They do that, man; I don't want to live in sinin fornicationand I don't want to follow this evil, filthy world. Brazilian women are promiscuous; I don't want that.
Hypocrisy Why incels are the biggest feminists. [super triggering]
I see, think only women in north Korea are safe kek
Yes, absolutely, because it is a horrible and disgusting dictatorship. I hate leftists, socialists, and communiststhey are satanic. Antisemitism is also satanic; the Bible says that Israel would be persecuted by many.
Can you pray for me to be set free from pornography?
Also the amount of shittok language this dude used there is no way he is an oldecel at all
As seen here, he claims to have been an incel "before the internet even existed"
"null argument since i was a truecel before the internet even existed lol"
And here are examples of him using shittok zoomer language frequently:
He commonly uses phrases like "dih" and "puhh/puh"
"elite ball knowledge"
Yet another shittok zoomer phrase.
"Iqlet" another phrase that is super popular on tiktok at the moment.
Shittok fags love to put "holy" before something.. for example "holy chopped bruh!"
There are plenty more examples of this but I cant be bothered to keep scrolling through this retards account.
Also he commonly uses condescending language and tone and gives psuedo intellectual midwit, above others, smug snarky vibes.
If you go through his profile you will quickly see this is the case.
As seen here, he claims to have been an incel "before the internet even existed"
"null argument since i was a truecel before the internet even existed lol"
And here are examples of him using shittok zoomer language frequently:
He commonly uses phrases like "dih" and "puhh/puh"
"elite ball knowledge"
Yet another shittok zoomer phrase.
"Iqlet" another phrase that is super popular on tiktok at the moment.
Shittok fags love to put "holy" before something.. for example "holy chopped bruh!"
There are plenty more examples of this but I cant be bothered to keep scrolling through this retards account.
Also he commonly uses condescending language and tone and gives psuedo intellectual midwit, above others, smug snarky vibes.
If you go through his profile you will quickly see this is the case.
Maybe he is an oldcel but this makes me think otherwise, who knows though right, after the dollfucker larp who knows how far these idiots will go to give off some sort of internet persona
I would be surprised if he wasn't an actual oldcel given many things he's said in the past. You could be right that he did use TikTok terms or similar though. I'm spiritually an unc and never used those platforms so I wouldn't know.
Yes, but you need a wife bro. Your sex drive will still be there, and you will sin by thinking about sex, and lusting after women you see in real life, therefore you need a woman for yourself
Last edited:
Tell me about da dollfucker I'm clueless
I am an incelis it impossible? What do I need to do? The desire will always be there; I can't live on pornography foreverit will kill my soul and my spirit, my very being. Please pray to the God of Moses to set me free from pornography. My name is Vinícius.
He was larping the entire time and was a troll, many users called it out but he eventually made it blatantly clear after faking a suicide attempt and using ai images to fake it etc.
Improve what you can improve, looksmaxxing can help depending on your situation, example if ur fat, u can lose weight, if u have acne u can use accutane, you can also move states or cities, I recommend living in smaller cities, big cities in the west are a shit show. How old are you? Btw
Did someone expose him ? Like somebody made a post bout it?
You are right about him being a bit smug and snarky, as well as using condescending language and tone. I personally liked much of what he had to say but he probably should have expressed his views in a more respectful and clear manner.
its in the bunker, you cant access it for now
A bit? cmon bro
you dont have to defend him this hard, he had made other posts in the past about this exact same topic that didnt get any traction, he was clearly looking to stir the forum up, atleast thats how I view it.. we have had people just like him in the past its nothing new.Try looking at his profile for a little bit with a clean mind
I'm 23 years old, friend; I have a place in the country, far from the city, and that might be a good way to handle the situation. The only thing that worries me is pornography. I know Rabbi Duduhe speaks Portuguese and Hebrew, if I'm not mistaken. Tell me, is breaking the devices the way to stop watching porn forever?
Unfortunately, everything is sexualized these daysTV series, the internet...
The thread is ass. I'd understand it if he only used the term feminism in the title for clickbait, I do that sort of thing too, but he genuinely equates simping to feminism. Simping is an observable behavior, feminism is an idea. Feminism does not exist. No one is a feminist.
