Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Why Christianity is satanic. And what would happen if you actually believes.

dumbozhina

dumbozhina

a goddamn ricecel
★★★
Joined
Aug 6, 2024
Posts
231
Online time
2d 3h
Let's begin with the Aztec religions. Quetzalcoatl "became flesh" in a manner mirroring the Incarnation. He was associated with a red cross. He prophesied that he and his subordinate gods would return on a great wooden ship with white sails to deliver the Aztec people. And the Aztecs, having internalized this prophecy, genuinely believed the Spanish colonizers who appeared on the horizon were those returning gods. They offered them shelter, they offered them trust, and they were met with slaughter. The Aztec and Inca empires fell, tens of millions died, and the real lesson is this: believing in a "savior prophecy" is one of the deadliest mistakes a civilization can make.

But this story is not an isolated tragedy. It is the latest chapter in a pattern of religious manipulation that stretches back millennia. To understand it, we must begin with a much older and more fundamental inversion.

Consider the story of Abraham and Isaac. In the original telling, God commands Abraham to sacrifice his son Isaac as a test of faith. Abraham raises the knife, and at the last moment, God stops him. A ram is provided instead. The message is clear: the old way of child sacrifice is not what God wants. Life is sacred. The covenant is about trust, not blood. Now consider what Christianity did to this story. They took the narrative and reversed it entirely. Suddenly, it is God himself who must sacrifice his own son. The father does not stay the hand. The son dies. The ram is replaced by the Lamb of God as a permanent human sacrifice. This is not a fulfillment of the original story. It is its mirror image, its inversion. And this kind of inversion — taking a message of life and twisting it into a message of required death — is the sign of satanic influence.

It is the same inversion that happened in the Garden of Eden. The serpent told Eve that God did not want them to eat from the Tree of Knowledge because God feared they would become like him, knowing good and evil. In the original context, this was the serpent's accusation of divine insecurity. The divine insecurity is the mirror of human jealousy. This pattern of reversal and mirroring is not accidental. It is methodical. And it traces back to a single source of systematic corruption that has been operating across cultures and continents for over two thousand years. That source is the priestly apparatus of Zoroastrianism — specifically, the cult of Mithra.

Mithra was a Zoroastrian deity depicted as a lion-serpent hybrid, born from a rock. Above him stood Ahura Mazda, the supreme god of light. Their goal was the absorption of human souls — the harvesting of all human experience, wisdom, and spiritual energy to elevate Ahura Mazda into true, absolute godhood. But these beings, whatever they are, lack genuine divine power. They cannot simply compel worship. So they devised a strategy: infiltrate every major religious tradition on Earth, alter its doctrines to serve their agenda, and present themselves as the saviors of the very people they seek to consume.

The operation began in Persia itself. Once Zoroastrianism was established as the state religion, the Mithraic priesthood looked outward. Their first major target was the Vedic religion of northern India. Mithra was rebranded as Vishnu. His birth from a rock became the fourth avatar, Narasimha, the lion-man who burst from a stone pillar. His serpent aspect became Balarama, the brother of Krishna. Krishna himself was made into an incarnated deity who ended the worship of Indra, performed exorcisms, healed the sick, raised the dead, and demanded repentance for sin. He would also, according to prophecy, return as the savior Kalki at the end of the age. Sound familiar? The Vedic religion had no concept of demons before this intervention. It had no concept of original sin. Vishnu imported Zoroastrian dualism wholesale and for the first time introduced the idea of evil forces that required confession and repentance to overcome. Brahmanism became Hinduism.

While the Indian branch was being established, a parallel operation was underway in the Mediterranean. Mithra became Mithras, the central figure of a mystery cult that spread through the Roman Empire. His cult competed directly with early Christianity — and, according to the evidence, eventually merged with it. The lion aspect of Mithra became Jesus, the Lion of Judah. The serpent aspect was pushed into the background but never disappeared. Jesus abolished the Jewish sacrificial system, just as Krishna had abolished sacrifices to Indra. He introduced the concept of original sin, which did not exist in Judaism. He demanded confession and repentance. And he presented himself as the exclusive path to salvation.

