Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Actual reasons why India lost to Australia in cricket world cup final

wereq

wereq

Cursed and Defeated by Fate
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 11, 2022
Posts
48,294
Online time
4d 5h
1. Lack of athleticism in their fielding. Contrary to popular bluepill notion that fielding can be improved through practice, the blackpill reality is that athleticism and spatial awareness are both highly genetic and they are severely lacking among weak diabetic pajeets. India could barely put pressure by stopping Australia's run scoring on the field.

2. Chadstralians and Anglos in general have the ability to relentlessly bowl in the right areas for long long periods of time. Indian pacers have improved at lot in the last 4 years, but still can't consistently create enough pressure by bowling in the same areas over and over again. They can't choke up the run flow. Now for the blackpill. Perfection in execution when it comes to fast bowling comes down to the body's ability to handle the stress. Australians are taller, bigger, and have more muscle mass which enables them to carry out streneous fast bowling with greater ease and more consistency than Indians who tire out faster.

3. India's batting still isn't great outside of 3 veterans and their tail still can't hold a bat. They rely too heavily on timing the ball rather than powering it to the boundary with muscle because their muscle belies are naturally smaller than Anglos. Brute strength matters. Another thing that matters is reaction time which is genetic as well. This applies to all sport really. Lower reaction time wins games.

Ultimately, ALL sport is about fighting prowess which curries lack in, that's why they don't win shit. Fighting prowess is inversely proportional to weak skinny-fat diabetes genetics. Because curries lack in physical dominance and fighting prowess, they will NEVER beat Anglos!

@ilieknothing @Caesercel @Subhuman100 @ethniccel1 @adharmi @The_McCheese
 
Last edited:
They lost because vegeterians are too weak for any sport. They don't even have a fraction of the strength anglo meat eaters have. That's why non veg people like Mohammad Shami are superior bowlers.
 
They lost because vegeterians are too weak for any sport. They don't even have a fraction of the strength anglo meat eaters have. That's why non veg people like Mohammad Shami are superior bowlers.
:blackpill::blackpill::blackpill::yes::yes::yes:
 
it was not a designated shitting pitch
 
Don’t get me wrong I am glad the Pajeets lost but they won 10 games in a row before this including against the cumskin nations of Australia, New Zealand, Netherlands, England and South Africa. So what is your reasoning for that?

1. Lack of athleticism in their fielding. Contrary to popular bluepill notion that fielding can be improved through practice, the blackpill reality is that athleticism and spatial awareness are both highly genetic and they are severely lacking among weak diabetic pajeets. India could barely put pressure by stopping Australia's run scoring on the field.
Isn’t Jadeja considered one of the best fielders? On par with Glen Maxwell

2. Chadstralians and Anglos in general have the ability to relentlessly bowl in the right areas for long long periods of time. Indian pacers have improved at lot in the last 4 years, but still can't consistently create enough pressure by bowling in the same areas over and over again. They can't choke up the run flow. Now for the blackpill. Perfection in execution when it comes to fast bowling comes down to the body's ability to handle the stress. Australians are taller, bigger, and have more muscle mass which enables them to carry out streneous fast bowling with greater ease and more consistency than Indians who tire out faster.
Probably your strongest point but Starc and Cummins have been very inconsistent with their line and length this World Cup. Also some of the fastest bowlers ever were Paki currys (Shoaib, Waqar and Wasim).

Also want your blackpill theory on the spinners. Zampa, a cumskin has been the best spinner of the World Cup. Very curious for your explanation.

3. India's batting still isn't great outside of 3 veterans and their tail still can't hold a bat. They rely too heavily on timing the ball rather than powering it to the boundary with muscle because their muscle belies are naturally smaller than Anglos. Brute strength matters. Another thing that matters is reaction time which is genetic as well. This applies to all sport really. Lower reaction time wins games.
Suryakumar Yadav was shit this game but his game usually revolves around brute strength and he is as Pajeet as they come.
 
They're not just ordinary anglos, they're thugmaxxed Anglo chads, Australia team mogs britbong team brutally in terms of looks
 
Don’t get me wrong I am glad the Pajeets lost but they won 10 games in a row before this including against the cumskin nations of Australia, New Zealand, Netherlands, England and South Africa. So what is your reasoning for that?


Isn’t Jadeja considered one of the best fielders? On par with Glen Maxwell


Probably your strongest point but Starc and Cummins have been very inconsistent with their line and length this World Cup. Also some of the fastest bowlers ever were Paki currys (Shoaib, Waqar and Wasim).

Also want your blackpill theory on the spinners. Zampa, a cumskin has been the best spinner of the World Cup. Very curious for your explanation.


