrelevance
The real blackpill is that culture is dying and there is nothing that can be done to resurrect its dying dead corpse where once it dies permanently untold horrors will befall this world instantaneously. You really haven't thought this through very well for any great length of time, but that's alright, I'm trying to help you here.

Also, not a good idea to declare war on the rest of the members here when they're offering criticism, it's okay every once and while to admit you're wrong on some things, first lesson of humility.
Bluepillers will never admit to anything that may jeopardize their copes.

For those of us that see clearly that only a deep societal change will solve our problems, there is only one possible attitude: accept that it will take long (centuries at least) and that since we have nothing better to do, we should just invest the time we have in building new foundations.
Talking about societal change is easy, actually implementing it is something different entirely and less easy to do.

What kind of changes are we talking about here? How do you plan on implementing it? Let's start with something simple like that.
Understood

I don't think that it makes sense to call something that comes from genetics "evil". Yes, it is a matter of semantics. But words do matter because they have connotations. "Evil" connotes something that it is in the power of the individual to change, like in the Google motto: "Don't be evil" (lol at the motto, I am just quoting it as an example).

What I said is that culture will not change fast and that, as a result, we will probably not see a new culture in our lifetime.

That is why I advocate the monkcel way. A monk is happy to serve something that will bear fruit in the distant future, long after his death. He takes his pleasure (his cope) in the building itself, not in the result. European monks were happy building Western Culture in the middle of forests over a thousand years before anything had started to change for the better.
Expecting a majority of men to live a celibate monk lifestyle is what we call unrealistic and anti human nature in general, do you honestly think that is achievable?

Hate to burst your bubble, but it's not. The reason there are very few monks to begin with is because the lifestyle isn't easy and the training is rigorous or strenuous. The lifestyle of being a monk for instance in a variety of religious customs is so very hard that many of them drop out because it becomes too much, anybody that studies different world religions at great lengths knows this.
 
Last edited:
K9Otaku

K9Otaku

Officer
★★★★
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Posts
846
Online
15d 14h 49m
The real blackpill is that culture is dying and there is nothing that can be done to resurrect its dying dead corpse
Agreed
where once it dies permanently untold horrors will befall this world instantaneously. You really haven't thought this through very well for any great length of time, but that's alright, I'm trying to help you here.
I don't understand what you mean. I know that the death of Western culture is going to bring about untold horrors. Maybe deaths in the billions

An order of Monkcel is the most likely group to survive such an event, like monks did when the Roman Empire collapsed.
Also, not a good idea to declare war on the rest of the members here when they're offering criticism,
They are not offering criticism, they are fake-Chad coping

See this thread

Talking about societal change is easy, actually implementing it is something different entirely and less easy to do.
It will take centuries to achieve. Hence the idea of a monkcel order. Only monkcels can have the endurance to achieie the goal

What kind of changes are we talking about here? How do you plan on implementing it? Let's start with something simple like that.
The first thing we need is a restoration of trust. Now everyone is bullshitting. Everyone is lying. Everyone is pretending to be something else than what they are.

This has to stop and it can stop. Achieving that goal is feasible because it has already been achieved in the past (see below)

Expecting a majority of men to live a celibate monk lifestyle is what we call unrealistic and anti human nature in general, do you honestly think that is achievable?
Monkceldom is not for the majority. Only a minority has the adequate psychology.

It is achievable because it has already been done. There were monks before. Why not us?

The reason there are very few monks to begin with is because the lifestyle isn't easy and the training is rigorous or strenuous. The lifestyle of being a monk for instance in a variety of religious customs is so very hard that many of them drop out because it becomes too much, anybody that studies different world religions at great lengths knows this.
I do know that. But it is worth it. This is why despite the difficulty, there were many monks in the past. Both in the East and in the West.

