Discussion Why do feminists cry about 'muh consent'

[Yabadadabadoo]

So first let me clarify that I'm against rape, obviously.

But why do feminists cry about consent?

All of us are living, and we didn't consent to being born.

All of our suffering wasn't consented either.

 

[CRASH THE CUCK]

I didnt consent to hear their opinion

 

[mirrors]

No means no till chad slides his fingers up her skirt. Then it's "hot" "so masculine" and "take-charge energy."

 

[Caichan]

What is your point

 

[Anonymoutron]

No means no till chad slides his fingers up her skirt. Then it's "hot" "so masculine" and "take-charge energy."

 

[Claudius the God]

So first let me clarify that I'm against rape, obviously.

But why do feminists cry about consent?

All of us are living, and we didn't consent to being born.

All of our suffering wasn't consented either.

Our suffering means we are entitled to female attention.

A man who suffers, and only suffers, without validation from the opposite sex is doomed to a life of depression and a pitiful death.

 

[Anonymoutron]

Foids even preach about how consent can be taken away at any time after the sex too so even a week latER they can change their mind and go ‘actually I regret it so I’m gonna change my mind and take my consent away thERefore you raped me’. It’s the dumbest shit evER.

 

[Claudius the God]

Foids even preach about how consent can be taken away at any time after the sex too so even a week latER they can change their mind and go ‘actually I regret it so I’m gonna change my mind and take my consent away thERefore you raped me’. It’s the dumbest shit evER.

Exactly.

They can't stand on the argument of 'consent' when their idea of 'consent' is never even consistent.

Like, you can give a man consent...

...but also retroactively withdraw it?

It sounds like they have no idea what 'consent' actually is, and is just used as a way to deem certain men 'attractive' or 'high-status' enough.

Like, a women can sleep with a man she initially finds to be 'high-status', but withdraw it a week later when she realizes he may not have been so high up on the hierarchy as she thought.

 

[Lv99_BixNood]

Their chadspawn didn't consent to being aborted either.

 

[Anonymoutron]

Exactly.

They can't stand on the argument of 'consent' when their idea of 'consent' is never even consistent.

Like, you can give a man consent...

...but also retroactively withdraw it?

It sounds like they have no idea what 'consent' actually is, and is just used as a way to deem certain men 'attractive' or 'high-status' enough.

Like, a women can sleep with a man she initially finds to be 'high-status', but withdraw it a week later when she realizes he may not have been so high up on the hierarchy as she thought.

Exactly they can’t comprehend the idea of sleeping with a man who isn’t chad so they call it rape.

The idea that a woman can take away consent at any time is ridiculous and heavily flawed. By their logic, if a foid gives a man consent, the right thing for a man to do is refuse to be intimate with them as they may take away their consent at a later date meaning they have ‘raped’ them. This would mean no one in the world evER has sex