Suryakumar Yadav was shit this game but his game usually revolves around brute strength and he is as Pajeet as they come.
Cricket is a shit sport bro. Australias care about Rugby more than it. No one cares about Cricket. The Indian Hockey Team defeated Germany in 2020 Olympics yet no one cares about such a W.
 
India relied too much on skipper Kohli and was similar to 2015 final once McCallum was gone Aust cruised to victory
 
No one gives a shit about cricket outside of South Asia
 
Probably your strongest point but Starc and Cummins have been very inconsistent with their line and length this World Cup. Also some of the fastest bowlers ever were Paki currys (Shoaib, Waqar and Wasim).
Cummins bowls very consistently in tests. In ODIs he can go for runs, but he can be very consistent.
Also want your blackpill theory on the spinners. Zampa, a cumskin has been the best spinner of the World Cup. Very curious for your explanation.
I don't care much about spinners because its the fast bowlers who win you matches. If you can't take 10 or 20 wickets (depending on format), you can't win.
 
Suryakumar Yadav was shit this game but his game usually revolves around brute strength and he is as Pajeet as they come.
He's not that strong or talented. He's like a typical middle order slogger. He lacks skill that KL Rahul possesses.
 
India relied too much on skipper Kohli and was similar to 2015 final once McCallum was gone Aust cruised to victory
India doesn't have any genuinely good batters who can adjust their game and play according to the situation outside of Kohli and Rohit.
 
They're not just ordinary anglos, they're thugmaxxed Anglo chads, Australia team mogs britbong team brutally in terms of looks
Exactly. The more Chad genes you possess, the better you are. There's an obvious genetic difference between the Anglos of UK and Anglos of Australia. The latter are descendants of criminals and thugs which means they are higher in T and fighting prowess which translates directly into sporting success.
 
They lost because vegeterians are too weak for any sport. They don't even have a fraction of the strength anglo meat eaters have. That's why non veg people like Mohammad Shami are superior bowlers.
Ah yes, (((vegetarian diets))). One of the most unhealthy things possible; it lowers testosterone levels, does not provide enough nutrients, and is not filling enough so you will constantly need to snack & eat more. Why do you think the (((elites))) & globohomo push so hard for this, whilst also pushing back so hard against stuff such as red meat?
 
Last edited:
Vegetarian diets are some of the most unhealthy things possible; they lower testosterone levels, don't provide enough nutrients, and are not filling enough so you will constantly need to snack & eat more. Why do you think the (((elites))) & globohomo push so hard for this, whilst also pushing back so hard against stuff such as red meat.
:yes: :yes: :yes: Low nutrition vegetarian diet = poor brain development and muscle development
 
Despite getting better balls for swing by ICC, Australians still outclassed pajeets.

Commentators wanted to blame the pitch and dew(there was none). Travis was simply phenomenal.
 
They lost because vegeterians are too weak for any sport. They don't even have a fraction of the strength anglo meat eaters have. That's why non veg people like Mohammad Shami are superior bowlers.
then why haven't south africa won a cup yet lol. And pakis exited too
 
Despite getting better balls for swing by ICC, Australians still outclassed pajeets.

Commentators wanted to blame the pitch and dew(there was none). Travis was simply phenomenal.

it was a win toss win match type of match. the dew made batting easier in the second innings. that's why they chose to bowl first
 
Cricket is a shit sport bro. Australias care about Rugby more than it. No one cares about Cricket. The Indian Hockey Team defeated Germany in 2020 Olympics yet no one cares about such a W.
yeah hoping hockey and soccer pick up in curryland.
 
Commentators wanted to blame the pitch and dew(there was none).
The pitch was absolutely fine. There was some dew but India couldn't apply any pressure at all because of their poor fielding.
 
then why haven't south africa won a cup yet lol. And pakis exited too
Well Pakis are inbred curries and I don't think South Africans give a shit about cricket. Blacks are dominant in sports like Basketball and Running.


Stop caring about Cricket brocel. Basketball, Soccer, Rugby, Hockey are a Chad Warrior Sports. Foids dream about being run through by Basketball and Football players.


Cricket is a passive low t sport. No foid dreams about fucking skinny fat cricket players.
 
Basketball, Soccer, Rugby, Hockey are a Chad Warrior Sports. Foids dream about being run through by Basketball and Football players.
Rubgy is only proper Chad sport. And wrestling too.
 
Well Pakis are inbred curries and I don't think South Africans give a shit about cricket. Blacks are dominant in sports like Basketball and Running.

south african cricket team is mostly white, not blacks

Stop caring about Cricket brocel. Basketball, Soccer, Rugby, Hockey are a Chad Warrior Sports. Foids dream about being run through by Basketball and Football players.

lol curries have zero chance of doing anything in soccer or rugby. not for another 100 years. india is rank 100 in soccer and doesn't even qualify for the WC.

hockey maybe but even in that Germany and Aus do well. hockey just isn't as popular now for some reason.

