Of course, the bantu aren't even native to southern africa, the khoisan people are and they have allied with the white south africans against the violent bantu blacks.
1. So no reason then lol. Maybe you can't read, but I asked what are the NEGATIVES, someone gets a rash or infection and it will be very irritating, if left unattended to or mistreated it can possibly lead to death.
What are the negatives of not having "TRUE diversity"?
What are the negatives of people having no connection to a past culture?
These things aren't inherently negative, having a rash or infection is inherently a negative to your well being, the same can't be said for the above.
2. Humans plan on going out into space and populating other planets, we may likely run into other humanoids then, there are likely millions of other humanoid species out there, assuming a "humanoid form" is always what the most intelligent species of a planet always takes. What the fuck does the culture of a specific race of a specific species matter then.
We don't need the old roots or culture, we'll create our own, new cultures will spawn, your argument is borderline retarded, we literally live in an age where people barely adhere to the tenants of their cultures in a strict manner, but you think keeping the races separate will do that. Nobody cares about culture, we care about progress, if we cared about culture we'd give up on computers, cars, etc and all the other conveniences we enjoy today.
Oh and I like your logic here, continuing generations of racial discrimination and hatred is just a necessary sacrifice so that we can wake up and see people with pale skin walking around or people with dark skin walking around, I mean a world where I can't see different races is a nightmare am I right, I mean fuck all that unity shit I need to see all of those colour variations or i'll die
We could literally end all racism so humanity as a collective can finally focus on more important issues in life and actually start working together but fuck that shit, because "muh diversity" and "muh cultural heritage". Holy shit you actually posted this like it was a legitimate argument.
Oh yeah, 99% of the planet completely united vs 1% and the 1% wins, yeah completely legit. You ever think that the zionist are winning because we see ourselves as seperate and don't have a "united front" against them. Why would I side with whites against zionists when whites want to exclude me from the society they create thereafter, doesn't seem like a good deal to me, now if were all mixed and its literally just all of us vs the jews don't you think that will go much differently (use some common sense dude).
You know I have a really simple solution to this statement you said right here that you race obsessed retards can't seem to get, you are so stupid you can't even see the irony of you saying something like this because a simple solution is staring you right in the face but you don't want it, for illegitimate reasons.
Simple solution............. NO RACES, ONE RACE, ALL MIXED.
We could literally end all racial hatred and fighting just by doing something humans already enjoy doing, having sex. But no, lets put barriers on what race of dick can enter what race of pussy, ironically doing so on an incel site. Like I've said before, all the races becoming one race is inevitable because the people who have a say on whether this happens (normies) aren't on this site and don't have such extreme views, they just enjoy living and having sex, so mixing happens by default, all your arguing amounts to nothing and mines also so this is where I stop, keep going if you want.
Last edited:
Living in a society your race creates for your race seems like a bad deal to you?
They wouldn't hurt me, I am an ally.
I refer back to my monopoly analogy, my race doesn't have broadwalk and parkplace, they're already starting off in a rigged game where all the resources have been distributed amongst whites and are hoarded, wealth gets passed down so it never really has a chance to spread to other races, unless we race mix, then the wealth will be spread amongst other races. Notice how race mixing literally ends all these race related problems.
But like you probably missed and I'll reiterate one more time before I leave:
It doesn't matter what one believes, it only matters what one does, and you're here on this site just arguing about it and will likely never do anything to impede or completely stop race mixing, so it doesn't matter in the end. The races uniting into one is inevitable.
I don't see Japan opening their borders to the third world scourge any time soon. You also keep neglecting to address Israel and I keep having to mention that they practice anti-miscegenation and legislate against it. There are certainly going to be places in the future that maintains their racial integrity. Even whites in the west have the lowest miscegenation rate which tells me that even on a subconscious level whites want to preserve themselves
The Jews are Ethnic Nationalists, They Hate everyone who isn't Jewish.
This means that they're supremacists, not ethnic nationalists. They are globalist scum who hate the goyim. I want all the goyim to rise up against them, but on the condition that civic nationalism is eliminated, as it is a Judeo leftist ideology.
>Supremacists and """ethnic nationalists""" are the same thing. Even WN's believe that they're superior, even look at all their speakers, as well as other WN's here like @ElliotRodgerHere, etc. After going through your own comments and those of your peers, even your statements supporting WN contradict WN.
And that ugly male will be cucked by that very ethnostate.
If the ethnostate supports traditional patriarchal values, he won't be cucked. You gotta have an ethnostate with an acceptable ideology that opposes hypergamy.
>If the ethnostate supports the Blackpill, that ethnostate is doomed to die. Simple as that. Then we'll be back to square one.
It's the only choice we have. I'm sorry, but this is the only thing we can do to end the hellish cycle of exploitation.
Different races should fix their own women and hypergamy problem.
>It's better that we all unite as one so women and Jews have nothing to divide us on.
And because they believed that they were "Pure Aryans" adn everyone else is inferior and hence deserves to die.
Jewish propaganda. Not all Germans were blue eyed, and those that weren't were accepted if they supported Hitler.
>Sure thing, buddy. Even NS literature of all sorts is dying to prove you wrong.
Also, a lot of Bosnians, Africans, Asians, and even Russians allied with hitler to fight off Jewish freemasonry (pic related).
>Listen here you Chutiya. The Russians and Slavs got in because they were also WN's and hated their nation, so Shitler was more than happy to accept these traitors. The Nonwhites like the Azad Hind Fauz were desperate for any way to free their nation from WN rule, even if it meant siding with other WN's and surviving off of the internal WN division (WWII). I guarantee that these people (the WN's) would've killed the nonwhites once they were done with them.
>The fact that you bring the nonwhites in the Nazi army shows how hypocritical the WN's are. These people would've been kicked out/killed when the war was finished if the Axis won, but Germans who never fought were somehow still 'worthy' of having citizenship just because of the color of their skin. WN is recipe of death for any and every nation.
Even the Nazis admitted to wanting to conquer the whole world. What's new here?
Jewish propaganda. Unless you post legitimate proof not from Jewish sources, then I might consider this argument.
>What do you consider as a "Jewish Source" and why would that be bad? I'm asking so I can give you the best proof possible.
I think that History and ethnostates like Israhell, pakistan, etc. would be more than happy to prove you wrong.
But Israel is not truly an ethnostate.
>Yes it is, they keep all the out-groupers out.
That's the thing, and I already proved why.
>When what was the proof, Uncle Tom?
Judaism is not limited to race alone. It is a whole ideology by itself.
>And WN is also an Ideology, no?
Also I stated that an ethnostate also has to believe in the concept of self determination to truly avoid imperialist tendencies.
>It supports ITSELF being self-determinant, but others being at it's feet.
Israel (if it is an ethnostate by your standards) or any Islamic ethnostate like Pakistan do not.
>Are you on acid? Pakistan, Israhell, etc. are the ones masturbating to the idea of """Self-Determination""", that why they were even created!
Then what happened to the Native Americans? The continuation of the Slave trade util the civil war? The Mexican-US civil war? If they didn't want to invade anyone, why didn't they go back since the Native Americans were there?
I'm first talking about early America, under the founding fathers and before crony capitalism was involved.
>But even then the slaves and Native Americans have something to say because they were around at your suggested timeline.
Expelling any remaining natives is not equivalent to colonizing other nations.
>But what about the Idea of a pure ethnostate? We've seen the extent you're willing to go to to get one, and you HAVE expelled natives from their land to expand the US even under the founding fathers, so it doesn't match up with history.
Also, you use the same argument used by a lot of lefties, that "oh you guys were not here first."
>No, I was using the WN argument of "Protect X, it's our '''native land'''", like how they use "Protect Europe, it's our native land!". I was using your own argument against you.
That's technically true, although "natives" technically also emigrated from Asia and traveled to North America.
>Ok and?
Also what matters is that North America wasn't really a nation of itself.
>Are you fucking retarded? What about the Iroquois, Aztecs, etc.?
The America that was formed by whites was the vital one under proper laws and governance.
>OK and?
If you have to use that argument, then you must consider that humanity overall is a result of expansion, and that a lot of modern nations belonged to other people in the past.
https://www.the-scientist.com/?arti...cans-Descended-from-One-Ancestral-Population/
Not everything short of ethnic genocide is Jewish you know, In fact, it's the Jews who SUPPORT Segregation and Genocide!
For goyim. However they hate it when whites segregate other races in their own nations.