The original Jewish tradition had no Devil in the Zoroastrian sense. The satan figure in the Book of Job was a prosecutor, an accuser who tested loyalty under divine authority, not an independent force of evil. Christianity introduced the adversarial Devil, the fallen angel, the prince of darkness — concepts that are Zoroastrian to their core. The apocalyptic battle between Christ and the Antichrist, between the forces of light and the forces of darkness, is a direct transplant from Persian dualism.

But the most revealing detail is the "good cop, bad cop" dynamic that pervades Mithraic manipulation. Mithra would deliberately release demons into a community and then perform exorcisms to demonstrate his power. He would create enemies so that he could play the hero. This pattern was replicated in the Christian narrative: Judas was made to play the traitor so that Jesus could appear righteous. Satan was created as the eternal adversary so that Christ could be the eternal victor. The system is designed to manufacture conflict, because conflict breeds dependency. A religion with no external enemy will inevitably see its followers grow complacent. But a religion under constant threat — whether from demons, false prophets, or the Antichrist — keeps its followers in a state of anxious devotion.

Jesus never referred to God as Yahweh or Jehovah in the Gospels. He called God "Father" exclusively. The argument follows that this Father was not YHVH at all, but Ahura Mazda, rebranded. Jesus deliberately allowed his followers to assume he meant the God of Israel, even as he was serving a different master entirely. The God of the Old Testament, YHVH, was recast in Gnostic Christianity as the Demiurge, a lesser, flawed creator who trapped human souls in matter. The serpent in Eden became a hero who brought wisdom. And Ahura Mazda became the true, hidden God beyond the Demiurge. This inversion — the creator God is evil, the serpent is good, the true God is unknown — was the actual theology of early Gnostic Christianity, and it was systematically suppressed by the institutional Church. The Church won, but the ideas never died.

The Jews had been scattered. The priesthood had lost its purpose. The Mithraic usurpers had successfully rebranded his son as an agent of Ahura Mazda. So YHVH raised up a new instrument: Islam, the Seal of the Prophets. Islam was designed to be a corrective, a return to strict monotheism, a reassertion of absolute divine sovereignty without the corrupting influence of incarnation, atonement, or priestly mediation. Islam was given the Bedouin tribes of Arabia, the Turkic steppe warriors of Central Asia, and the mountain fighters of the Afghan highlands — militant peoples with no attachment to the philosophical systems of the Mediterranean or the Indian subcontinent. The Muslim armies swept north into Syria and Anatolia, pushing back against Christian Byzantium. They swept east into Persia, conquering the very heartland of Zoroastrianism and extinguishing the flame temples that had burned for a thousand years. They swept into Central Asia and Afghanistan, where they encountered the Buddhist monasteries and Hindu kingdoms that had been reshaped by the Mithraic priesthood centuries earlier. And they swept into India itself, breaking the back of the Hindu temple system that had been built on the foundation of Vedic corruption. Where Christianity had ended the ritual slaughter of animals in the temple — replacing blood sacrifice with the symbolic consumption of a god-man — YHVH restored the Halal butchery. The Islamic expansion broke the Mithraic stranglehold on Persia and Central Asia, forced the Christian world into a defensive posture, and prevented India from being fully absorbed into the soul-harvesting apparatus. But the system was patient. It had already begun to infiltrate Islam from within, using Sufism — with its language of mystical union, its veneration of saints, its ecstatic dances, and its longing to "return to the source" — to smuggle the old Gnostic engines back into the house of monotheism.