The real secret of monkdom is that you are in fact working for yourself. The goal of the monk is to achieve peace, to stop being at war with oneself, regardless of what happens in the world around you. It is an achievable goal that has been realized by thousands of men in the past. There is no reason we cannot achieve it too, if we follow the same path
 
K9Otaku

K9Otaku

Officer
★★★★
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Posts
846
Online
15d 14h 49m
Nah im not talking about people who read philosophy, i'm talking about people like OP who thinks they are hot shit because they read a wikipedia page and know how to use the word inherently in a sentence, i bet OP thought he was really clever by making this thread with this title. "well achually it's not women fault but society and culta see how out of the box i am?" nigga who cares they are still whores and fuck em.
That is snobbery: not being able to talk about the matter under discussion but instead making ad-hominem remarks

You are acting like a character from Gossip Girl

Snobbery is the upper class form of Chad-behavior. Being a snob on Incel.is is the most miserably pathetic cope there is.
 
MarquisDeSade

MarquisDeSade

$The Price For Pussy Is Too Damn High$
★★★★
Joined
Feb 11, 2021
Posts
2,376
Online
21d 5h 44m
Agreed

I don't understand what you mean. I know that the death of Western culture is going to bring about untold horrors. Maybe deaths in the billions

An order of Monkcel is the most likely group to survive such an event, like monks did when the Roman Empire collapsed.

They are not offering criticism, they are fake-Chad coping

See this thread


It will take centuries to achieve. Hence the idea of a monkcel order. Only monkcels can have the endurance to achieie the goal


The first thing we need is a restoration of trust. Now everyone is bullshitting. Everyone is lying. Everyone is pretending to be something else than what they are.

This has to stop and it can stop. Achieving that goal is feasible because it has already been achieved in the past (see below)


Monkceldom is not for the majority. Only a minority has the adequate psychology.

It is achievable because it has already been done. There were monks before. Why not us?


I do know that. But it is worth it. This is why despite the difficulty, there were many monks in the past. Both in the East and in the West.

The real secret of monkdom is that you are in fact working for yourself. The goal of the monk is to achieve peace, to stop being at war with oneself, regardless of what happens in the world around you. It is an achievable goal that has been realized by thousands of men in the past. There is no reason we cannot achieve it too, if we follow the same path
In such a cataclysm to befall civilization pacifists and the weak will be the first to perish so I really don't understand your obsession with monkhood unless you're one of those super Catholic people or want to become a Buddhist monk that is.

This is a forum of men and even hated men like us still have tribal loyalties where there is to some degree a social pecking order. It's just the nature of a male social environment, I don't take such things seriously at all.

Different kind of guys out there, not everybody here is an intellectual my dude.

The world doesn't have another ten years left in it currently let alone another century, a vision of the future might be better explained as one of juntas. There's no social or societal trust in a zero trust environment fren, social trust has been utterly destroyed for some time, instead we have a world of paranoids which given the current world is perfectly natural unfortunately.

Our position is that we hate living in social isolation and alienation, so why would we want a monk fraternity?
 
Last edited:
Diocel

Diocel

˙ǝsɐǝld 'ǝuo ɹoɟ dnoS ∀
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 5, 2019
Posts
47,111
Online
237d 19h 36m
making ad-hominem remarks
Too cool to know what that is.
You are acting like a character from Gossip Girl

Snobbery is the upper class form of Chad-behavior.
Thanks, i guess. sorry but im not used to getting complimented.
 
K9Otaku

K9Otaku

Officer
★★★★
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Posts
846
Online
15d 14h 49m
In such a cataclysm to befall civilization pacifists and the weak will be the first to perish so I really don't understand your obsession with monkhood unless you're one of those super Catholic people or want to become a Buddhist monk that is.
Monks are not pacifists. Look at Shaolin or the Templars. They are just disciplined people

I am definitely not catholic nor Buddhist. These old religions no longer work.
This is a forum of men and even hated men like us still have tribal loyalties where there is to some degree a social pecking order. It's just the nature of a male social environment, I don't take such things seriously at all.
You should.

The issue is not whether there will be a pecking order. There will indeed always be one. What matters is how this pecking order is established.