All ideas are still images, set groups of values. But humans aren't still. They are shapeshifters. They are fluid. Every belief they hold is in one way or another a coping mechanism. Their beliefs adapt to ensure their survival within their current environment or mental state. Which is why they switch beliefs every couple of months. The life cycle of a belief usually goes like this:
1. A person finds the belief, and attaches themselves onto it, usually to justify their lifestyle, belong to a collective, or cope with trauma.
2. They realize they dont perfectly align with their belief as they are not robots. Instead of immediately abandoning their belief, they try to redefine it so that it fits their new outlook. (Eg. Everchanging biblical interpretations)
3. Their peers feel as if their redefining of their shared belief is an attack on their identity so they protest. The person has no more wiggle room so they finally abandon the belief and move on to the next one.
4. Rinse and repeat into infinity.
Even if I were to entertain peoples delusions as reality- Anyone can label anyone as anything. "Nazi" is a common one. If a person disagrees with you and labels you a Nazi, does that make you a nazi? Labels are only meaningful to a person(though not in objective reality) if they believe in it.
"Feminist" is also a label. People can label themselves as feminists if they currently believe they subscribe to feminist beliefs.
In which case incels certainly wouldn't be feminists as they believe the label doesn't apply to them. (I'm referring to the stereotypical idea of an incel as a woman hater, which is they context in which op used the term incel. Obviously an incel can still believe feminist ideas).
Haven't and probably won't read the replies as the original argument is poorly constructed.
I have you on ignore but I actually think this was a good take on it similar to mine, you will be unignored and thanks for posting this.
I guess you're right about that. His behaviour broke the rules and warranted a ban on its own, regardless of what he said. Even so I must admit that his thought patterns, views and and humour resonated with me heavily. Make of that what you will, and I know that I must have more than a few screws loose. I don't know exactly where it could be, but @FoidsEnshittifyAll would probably be better served by an audience somewhere else than Incels.is.A bit? cmon bro
If you thought his profile was crazy, you should check out mine
. The vast majority of the time someone replies to me it's because they disagree with me, most of my opinions don't seem very popular here. I have no idea how I have gone this far without getting a single warning or even getting permabanned myself, that's a first for me on the internet. It's especially surprising when you consider the fact that I've criticised this forum plenty of times and argued with several moderators directly. My guess is that me being from a Western country and using zero OPSEC when using this site saved me (i.e. logging in from a genuine Western IP Address and a regular browser, writing my replies on the site instead of pasting them in and so on). If it's not that then I must have seriously underestimated the halo picking the username and profile picture I did would have, I guessed that it would have brought me a 50% halo and 50% failo at best.
You're getting too hung up on the word "feminist".
What a shame.
That's the whole point he's making in the original post. That simping is somehow a form of feminism.
If you say so. I've already had this argument.
The only way to stop is to focus on other things, and try to keep your mind occupied, otherwise you will finding yourself doing the same thing over and over again
Don't watch tv, delete social media, only listen to old music, watch old movies, play old games etc, unplug from the matrix so to speak
We need to destroy the system.
Go join MGTOW then
Intelligent GrAY. I won't name names, but there are a few who push this more subtly.
Not being able to fuck a foid is far from the grievances I have with foids. It’s the systematic gynocracy I have issues with. Then again, a lot of users are just foid-worshipping slaves who don’t care how much they get pegged by the gynocracy as long as they can stick it in a hole once in a while. So, they project it on to other users.
Last edited:
I realized this a while ago, I put too much energy and time focusing on something I’ll probably never have and I was basically living for pussy which just made every second without it rough.
Based.
Still haven't read the replies but I read the ban discussion thread. I would assume you like this thread on a meta level because it "exposes" that the label of "feminist" ignites an emotional response out of incels.
But you yourself have said that being labeled a pretentious nigger made you angry. So what is the issue here? Him triggering some sort of complex isn't even the issue here. I think what triggers others, or at least me, is him being confidently wrong in equating a bilogical drive to be loved by a woman to feminism. It's the audacity that "triggers" me.