>They love it, because then everyone divided and hates each other and is too busy fighting each other rather than the Jews.
https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/jews-in-the-civil-rights-movement/
>The Jews trying to piggy-back on the Civil Rights movement when in reality they were the ones against it at the time, they're just doing whatever they can to divide and conquer. Fist seep in, then make them look like a privileged enemy.
I care about quality and merit, not diversity. If I did, I wouldn't even let members of my country leave their homes.
And I care about race, as well as quality and merit.
>It's clear by the fact that'd you'd kick out skilled nonwhites in favor of keeping morons just because of their skin color that you don't.
It's also human nature to be sadistic and commit genocide and have the whole hypergamy system. Not everything that is "Human Nature" is good. We must transcend humanhood and the prison known as the world to be free.
Hypergamy isn't technically natural and is inflated by the post modernist society we live in.
>It happens all the damn time in nature you Cuck. It's a part of female human Biology and Natural Selection. Are you even Blackpilled?
How are they "taking over"?
By demographic replacement and overpopulation through fertility rates. In the West, it is a fact that non whites have a way higher fertility rate than whites do.
>Ok, and how are they "taking over"? How are they "Invading"? How is this an "invasion" or a "bad thing"?
http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2012/05/17/explaining-why-minority-births-now-outnumber-white-births/
Banning the first two is good. Banning the third causes disunity in the country and is the reason (NOT MULTICULTURALISM) why Jews can use muliculturalism to disunite, by creating tension between them and not brotherhood. You can do this with every other denomination, such as religion, blood type, etc. yet I don't see you segregating on those parameters, now do I?
If you're blackpilled then it is shameful to believe in race mixing.
>How so?
The whole "JBW and JBB theories" stemmed from the issue of race mixing.
>No, JBB was invented by coping racists to falsely justify an ethnostate and JBW is the fact that Asian Women in poorer counties will chase after a White dude for his $$$, as they believe he has lots of it, but not for other races and ALL women are inherently White Worshiping racist gold-diggers. They divide the world up, and your response is to help them?! You are truly Shameless.
Women, particularly Asian ones, love to betray their tribes, and early male leaders knew the horrors that would result from legalizing miscegenation.
>This one is true for the following reason: Women are inherently evil and do whatever they can to cause strife and pain in the world. That's why we need to unite against them as ONE INCELISTAN, so they have no boundaries to divide us on.
???
What?
Proof of this?
Search for albinos (negroes with white skin) and you'll realize that they still hold distinct features that do not make them European.
>What makes people "European" to me is their patriotism to it, yours would be their skin color and some unimportant minute differences.
(Pic related)
>These are the most extreme of extremes. With pic 1, the faces seem about normal for everyone, but the proof of the skulls is lacking. Regarding the albino pic, I guess then I can kind of understand, But I mean we're all still humans and mixed people do exist and fit all the criteria of being human and being able to breed. Even if all these "differences" were real, they're so minute that it doesn't make a difference. It's like the rule of a thousand practically.
That's like a criminal handing himself over to police and then complaining that the police are actually taking action against him. Are you really this stupid?
All you've proven is that when you try to cause racial tensions, race will have tension to it. You commit crimes elsewhere and then complain the victims of the crimes actually want some justice.
How so?
But I thought you wanted everyone for their """native land"""?! I thought that you WEREN'T going to support colonialism!? I thought that you were against this type of Imperialism?!
Does it really matter though? Just give South Africa to all those who love it, no matter the race, so ALL patriots of South Africa can contribute to it.
Yes, I'd rather countrymen of Incelistan create for Incelistan (Since Incelistan will have the whole world femoids have nowhere to run) and NOT some Cucked tribal Ethnostate that's always at war with every other ethnostate for muh femoid overlords.
>That's what the Indians conquered by the British though time and time again even after the horrific genocides, atrocities, and massacres as well the total destruction of India.
>They must for their own good, else the fall and die.
>WN's respect all races!
>And those places must be destroyed.
>"""Muh Whites are mixing with all these niggers adn ayrabs!"""
>Are you Ok there buddy?
>Also, how does tell me that somehow subconsciously that ALL whites are tribalists? (Not an attack, just wondering)
>The whites who think this way subconsciously are the ones less evolved and must be destroyed.