If it is based on low-IQ intimidation and ape-like chest beating, it is just as wrong as any kind of Chad tyranny. If we stoop down to that level, it means we have learned nothing from our misery.
Different kind of guys out there, not everybody here is an intellectual my dude.
That is not the issue. Both intellectuals and non-intellectuals can be tempted by Ersatz-chadness. For intellectual types, it leads to snobbery, like in @Diocel's case. For non-intellectuals, there are plenty of brutal and aggressive types in here

The world doesn't have another ten years left in it currently let alone another century, a vision of the future might be better explained as one of juntas. There's no social or societal trust in a zero trust environment fren, social trust has been utterly destroyed for some time, instead we have a world of paranoids which given the current world is perfectly natural unfortunately.
Yes. Absolutely. That is why monkdoom is required. A group of monk is a miniature laboratory in which trust can be nurtured back into existence in a sheltered environment

Our position is that we hate living in social isolation and alienation, so why would we want a monk fraternity?
To regain trust and to achieve peace
 
Diocel

Diocel

˙ǝsɐǝld 'ǝuo ɹoɟ dnoS ∀
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 5, 2019
Posts
47,111
Online
237d 19h 36m
For intellectual types, it leads to snobbery, like in @Diocel's case.
Jfl if you think im an intellectual, im a sub80 iq high school drop out.
 
D

Draco

Greycel
Joined
Sep 18, 2019
Posts
92
Online
4d 4h 28m
hate must be vented against something.
Venting against God or Nature isn't rewarding to me because they don't physically exist, so i choose to vent against their intermediaries: women.
 
K9Otaku

K9Otaku

Officer
★★★★
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Posts
846
Online
15d 14h 49m
hate must be vented against something.
Venting against God or Nature isn't rewarding to me because they don't physically exist, so i choose to vent against their intermediaries: women.
You can also vent against the normie cucks who invented all the degeneration and made it possible

Like this brocel says:
I don't hate women, I hate the cucks who allowed things to get to such a state of affairs.
Jfl if you think im an intellectual, im a sub80 iq high school drop out.
Sub 80? Yeah, sure ... High School drop out? That's believable. Nothing to do with IQ, though
 
Last edited:
Diocel

Diocel

˙ǝsɐǝld 'ǝuo ɹoɟ dnoS ∀
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 5, 2019
Posts
47,111
Online
237d 19h 36m
Wizchan

Wizchan

Wizardmaxxing on Wizchan.org
★★★★
Joined
Mar 27, 2021
Posts
381
Online
3d 6h 51m
It comes naturally, like hating niggers.
 
incelerated

incelerated

KHHV | Never began
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 23, 2020
Posts
2,985
Online
23d 35m
i hate everyone and everything.

my rage is trully uncontrablle tbh
This.
I hate every single human being. Selfish disgusting animals, one of the most savage and brutal in the animal kingdom, yet they have the audacity to pretend they have "values", "morality", and other made up and meaningless things.
 
T

TheObjectifier

Greycel
Joined
Apr 11, 2021
Posts
2
Online
56m
I hate them because of the gaslighting. They've always led me to believe that if I do this or that, that I might have a chance. They do this so that all men cater to their needs, but they only repay Chad. Instead of chasing moving goalposts my whole life, I could've been fucking noodle whores in Thailand. I resent women for misleading me.

I also hate them because they are bad winners. I suppose they don't hold all the blame for having the SMV advantage, but it's the way they act with that knowledge that gets me. It's a very "in you face" attitude, and uncalled for. It's unsportsmanlike behavior that extends into other parts of our life: you think your boss respects you if you can't get laid?

They're also selfish. Take sexual abuse for example. Any rational person would say that physical violence is more of a danger than sexual abuse, but we have people doing life for jacking off in front of a crybaby, while Meeks is living it up. That's simply an abuse of power IMO.
 
K9Otaku

K9Otaku

Officer
★★★★
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Posts
846
Online
15d 14h 49m
I hate them because of the gaslighting. They've always led me to believe that if I do this or that, that I might have a chance. They do this so that all men cater to their needs, but they only repay Chad. Instead of chasing moving goalposts my whole life, I could've been fucking noodle whores in Thailand. I resent women for misleading me.

I also hate them because they are bad winners. I suppose they don't hold all the blame for having the SMV advantage, but it's the way they act with that knowledge that gets me. It's a very "in you face" attitude, and uncalled for. It's unsportsmanlike behavior that extends into other parts of our life: you think your boss respects you if you can't get laid?

They're also selfish. Take sexual abuse for example. Any rational person would say that physical violence is more of a danger than sexual abuse, but we have people doing life for jacking off in front of a crybaby, while Meeks is living it up. That's simply an abuse of power IMO.
Congratulations on your first post.

Let us talk about young foid first. They do behave the way you say, no doubt about that. But wouldn't you behave the same way if you had been educated the way they were? When you are young, you have no experience of your own, you know only what you have been told. Today's young foids have been told all their life that men are trash and that they have every right to do what they want. They are just doing what they have been told.

The point is not to find excuses for foids, but to avoid being angry at the wrong target. The question you need to ask yourself is who told young foids to behave that way and why they did it. The behavior of foids is just the surface. You have to dig deeper. Your remark about your boss points in the right direction ...
 
Rein

Rein

Man in the Box
★★★★
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
322
Online
2d 3h 6m
Even if it was in their nature I would see no problem with hating them. I hate mosquitoes too and they also only follow their nature. I can hate whatever I want for the reasons I deem fit, everything becomes moral in the moment you deem it as moral and everything becomes immoral in the moment you deem it as immoral. When I say slavery/etc. is moral it then becomes moral in that moment for me as an individual. Why should I restrict myself in my own feelings when these feelings offer me improvements of my own life quality? Why should I pose restrictions for myself when nobody else restricts themselves for me? You can make any judgement you want, but in the end everything you say falls apart after a single "No, I see that differently!" The question is not whether we should hate someone, the question is "Why not?"


Furthermore, just because something in nature it doesn't mean that we have to accept it, in nature incest/rape/necrophilia/infanticide and everything else occurs, but these behaviors cannot be tolerated within the limits of a civilized society, if we say the behavior of some people is normal because it occurs in nature we can say it for everything. Nature isn't something inherently good or bad, it's inherently neutral and with law/force/etc. we try to subjugate it, if it came to nature we would still shit in caves and die after a minor injury due to infections, flying to the moon or transplantating hearts is highly unnatural. Nature isn't something to accept, it's something to subjugate.
This is the only answer needed whenever this question comes up on every fucking forum.
 
Iamnothere000

Iamnothere000

Recruit
★★★★
Joined
Nov 13, 2019
Posts
303
Online
4d 2h 5m
Men are anti-civilization too. Look at Afghanistan. Our tendency to fight for the alpha spot is destructive of any kind of complex society, if not properly reined in.

The problem women is that their ant-civilization traits are less visible than ours. They are more insidious. That is why they are more dangerous. What you can't see is more likely to kill you than what you can.

Yea but, to return to the topic at hand, men choose to be good = “pro-civilisation“ way more often than women do. Therefore they don’t deserve as much hate as women do.

This cycle does not fit with the data we have about history. It is an oversimplification we have inherited from the Greeks, along with a lot of useless rubbish (like philosophy and gayness)

What we do see in the historical data that we have is very different. Strong men can stay with shitty lives for ever. What changes things is when a winning cultural pattern emerges.

Look at Norway, for example. They had hard lives and plenty of hard men for millennia, yet nothing changed. They still had shitty, violent lives lived in poverty and bad weather. Then Christianity came, and then Protestantism. Now they are the most civilized of men (or they were until they were corrupted by feminism).

The same is true of plenty of other places: Scotland, the Netherlands, Ireland, Germany, ... even England. Until the late Middle Ages, England was no better than Afghanistan or Somalia.

A Monkcel is not "strong" per se. He is only as strong as the ideas he carries forward.

“Strong” does not mean “Big buff Viking”, it means thinking and acting to the long term benefit of your people/culture, even if it is difficult, even if you can’t enjoy the fruits yourself.

The Romans/Christians/Protestants/Monkcels where strong because they perpetuated a strong and enduring culture with strong values (like meritocracy and the importance of family/monogamy).

Those people perpetuate the cycle, therefore it is all pointless IMO.

The strong culture will grow fat and lazy with affluence, giving raise to SJW/feminism/“gibs-me-dat”-ism. This will lead to decline and here we go again.

That is one of the reasons I don't mind not having offspring. For at least 10000 years already, carrying your genes forward in time has become far less important that carrying your ideas (this is the origin of the word "meme": a "mental gene") Chad and Stacy can fuck like rabbits right now and cover the Earth with their spawn, but a few centuries down the line, their descendants will be ruled according to principles that I upheld and helped carry forward. My mental legacy will override their biological legacy.
I’m afraid in a few centuries the world will be populated by low IQ trash that will never be able to comprehend your ideas, much less live by them.
 
CleverJester

CleverJester

Ignore the shills & don't bump any of their thread
★★
Joined
Sep 19, 2020
Posts
639
Online
22d 19h 22m
Fat chance. You know who runs this place, right?
I did not admit to jack shit. I am just making an observation about your powerlessness and your irrelevance
Some 2019 greycel that WHO KNOWS WHY suddenly wakes up in 2021 to make these low IQ schizo retrospective threads, bait threads.
Admits he is a foid/shill since he says he won't be banned depending on who runs .is. We have no choice but to hijack authority.
Ignored and moving on, brocels.
 
BPincelien941

BPincelien941

Road To Self-acceptance
Joined
Mar 9, 2020
Posts
545
Online
6d 1h 55m
I think the issue is more their hypocrisy. I.e the classic 'oh height doesn't matter, personality matters more than looks' that you see all the foids spouting. But then via the black pill its blatantly obvious that this just isn't true.
 
K9Otaku

K9Otaku

Officer
★★★★
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Posts
846
Online
15d 14h 49m
Yea but, to return to the topic at hand, men choose to be good = “pro-civilisation“ way more often than women do. Therefore they don’t deserve as much hate as women do.
At the moment, in our culture, yes. But there were other moments and other cultures where it was not the case. Look at Pagan Norway in 500AD or Afghanistan now.
“Strong” does not mean “Big buff Viking”, it means thinking and acting to the long term benefit of your people/culture, even if it is difficult, even if you can’t enjoy the fruits yourself.

The Romans/Christians/Protestants/Monkcels where strong because they perpetuated a strong and enduring culture with strong values (like meritocracy and the importance of family/monogamy).

Those people perpetuate the cycle, therefore it is all pointless IMO.
Why pointless, I do not understand.

What you do not get, I think is that, although there is indeed a cycle, there is also an underlying upward trend. The curve is not sin(t) It is sin(t) + t. Each maximum of the curve is higher than the previous one.
I’m afraid in a few centuries the world will be populated by low IQ trash that will never be able to comprehend your ideas, much less live by them.
There is no evidence of that. In the past, things got very bad at certain periods and yet they always bounced back. There is no reason to believe they wont this time too.

The question is: Why do you want to be pessimistic? I think it is because you have been deceived too many times and you don't want to make the mental investment of hoping for something anymore. I get that. However. eventually, I think your animal instincts will take over and you will hope again. We have been selected on our capacity to hope in the future. Only those who had this capacity survived in the long run. It is one of these evolutionary self-fulfilling prophecies
Even if it was in their nature I would see no problem with hating them.
"Dislike" or "be opposed" would be better than "hate". The word "hate", when applied to people, implies that they could be otherwise than they were. That is obviously not the case at the genetic level. Nobody can change his genes.

I hate mosquitoes too and they also only follow their nature.
Mosquitoes are not people.

I can hate whatever I want for the reasons I deem fit,
Yes, but people will judge you based on what you hate. If you hate stupidly, they will have a poor opinion of you.

everything becomes moral in the moment you deem it as moral and everything becomes immoral in the moment you deem it as immoral.
Who is "you" in that sentence? It cannot be an individual. By definition, morality transcends the individual. A certain set of moral rules has to be anchored in some human group (a religion, a nation, a culture) in order to be deemed to exist at all. Only idiots like Nietzche (who died crazy) believe that you can make your own morals.

When I say slavery/etc. is moral it then becomes moral in that moment for me as an individual.
Hogwash. You are twisting the meaning of the word "moral" (under Nitzchean influence, even if you do not realize it)

Morality has its basis in the collective. Otherwise it is just an empty word.

