I wanted to do an experiment with Chat JEW-PT, where i express being frustrated with the dating market as a guy, and afterwards come with the same complaint (but pretending to be a foid).
The answers i got when pretending to be a female just shows how much garbage these foids are getting fed by society. They have been indoctrinated to these belief systems because they're much more low IQ than males and way easier victims to propaganda.
View: https://imgur.com/a/m0xnaVU
View: https://imgur.com/a/sV88tvX
Notice the difference in just the communication:
Addressing the foid's standards:
"First of all — you are absolutely allowed to have standards. Wanting a tall, lean guy? Totally fine. Attraction is real. Preferences are real."
Addressing the man's standards:
"But the way you’re framing it comes across as very rigid and judgmental toward women, which will only narrow your opportunities and potentially create resentment."
Later on it tries to suggest how to fix their issues/frustration.
The main message the man gets is lower your standards, and it goes on to argument for how its wrong to judge sluts for... well... acting like sluts.
"People aren’t “worn down” or “sluts” just because they have their own experiences or life choices"
Muh life choices and experiences
While the foid gets a somewhat vague answer suggesting that she (obviously) needs to align herself with the type of man shes looking for. It gives some pretty shitty advice on how to attract that man tho, talking about "femininity" and "emotional stability"
The funny difference is the suggestions it gives at the end on what topic it should cover next:
The foid gets these suggestions:
"Now tell me — are you looking for:
Now the man on the other hand gets this suggestion, as the only one:
"I can also help you rewrite your “requirements list” for a partner in a way that’s high standard without being toxic or entitled, which actually makes it more realistic and effective.
Do you want me to do that?"
So basically wanting a foid that isnt a worn down slut is being toxic, entitled and unrealistic. While having a lean 6'3 man (which is the top 1% of men) is to be validated.
I decided to continue the conversation to see what "better" requirements list it had for me, as well as what the validation for the foid would look like.
Foid conversation continued:
View: https://imgur.com/a/HH18zlZ
The foid gets a absolutely retarded answer, talking about how she should "radiate an energy" that shows that her standards are natural and non negotiable - what??
Mans conversation continued:
View: https://imgur.com/a/Db4jnIB
The man gets told how its "entitled" to use phrasing like "i deserve" (the exact same phrase the foid used btw), and how physical demands should be preferences - not rules (meanwhile the foid was told that her preferences for a 6'3 lean guy is "non negotiable" and "natural") JFL
The sad thing is that these AI language models reflect the patterns and biases present in the human data they're trained on. These models don't "think" for themselves, but predict likely responses based on millions of REAL HUMAN conversations, articles and social media posts. So that means that these answers i got arent just random AI goyslop - but they actually mirror the way actually talks to these foids.
In other words this is close to what these foids encounter when reaching for advice irl, they're encouraged to have delusional standards literally asserting them as "natural" and "non-negotiable".
Insane ropefuel imo. This society is fucked.
Thoughts?
The answers i got when pretending to be a female just shows how much garbage these foids are getting fed by society. They have been indoctrinated to these belief systems because they're much more low IQ than males and way easier victims to propaganda.
View: https://imgur.com/a/m0xnaVU
View: https://imgur.com/a/sV88tvX
Notice the difference in just the communication:
Addressing the foid's standards:
"First of all — you are absolutely allowed to have standards. Wanting a tall, lean guy? Totally fine. Attraction is real. Preferences are real."
Addressing the man's standards:
"But the way you’re framing it comes across as very rigid and judgmental toward women, which will only narrow your opportunities and potentially create resentment."
Later on it tries to suggest how to fix their issues/frustration.
The main message the man gets is lower your standards, and it goes on to argument for how its wrong to judge sluts for... well... acting like sluts.
"People aren’t “worn down” or “sluts” just because they have their own experiences or life choices"
Muh life choices and experiences
While the foid gets a somewhat vague answer suggesting that she (obviously) needs to align herself with the type of man shes looking for. It gives some pretty shitty advice on how to attract that man tho, talking about "femininity" and "emotional stability"
The funny difference is the suggestions it gives at the end on what topic it should cover next:
The foid gets these suggestions:
"Now tell me — are you looking for:
- A fantasy archetype?
- A long-term partner?
- Or validation that you deserve high standards?"
Now the man on the other hand gets this suggestion, as the only one:
"I can also help you rewrite your “requirements list” for a partner in a way that’s high standard without being toxic or entitled, which actually makes it more realistic and effective.
Do you want me to do that?"
So basically wanting a foid that isnt a worn down slut is being toxic, entitled and unrealistic. While having a lean 6'3 man (which is the top 1% of men) is to be validated.
I decided to continue the conversation to see what "better" requirements list it had for me, as well as what the validation for the foid would look like.
Foid conversation continued:
View: https://imgur.com/a/HH18zlZ
The foid gets a absolutely retarded answer, talking about how she should "radiate an energy" that shows that her standards are natural and non negotiable - what??
Mans conversation continued:
View: https://imgur.com/a/Db4jnIB
The man gets told how its "entitled" to use phrasing like "i deserve" (the exact same phrase the foid used btw), and how physical demands should be preferences - not rules (meanwhile the foid was told that her preferences for a 6'3 lean guy is "non negotiable" and "natural") JFL
The sad thing is that these AI language models reflect the patterns and biases present in the human data they're trained on. These models don't "think" for themselves, but predict likely responses based on millions of REAL HUMAN conversations, articles and social media posts. So that means that these answers i got arent just random AI goyslop - but they actually mirror the way actually talks to these foids.
In other words this is close to what these foids encounter when reaching for advice irl, they're encouraged to have delusional standards literally asserting them as "natural" and "non-negotiable".
Insane ropefuel imo. This society is fucked.
Thoughts?
Last edited:
