Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Subhuman foids support casual sex MORE when made unpopular!!

AsiaCel

AsiaCel

[AIDS] ACCELERATIONIST INCEL DEATH SQUAD
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 24, 2017
Posts
19,986
Unpopular low mate-value women reported more support for casual sex than popular low mate-value women.

Objective Trait mate value covaries with several socio-political attitudes. One’s dating popularity in a mating market can, however, shift one’s self-perceived mate value in that market. We tested whether dating popularity could therefore also shift socio-political attitudes, and whether trait mate value could moderate this effect. Method Heterosexual participants (N = 237) reported their trait mate value. Participants then recorded a video of themselves and received video responses from five opposite-sex peers, each consisting of either positive or negative romantic feedback—forming the manipulation (popularity: from low to high). Afterwards, we measured participants’ attitudes to traditional gender roles, casual sex, minimum wage and healthcare, and implicit sexual and political attitudes. Results Unpopular men reported less support for casual sex than popular men. There was no main effect on women. Unpopular men had lower positive affect than popular men, and in turn men with lower positive affect reported less support for casual sex and for increasing the minimum wage and access to healthcare than men with higher positive affect. Unpopular low mate-value women reported more support for casual sex than popular low mate-value women. Unpopular men of low and average mate value reported less support for casual sex than popular men of low and average mate value. There was no effect on average mate-value women and high mate-value women and men. Conclusions Changes in positive affect due to dating popularity influence some of men’s, but not women’s, socio-political attitudes, and trait mate value moderates the effects of popularity on attitudes to casual sex.
 
What are "popular low mate-value women"? :feelstastyman:
 
Chad doesn't want to be seen with a goblina but he still fucks her to relieve sexual tension.
 
What are "popular low mate-value women"? :feelstastyman:
When the term "popular low mate-value women" is used, it may refer to women who are considered to have lower mate-value but are still socially or culturally popular or well-liked. This could imply that they possess attributes or engage in behaviors that are typically associated with low mate-value, such as low physical attractiveness, low social status, or undesirable personality traits, yet they still garner attention or admiration from certain social circles.
 
What are "popular low mate-value women"? :feelstastyman:
When the term "popular low mate-value women" is used, it may refer to women who are considered to have lower mate-value but are still socially or culturally popular or well-liked. This could imply that they possess attributes or engage in behaviors that are typically associated with low mate-value, such as low physical attractiveness, low social status, or undesirable personality traits, yet they still garner attention or admiration from certain social circles.
So, I actually managed to hound down a PDF of the full study:feelshaha:.


The "popularity" was the participants' popularity in the fake dating game the study was ran as. The researchers hired 5 actors and 5 actresses, with each of those filming one video accepting the participant and one video rejecting the participant. The male participants were then shown videos from all 5 of the actresses, randomly chosen whether positive or negative, and the female participants went through the same with the 5 actors' videos. Basically, they were made to believe in their randomly given popularity there.

We led heterosexual participants to believe they would besending a self-introduction video to fve opposite-sex peers, and that in turn, the fvepeers would send them back one video each. In these fve response videos, each peertold participants that they would either date them or would not want to date them(each response video consisted of either positive or negative feedback). We told participants that the fve peers were volunteer research participants, too (although theywere actually paid actors/actresses). After the experimental manipulation, we measured participants’ self-reported attitudes towards casual sex, traditional gender roles,and the minimum wage and healthcare.

Mate value was calculated using a scale from another study:

Four items from the Mate Value Scale (MVS; Edlund & Sagarin, 2014) measuredparticipants’ mate value, e.g., “Overall, how would you rate your level of desirability as a partner on the following scale?”. All answers to the four MVS items wererecorded on a Likert scale from 1 to 7; e.g., 1- extremely undesirable to 7- extremelydesirable. Higher scores on each item represented higher trait self-perceived matevalue (α=0.86)

Won't lie though, this shit's pretty blackpilling when they bring in other studies as well:

Empirical fndings support the prediction that high mate-value men are moresexually unrestricted than low mate-value men. In a laboratory experiment wheremen were asked to choose whether to engage in short-term or long-term relationships with potential partners of varying attractiveness and earning potential levels, high mate-value men were more likely to choose short-term mating than low mate-value men were, especially if the prospective partners were physically attractive (Landolt et al., 1995).

Meanwhile, retards tell us that we are the ones who only want sex and don't want love:feelstastyman::feelstastyman::feelstastyman:.

High mate-value men are also less likely to engage incost-inficting mate retention behaviours than low mate-value men, suggesting thathigh mate-value men might be less concerned about losing a mate than low matevalue men (Miner et al., 2009).

Meanwhile, retards tell us that we are the ones who see women only as replaceable sex objects.

Some researchers suggest that high mate-value women should be choosier than low mate-value women, because high mate-value women, more so than lowmate-value women, can aford to be conservative and only mate with high-qualityand highly-investing partners, giving them a ftness advantage (e.g., Buss & Schmitt,1993; Regan, 1998).

Were the redpillers right:feelsbaton:?

Contrary to the prediction that high mate-value women shouldbe sexually restricted, however, there is evidence that mate value might have the sameefect on women as on men. A series of three experiments provided partial supportfor the prediction that self-perceived attractiveness would positively correlate withunrestricted socio-sexuality in women: Two of these experiments found a signifcantefect in the predicted direction, but one did not (Clark, 2004). Another study foundthat women with low waist-to-hip ratios (i.e., a cue of women’s physical attractiveness) were signifcantly more likely to report a very large number of past sexual partners than women with higher waist-to-hip ratios (Mikach & Bailey, 1999).
In line with thisargument, a recent meta-analysis examining data from over 5,000 research participants found that higher self-perceived mate value is positively correlated with moreunrestricted socio-sexuality in both women and men, although the size of the efectis larger for men (Arnocky et al., 2021). These fndings suggest that high mate-valuewomen’s reproductive ftness, like high mate-value men’s ftness, might beneft fromengaging in short-term mating, but that short-term mating is too costly for low matevalue women.

Oh, seems like they weren't, turns out both Chads and Stacies are fully enjoying all the sex with other attractive people that this world offers and, really, hands them on a silver plate, and they don't give AF about whether they should be sexually restricted or not.
 
So, ugly bitches are coldhearthless compared to goodlooking ones? Thats why all those dykes and stereotypical hambeast are so fucking ugly and evil.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top