SlayerSlayer
The Satoru Iwata of incels.is
★★★★★
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2018
- Posts
- 25,358
- Online time
- 18h 32m
I simply don't buy into the bullshit that confidence is a 'real' thing. And even more, I don't buy into the bullshit that women are more socially intelligent people. The way in which women consistently go out of their way to CHOose dark triad con artists, go out of their way to get punched in the face, abused, and even murdered over them, over safer meeker men seals the deal. Even the whole thing about females having deeper friendships. That's just not true Maybe it's true for Chads, but in my limited experience, men have no problem being emotionally vulnerable and relating to each other, and it's women that are tight-lipped, gossipy, competitive, and frequently close the door on friendships over trivialities.
There is I suppose an 'inner' confidence. And to some degree it is real in the sense of one personally feeling a genuine sense of competence about a given context. But I think the entire concept of confidence is highly overrated, because confidence is often a short hand for lacking through examination of a problem. It's the lazy superficial choice to deep thinking or really sweating thru an obstacle. Again, this is women thinking the nicer looking newer home is the correct choice, when really, they aren't looking if this home is even thought out-- quite often newer homes are built with shoddy materials. Do they even know if the foundation it's built on is water sealed? If it's built on a slab, how even feasibly maintainable is the home? They don't care they are being ripped off and that the newer home will keel over at a gust of wind. ITS NEWER, IT LOOKS NICER. I DONT CARE IF THE WIND WILL BLOW IT OVER, LETS PAY MORE FOR IT.
Again women are simply hedonistic thinkers, that simply want to be curated easy experiences as opposed to being rational about long-term well being and safety. They want to be right when they are wrong, and for it all to be a dramatic rollercoaster. And this is especially true in their own ability to think that 'confidence' is a real thing, and that it could be accurately perceived, and that it has anything to do with their own well being. Like fish drawn to a dangling worm on a hook, they think inner confidence is Chad standing in the corner preening with a stone cold look on his face.
Confidence can only exist as external superficial traits. And for the most part, if it is 'genuine' confidence, that's more akin to being innately sociopathic, in a way that's brought about from early childhood experiences. I asked ChatGPT to break down 'superficial confidence' as a skill tree as follows:
The foundation.
Passive Bonus: People form opinions before you've spoken.
The ability to be easily understood.
Instead of:
You become:
Passive Bonus: People remember you.
The branch most people mistake for actual confidence.
Passive Bonus: Others assume competence.
This is where the sociopathy criticism starts entering.
Turning yourself into a story.
Think of how founders, celebrities, politicians, and influencers operate.
People stop evaluating facts.
They start evaluating lore.
Passive Bonus: Immunity to mundane criticism.
Understanding social ranking systems.
At this stage you're no longer selling yourself.
You're selling evidence that others already value you.
Passive Bonus: External validation compounds.
The dark path.
This is where confidence, narcissism, and sociopathy become difficult to distinguish from the outside.
Passive Bonus: Resistance to shame.
Debuff: Increased risk of delusion.
Ironically, I kind of get the sense that women want to say they want "depth" over "confidence." However, because ugly neurotic people have 'depth' in ways they lack confidence, and they can't flick their clit to that-- they don't often say that want a man with 'depth.' Because again, women LIKE the superficiality of it all.
They want to eat CHAD CONFIDENCE, caviar, cocaine, on a CRUISE for their CUNT
So I think if I had any stupid PSA message from this long winded diatribe it's that you should really be a sociopath-- because it's not all looks, they like sociopathic personalities too. And if you can't develop your sociopathic skill tree because you are autistic then you should goon because it's over.
There is I suppose an 'inner' confidence. And to some degree it is real in the sense of one personally feeling a genuine sense of competence about a given context. But I think the entire concept of confidence is highly overrated, because confidence is often a short hand for lacking through examination of a problem. It's the lazy superficial choice to deep thinking or really sweating thru an obstacle. Again, this is women thinking the nicer looking newer home is the correct choice, when really, they aren't looking if this home is even thought out-- quite often newer homes are built with shoddy materials. Do they even know if the foundation it's built on is water sealed? If it's built on a slab, how even feasibly maintainable is the home? They don't care they are being ripped off and that the newer home will keel over at a gust of wind. ITS NEWER, IT LOOKS NICER. I DONT CARE IF THE WIND WILL BLOW IT OVER, LETS PAY MORE FOR IT.
Again women are simply hedonistic thinkers, that simply want to be curated easy experiences as opposed to being rational about long-term well being and safety. They want to be right when they are wrong, and for it all to be a dramatic rollercoaster. And this is especially true in their own ability to think that 'confidence' is a real thing, and that it could be accurately perceived, and that it has anything to do with their own well being. Like fish drawn to a dangling worm on a hook, they think inner confidence is Chad standing in the corner preening with a stone cold look on his face.
Confidence can only exist as external superficial traits. And for the most part, if it is 'genuine' confidence, that's more akin to being innately sociopathic, in a way that's brought about from early childhood experiences. I asked ChatGPT to break down 'superficial confidence' as a skill tree as follows:
Tier 1: Visibility
The foundation.
- Grooming
- Fashion
- Posture
- Voice projection
- Facial expressions
- Body language
- Environmental signaling (car, office, social media, neighborhood)
Passive Bonus: People form opinions before you've spoken.
Tier 2: Social Legibility
The ability to be easily understood.
- Clear narratives about yourself
- Consistent personal brand
- Memorable catchphrases
- Simplified opinions
- Archetypal identity
Instead of:
"I'm a complicated person with conflicting desires."
You become:
"The entrepreneur."
"The artist."
"The rebel."
Passive Bonus: People remember you.
Tier 3: Confidence Projection
The branch most people mistake for actual confidence.
- Speaking without hesitation
- Maintaining eye contact
- Low apology frequency
- Certainty signaling
- Status assumptions
- Conversational dominance
Passive Bonus: Others assume competence.
This is where the sociopathy criticism starts entering.
Tier 4: Mythmaking
Turning yourself into a story.
- Selective self-disclosure
- Strategic ambiguity
- Hero narratives
- Origin stories
- Public enemies
- Public victories
Think of how founders, celebrities, politicians, and influencers operate.
People stop evaluating facts.
They start evaluating lore.
Passive Bonus: Immunity to mundane criticism.
Tier 5: Status Manipulation
Understanding social ranking systems.
- Association with prestige
- Scarcity creation
- Exclusivity
- Name-dropping
- Social proof
- Prestige consumption
At this stage you're no longer selling yourself.
You're selling evidence that others already value you.
Passive Bonus: External validation compounds.
Tier 6: Reality Editing
The dark path.
- Extreme self-confidence displays
- Refusal to acknowledge failure
- Narrative control
- Blame shifting
- Selective memory
- Strategic dishonesty
This is where confidence, narcissism, and sociopathy become difficult to distinguish from the outside.
Passive Bonus: Resistance to shame.
Debuff: Increased risk of delusion.
Ironically, I kind of get the sense that women want to say they want "depth" over "confidence." However, because ugly neurotic people have 'depth' in ways they lack confidence, and they can't flick their clit to that-- they don't often say that want a man with 'depth.' Because again, women LIKE the superficiality of it all.
They want to eat CHAD CONFIDENCE, caviar, cocaine, on a CRUISE for their CUNT
So I think if I had any stupid PSA message from this long winded diatribe it's that you should really be a sociopath-- because it's not all looks, they like sociopathic personalities too. And if you can't develop your sociopathic skill tree because you are autistic then you should goon because it's over.
Last edited:





