The university of Utah organized a study on inceldom, it is a qualitative study where incels are being asked questions in a short interview.
I know most of you would say it is Feds or something fishy, but I will explain why it doesn’t matter:
1. The ultimate chance to show the truth:
Most of such studies misrepresent incels, they say either we feel inadequate as men or that we are terrorists, we have an unique opportunity to say that we just want sex as we are, that we have a real problem in our lives that we cannot just change by conforming to feminist or traditional norms, problem often caused by injury, mental illness or poverty, that we are not a self-help forum but fellowship of people in similar life conditions that share their movies, games and are venting together.
2. The bias:
If the most of people don’t participate or they show defensiveness or desperation, the ones who will certainly participate are Reddit and .org trolls that will portray inceldom in very inaccurate manner perpetuating the bias further.
3. The valuable asset:
Incel spaces are rare and censored, by being participants we don’t act as interviewed criminals but rather as intellectual partners in the discourse and debate, we have opportunity to be seen and heard as we are, and they know it, to them our opinion is rare and valuable asset so we can speak from position of equal if not more valuable person, as they have no other way to obtain information about us, it means we can just show truth how it is, we can take part in debate and show our side of the story to make public opinion about us fair and positive.
4. 25$
25$
25$
25$
Pretty based