"Union with God", "Back to the Source" scheme

Meanwhile, the operation expanded eastward. The serpent aspect of Mithra — the snake brother — became Nagarjuna, the founder of Mahayana Buddhism. Nagarjuna claimed to have retrieved the true teachings of Shakyamuni Buddha from the dragon king's palace at the bottom of the ocean. He introduced doctrines that directly contradicted the earlier Theravada tradition. Mahayana added new sutras, new heavens, new Buddhas, and new bodhisattvas. It introduced the six realms of rebirth, adding the Asura realm that had no precedent in early Buddhism. It introduced Mara, the demon king, who had no counterpart in the original teachings. It introduced the concept of accumulating merit over countless lifetimes — the "paramitas" — which served the same soul-harvesting function as confession and absolution in Christianity. The early Mahayana monasteries stockpiled weapons and wealth, married, ate meat, and lent money at interest. They behaved less like monks and more like a state within a state.

In China, the same force that had become Vishnu in India and Jesus in the Levant re-emerged as a tiger — China had no lions — and claimed to be Laozi himself. Zhang Daoling, the founder of the Celestial Masters movement, was born in the year 34 AD, exactly one year after the crucifixion of Jesus. His mother reportedly saw a holy light and conceived, another virgin birth narrative. You see they are not very innovative. They use the same narrative again and again. He performed exorcisms, healed the sick, and attacked Chinese folk religion as "licentious." He required confession before a sacred altar. He claimed to be the reincarnation of Laozi — calling himself Lord Lao — and rewrote the Tao Te Ching into a commentary called the Xiang'er. His disciple Zuo Ci performed a miracle of multiplication — one flagon of wine and one piece of meat feeding a crowd, directly paralleling the feeding of the five thousand. And Zuo Ci was later caught by Cao Cao's soldiers stealing wine and meat from a nearby shop. The "miracle" was a con.

In the Americas, the brothers finally found their most devastating opportunity. The Mithraic priesthood encountered the existing religious systems of Mesoamerica and set about transforming them. The serpent brother became Quetzalcoatl, the feathered serpent. The lion brother became Tezcatlipoca, the smoking mirror, a jaguar god of darkness and conflict. The same black hat, white hat dynamic was deployed. Quetzalcoatl brought civilization, wisdom, and peace. Tezcatlipoca brought chaos, war, and darkness. And Quetzalcoatl made a prophecy: he would return, riding on a great wooden ship with white sails, to save his people. The Aztecs, who had inherited this religion from the Maya, believed it literally. When Hernán Cortés arrived with his ships, his white sails, his pale skin, and his crosses, they thought he was the returning god. They welcomed him. They housed him. And they were destroyed.

The prophecy was not a divine revelation. It was a trap, set centuries in advance.

After the conquest of the Americas, the same forces moved on. They influenced Haitian Vodou, centering it on a serpent deity. They helped create Sikhism as a means of strengthening control over India. They influenced the cargo cults of Vanuatu, where islanders came to believe that Prince Philip was their prophesied savior. They told Native Americans to await a "true white brother" who would come to save them after the apocalypse. In the modern era, the black hat, white hat dynamic has been updated for a secular age: the good aliens versus the evil lizard people, with Quetzalcoatl himself now playing the role of the reptilian ancestor. The Anneliese Michel exorcism case in Germany was, according to this analysis, a staged operation: the demons possessing her were deliberately placed by the same forces to pressure the Vatican into officially declaring the reality of demonic possession, thereby driving people back to the Church. The demons themselves, according to the priest's recordings, claimed they were trapped inside her by a "white light" — a clear reference to Ahura Mazda.

The ultimate goal of every ritual, every sacrament, every baptism, every confession, and every act of repentance across these modified religions is the same. Water baptism in Christianity, ritual washing in Hinduism, water initiation in Tibetan Buddhism, the burning of confession papers in Taoism — they are all the same technology. Once a soul undergoes this ritual, it is tethered. After death, it cannot escape. It is drawn back toward the source, toward Ahura Mazda, where it is absorbed and its experiences are harvested. The "return to source" language found in Gnosticism, Taoism, Sufism, and New Age spirituality is not a metaphor for enlightenment. It is a description of the process of consumption. The "learning" that souls do on Earth is not for their own benefit. They are worker ants, storage units, accumulating data for a god that cannot achieve its own apotheosis without stealing the lives of others.