I said it there and I will say it here again: I can't have a discussion with someone who won't even read what was discussed here. There is no need to assume anything, it's all here if you could do as little as actually read it. Spoiler alert: that is not why I like this thread.
I was just surprised at getting such an emotional reaction out of my replies there. It's no big deal.
Again, I've already had this argument in this thread. If you don't want to read it that's fine.
Not much more to say on Sparta except that it was one of the few, if not the only, Greek city state where foids had inheritance rights and we for sure know owned property, but Athens are much more insteresting in this. Mainstream historians's view of it is that it was one of the most "patriarchal" and "oppressive" societies that ever existed in Europe, but I wonder whether it couldn't more correctly be described as a gender segregated society, and whether it was that way because of its crazy wealth instead of any ideology about sex roles?
Athens was ridiculously rich for its period, so I wonder whether the reason foids were so restricted from owning property and such wasn't simply because they didn't need to, since foids can always just find some man to simp for them (the same reason why there are and always have been much more male homeless sleeping on the streets), and when basically every man out there was rich, there was absolutely no need to give anything to them, since that would just deprive those women's brothers from property they would actually need. Similar to, as you pointed out below, the fact that gender differences get more pronounced in more gender-egalitarian societies, except in this case, Athens would get so gender segregated purely through its crazy wealth.
I think it's as simple as foids talking about it because that's what they are told to talk about their entire lives. Honestly, that entire "issue" gives off a serious "Midwits screaming at each other over stuff they don't understand" vibe.Do you think it's because foids know men would never act on it?
Or do you think, even in the worst-case scenario of losing voting rights, not much would change for them?
It just shows how aware of the normie male psychology foids are.
For 99% of democracy's existence, neither gender had a universal right to vote. In Britain for example, the same laws which gave foids the right to vote also did so to the remaining 30% of men who didn't have that right as well. The "it was an issue of whether all foids could vote, or only all men could" isn't how it would've been thought of outside of maybe very small, very specific periods of time in a couple of places.
However, all of that is just skipped over, because that's how foids see it. Both genders have the Apex fallacy clouding their view of the world, and history, and foids also have their in-group bias affecting them. Therefore, foids look at the already poorly-taught past, only the "women couldn't vote" part is told to them and it's also the only thing they care about, even if their in-group bias doesn't affect them, their Apex fallacy view of the world makes sure they don't care about low-status men also not voting, men either also only ever get past democracies explained to them only as "men could vote, women couldn't" or, even if it's explained to them that voting was absolutely a privilege, they'll just assume they'd be those privileged men dur to Apex fallacy and main character syndrome, and so that's how it's seen.
Then, foids have it drilled into their heads, constantly, endlessly, by all media and the entire political sphere, that they are oppressed, that they are victims, that all of history is just foids being oppressed, and that becomes how they see the world and history, because how and why tf it wouldn't
? So, they'll start making their worldviews based on that, and what is the symbol of "female oppression" in democracies? The fantasy idea of long-suffering females being unable to vote while all men could. Therefore, that becomes an integral part of what they imagine "returning to the past" would mean, and it becomes what they start kvetching that rightwingers want to do, and rightwingers start repeating it right back, even if they would've never thouht about that, solely because foids make it clear that that's what triggers them.As a result, neither side actually has any real understanding of the past and those complex issues, all they have is a foid oppression fantasy with all the low-status men removed that they share, and that's what they scream at each other over.
True.
They always worked and paid bills and rent. The only foids in recent history who didn't do so were those lucky enough to be born in specific places in the time when those places became rich enough that foids could afford being simped for by the men they married their entire married lives.
EARLY FEMINISTS WANTED WOMEN TO WORK LESS - NOT MORE -> REPLY OR U GAY
"The desire to free oneself from work was common to all classes and both sexes. Dr Joanna Bourke of Birkbeck College, London, has studied the diaries of 5,000 women who lived between 1860 and 1930. During that period, the proportion of women in paid employment dropped from 75 per cent to 10...
incels.is
Foids never going to war, because society valued them while men were always seen as cannon fodder, is the only truly consistent gender difference on a societal level.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
- guitarcel