Why should I restrict myself in my own feelings when these feelings offer me improvements of my own life quality?
The feeling of hatred does not offer any improvement. It is a cope. In the beginning, when one realizes what has happened to us, it helps to vent a little, no doubt. But if you keep on venting, month after month, year after year, it just pluges you ever deeper into depression.

Why should I pose restrictions for myself when nobody else restricts themselves for me?
Because it is in your own interest.

You can make any judgement you want, but in the end everything you say falls apart after a single "No, I see that differently!"
Over time, some opinions spread and others disappear. If you bet on a losing opinion, you will pay the price

The question is not whether we should hate someone, the question is "Why not?"
Already answered above: Because it is a stupid, self-defeating cope.

Furthermore, just because something in nature it doesn't mean that we have to accept it,
Of course not. That is the point of culture. Culture's role is to bend the instincts that have a detrimental effect, in order to be able to live in society. But you don't need to hate women to wish for a culture that restricts their negative traits. Indeed, the less you hate them, the better able you will be to achieve that goal. Achieving any goal requires a cool head. Hate is counterproductive in that regard

in nature incest/rape/necrophilia/infanticide and everything else occurs, but these behaviors cannot be tolerated within the limits of a civilized society, if we say the behavior of some people is normal because it occurs in nature we can say it for everything.
Yes

Nature isn't something inherently good or bad, it's inherently neutral and with law/force/etc. we try to subjugate it,
Yes

if it came to nature we would still shit in caves and die after a minor injury due to infections,
Yes

flying to the moon or transplantating hearts is highly unnatural. Nature isn't something to accept, it's something to subjugate.
Absolutely.

But to succeed in that regard you have to be in control of yourself and be able to give and take. Nothing can be achieved otherwise
 
Last edited:
dirtykombatcel

dirtykombatcel

They will know
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 5, 2020
Posts
6,753
Online
27d 6h 30m
shut the fuck up you cuck
 
suigin

suigin

schizoidcel
★★
Joined
Feb 24, 2019
Posts
1,196
Online
22d 9h 24m
Evolutionary psychology may hold the key. Just as it is in women's nature to select Chads, it's our nature to hate women.

We hate real women because they are at odds with our conception of the ideal women. Our inner Anima is as much a part of our own nature, and the Anima tells us what we should expect from actual foids. When the map of Anima does not match the territory, the normal response is to get angry at the physical foids deviating from this. Why is it normal? Because it reinforces a bidirectional dynamic between the male and female that acts as a positive feedback loop. The desires of each sex, over generations, shape the nature of the opposite sex. Cucks who don't get mad at women and instead get mad at themselves or try to convince themselves that they are wrong I would deem as psychologically crippled in some way, as they will be even greater genetic dead ends than the incels who do hate women. Before the advent of our modern day restrictive control societies, hating women would often lead to raping women. At least then one's genes had a greater chance of being passed on.

But today, rape is very likely to land one in hot water, and the raped foid is likely to get an abortion. In time, these pressures may select against traits that lead to getting angry at women for rejection, but could also have a catastrophic, unforeseen destabilizing consequence on humanity--how would such trait modification affect Chad, and in turn how would it feedback into affecting the nature of women?

So, for men, hating women is as natural for us as for women to act like hypergamous sluts for Chad. We are slaves to our nature. There's no gym for your biologically predetermined behavioral traits and predispositions, only copes.
Look at Norway, for example. They had hard lives and plenty of hard men for millennia, yet nothing changed. They still had shitty, violent lives lived in poverty and bad weather. Then Christianity came, and then Protestantism. Now they are the most civilized of men (or they were until they were corrupted by feminism).
I'm starting to think you're way too biased in favor of Christianity. As in, it's almost like you're trying to forcefully associate incel culture with militant pseudo-Christian bullshit for the purpose of some sort of agenda.

It wasn't Christianity that made Norway what it was, but the harsh viking culture that preceded it which ensured the genetic pruning of everyone who deviated from the social norms and who violated the laws of the tribes and kings. Thievery and bandrity became very rare and high ingroup trust asserted itself *before* Christianization.