Last edited:
South africa was colonized hundreds of years ago. Israel practices colonialism and imperialism in the current year and is essentially an extension of american imperialism. theres a difference
We preserve it because the opposite would be genocide. mixing would not improve it only destroy. Qualities such as physical characteristics, cultures, traditions, history,art..etc.KEK. We all have our delusions. That one is yours.
Then let's get to the task! Are you really this lazy!?
Well, don't complain to me as Dr.Currycel when you become an ethnic genocide survivor.
There's no reason at all for that. Do you WANT your race to be hated? Are you TRYING to cause war!?
We're FAR batter then our origins, and we'll keep evolving to get rid of impurities, or better yet, spiritually transcend the prison known as the Earth altogether.
Their way of life improved FAR better under colonialism than the previous state, while ethnic ones degraded to misery.
You just hate non-white people for being non-white and you refuse to admit that.
They agitated the Blacks by the way of apartheid and taking all the good spots in South Africa while the blacks rotted in the poor areas. Your logic is: "Why are these people I oppressed now trying to kill me?! I'm the victim!". It's like when women bitch about patriarchy when in reality they're the ones oppressing men in the current year. Cuckqueers would be proud of you. You should become a mod there, I know you'd do a good job! You have my approval!
But why RACE?!
They own both the left and the right. What's new here? Just divide up people more so they can't fight the Jews, they'll be too busy fighting each other!
?????
The Ethnics coming over also have the same interests. What's new here?
And? There's a difference between supporting a party that's ok-ish and the party that hates you. Coming from the one who sucks identitarianism's dick like it's a Chad, you should be the one justifying this, not me.
Because WN respects other races, right? JFL at anyone who actually believes that WN have respect for anyone other than themselves.
"You all are ignorant on Israel's tribalism! That's why they're bad!" "I'm a proud tribalist who hates non-whites and that's A-OK!"
KEK
So you DO want to have wars? JFL at WN's who say they don't want war.
You are a rabid attack dog for Zionists wanting to divide and conquer the world.
And for that, Israel must be destroyed.
Well actually they'd stand out as the real racists for not having joined in, so that would be suicide for them.
The amplitude of this problem isn't as big as you paint it. There are many of these minute health problems you get with even being pure, so no matter where you are, you're in some shit no matter what. Better yet, we should remove these ethnostate borders and lets scientists, doctors, and engineers of ALL races collaborate for solutions for these problems! (BTW can I get the stats for what you just said, this isn't an attack, just interested
Why preserve it at all? Why not get all the best parts of all cultures and improve from there?
What 'racial qualities' do they have?
Why keep diversity that seeks to kill us all? Even in Biology the taxonomy of animals is diverse, but that's what leads to the cruelties of nature and hypergamy. There's no reason to keep this BS diversity scam.
@LebaneseCel My response to you won't be in this text but the one immediately after it, for the sake of readability and integration. Sorry man. Just hold on a bit.
Ethnostates don't have to be constantly warring with eachother, ideally isolationism and cooperation makes for peaceful neighbors
Your own quotes and actions as well as history and biology prove you wrong.
That's the ideal goal until you, the "suBerior h'white brace" wants some more land.
How so?
How so?
This is easily interchangeable even speaking from history...
Your "simple solution" involves genocide because believe it or not, not everyone wants to mix out their genes so how do you create one mixed up race nonviolently?
Countries that try to expand their borders are universally condemned. In the age of nuclear weapons no one would dare try such a thing
How would an ethnostate fix the fact that women aren't fucking average men and reproducing children?
By your logic then WN is genocide because many people DO want to mix their genes, but the ethnostate would be stopping them!
PS: His solution is the best one for stopping genocide and war, the people against it and for keeping their tribe SHOULD be killed off for trying to divide humanity into international war, they have committed MUTINY against humanity.
Whites deserve their own space without nonwhite interference. Mixing destroys ,once its mixed its not what it was to begin with.
Why do they 'deserve' an ethnostate?
How does it 'destroy'?
[QUOTE="ProudIncelistani, post: 918842, member: 5200"Hitler tried to create an ethnostate, claiming he wanted peace and we all know what happened afterward.[/QUOTE]
We don't really know, they didn't let him finish creating his ethnostate.
We don't really know, they didn't let him finish creating his ethnostate.
There are hundreds of countries in the world that don't have laws against miscegenation so what exactly would be stopping a person from going there and mixing out their genes? Maybe you don't understand what the term 'genocide' meansBy your logic then WN is genocide because many people DO want to mix their genes, but the ethnostate would be stopping them!
Self determination should be a universal right. What gives you the authority to say that whites or any group of people don't deserve that right?
So? That won't stop any ethnostate that's fighting for it's tribe according to you...
By that logic ISIS doens't exist, because we have nukes.
We kinda do from what his goals were...
In an ethnostate there would be clear rules against race mixing.
If we take your logic, then people wanting to 'stay in their own race' have no problem doing so, so no '''genocide''' is present.
Coming from the rabid dog who flings it about without knowing what it even means... (Muh h'white geemocide)
I think the threat of a nuclear war will stop countries from expansionist policies...
You obviously don't understand what ISIS is or how they fight. ISIS is not a country, they're a rag tag team of guerrilla fighters supported by the terrorist state of israel, nuking them is implausible
Has it really? Look at the cold war and even the modern day. Some leaders AND their people are bat-shit Insane.
The cold war is a perfect example of nuclear weapons PREVENTING a hot war. Thank you for proving my point
Whites are being displaced, if you prefer population displacement to genocide then fine, but my point is that whites are not allowed control of their own destiny under the current system
Last edited:
Look at Korea, Vietnam, 1962, 1965, 1971, 1991 Kashmir War, etc. You've only proven my point, that Nukes aren't a factor if everyone agrees to 'play cleanly' (Well actually some of these cases had only 1 nation with the a-bomb and the other one still went all out). Even ISIS today fought knowing that it had NO nuclear bombs. War will always be present, atomic or not, and the people will always find ways to heat it up. That's tribalistic human nature for you. We're all evil, and find ways to facilitate that evil.
how is it 'displacement'?
How so? How is it even a bad thing to make sure that tribalists don't rile up more already spiked racial tensions and destabilize the world further?
Last edited:
So your initial comment was about what problems it causes. This is very subjective as what's a problem for you might not be for me. And besides, we don't know what it might have led to after the goals got reached.
Actually fair enough, but we can only assume for now based on the pre and during war evidence we have.
Because the percent of whites in the population is dropping while the percentage of nonwhites in the population is going up. Do you not understand what displacement means? I've asked you this before I think but is english your first language?
Because countries that have been historically white are now going to be majority nonwhite in the coming decades. Whites didn't collectively choose to become a minority in what has historically been their own countries therefore they do not have control over their own destiny obviously. As to you point about racial tensions, I have no tensions with aboriginal australians and do you know why that is? Because they are not in my country and I never have to deal with them. Separating the races into their own countries is the key to racial cohesion
Last edited:
And?
How has it been "their own country"?
Good, because otherwise they'd get back to plundering and more tribal war. Such people in general who want the ethnostate for their skin color should be wiped out regardless of race.
But you're the one justifying the Australian and British Government's atrocities towards them and claiming that you're superior, look at your own threads where you justify every atrocity towards nonwhites but then get defensive about non-issues.
If unity is sincere, why emphasize the differences?
And how is that EVEN A BAD THING?
And how you judge what you assume is subjective. My measure is happyness. Is a 100% happy Aryan Earth worse than a 50% happy metis Earth?
And whites have no reason to want to be a minority in countries that have historically always been their own. There are many disadvantages to being a minority as I am sure you are aware
Because their ancestors conquered the land or have been living on it for generations. The same way every other country in the world exists
This is purely speculation and I've already brought up the fact that in the age of nuclear weapons there is a concept known as mutually assured destruction (MAD abbreviated you can google it because you seem to be completely unaware of the concept and still think its the fifteen hundreds or something where people are going around fighting with swords and bow and arrows) so peace time is infinitely preferable to war between major super powers
Last edited:
????
I was just talking about the evidence that Hitler wanted war, an ethnostate and all the non-whites removed from the world.
1) Do you have proof of those numbers?
2) Depends on more than one factor tbh
3) Are you a WN btw? Just wondering...
How has it been "their own", and how is this displacement even a problem if the new people are contributing to the nation?
Only when some WN tries to rile up racial tensions so they can cuck to women am I in actual danger. Otherwise it's all G for me.
And you assume it's necessarily a bad thing. I can easily argue in favour of all these points, even though I don't support what he did.
It was just a theoretical example. The point is there's no way to compare alternate realities to our own, because they didn't happen. The fact ours happen doesn't mean it's better. Winners write history.
No, just the devil's advocate. I think a metis/bastard is superior to a pure breed, whatever the species. And to be entirely honest I think he had the right methods (well, up to a point, he failed after all), just the wrong targets.
Like I said in my earlier post, either their ancestors conquered the land or they have been living on the land for generations.
In my country immigrants and blacks vastly outnumber the native whites as far as welfare consumption per capita and this is mostly true throughout the west so your notion that these people are coming here and its a huge bonus for the native population is just a fantasy. Besides the fact that I hope we can both agree that being a majority is preferable to being a minority
So by your logic, the "Third World Invaders" are the ones who deserve this land because they're invading it?
Oh. I see. Tbh no race is really superior, just some individuals in it. However, ethnic nationalism for any race is bad, and not just WN's.
Not really assume, I know from the evidence, history, and Biology it would spell disaster for humanity.
Fair Enough. I agree on that one.
This isn't my logic at all. You keep trying to misrepresent what I'm saying and I'm getting really tired of it so if you keep doing this I'm going to stop responding. The third worlders coming here aren't trying to conquer us violently, they are coming under the guise of seeking asylum from economically disadvantaged or war torn countries. If these mexicans or afghans or whatever want to try to fight me and my kin for the land then fine, but that is not at all what is happening
How is this going to improve the mating situation of the average white man though? Women will still flock to Chad and won't fuck you. The problem of female hypergamy still exists with or without ethnics. One only needs to look at Japan for clues.
We will more easily be able to enforce monogamy in a racially homogeneous nation. The problem with Japan is that they are being overwhelmed with the cultural poison of the west
Don't project yourself onto me.
You know, I don't think they're not trying to "conquer" you at all, their concerns are legitimate and they want to improve your nations as members of it.
How about we DON'T fight and live in universal brotherhood instead? JFL at WN's who say they want peace.
IF you try that, It's only a matter of time before the whole nation dies, one way or another. Then you'll have NO ethnostate. Again, Incel and WN are NOT compatible at all.
Well thats just your opinion. The islamic imams in europe are preaching economic terrorism by way of getting on welfare and draining the social welfare net. I look at the problems that immigrants bring with them and I think that no matter what a few individuals intentions might be, its just not worth it.
BTW, what cultural poison whould that be? Just wondering
Then kick those fucks out but don't pin the blame on everyone.
Like?
When did I suggest that we should fight? I was making the point that whites are being nonviolently displaced because these other groups wouldn't stand a chance trying to conquer our countries in a hot war
How are you going to enforce monogamy by removing ethnics? How are ethnics causing modern female hypergamy?
You're grossly skewing the picture. A few dumbass Imams don't represent the whole.
Feminism, anti natalism, hypergamy, gigantic welfare systems. The culture of the west is actually anti-culture designed to destroy the preexisting culture.
The best Idea would be for Universal Brotherhood, with NO chance of war, hot or cold.
Fair enough I guess.
Politics is a zero sum game. The arab immigrants as a whole are a net negative for the countries so why should they sift through the good and bad ones when it would be easier to just get rid of them all?
So did this cultural poison stem from ethnics or is this something that was festering in Western culture long before ethnics showed up?
I agree, I don't want war because war is wrong. World war one and two killed a fuck ton of my ancestors
They're the religious leaders... if not them then who does represent the whole?
Like they rape, commit more violent crime, use welfare at a vastly disproportionate rate than the native population who actually paid into the welfare net
I didn't say id solve all problems. Itll certainly solve a lot tho.
So you're saying that you would prefer the Mexicans to kill your family in war than to live nextdoor to you as neighbours?
Also, any white nationalist in the Americas instantly loses this debate because you are in a land that was stolen by underhanded means and isn't your own. If it's okay to invade a land when whites do it then it's okay for ethnics to do it back to you in a less murderous way.
All peoples deserve a place of their own. Why dont you think Whites have a right to exist?
Similar threads
Experiment
Chat Jew-PT's answer to expressing frustration with the dating market as a male vs female
- ethnicchuditsover
- Inceldom Discussion
Hoodpreet
Users who are viewing this thread
