Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

News Update: Federal judge terminates fakecel pedophile Nathan Larson's pro se status after he refuses to wear a mask in her courtroom

PPEcel

PPEcel

cope and seethe
-
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Posts
29,089
For background information, see previous thread:

Yesterday, on 31st March 2022, a status conference was scheduled for Nathan Larson. It didn't happen. Later in the day, the courtroom deputy filed the following text-only entry in the docket:

Screenshot 2022 04 01 085210

Because Larson isn't the kind of person who listens to what judges have to say, it really isn't a surprise that the judge doesn't think he should be allowed to represent himself. Judge Thurston is the no-nonsense type, I see. Peter M. Jones was reappointed as Nathan Larson's attorney.

I guess we might not get the courtroom theatrics we wanted. :feelsPop::feelsPop::feelsPop:

What a clown. :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:

@-BrettyBoy- @Indari @Billowel @Transcended Trucel @rope2cope @solblue @Rotter @Restart80 @Linesnap99 @SparkLight @fukurou @nazianime @gigacel123 @uo89997 @Lux @Escthectrler @Sneir @Defetivecuckachu @Zensfy @Philistine @the virgin shepherd @Zhou Chang-Xing
 
Damn, shit isn’t looking good for him.
 
Lol I really wish we could have seen him represent himself. He's so dumb he actually failed upwards and got his lawyer back.
 
i don't know how courts work,but is larson such a high profile case to warrant all this attention?i thought he would be judged by some random guy,but instead he is being judged by a judge who is chummy with biden(or his group no idea) and even has a wiki page?
 
i don't know how courts work,but is larson such a high profile case to warrant all this attention?i thought he would be judged by some random guy,but instead he is being judged by a judge who is chummy with biden(or his group no idea) and even has a wiki page?

Well, the femoid that Larson allegedly kidnapped was living in Fresno, California, so the case fell under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of California (E.D. Cal.) The U.S. District Court for E.D. Cal. has only six authorized federal judgeships: four in Sacramento, two in Fresno. So Larson's case was going to be handled by either Judge Jennifer L. Thurston or Judge Dale A. Drozd (who was actually Larson's judge before Thurston was appointed to the bench in Dec 2021).

It boils down to location:
Screenshot 2022 04 01 093746
 
@PPEcel what are your thoughts on the case? Do you think Larson is screwed or does he have a chance now that he has a real attorney again?
 
nathan larson deserves saint title tbh ngl ded srs he is based :owo:
 
@PPEcel what are your thoughts on the case? Do you think Larson is screwed or does he have a chance now that he has a real attorney again?
haha no he is screwed no matter what
 
foid would have asked to remove the mask had he looked like meeks.
 
larsons lawyer will probably plea insanity. seeing as larsons goal is to maximize his time in prison
I personally believe larson has an imprisonment fetish of some sort.
 
larson says the foids ex BF alerted her parents
 
Tldr what happened
 
Well, the femoid that Larson allegedly kidnapped was living in Fresno, California, so the case fell under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of California (E.D. Cal.) The U.S. District Court for E.D. Cal. has only six authorized federal judgeships: four in Sacramento, two in Fresno. So Larson's case was going to be handled by either Judge Jennifer L. Thurston or Judge Dale A. Drozd (who was actually Larson's judge before Thurston was appointed to the bench in Dec 2021).

It boils down to location:
View attachment 596270
Honestly, do you think it matters man? Is he better off with a cuckservative judge or woketard judge? Cause mostly, that's all we have left today in the U.S. and Europe. I would say there are only a handful of marginally better ones who have managed to stay in their positions, and who are still applying their decision making ability in conjunction with legal precedent properly. The rest are infected by cultural decay themselves. These judges are few and far between !
 
Last edited:
Honestly, do you think it matters man? Is he better off with a cuckservative judge or woketard judge? Cause mostly, that's all we have left today in the U.S. and Europe. I would say there are only a handful of marginally better ones who have managed to stay in their positions, and who are still applying their decision making ability in conjunction with legal precedent properly. The rest are infected by cultural decay themselves. These judges are few and far between !
I think if you apply precedent properly, Nathan Larson is kind of fucked anyway. He really is going to get 30 years at least.
 
He probably shouldn't be disclosing that. There is a protective order filed in this case, no?
it was written in the news article anyways
 
Jfl, couldn't even be bothered to wear a mask :feelshaha: It's like he knows he's going down and just wants to make the process as annoying for everyone as possible. I bet he's pissed he was appointed counsel for that reason
 
I think if you apply precedent properly, Nathan Larson is kind of fucked anyway. He really is going to get 30 years at least.
I'm not really even talking about Larson's case specifically, I'm talking about the cultural decay in our times, and relating it to this case.

Oh yeah. In fact if the proper statutes are applied, he will likely get far more than that. Especially consider wokeVille will be driving the bus and "people's court" opinions. This chap could see a life sentence, maybe multiple ones as each charge carries maximum penalty of that much.
 