When Christianity spread to China, with the Taiping rebellion, it resulted in hundreds of millions of deaths, famine and cannibalism, because the Chinese weren't (and in some ways still aren't) ready for such a society. They never had a system in place to purge such criminal traits from their gene pool, like the vikings did. The CCP understands this, hence their modern social credit system to prune undesirables from the gene pool.
 
Last edited:
MarquisDeSade

MarquisDeSade

$The Price For Pussy Is Too Damn High$
★★★★
Joined
Feb 11, 2021
Posts
2,376
Online
21d 5h 44m
A monk brotherhood of incels sounds pretty gay, the goal no matter how impossible it seems is to ascend. [Shrugs]
 
Last edited:
K9Otaku

K9Otaku

Officer
★★★★
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Posts
846
Online
15d 14h 49m
A monk brotherhood of incels sounds pretty gay, the goal no matter how impossible it seems is to ascend. [Shrugs]
When you realize how impossible that goal is, you will think again.
 
T

TheObjectifier

Greycel
Joined
Apr 11, 2021
Posts
2
Online
56m
Congratulations on your first post.

Let us talk about young foid first. They do behave the way you say, no doubt about that. But wouldn't you behave the same way if you had been educated the way they were? When you are young, you have no experience of your own, you know only what you have been told. Today's young foids have been told all their life that men are trash and that they have every right to do what they want. They are just doing what they have been told.

The point is not to find excuses for foids, but to avoid being angry at the wrong target. The question you need to ask yourself is who told young foids to behave that way and why they did it. The behavior of foids is just the surface. You have to dig deeper. Your remark about your boss points in the right direction ...
You are way off base. Women taught them most of that, so in turn, I hate those women. If they're too stupid to recognize right from wrong, I hate them for that.

In contrast, men were taught to respect women no matter what, but we still found a way to hate them. So, you know, people can think for themselves--well, obviosly women can't (which is your point).

I agree with others; this person doesn't sound like an incel and should be investigated for ban.
 
Tenshi

Tenshi

もういいよ
★★★★★
Joined
May 21, 2020
Posts
7,768
Online
67d 1h 50m
I don't believe in any of that pseudo scientific, evolutionary psychology nonsense people take for granted when trying to address female nature. "Muh me ugly so me have bad genes" just no, no evidence of that, that's just bs made up by laymen who don't know jackshit about neither.

I seriously cringe when I see anyone quote evolutionary psychology as real science. That being said, I think there's a structural problem with modern society that influences people to misbehave in a certain way, through unnatural practices. Human nature is being overblown here, in fact imo we're actually going against nature in a certain way.

The thing is that most women nowadays are just narcissistic byproducts of this dysfunctional world. So yeah, they're not acting out of instincts, they are still accountable for their actions.
 
K9Otaku

K9Otaku

Officer
★★★★
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Posts
846
Online
15d 14h 49m
I don't believe in any of that pseudo scientific, evolutionary psychology nonsense people take for granted when trying to address female nature. "Muh me ugly so me have bad genes" just no, no evidence of that, that's just bs made up by laymen who don't know jackshit about neither.
Ok, I agree with that

That being said, I think there's a structural problem with modern society that influences people to misbehave in a certain way, through unnatural practices. Human nature is being overblown here, in fact imo we're actually going against nature in a certain way.
Yes

The thing is that most women nowadays are just narcissistic byproducts of this dysfunctional world.
Yes

So yeah, they're not acting out of instincts
I am not sure I can agree with that. Don't you think that the fact that every woman wants to fuck Chad is heavily influenced by the alpha male instinct that all mammals have?

I am not saying that women's behavior nowadays is fully the result of that instinct. Of course there are lots of societal factors at play too. But it seems to me that the good old dominant male instinct is the raw material these societal factors build upon.

they are still accountable for their actions.
"Accountable" implies a set of norms. It is not clear what those norms are at present. We can try to build a new set of norms. But that is going to take time and, in the meantime, I am not sure about what standard women (and men) are to be held accountable against.