All*
Cope. Southern Italians have a decent chunk of Blue & Green eyed among them, they also correlate heavily with the rest of Italy DNA wise, and for the most part still represent the original stock of that region.
.
Okay, I was defending Italians and you got aggressive all of a sudden. But I see your profile picture alludes to the Fascist regime, so you're probably part Italian and that's why you're offended. By "most" I meant people who live in Italy. Obviously genetically Italian people are White European, and the only foreign admixture of significance can be found in the south because of the invasions, but even there is negligible.
Only some of these ones do.
Yes, Nordicists want to claim Roman history for themselves so obviously will say they are white. And if they say they aren’t, will claim original Romans were white but were replaced or mass raped.
Idk
They need dark skin to protect them against the Egyptian sun. People who genuinely think Egyptians were white are just retarded. As for race, they are still caucasoid.
You mean they all do?
Nope. Romans were EEF with some Yamnaya, whereas Nords are Yamnaya with some EEF.
No
Romans also take heavily from early western european hunter gatherers, who were dark skinned but had lighter eyes.
Being colinized doesn't mean automatically sharing genes, otherwise, you'd be calling indians, british
Literally everything. Be it art depicting egyptians from 2000 years ago or genetic studies.
Here is a map of modern populations closeness to ancient egyptians. Redder = closer
There are indigenious people in north africa with lighter hair and eyes. It's not that deep. I have no European DNA yet have a red beard and 2 of my sisters are brunettes with pale skin
MENA/Semites should be above Asians
You forgot indians and turkics JFL
Asians have FAR FAAAR more dominant genes compared to Whites and Semites, by that logic, they should be on top
Whites and Arabs on a PCA still clusters EXTREMELY close to one another when all of humanity is taken into consideration
Not to mention that 8% black DNA is likely ethiopian, not west african bantu. AND we can't ignore that modern egyptians also have an increase in White blood too via circassions, albanians, and especially anatolians due to being ruled by Ottomans
I have relatives with blue eyes/green eyes and light hair yet when I did a DNA test, I had no european dna
Sure. Whites and Semites were the last ones to split about 10,000 years ago, so we are quite close, but we are a distinct racial group. Also, East Asians like the Chinese, the Japanese and Koreans have more recessive traits than Semites. Straight hair is more recessive than wavy or curly hair. Yellow skin is more recessive than brown skin.
You're telling me this...
is more dominant than this?
"But... but what about blue-eyed Syrians like Hadam Hussein?" Minority groups.
That is what I am referring to.
East Asians have more accomplishments and better civilizations than Middle Easterners, but less accomplishments and worse civilizations than Whites, so East Asians are second best. Pretty simple.
yes. You just need to look at mixed mena/asian people to see that asians still have more dominant genes. Asians mixed with anyone = kid looks asianSure. Whites and Semites were the last ones to split about 10,000 years ago, so we are quite close, but we are a distinct racial group. Also, East Asians like the Chinese, the Japanese and Koreans have more recessive traits than Semites. Straight hair is more recessive than wavy or curly hair. Yellow skin is more recessive than brown skin.
You're telling me this...
View attachment 963218
View attachment 963212
is more dominant than this?
View attachment 963215
View attachment 963214
Most MENA dont look that white, sure, but they also dont look as black as the pics you posted
No they dont.
Asians are ugly as fuck. That is absolutley a factor that must be considered on racial supeirority as well
Okay, whatever. I admit that I don't know much about Middle Easterners. I just don't want them here (or any other race, for that matter).
where is here?
I don't know if they're not human, but they're definitely the most primitive out of the bunch.
Europe specifically, the West generally.
Either them or Australian Aborigines. No wonder they're very close in appearance and accomplishments (or lack thereof).
ok. go do something about it
Should be put in must read
@Made in Heaven @verybasedindeed
No this is the 5 racial model all groups you mention fall into one of these except maybe Pygmies tbh.
No this is the 5 racial model all groups you mention fall into one of these except maybe Pygmies tbh.
I don't know, man.
In 2004 Hua Tang et al. perfectly separated the races with the technology that was available. Race was identified by genes alone with 98% accuracy. Only Native Americans, Whites, Orientals, and Blacks were tested, though.
Genetic structure, self-identified race/ethnicity, and confounding in case-control association studies - PubMed
We have analyzed genetic data for 326 microsatellite markers that were typed uniformly in a large multiethnic population-based sample of individuals as part of a study of the genetics of hypertension (Family Blood Pressure Program). Subjects identified themselves as belonging to one of four...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Is this the weekly "are Italians white?" thread? JFL
I did not mean to come across as aggressive, and apologize if I did. You're much better than 95% of all GrAYcels, so that's something at least.
And yes, all Italians have a considerable amount of the original EEF stock. The Berbers & Arabs who controlled parts of Italy only controlled it for a brief period of time, were only a smaller chunk of the population, and would have very likely had some sort of caste-system or apartheid-like system. Even the Anglo-Saxons had this when they arrived in Celtic Britain. So even if they did leave any trace, it is very small & likely amongst certain individuals.
Southern Italians still have a very good chunk of Lighter colored eyes amongst them:
They also cluster closer together with other Europeans:
And many look very similar facially to other Italians & Europeans as a whole:
Seems one of our moppers, @Dregster is lurking here quite a bit:
His choice, ultimately.
It went from me discussing how Blacks are very different in many ways from the rest of the human race, and thus are not fully human, to this real fast jfl
.
I see. Thanks. I've known some Italians. Good people.I did not mean to come across as aggressive, and apologize if I did. You're much better than 95% of all GrAYcels, so that's something at least.
And yes, all Italians have a considerable amount of the original EEF stock. The Berbers & Arabs who controlled parts of Italy only controlled it for a brief period of time, were only a smaller chunk of the population, and would have very likely had some sort of caste-system or apartheid-like system. Even the Anglo-Saxons had this when they arrived in Celtic Britain. So even if they did leave any trace, it is very small & likely amongst certain individuals.
Southern Italians still have a very good chunk of Lighter colored eyes amongst them:
They also cluster closer together with other Europeans:
View attachment 963294
And many look very similar facially to other Italians & Europeans as a whole:
View attachment 963296
Ofc
Even the Mafia was much more moral & human in comparison to most organized crime nowadays: Look at the Cartels in Mexico or Nigger street gangs(both funded by the CIA I have heard).
We could start a thread about the human species and go into more detail about genetics, phenotypes, haplogroups, cultures, societies, and more. For example, there is evidence that the ancient Sumerians and Egyptians were White. It would be a very interesting thread.It went from me discussing how Blacks are very different in many ways from the rest of the human race, and thus are not fully human, to this real fast jfl
Definitely. I know this is probably the worst source to draw a conclusion from, but even watching movies like The Godfather made me realize Italians are a very honourable and organized people. They place a high value on ethics, family, honor, order, etc. It resonates with conservatives like me. "A man who doesn't spend time with his family isn't a real man."Ofc
Even the Mafia was much more moral & human in comparison to most organized crime nowadays: Look at the Cartels in Mexico or Nigger street gangs(both funded by the CIA I have heard).
I’m pretty sure this component is present in all white Europeans
As a medfag I say southern shwarty medfags are not white, simply based on my own treatment by scandicuckaloids.
I would be for that: I also believe we have evidence North-West Africa was White at one point.
Very interesting indeed.
Go whine about it to your two gay moms bitchass
At this point nothing this faggot does surprises me. Just look at the top comments on my profile rn, also search “Chudpreet” in the search engine by member “PacinoMan” and then do the vice versa to see how many times he’s attempted to get my attention unprovoked & to no avail whatsoever
Not at all shocked to learn this clown has a crush on me
Water: Both are Caucasoid, except one is classified as White European(Nordic, Alpinid, and Mediterranid) Whilst the other is Semitic & Orientalid or Armenoid according to traditional anthropology.
Last edited:
You realize I can just write in my signature or custom title that I don’t use any forums besides this one to counteract that shit?
This account is registered way earlier than whatever new bullshit you could create so naturally people would know this is the OG Chudpreet
The moderators actually pinned this.
Now every member and passerby will have to eat the message: "Blacks are not human."
Now every member and passerby will have to eat the message: "Blacks are not human."
This is why White Europeans are different from Arabs & Jews(both Semites) @Rabbi Schneerson
Both are Caucaosid, but have traits that define them as different phenotypically.
They are not just whites with "fancy names"
I even have this comment screenshotted as proof in case I ever need to provide it.
If you wanted to pull some shit like this then you fucked up by telling me ahead of time
Eat a dick and die, faggot, and while you’re at it ask your gay moms to give dick a try too
The moderators actually pinned this.
Now every member and passerby will have to eat the message: "Blacks are not human."
Hey, at least it might help truthpill some normgroid who is slightly more intelligent than the average Redditard.
I screenshot it also & will show it to mods on the other site.I even have this comment screenshotted as proof in case I ever need to provide it.
If you wanted to pull some shit like this then you fucked up by telling me ahead of time
Eat a dick and die, faggot, and while you’re at it ask your gay moms to give dick a try too
You think I give a flying fuck if you put me on ignore?
You’re the one desperately seeking my attention, not the other way around
Blessed to have bros like you
I screenshot it also & will show it to mods on the other site.
Most of the time when I’ve posted that it was in threads you tagged me in first
I have heard this also, can you possibly link this book?
It has. If anything, they are closer to Whites & MENAs.
This is fair, but where are curries, hispanics, and South-East Asians?
The whole "muh recessive genes means inferior" argument is such a 50-IQ stance: It just means that their ancestors screwed each other too much & are r-selective instead of k-selective.
R
They all participate in the same society under the same rules , with the same mindsets. I will not change my MIND !
Cope, Sands & Jews follow religions which have very different concepts & interpretations than Whites.
Semites also enhanced the slavery amongst Africans more.
JFL if you think we have the "same mindsets"
Europeans build civilizations, kikes subvert them, sands destroy them
You are serving as good proof of this threads theory.
Similar threads
- bcroger
- The Lounge
bcroger
Users who are viewing this thread
