First reply:
Admitting that a civilization is better than another is not supremacism. Do I want to control Africa and basically kill them or use them for being black? No. My example of the US before leftism and the 1965 immigration act is a great example on how WN and the blackpill worked perfectly. However I still need proof that civic nationalism and the blackpill will be able to coexist, since the current trends show that as soon as a nation accepts civic nationalism (a leftist policy), sexual freedom tends to follow, causing hypergamy. The western world alone is an evidence of this trend.
Second reply:
Show me a legitimate example where a civic nationalist society is NOT sexually free and hypergamous
Third reply:
Again that's just an opinionated statement, not a fact. Western society would not have become hypergamous had we not accepted the Jewish outsiders who essentially promoted sexual freedom.
Fourth reply:
Both Hitler and Trump became popular after white males saw that their nation is being driven into more leftism and degeneracy. However the only difference between Hitler and Trump is that the latter eventually bowed down to the Jews and sold himself out. All the neocohens such as Bill Kristol and Ben Shapiro expressed deep concern about Trump's presidency before selling out.
Fifth reply:
There's 0 evidence in your articles that hitler wanted to essentially take over the world, impose nazism, and then kill all the non-blue eyed Germans. The articles show proof of how race realist Germany essentially was, in regards of wanting the German race to be the only race dominant in the nation. Just accept that it's a Jewish myth boyo. In fact this myth isn't even stated ONCE in official Nazi articles and in mein kampf itself. If the "Jewish sources" can offer direct evidence from official Nazi documents without making falsified claims then I'll consider that evidence.
Sixth reply:
See above ^^^
Seventh reply:
I already provided proof of this in my other set of replies, but you obviously disregarded it.
Eighth reply:
http://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/israel-population/
It's only 75% (max) Jewish, so it's not technically an ethnostate.
Ninth reply:
A Jew has to believe in Judaism, and has to have Jewish blood. It is clearly an ideology.
Tenth reply:
You don't have to be white to believe in race nationalism.
Eleventh reply:
That's ridiculous. Again you're just showing how ignorant and low IQ you really are. How does the belief that your own nation should be homogeneous in one race relate to imperialistic tendencies? And no, don't give me these statics that "oh some European nations that believed in race nationalism colonized others." I told you that you have to also believe in self determination (I suggest you research its meaning) to not invade other nations and impose your own laws.
12th reply:
Obviously you have no idea what self determination is.
13th reply:
100% it's you who's doing that tbh... keep repeating the same dumb arguments without seeing through logic and evidence...
"Muh if you're a race nationalist then you're automatically an imperialist bcuz some racial nationalistic nations were also imperialists... you see how strong my logic is? Also the Jews support white nationalism even though they express vehement opposition toward it... my argument is really logical and scientific!"
14th reply:
Are you fucking serious? They simply expelled the remaining native Americans from their lands to establish an ethnostate. The British essentially "invaded" North America and colonized it.
15th reply:
So you obviously don't know what self determination is...
Had early North America traveled across the world and invaded some exterior nations like China, then it wouldn't be supportive of self determination. The early North Americans simply wanted to establish a land of their own and simply forced the remaining "natives" out.
16th reply:
They are essentially scum since all they do is cause trouble and division, while fulfilling Jewish desires of destabilizing the West.
Also, yes, I would rightfully call them invading bastards due to their high fertility rates.
https://amp.theguardian.com/uk/2000/sep/03/race.world
If this doesn't look like a proper demographic replacement to me then I don't know what does. Did whites of early North America purposely go to a foreign nation like China en masse and use high fertility rates to take over the nation? Nope.
17th reply:
Those who "did the important work" were mainly white though. Picking cotton on a farm =/= introducing important laws, technology, and forming the backbone of a nation. So yes, the "merit" statement is perfectly compatible with white nationalism itself.
18th reply:
First Gen immigrants are just skilled laborers who come AFTER a nation is fully developed to gain benefits for themselves. The people who introduce the laws, governorship, and act as the backbone of society deserve to be the ones preserved.
19th reply:
My scientific link that showed they they immigrated from Asia, faggot.
20th reply:
Not an argument
21st reply:
Thing is, modern division among races in the United States show that your goal is just a utopian one that can't be achieved easily. Other races are naturally inclined to be divided against each other. Just look at how the ethnics vote leftist largely and for anti-white immigration policies
22nd reply:
There are barely any supremacists right now in the leftist and tolerant West, faggot, and it is heavily divided racially.
https://www.economist.com/united-st...r-martin-luther-kings-death-a-divided-america
At least when it was segregated back then the country wasn't degenerate and divided technically, because the races were separated from each other.
23rd reply:
Alright, how about we use your beloved "neutral" Wikipedia sources to prove my point?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_American–Jewish_relations
Now fuck off.
24th reply:
Really depends on the type of education he receives tbh. Being a college graduate is not alone an indication of success.
25th reply:
Nope you didn't, lol. And I already provided proof for my argument unlike yourself (in the other set of replies AND this one too).
26th reply:
The Alabama election regarding Roy Moore is a proof alone.
And also see these stats for further proof
http://www.people-press.org/2018/03/20/1-trends-in-party-affiliation-among-demographic-groups/
27th reply:
Thing is, Roy Moore wasn't even a racist and didn't want to kill non-whites. Thus your argument fails miserably.
28th reply:
Surprised you have no idea regarding racial hypergamy. Haven't your ethnic buddies made it clear to you?
29th reply:
And keep your JBW falsified theories to yourself. No ethnic female would reject an average ethnic dude over a horrendous white ugly dude. I am ethnic and I know it's mostly BS.
30th reply:
"Muh JBW dude... these white men are stealing our women! They are flocking to white cock!"
That's your concern.
31st reply:
THEN PASSING ANTI RACE MIXING LAWS WOULD BE BENEFICIAL, faggot! If you don't want "naturally evil" ethnic women flocking to white cock, then the reasonable solution would be to NOT allow them to do that and invoke punishment if they did so! Gosh, how stupid and low IQ your mind is.
32:
And that choice is ridiculous. Along with civic nationalism comes other leftist policies promoting sexual freedom.
33:
Alright here's an article regarding racial differences, faggot.
http://johnhawks.net/explainer/laboratory/race-cranium.html
Genetics seem to have a correlation with race! Even your ethnic buddies agree with this statement.
34:
Thing is, wanting to live with your own kind is not detrimental, unlike other things.
I already stated that there are evil and non evil human tendencies, and wanting to live with your own kind goes into the second category.
35:
Nope. It's not an overreaction. It simply proves that whites do not want to be associated with blacks and live in a multiracial society. Jewish leftist propaganda obviously changed that, however.
36:
Your statement is incorrect. I already provided countless proof regarding racial differences, and you simply denied all of it without providing proof of your own arguments.
37:
I suggest you read some history!
https://www.thoughtco.com/afrikaners-in-south-africa-1435512
38:
That's true, the white South Africans were essentially the dominant building force in South Africa (see above),
39:
Lmao, nice. You barely offer any evidence and now you're denying that?
40:
I already provided countless evidence that they HATE WN. It's your time to do so buddy. Provide evidence that they LOVE IT.