First reply:
A supremacist is someone who wants to dominate the world to impose his own racial superiority on others, i.e. the modern Jewish political tribe. I do not believe that I'm inherently "superior" to others simply because of race, but it is a fact that European civilization exceeds that of Africa, for instance. An ugly male won't necessarily be cucked by an ethnostate that does not promote sexual freedom (i.e. the US up until 1960's).
Second reply:
If the ethnostate does support the blackpill and is blackpilled on women essentially, then it is doomed to succeed. Much of Western society, before leftism and sexual feminism got its hand on the popular culture, was essentially blackpilled and promoted gender role differences, as well as traditional patriarchal values.
Third reply:
It's better to unite as one world, but the Jews essentially back colored diversity across the West in order to cause destabilization and division. As one Jewish rabbi said, "the Islamization of Europe is a good thing."
https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4299673,00.html
Another Jewish Zionist noted that, "White nationalism: a scourge that won't go away."
https://huffpost.com/us/entry/1338565
All forms of multiracial and multicultural policies in distinct nations are essentially good for the Jews.
Again proof directly from Nazi books/literature/speeches for your second sentence??
Fourth reply:
Alright, prove that Nazis essentially wanted all non-blue eyed Germans gone.
Fifth reply:
"Hated their nation"
Nope, it's because they loved their nation and wanted it free from Jewish control. Other races joined in the fight to strike back against the Zio banking cartel.
"These people would have eventually been killed."
Proof? Nazis did not want to kill all non-whites essentially. This is simple a myth spread by Judaism. In fact, the Jews admitted that the whole "5 million Europeans killed by hitler" is a lie invented to gain sympathy from white people toward the Jews.
https://www.jta.org/2017/01/31/news...lated-victims-tally-irks-holocaust-historians
"Bauer and other historians who knew Wiesenthal said the Nazi hunter told them that he chose the 5 million number carefully: He wanted a number large enough to attract the attention of non-Jews who might not otherwise care about Jewish suffering, but not larger than the actual number of Jews who were murdered in the Holocaust, 6 million."
Can't wait until the Jews also admit themselves that the latter is nothing but a hoax!
Sixth reply:
Any holohoax website that doesn't cite sources directly from the Nazis is a biased website, seeking to make Hitler seem bad as possible. I need tangible proof and not "claims" in regards to the Nazi plan to eventually murder all non-blue eyed people in the world.
7th and 8th reply: again, it is not that "Jewish" to be an ethnostate. Also, Judaism is essentially an ideology (race and religion), and not simply a "tribe" since there are all kinds of Jews, especially in Israel.
Ninth reply: White nationalism is limited to whites only. Ethnic nationalism is limited to all races.
Tenth reply: do you even know what self determination means? An ideal white nationalist society would respect the free will of other nations to abide by their own customs and traditions.
11th reply: Israel supports the invasion of other nations (i.e. Syria) to gain control of the Middle East. That does not look like self determination to me. Pakistan is simply an Islamist supremacist state that converted every non-Muslim by the sword. Not supportive of self-determination.
12th reply: are you dumb, or what? You seem to keep offering the same low IQ opinions. Early North America did not participate in colonization of other nations. Did the founders decide to invade Africa and establish a colony there? No. Also, natives were already scattered across the North American continent and were simply expelled to establish an ethnostate.
13th reply: which is my point. I admit that. However expelling natives does not mean that we're supporting imperialism.
14th reply: thing is, the idea that Europe is "native" to Europeans comes from the fact that white males were the ones who essentially "formed" the continent and built it to the continent we see today. This is why the white race there is worthy of being preserved. Native Americans had little influence in shaping the United States.
15, 16, 17:
Well, it just shows that even native Americans weren't really "native." It was whites that formed the early United States, and as a result, are deserving of majority status. Do you know what a civilized nation governed by laws means? Tribes scattered across a continent do not form a nation .
18: only against the goyim.
19: how is everyone divided against one another through segregation/separation? If anything putting races together will cause division, not the reverse.
20: they were the ones who backed it, my friend.
https://www.momentmag.com/martin-luther-king-jr-jews-civil-rights-movement/
21: depends on what you call "skilled" tbh. An educated white will have more value in a nation than a "skilled" Mexican worker.
22: Are YOU even blackpilled? Explain how animalistic societies thrive and grow as each male essentially is able to reproduce easily? Also, if females naturally were really hypergamous and refused to mate with 90% of the male population, then males simply resorted to rape and dominance.
23: I told you, through demographic replacement. They are slowly becoming the majority of the nation and taking over key positions in society. Plus, don't forget fact that non whites act collectively and seem to vote leftist most of the time (see the Roy Moore election and how 90+% of Alabama's African Americans voted against him)
24: because of racial hypergamy (Asian females flocking to white men, white females flocking to blacks because of the big penis size, etc.)
25: as a result, you should stand against race mixing, if that's your concern (LOL). If ethnic women especially have some kind of fetish for white dick then passing anti-miscegenation laws will be beneficial.
26: I agree that women are inherently evil, but we do not need a dystopian globalist-backed multiracial nation to control them and end hypergamous tendencies.
27, 28: again it's not just skin color. Lips, noses, eyes, etc. all play an important role. You're referring to the human argument. Humans love to live with their own kind, like different breeds of animals. This is evident by the whites fleeing their own areas when there was a large influx of blacks from the South in the 1920s (the great migration). Racial differences are vital, and we should not treat humanity as one whole race.
Regarding the other South Africa imperialism reply, the Dutch did not "colonize" South Africa by force technically and simply existed peacefully since a long time. I would prefer if we could bring all white South Africans to European nations and send the Western blacks to South Africa.