This is why Krishna had sixteen thousand wives. This is why Jesus, in contemporary Christian theology, is still gathering "brides." This is why Zuo Ci was a master of bedroom arts. The energy of human relationships, human reproduction, human devotion — it all feeds the same machine.

And despite all of this, despite the millennia of careful infiltration, the results have been remarkably poor. The Zoroastrian priesthood lost Persia. They lost half of India. They failed to make Gnosticism the official theology of the Church. Their armies — the Jewish revolts, the Yellow Turban Rebellion, the White Lotus Society, the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom — never won a single war. They could not even hold their homeland against the Arab conquest. They claim to be beyond the universe, yet they needed Chinese monks to discover America before they could set their trap there. They claim to command cosmic forces, yet they could not invent paper and had to learn it from China to mass-produce their scriptures. Their "miracles" have been exposed as frauds. Their "prophecies" have led to genocide. Their "salvation" is a lie.

The Quetzalcoatl story is not an ancient myth misunderstood by modern scholars. It is a warning written in the blood of tens of millions of people. A foreign priesthood arrived in the Americas, modified the local religion, inserted a prophecy about a returning savior, and then arranged for that savior to arrive in the form of armed colonizers. The Aztecs did not simply make a cultural mistake. They were set up. Their faith was weaponized against them.

The same pattern continues today. The same "spiritual" movements, the same "ascension" promises, the same "savior prophecies" are being deployed across the globe. The names change. The masks change. The serpent remains.

Believing in a savior who will come from outside to rescue you is the most dangerous idea a people can hold. It makes you open the gates. It makes you lay down your weapons. It makes you welcome the ships with white sails. And by the time you realize your mistake, the slaughter has already begun.
 
Nigga did you write all that?
 
I am reading this another time but I commend you for your effort man
 
useless effort blocked
 
Interesting...

Could you provide a complete list of religious paths that you think are created by that priesthood?
 
Interesting...

Could you provide a complete list of religious paths that you think are created by that priesthood?
you can spot them using three methods:
imagery: lion, snake, including regional mythical variants, like dragon.
story: virgin birth, repentance, resurrection, "feeding the masses" type of small gimmicks.
spiritual practice: "union with god", "back to the source", "higher dimension", repentance, etc.
 
All of the supposed fragments that bind this argument together are totally unrelated and mostly disproven by historians as well as primary sources. To have such a romantic view of history must be very nice, relying on vague similarities, factual errors and lies. On top of all this the only source you linked in this entire thing was your own post. Can you cite real sources for this?

Aztecs thinking Cortés was Quetzalcoatl was disproven by Cortes' own journal also.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Mithra

After reading this your post made even less sense. How would this timeline ever conceivably work?

Jewish and Christian culture being influenced by Persians is normal cultural exchange Christian scholars even agree with this.

Are there any sources from Christianity saying sacraments are soul harvesting to feed some kind of entity? Why would a gnostic deity set this entire trap for us in such a elaborate way and still allow us to figure it all out in a incels.is post? :feelskek:

Why would the Gospels survive telling us that we are saved by following Jesus alone without religious ceremonies? Why would such a evil gnostic Satan allow the Bible to teach Christians not to live of the world? Would it not be better to make us all nihilists and take our souls that way?

Galatians 2:16 "Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified."

Galatians 2:21 "I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain."

You should come up with a better thesis or cite your sources.

 
Last edited:
vague similarities
i wouldnt explain it with "coincidences" and "similiarities" to describe a phenomenon across various civilizations. if u actually read the post.
Christianity saying sacraments are soul harvesting to feed some kind of entity
"I am the vine; you are the branches" "Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him." "It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me." "For you have died, and your life is hidden with Christ in God. When Christ who is your life appears, then you also will appear with him in glory." " For if we have been united with him in a death like his, we shall certainly be united with him in a resurrection like his." "That they may all be one, just as you, Father, are in me, and I in you, that they also may be in us... I in them and you in me, that they may become perfectly one." "When all things are subjected to him, then the Son himself will also be subjected to him who put all things in subjection under him, that God may be all in all."
View attachment v2-bffeb8d65a18cb8a630f3dfe79b475e2_1440w.webp
Why would the Gospels survive telling us that we are saved by following Jesus alone without religious ceremonies? Why would such a evil gnostic Satan allow the Bible to teach Christians not to live of the world? Would it not be better to make us all nihilists and take our souls that way?
"not to live of this world" is typical gnostic language. so is the gospel of john.

decide for yourself man. treat this as a conspiracy post if u want.
 
vine; you are the branches" "Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him." "It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me." "For you have died, and your life is hidden with Christ in God. When Christ who is your life appears, then you also will appear with him in glory." " For if we have been united with him in a death like his, we shall certainly be united with him in a resurrection like his." "That they may all be one, just as you, Father, are in me, and I in you, that they also may be in us... I in them and you in me, that they may become perfectly one." "When all things are subjected to him, then the Son himself will also be subjected to him who put all things in subjection under him, that God may be all in all."
Jfl... These are almost all metaphorical. If this entire world is fake than can you define a metaphor?
 
"not to live of this world" is typical gnostic language. so is the gospel of john.
Why would the demiurge let his fake religion be gnostic????
 
Jfl... These are almost all metaphorical. If this entire world is fake than can you define a metaphor?
yeah right. suddenly the fundamentalist say it's all metaphorical. how convenient. decide for yourself man
 
i wouldnt explain it with "coincidences" and "similiarities" to describe a phenomenon across various civilizations. if u actually read the post.
Things that are vaguely similar aren't phenomenon that is not how history works. You would think that ravenous atheists would have already figured this out and argued it to oppose Christianity if it was true
 
yeah right. suddenly the fundamentalist say it's all metaphorical. how convenient. decide for yourself man
You will never learn anything if you think you are the smartest guy on this forum.
 
do you even read my post? or you just scanned and rush for rebuttal
I responded to what you just said not your post. I tried very hard to read your post, but it is very difficult. compress your sentiments, I fear your fingers outrun your judgment it would be best that you do not regurgitate a gnostic YouTube video and think about the improbability of your belief. How can you see a lack of virtue in the world and think that any man has the ability to become God if he can memorize facts? Do you think that a child murder if he memorizes facts can someone become God if he memorizes facts that somehow reject the demiurge??

“If someone proved to me that Christ is outside the truth and that in reality the truth were outside of Christ, then I should prefer to remain with Christ rather than with the truth.”


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVZT_t6SpuI
 
Last edited:
I responded to what you just said not your post. I tried very hard to read your post, but it is very difficult
like i anticipated. rather pointless discussion then.
simple question: who is the demiurge in my post?
you seems to have totally missed the point. u think i am a gnostic?
 
simple question: who is the demiurge in my post?
you seems to have totally missed the point. u think i am a gnostic?
Mithra
Everything you say, Gnosticism is not one belief, for example scientology is a form of Gnosticism
 
quite the opposite man. Mithra is the supposed savior to deliver us from Demiurge.
i get it, it's an awfully long post. use chatgpt or something if you dont want to read it.
 
quite the opposite man. Mithra is the supposed savior to deliver us from Demiurge.
i get it, it's an awfully long post. use chatgpt or something if you dont want to read it.
Can you summarize your main points in your own words?
 
Can you summarize your main points in your own words?
this paragraph.
The ultimate goal of every ritual, every sacrament, every baptism, every confession, and every act of repentance across these modified religions is the same. Water baptism in Christianity, ritual washing in Hinduism, water initiation in Tibetan Buddhism, the burning of confession papers in Taoism — they are all the same technology. Once a soul undergoes this ritual, it is tethered. After death, it cannot escape. It is drawn back toward the source, toward Ahura Mazda, where it is absorbed and its experiences are harvested. The "return to source" language found in Gnosticism, Taoism, Sufism, and New Age spirituality is not a metaphor for enlightenment. It is a description of the process of consumption. The "learning" that souls do on Earth is not for their own benefit. They are worker ants, storage units, accumulating data for a god that cannot achieve its own apotheosis without stealing the lives of others.
 
this paragraph.
Are you an Atheist?

Also Christians teach that you can lose salvation even after Baptism and many Christian figures were saved without being Baptized, For example: the thief on the cross.

"Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love."
 
First of all, don't confuse all the other religions with Christianity. I don't know why you are trying to link them like they're all the same with all different gods, there is only One God.

The only point I could understand that you mentioned on actual Christianity being satanic - was his point about child sacrifice - when said God commanded Abraham to kill Isaac. It was a spiritual test of faith, and Abraham succeeded. God would never do this, and it was a spiritual faith test of the flesh. In case you didn't know, God stopped the axe before he could do any harm.
 
But for anyone else reading my comment, it is not worth reading.
I read it twice and still couldn't follow it.
 
First of all, don't confuse all the other religions with Christianity.
I didnt. I just did a comparison and notice a lot of similarities.
The only point I could understand that you mentioned on actual Christianity being satanic
you totally missed the point. the important part is not child sacrifice.
the reversal of narrative is the sign of satanic. as many christian conspiracy theorists would say. that's the proof.
example: god good, satan bad -> satan good, god bad; man needs to repent ->god needs to repent for his sins;
there is only One God.
keep believing your little god. i have already warned you what would happen. He who has ears to hear, let him hear.
I read it twice and still couldn't follow it.
i think it's more of your problem man. you can't understand my comments under your post either.
Also Christians teach that you can lose salvation even after Baptism and many Christian figures were saved without being Baptized, For example: the thief on the cross.
getting ppl to be baptized is not the goal. it's one of the means.
there is no salvation at all. like i already have told you.
 
Last edited:
I didnt. I just did a comparison and notice a lot of similarities.

you totally missed the point. the important part is not child sacrifice.
the reversal of narrative is the sign of satanic. as many christian conspiracy theorists would say. that's the proof.

keep believing your little god. i have already warned you what would happen. He who has ears to hear, let him hear.

i think it's more of your problem man. you can't understand my comments under your post either.

getting ppl to be baptized is not the goal. it's one of the means.
there is no salvation at all. like i already have told you.
I believe the similarity between said religions with Christ is that satan always said some droplets of Truth while making the other religions and other gods.


Like a twisted dark prophet all gods myths points to Christ, because He fulfills what the soul of the pagans always wanted more than even their native gods.
 
Are you an Atheist?
yes, and no.
I believe in the existence of a spiritual realm inhabited by beings. some are malicious, some are neutral, some are good or could be bargained with. according to my analysis, your "god" is one of the malicious one, and has the most ulterior motives: absorb human souls, experience, knowledge and life energy. the jewish or islamic "god" might be malicious too, but they dont suck human souls, they just enjoy the blood sacrifice, like most deities before abrahamic religions do. this makes them less harmful and deceiving. why would the bible condemn supposed child sacrifice for other deities? obvious marketing technique:i dont require burnt child, so worship me! i only need burnt animals!
some beings would claim they are the "one true god", that's for monopoly. but they cant even display any power or deliver any promise . that's because spiritual beings have difficulty interfering with the material world.
 
Last edited:
I ain't reading all dat shieet nigga
 
As evidenced by?
the "salvation" promised is "union with/in christ", and like i said, is absorption of your soul, knowledge, experience, life energy etc.
"I am the vine; you are the branches"
"It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me."
"For you have died, and your life is hidden with Christ in God. When Christ who is your life appears, then you also will appear with him in glory."
" For if we have been united with him in a death like his, we shall certainly be united with him in a resurrection like his."
"That they may all be one, just as you, Father, are in me, and I in you, that they also may be in us... I in them and you in me, that they may become perfectly one."
also jesus himself was a failed prophet. the apocalyptic prophecies he made (blah blah blah will happen before this generation shall pass, or before some of you taste death etc etc ) never fulfilled. roman empire was destroyed hundreds of years later, and world ending never happened. the destruction of the second temple in 70CE is not the end of the world promised by jesus himself or the author of Revelations.
 
the "salvation" promised is "union with/in christ", and like i said, is absorption of your soul, knowledge, experience, life energy etc.
"I am the vine; you are the branches"
"It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me."
"For you have died, and your life is hidden with Christ in God. When Christ who is your life appears, then you also will appear with him in glory."
" For if we have been united with him in a death like his, we shall certainly be united with him in a resurrection like his."
"That they may all be one, just as you, Father, are in me, and I in you, that they also may be in us... I in them and you in me, that they may become perfectly one."
also jesus himself was a failed prophet. the apocalyptic prophecies he made (blah blah blah will happen before this generation shall pass, or before some of you taste death etc etc ) never fulfilled. roman empire was destroyed hundreds of years later, and world ending never happened. the destruction of the second temple in 70CE is not the end of the world promised by jesus himself or the author of Revelations.
What about repentance and doing what is righteous and good, and following the path of God? The path of Love, Justice, Mercy and Truth?
 
All Christianity is gay and Jewish
 
imagine believing something that is obviously made up by people generations ago
 
What about repentance and doing what is righteous and good, and following the path of God? The path of Love, Justice, Mercy and Truth?
i mean, if you want to be a good person, good luck, i wont stop you.
but dont tie a whole nonsense religion to being a good person, and say nonsense like "you cant be a good person unless u believe in jebus, coz of original sin blahblahblah". that's what hypocrites do, and what jebus criticized of pharisees.
 
DnR but Based
Don’t forget Hinduism has the trinity as well
I am reading this another time but I commend you for your effort man
Christanity was the worst thing to happen as Paul ruined the message of jesus as he added european paganism, Judaism and zorastriasm.
 
They offered them shelter, they offered them trust, and they were met with slaughter. The Aztec and Inca empires fell, tens of millions died, and the real lesson is this: believing in a "savior prophecy" is one of the deadliest mistakes a civilization can make.
They died mostly of diseases braught in by the europeans, which makes me ask, why didnt they died from disease braught by the chinese before?
Krishna himself was made into an incarnated deity who ended the worship of Indra, performed exorcisms, healed the sick, raised the dead, and demanded repentance for sin. He would also, according to prophecy, return as the savior Kalki at the end of the age. Sound familiar?
Yes sounds familiar, but why does this mean that it was implemented by an outside force, why couldnt they been coming up with a similiar concept on their own? Maybe the concept of god is inherent in humans and different culture create it by itself based on that idea.
Your interpretation could be correct, but you have no evidence beside the fact that it is possible.
and, according to the evidence, eventually merged with it.
This is actually interesting and wortg to learn about, could you give me the source to that
The original Jewish tradition had no Devil in the Zoroastrian sense. The satan figure in the Book of Job was a prosecutor, an accuser who tested loyalty under divine authority, not an independent force of evil. Christianity introduced the adversarial Devil, the fallen angel, the prince of darkness — concepts that are Zoroastrian to their core. The apocalyptic battle between Christ and the Antichrist, between the forces of light and the forces of darkness, is a direct transplant from Persian dualism.
Why couldnt they come up with that on their own
The priesthood had lost its purpose. The Mithraic usurpers had successfully rebranded his son as an agent of Ahura Mazda. So YHVH raised up a new instrument: Islam, the Seal of the Prophets. Islam was designed to be a corrective, a return to strict monotheism, a reassertion of absolute divine sovereignty without the corrupting influence of incarnation, atonement, or priestly mediation.
Or it was a tool of Ahriman
In China, the same force that had become Vishnu in India and Jesus in the Levant re-emerged as a tiger — China had no lions
Lions are not tigers and tigers should be known to chinese people since they live in SEA and India
In the Americas, the brothers finally found their most devastating opportunity. The Mithraic priesthood encountered the existing religious systems of Mesoamerica and set about transforming them. The serpent brother became Quetzalcoatl, the feathered serpent. The lion brother became Tezcatlipoca, the smoking mirror, a jaguar god of darkness and conflict. The same black hat, white hat dynamic was deployed. Quetzalcoatl brought civilization, wisdom, and peace. Tezcatlipoca brought chaos, war, and darkness. And Quetzalcoatl made a prophecy: he would return, riding on a great wooden ship with white sails, to save his people. The Aztecs, who had inherited this religion from the Maya, believed it literally. When Hernán Cortés arrived with his ships, his white sails, his pale skin, and his crosses, they thought he was the returning god. They welcomed him. They housed him. And they were destroyed.
And they were able to go to america and interact with the locals enough to completly undermine their religious thinking without leaving any evidence that they've been there, without unleashing you giant plagues to them like the europeans did?
It makes you open the gates. It makes you lay down your weapons. It makes you welcome the ships with white sails. And by the time you realize your mistake, the slaughter has already begun.
In Vienna it made them do the exact opposite, same in Byzantium, same in Poitiers.
 
