Skimming the history of cheer leading, I was pleasantly surprised that the first cheerleaders were all men. This was around the 1870s, and it wasn't this faggy exhibitionist thing as you would think- it was more just men gathering around and chanting fight songs, as male fans naturally do even to this day. It seems like in times past, it was more socially acceptable for men to support men.
It wasn't until 1923 when they allowed women to cheerlead, and it wasn't long at all till it became this hyperfeminine activity adding exhibitionist shit like spead-eagle acrobatics, booty shaking, and pom-poms. Parallel to this, because this hyperfeminine exhibitionism became synonymous with emotional support, the numbers of men who were once naturally inclined to support men got elbowed out of this activity since they don't want the fag finger pointed at them. It's fascinating how the infiltration of women into cheerleading corrupted it into an gatekeepy exhibitionist vehicle of hypergamy, and that had macroscopic cultural consequences of men needing to be steely, and being bottled up emotionally in the day-to-day.
I always thought the idea of cheerleaders and ring girls are stupid. They are just unneccessary whores that bring too much attention to themselves in between gameplay. Historically, I find it suspect that cheerleaders are only acceptable in the most masculine of sports: football and basketball. In those sports, you get sets of cheerleaders for each team. In boxing/MMA, you get neutrally aligned ring girls. Cheerleaders in less Chaddy activities like chess or esports, while there is a bit of it, you get the sense that it's out of place, and we've been conditioned that way.
It's weird how society has always found it acceptable to emotionally support these hyper-masculine athletes in the form of these hyper-feminine cheerleaders, while normie-tier and below men get gaslit to suck it up in everything we do (or else we aren't real men).
Chad always wins, even in the emotional support game.
It wasn't until 1923 when they allowed women to cheerlead, and it wasn't long at all till it became this hyperfeminine activity adding exhibitionist shit like spead-eagle acrobatics, booty shaking, and pom-poms. Parallel to this, because this hyperfeminine exhibitionism became synonymous with emotional support, the numbers of men who were once naturally inclined to support men got elbowed out of this activity since they don't want the fag finger pointed at them. It's fascinating how the infiltration of women into cheerleading corrupted it into an gatekeepy exhibitionist vehicle of hypergamy, and that had macroscopic cultural consequences of men needing to be steely, and being bottled up emotionally in the day-to-day.
I always thought the idea of cheerleaders and ring girls are stupid. They are just unneccessary whores that bring too much attention to themselves in between gameplay. Historically, I find it suspect that cheerleaders are only acceptable in the most masculine of sports: football and basketball. In those sports, you get sets of cheerleaders for each team. In boxing/MMA, you get neutrally aligned ring girls. Cheerleaders in less Chaddy activities like chess or esports, while there is a bit of it, you get the sense that it's out of place, and we've been conditioned that way.
It's weird how society has always found it acceptable to emotionally support these hyper-masculine athletes in the form of these hyper-feminine cheerleaders, while normie-tier and below men get gaslit to suck it up in everything we do (or else we aren't real men).
Chad always wins, even in the emotional support game.
Last edited:
