LebaneseCel said:
A supremacist is someone who wants to dominate the world to impose his own racial superiority on others, i.e. the modern Jewish political tribe. I do not believe that I'm inherently "superior" to others simply because of race, but it is a fact that European civilization exceeds that of Africa, for instance. An ugly male won't necessarily be cucked by an ethnostate that does not promote sexual freedom (i.e. the US up until 1960's).
1) You deny being a supremacist, but then Immediately go to "tribe A is superior to tribe B!". Are you on acid?
2) Your example of the '60's is a good example of why the blackpill and WN cannot coexist.
LebaneseCel said:
If the ethnostate does support the blackpill and is blackpilled on women essentially, then it is doomed to succeed.
No. It is doomed to fail. See your own example.
LebaneseCel said:
Much of Western society, before leftism and sexual feminism got its hand on the popular culture, was essentially blackpilled and promoted gender role differences, as well as traditional patriarchal values.
It's death knell rang when It decided to keep the blackpill and racism at the same time.
LebaneseCel said:
https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4299673,00.html
Another Jewish Zionist noted that, "White nationalism: a scourge that won't go away."
https://huffpost.com/us/entry/1338565
All forms of multiracial and multicultural policies in distinct nations are essentially good for the Jews.
Let me ask you something:
How did Trump get so popular? How did HITLER get so popular? How do/did many politicians IN HISTORY and the CURRENT DAY get so popular? Simple. Self-flagellation for attention. Hitler's Beer Hall Putsch, Trump deviating greatly from basic common sense, Anglin and many others creating and posting self-flagellating memes, etc. all of it got them to their goal. This is no different. They'll put them in a negative light, sure, so it doesn't get removed immediately by those with common sense, but their name still is visible, so the lower IQ morons can find out about it and enlist in it.
LebaneseCel said:
Alright, prove that Nazis essentially wanted all non-blue eyed Germans gone.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism_and_race
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_policy_of_Nazi_Germany
Look at the articles and their reference sections in particular. There's lots of evidence there. I'd add a tom more, but I'll refrain because you don't like things that don't come from some protist-iq level skinhead's asshole on stormfront.org . Let me ask you this: If a Jew told you that 2 + 2 = 4, would you disagree? So why are you so scared of "Jewish sources", IF they are credible? If you want to see them, just say the word.
LebaneseCel said:
Proof? Nazis did not want to kill all non-whites essentially.
See above.
LebaneseCel said:
. In fact, the Jews admitted that the whole "5 million Europeans killed by hitler" is a lie invented to gain sympathy from white people toward the Jews.
OK, proof of this?
LebaneseCel said:
it is not that "Jewish" to be an ethnostate.
?????
Angrezi, Chutiya ji?
LebaneseCel said:
Judaism is essentially an ideology (race and religion), and not simply a "tribe" since there are all kinds of Jews, especially in Israel.
They are a race, hence a tribe. What's new here? There are many 'types' of Whites as well.
LebaneseCel said:
White nationalism is limited to whites only. Ethnic nationalism is limited to all races.
Same difference. What's new here?
LebaneseCel said:
An ideal white nationalist society would respect the free will of other nations to abide by their own customs and traditions.
And seeing your own actions, history, biology, etc., WN would like to prove you wrong. Even take a look at some of it's more commanding Cucks, like William Luther Pierce, Andrew Anglin, Ben Klassen, etc.
Even from a WN perspective, this is wrong. The will of your tribe comes first (that's how you moved around so many Blacks, etc., and want to get rid of nonwhites since it's us first), so whatever some out-groupers say means nothing if it even slightly offends a single White (Right) Man.
LebaneseCel said:
That does not look like self determination to me.
Yes it is, according to WN logic. See above.
LebaneseCel said:
are you dumb, or what? You seem to keep offering the same low IQ opinions.
That's a surprising statement coming from you. Are you sure it's ME who's doing that?
LebaneseCel said:
Early North America did not participate in colonization of other nations
They invaded the land of the Native Americans, so yes. They also invaded the ones of that they had been earlier friends with, more reason we can't trust ethnostates to keep peace. YOUR Early America ethnostate had always broken it's promise of peace. You people are despicable.
LebaneseCel said:
No. Also, natives were already scattered across the North American continent and were simply expelled to establish an ethnostate.
WHAT!? I THOUGHT YOU SUPPORTED SELF-DETERMINATION OF ALL PEOPLES!? These are new levels of hypocrisy. Cuckqueers would be proud of you.
LebaneseCel said:
However expelling natives does not mean that we're supporting imperialism.
You call the 'third worlders' imperialists and scum for expelling 'native Whites', so... (That doesn't also mention the fact that that contradicts both your 'self-determination' pornography as well as your 'ethnostates are for peace and we won't invade' nonsense)
LebaneseCel said:
This is why the white race there is worthy of being preserved.
Not really a whole race of peoples, you can't just redistribute the work of some hard-working people to lazy louts just because of their skin color (yea because you care about merit, amirite?), if anything, it just shows that the people who DID work hard should be honored and ALL people, regardless of their skin color, should be allowed to honor their sacrifices by building upon them.
LebaneseCel said:
It was whites that formed the early United States, and as a result, are deserving of majority status.
So by your logic a country belongs to whomever develops it, hence it also belongs to immigrants who also help build it.
LebaneseCel said:
Well, it just shows that even native Americans weren't really "native."
What doesn't? I lost you when you started this retarded Xth reply system rather than actually linking my posts.
LebaneseCel said:
Tribes scattered across a continent do not form a nation .
Say it louder for the WN's in the back!
LebaneseCel said:
how is everyone divided against one another through segregation/separation?
Rather than sharing the land and caring for each other together as one, we're all divided at each other believing we're superior.
LebaneseCel said:
? If anything putting races together will cause division, not the reverse.
Only when racial supremacists like you are released into the public will the division will happen. But it is a preferable alternative to giving you a whole ethnostate where you can easily relax and cause war with ease, you whole nation's support included. At least without the borders those who want to cause war will be easily found and their plans foiled.
LebaneseCel said:
You are humanity's biggest hypocrite. You tell me not to use Jewish sources and then you go ahead and use them yourself. The article is just the Jews piggybacking off of what they actually went against when it was happening, now they take the position of the anti-racist so more people buy their BS and more people get into racist movements when they write off more advertising to racist movements disguised as criticism.
LebaneseCel said:
21: depends on what you call "skilled" tbh. An educated white will have more value in a nation than a "skilled" Mexican worker.
I meant in terms of education. An educated Mexican will have more value in a nation than a NEET White dude.
LebaneseCel said:
They are slowly becoming the majority of the nation and taking over key positions in society.
And? I've already debunked why you think that this is a bad thing.
LebaneseCel said:
Plus, don't forget fact that non whites act collectively and seem to vote leftist most of the time
You have no proof or any way to argue for that.
LebaneseCel said:
(see the Roy Moore election and how 90+% of Alabama's African Americans voted against him
Let me ask you a question. If, suppose in a nation that you liked to live in that was a democracy, I ran as president to kill all the White folk in some horrific genocide, what % of the White vote do you think I would get? Also, would it then by hypocritical of me to say that 'Oh! All whites act collectively! I had a low % of the White vote!'? Yes, it would be.
LebaneseCel said:
because of racial hypergamy
What because of racial hypergamy? You joined r/Cuckold? Is that what it is?
LebaneseCel said:
white females flocking to blacks because of the big penis size,
Keep your cuck porn to yourself. This is INCELS.ME, you will be escorted back to r/Cuckold. r/Cuckold is here:
www.stormfront.org
LebaneseCel said:
as a result, you should stand against race mixing, if that's your concern (LOL).
What is? Can you reply to my threads directly not do this ambiguous Xth reply system?
LebaneseCel said:
If ethnic women especially have some kind of fetish for white dick then passing anti-miscegenation laws will be beneficial.
Again, how so? Women are inherently evil, and do whatever they can to divide us all up.
LebaneseCel said:
but we do not need a dystopian globalist-backed multiracial nation to control them and end hypergamous tendencies.
It's our only choice. Sorry man.
LebaneseCel said:
again it's not just skin color. Lips, noses, eyes, etc. all play an important role
You were only using the most random and unproven aspects of some human individuals and then projecting that onto a whole race.
LebaneseCel said:
Humans love to live with their own kind
Even if they did, that's not a good thing. That's like when Cuckqueers (You for example) tries to justify women's evil by "Oh! But women
love destroying society!" It's like AND?! That doesn't justify anything or mean that it's right.
There's also many things that humans like that's detrimental for them (smoking, drinking, etc.) but the existence of it and the love of it does not JUSTIFY it.
LebaneseCel said:
This is evident by the whites fleeing their own areas
Even if this did happen, this is just racial supremacists overreacting to non-issues. It's like when Cuckqueers tries to get us banned because of some BS reason. The fact that Cuckqueers is scared means nothing other than they are overreacting to non-issues, just as these whites were.