Cricket is a passive low t sport. No foid dreams about fucking skinny fat cricket players.

true but it's the only sport where curries do somewhat well. that's just the bad luck of curries, can't do well in any actual popular sexy sport.
 
1. Lack of athleticism in their fielding. Contrary to popular bluepill notion that fielding can be improved through practice, the blackpill reality is that athleticism and spatial awareness are both highly genetic and they are severely lacking among weak diabetic pajeets. India could barely put pressure by stopping Australia's run scoring on the field.

2. Chadstralians and Anglos in general have the ability to relentlessly bowl in the right areas for long long periods of time. Indian pacers have improved at lot in the last 4 years, but still can't consistently create enough pressure by bowling in the same areas over and over again. They can't choke up the run flow. Now for the blackpill. Perfection in execution when it comes to fast bowling comes down to the body's ability to handle the stress. Australians are taller, bigger, and have more muscle mass which enables them to carry out streneous fast bowling with greater ease and more consistency than Indians who tire out faster.

3. India's batting still isn't great outside of 3 veterans and their tail still can't hold a bat. They rely too heavily on timing the ball rather than powering it to the boundary with muscle because their muscle belies are naturally smaller than Anglos. Brute strength matters. Another thing that matters is reaction time which is genetic as well. This applies to all sport really. Lower reaction time wins games.

Ultimately, ALL sport is about fighting prowess which curries lack in, that's why they don't win shit. Fighting prowess is inversely proportional to weak skinny-fat diabetes genetics. Because curries lack in physical dominance and fighting prowess, they will NEVER beat Anglos!

@ilieknothing @Caesercel @Subhuman100 @ethniccel1 @adharmi @The_McCheese
Dude India made it to the final, that alone is not easy at all.

The reason they lost is because they made too few runs just the same as South Africa against AUS. The Aussies won fear and square.

This still doesnt change the fact that raising children on a veggie diet makes them weak pathetic adults so in that sense you are right
 
Cricket is a shit sport bro. Australias care about Rugby more than it. No one cares about Cricket. The Indian Hockey Team defeated Germany in 2020 Olympics yet no one cares about such a W.
I like cricket. It also depends by what you mean by Rugby. Cricket is definitely more popular than Rugby Union. Rugby League is more popular in the winter in NSW and Qld, otherwise cricket is more popular
 
I like cricket. It also depends by what you mean by Rugby. Cricket is definitely more popular than Rugby Union. Rugby League is more popular in the winter in NSW and Qld, otherwise cricket is more popular
I'm with you on that one, cricket is the only sport I like actually. Football is too much for meatheads/dumbasses, imo.

What a great win by the Aussies, with 130k Indian fans in disbelief total silence :feelshaha:
 
kek I thought India would win
 
They're not just ordinary anglos, they're thugmaxxed Anglo chads, Australia team mogs britbong team brutally in terms of looks
thats cos theyre all welsh or pakis
 
Football is too much for meatheads/dumbasses, imo
If anything football is far more genetics oriented than cricket. That's why curries fare far worse in it than cricket. The French national team is just a bunch of 18-24 year old africans
 
If anything football is far more genetics oriented than cricket.
Cricket also requires a lot of genetic prowess, especially if you're a pacer, or fielder. Excellence is fielding is entirely genetic, especially wicketkeeping. Success in test match batting requires low reaction time (i.e., playing the ball as late as possible) which is genetic too. Only spin bowling isn't as as demanding.
 
Cricket also requires a lot of genetic prowess, especially if you're a pacer, or fielder. Excellence is fielding is entirely genetic, especially wicketkeeping. Success in test match batting requires low reaction time (i.e., playing the ball as late as possible) which is genetic too. Only spin bowling isn't as as demanding.
Fielders literally stand around until a play. Very different from running around for 90 minutes straight.
 
Fielders literally stand around until a play.
Yes but jumping, leaping, reacting quick, throwing your body at a ball that's flying past you... all of that requires fast twitch muscle fibers, low reaction times, and spatial awareness, which are influenced by genetics. There's more to athleticism than just good cardio and lung capacity.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

The Notorious SLAV
Replies
4
Views
787
The Notorious SLAV
The Notorious SLAV
FoidsEnshittifyAll
Replies
189
Views
4K
The Notorious SLAV
The Notorious SLAV
SlayerSlayer
Replies
5
Views
523
Rick prime
Rick prime

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top