For background information, see previous thread:

Yesterday, on 31st March 2022, a status conference was scheduled for Nathan Larson. It didn't happen. Later in the day, the courtroom deputy filed the following text-only entry in the docket:

View attachment 596268

Because Larson isn't the kind of person who listens to what judges have to say, it really isn't a surprise that the judge doesn't think he should be allowed to represent himself. Judge Thurston is the no-nonsense type, I see. Peter M. Jones was reappointed as Nathan Larson's attorney.

I guess we might not get the courtroom theatrics we wanted. :feelsPop::feelsPop::feelsPop:

What a clown. :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:

@-BrettyBoy- @Indari @Billowel @Transcended Trucel @rope2cope @solblue @Rotter @Restart80 @Linesnap99 @SparkLight @fukurou @nazianime @gigacel123 @uo89997 @Lux @Escthectrler @Sneir @Defetivecuckachu @Zensfy @Philistine @the virgin shepherd @Zhou Chang-Xing
LMAO. I remember when he was having back and forth arguments on here. Hope he enjoys getting a train ran on him.
 
While the fakecel nathan larson is on prison, the young foid he "kidnapped" is now riding the carroussel with other guys, he was dumb when he tried to make his plan, the site were he met the young foid was full of young foids who were attracted to the violence of that forum (these young foids loved the violent fantasies there), he should have seen his plan failling since she is a young foid (the most powerful type of foid), but i guess she teased him with sexual innuendos on that site (i remember that there was full of sexual fantasy content coming from "verified" young girls). At the end he will no longer satisfy and will rot on prison, while the young foid is having the typical sexual life of a foid, especially because she is young, with older and younger men. He made a mistake for himself by trying to actually flee with her, now his story is over.
 
foid would have asked to remove the mask had he looked like meeks.
Hahahaha

I'm not really even talking about Larson's case specifically, I'm talking about the cultural decay in our times, and relating it to this case.

Oh yeah. In fact if the proper statutes are applied, he will likely get far more than that. Especially consider wokeVille will be driving the bus and "people's court" opinions. This chap could see a life sentence, maybe multiple ones as each charge carries maximum penalty of that much.
Well, the increasing politicization of the judiciary is unfortunate. But in any case, even a cursory read of the federal sentencing guidelines will make it clear that he may not leave prison alive.
 
While the fakecel nathan larson is on prison, the young foid he "kidnapped" is now riding the carroussel with other guys, he was dumb when he tried to make his plan, the site were he met the young foid was full of young foids who were attracted to the violence of that forum (these young foids loved the violent fantasies there), he should have seen his plan failling since she is a young foid (the most powerful type of foid), but i guess she teased him with sexual innuendos on that site (i remember that there was full of sexual fantasy content coming from "verified" young girls). At the end he will no longer satisfy and will rot on prison, while the young foid is having the typical sexual life of a foid, especially because she is young, with older and younger men. He made a mistake for himself by trying to actually flee with her, now his story is over.
That's a given. People who meet underage foids from ANYWHERE in the digital sphere are idiots.
 
Jfl, couldn't even be bothered to wear a mask :feelshaha: It's like he knows he's going down and just wants to make the process as annoying for everyone as possible. I bet he's pissed he was appointed counsel for that reason
Honestly if he had just taken the L and worn a mask now, he could've turned his case into a bigger clown show at trial, when he's in the driver's seat. Instead what will probably happen is that he will make an outburst during the trial and the judge will have U.S. Marshals drag him out
 

Federal judge terminates fakecel pedophile Nathan​


Nathan Larson has shown no signs of pedophilia though OP

SmallBoys

If he tried to fuck a 12yo loli that's korephilia or parthenophilia

if he was actually serious about fucking his newborn daughter that'd be nepiophilia

IMO he prob wasn't though he just liked to traumatize his wife by fucking with her head saying shit like that
 
Nathan Larson has shown no signs of pedophilia though OP

View attachment 598815

If he tried to fuck a 12yo loli that's korephilia or parthenophilia

if he was actually serious about fucking his newborn daughter that'd be nepiophilia

IMO he prob wasn't though he just liked to traumatize his wife by fucking with her head saying shit like that
quit the bullshit semantics

You're telling me that he didn't show any signs of pedophilia despite the criminal complaint stating that Larson possessed on his devices, among other items, a video of an adult male raping a 7-year-old
 
You're telling me that he didn't show any signs of pedophilia despite the criminal complaint stating that Larson possessed on his devices, among other items, a video of an adult male raping a 7-year-old
if it was a 7yo boy that would be pedophilia

if it was a girl then that's korephilia

though TBH that guy is such a troll attention whore he might even DL porn like that just to get arrested for it even if he didn't find it arousing
 
if it was a 7yo boy that would be pedophilia

if it was a girl then that's korephilia

though TBH that guy is such a troll attention whore he might even DL porn like that just to get arrested for it even if he didn't find it arousing
He could've just run for Congress instead of getting himself locked up for the rest of his life, if he wanted attention
 
He could've just run for Congress instead of getting himself locked up for the rest of his life, if he wanted attention
he did, he lost
 
He could run again and again and get attention every two years
Yeah, though it makes me wonder if he'd get the same amount. I imagine his first run got the most because he was actually getting some significant support from people as a 3rd party prior to them getting to know about his extreme stances on many things.
 
yeah I kinda wish he hadn't been so obivous right away (they discounted him quick after this) so he could've dropped his views a bit later after getting more attention, drama would've been epic
too late
 
I doubt the Republicans would unify behind Larson but do you know if there are any other cases where someone is being denied their right to represent themself over refusal to mask?
 
I doubt the Republicans would unify behind Larson
Firstly, no of course they won't. Why would Cuckservatives unify behind an someone like Larson?
but do you know if there are any other cases where someone is being denied their right to represent themself over refusal to mask?
Secondly, even their was an instance of this, doing it is stupid. You should never try to represent yourself in a courtroom unless you are a practicing lawyer. Even then, it's not something smart people do.
 
Firstly, no of course they won't. Why would Cuckservatives unify behind an someone like Larson?
I just meant because of the issue of the type of mask controversy.
If this was something like 10-years-older attorney superstar Rittenhouse wanting to represent himself and being denied that because he refused to wear a mask, for example.
Secondly, even their was an instance of this, doing it is stupid. You should never try to represent yourself in a courtroom unless you are a practicing lawyer. Even then, it's not something smart people do.
generally yes, unless you really have no decent skills at evaluating who is on your side or can't find (or afford) someone good enough

I think his degree from George Mason University might've been in accounting because he's an accountant?

He's probably more fit to act as a lawyer than most on this forum (including me) but yeah I still agree he should've found a firm.

Not sure if he could afford one, and there's a question if a public defender is giving you fair time or fair chance.
 
I just meant because of the issue of the type of mask controversy.
If this was something like 10-years-older attorney superstar Rittenhouse wanting to represent himself and being denied that because he refused to wear a mask, for example.
Yeah. Rittenhouse is different. Hes more Normie. I c man = they won't touch.
generally yes, unless you really have no decent skills at evaluating who is on your side or can't find (or afford) someone good enough

I think his degree from George Mason University might've been in accounting because he's an accountant?

He's probably more fit to act as a lawyer than most on this forum (including me) but yeah I still agree he should've found a firm.

Not sure if he could afford one, and there's a question if a public defender is giving you fair time or fair chance.
I don't know. Hard to say how well he can navigate the law. Most public defenders (if you are good at making your case to them) will be inclined to try their best efforts for you, otherwise they usually just drop the case. Most of them want to better their career so if one drops you it's because he doesn't buy into the story himself. Which is a good thing. Generally nobody wants a guy defending them who is against them morally etc etc.
 
I just meant because of the issue of the type of mask controversy.
If this was something like 10-years-older attorney superstar Rittenhouse wanting to represent himself and being denied that because he refused to wear a mask, for example.

generally yes, unless you really have no decent skills at evaluating who is on your side or can't find (or afford) someone good enough

I think his degree from George Mason University might've been in accounting because he's an accountant?

He's probably more fit to act as a lawyer than most on this forum (including me) but yeah I still agree he should've found a firm.

Not sure if he could afford one, and there's a question if a public defender is giving you fair time or fair chance.
Yeah. Rittenhouse is different. Hes more Normie. I c man = they won't touch.

I don't know. Hard to say how well he can navigate the law. Most public defenders (if you are good at making your case to them) will be inclined to try their best efforts for you, otherwise they usually just drop the case. Most of them want to better their career so if one drops you it's because he doesn't buy into the story himself. Which is a good thing. Generally nobody wants a guy defending them who is against them morally etc etc.

It doesn't matter who you are. It's always stupid to act as your own lawyer in a criminal trial even if you are also a lawyer.
 
Secondly, even IF there was an instance of this, doing it is stupid. You should never try to represent yourself in a courtroom unless you are a practicing lawyer. Even then, it's not something smart people do.
@CCPcel , yes I said that here ^
 
LMAO. I remember when he was having back and forth arguments on here. Hope he enjoys getting a train ran on him.
Huh, did I miss something? Larson was on here?
 
You didn't think I was writing about him for no reason?
Well, no. No[UWSL]body really does anything without a reason. But I also know you have a fascination regarding underage criminal proceedings. The fact he's a fakecel should mean we ignore it entirely and eventually rise above repeatedly discussing it, I suppose. [/UWSL]
 
Well, no. No[UWSL]body really does anything without a reason. But I also know you have a fascination regarding underage criminal proceedings. The fact he's a fakecel should mean we ignore it entirely and eventually rise above repeatedly discussing it, I suppose. [/UWSL]
No, he tried to appropriate the incel community into endorsing his sick bullshit. I want to see him spend the rest of his life in federal prison.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top