the "salvation" promised is "union with/in christ", and like i said, is absorption of your soul, knowledge, experience, life energy etc.
"I am the vine; you are the branches"
"It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me."
"For you have died, and your life is hidden with Christ in God. When Christ who is your life appears, then you also will appear with him in glory."
" For if we have been united with him in a death like his, we shall certainly be united with him in a resurrection like his."
"That they may all be one, just as you, Father, are in me, and I in you, that they also may be in us... I in them and you in me, that they may become perfectly one."
also jesus himself was a failed prophet. the apocalyptic prophecies he made (blah blah blah will happen before this generation shall pass, or before some of you taste death etc etc ) never fulfilled. roman empire was destroyed hundreds of years later, and world ending never happened. the destruction of the second temple in 70CE is not the end of the world promised by jesus himself or the author of Revelations.
No one other than you has ever taken these verses this literally. I cannot believe that you actually agree with what you are saying
 
I respect the effort in this. Even though most of it goes way over my head.

:feelskek: :feelskek: I kek'd hard when I noticed:

"a goddamn ricecel"
 
And there are few things in life that are more obnoxious than a grand unifying theory of everything. But I admire that too. :feelsokman:
 
All of the supposed fragments that bind this argument together are totally unrelated and mostly disproven by historians as well as primary sources. To have such a romantic view of history must be very nice, relying on vague similarities, factual errors and lies. On top of all this the only source you linked in this entire thing was your own post. Can you cite real sources for this?

Aztecs thinking Cortés was Quetzalcoatl was disproven by Cortes' own journal also.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Mithra

After reading this your post made even less sense. How would this timeline ever conceivably work?

Jewish and Christian culture being influenced by Persians is normal cultural exchange Christian scholars even agree with this.

Are there any sources from Christianity saying sacraments are soul harvesting to feed some kind of entity? Why would a gnostic deity set this entire trap for us in such a elaborate way and still allow us to figure it all out in a incels.is post? :feelskek:

Why would the Gospels survive telling us that we are saved by following Jesus alone without religious ceremonies? Why would such a evil gnostic Satan allow the Bible to teach Christians not to live of the world? Would it not be better to make us all nihilists and take our souls that way?

Galatians 2:16 "Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified."

Galatians 2:21 "I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain."

You should come up with a better thesis or cite your sources.

i am too low iq to understand anything being said here
 
please educate yourself on the bible and the gospel b4 making a thread

thanks
 
adam sandler weed GIF

Believing in a savior who will come from outside to rescue you is the most dangerous idea a people can hold. It makes you open the gates. It makes you lay down your weapons. It makes you welcome the ships with white sails. And by the time you realize your mistake, the slaughter has already begun.
Regardless if all the other things you said are true or not, your core argument is sound. Believing in a saviour is very foolish indeed.
 
Damn, thats like a seasons worth of acient aliens right here.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top