LebaneseCel said:
Racial differences are vital, and we should not treat humanity as one whole race.
That is incorrect.
LebaneseCel said:
Regarding the other South Africa imperialism reply, the Dutch did not "colonize" South Africa by force technically and simply existed peacefully since a long time.
You really know NO history, now do you? You were also the one applauding their 'achievement' of colonizing them...
LebaneseCel said:
I would prefer if we could bring all white South Africans to European nations and send the Western blacks to South Africa.
But I thought it was "whomever built the first part of it gets to keep it"?! You can't even stay consistent here..
LebaneseCel said:
All you do is post like cucktears without any facts or evidence...
Don't project yourself onto me.
LebaneseCel said:
"But muh the Jews and white nationalists are literally the same, even though Jews hate white nationalism. Can't you see that, dumb SFcel? My opinionated argument is supreme!"
The Jews don't hate WN, they LOVE it. Also, I don't think that it's ME with the opinionated arguments...
LebaneseCel said:
Coming from the Uncle Tom why cucks for white supremacists.
ElliotRodgerHere said:
Because the mass media of news and entertainment is owned and dominated by jews who want whites to mix their genes out because they perceive whites as a threat.
They control both sides, and teeter-totter the media's happenings as they see fit so more people are willing to fight each other rather than the Jews. Also, the fact that Whites still take the anti racist media anyway doesn't disprove his question.
ElliotRodgerHere said:
the white race is already the most diverse of the three major races of man: caucasion, oriental, negro. We don't need any more diversity
So both is and my theory is correct:
Mine of "well none of that diversity crap matters, so let's judge individuals as individuals!" as his of "More diversity adds onto itself!". You were trying to use the "we have diversity, so we're good!" argument as a reason for not having diversity JFL


i_a_m_i said:
Like the fact that a highly advanced civilization can't sustain itself without a sufficiently high IQ population(either whites or asians).
So then select for individuals from ALL races who are high IQ, not keeping any White/Asian NEETs, but keeping the Black professors.
i_a_m_i said:
Or the preservation of western culture, the existence of which is intrinsically tied to the white race.
Hate to beak it to you, but people can assimilate into other cultures. It's happened before and it will continue to happen.
i_a_m_i said:
wanting a sense of community, cleaner streets and less crime
You can do that with any nation/community, what, you don't feel like a brother even here in Incels.me?
i_a_m_i said:
asian men have it the worst in a diverse dating market, because asian women date interracially far more often than asian men, leading to a large number of asian incels which would not exist in an ethnically homogeneous country.
A) In both cases Asian men would be Incel, because even in the ethnostate women want Chang, leaving the Ricecels as Ricecels.
B) Women try whatever they can to cause despair, even using race to divide. All this would do is just redirect their focus to something else, leaving you dumbfounded at their new choice. It was at random that women even chose to divide along the parameter of skin color, not even God knows what next they'll divide off of.
i_a_m_i said:
The Chinese will control the earth, and subjugate the rest of the mixed race world that remains
Nah, seems like a WN goal tbh tbh tbh tbh.
LebaneseCel said:
Idk why ethnics keep crying at anti miscegenation laws.
Because those laws are stupid.
LebaneseCel said:
They keep screaming and complaining that ethnic foids are naturally going for white males,
No, JBW is a little different from that.
LebaneseCel said:
Maybe it's because they want white women, isn't it?
Nah man I don't really acre about race at all it's a useless parameter on the other hand SFcels believe that they are entitled to a white foid
1)
LebaneseCel said:
It's mentally sick for a man to be attracted to a literal child.
2)
LebaneseCel said:
13+ AOC isn't "pedo"
Also, not wanting there to be an age of consent isn't pedophilic too.
First of all, can you make your mind up? Second of all, are you mentally insane?
ElliotRodgerHere said:
Patriarchy is a backwards mindset too you fucking idiot, modern societal norms are meaningless because society as a whole is cancer if you haven't noticed. Wanting women to not act like complete whores and fuck every Chad that walks down the street is a "backwards" mindset.
He meant backwards in an Incelistani society you dumbfuck.
ElliotRodgerHere said:
Incorrect. The only white women who have sex outside of their race are always the biggest whores
Nice conjecture there so a white foid who fucks 5 tyrones is a bigger whore than a white foid who fucks 100 chads?
LebaneseCel said:
@BluePillsPoison You're a cucktears troll who wants to appease normalfags.
Don't project yourself onto him.
BluePillsPoison said:
This tbh.