For those of you who've been hanging out on the incelosphere since 2020, you probably know that r/IncelTear had a giant freakout over one of Nathan Larson's websites, Rapey./su. The mere existence of Rapey./su was their primary argument that "incels are pedophiles," despite the fact that not a single one of our members has ever been convicted of any offense related to child exploitation...something which can't be said for r/IncelTear itself.
As we all know, the notion that Rapey constituted an incel forum was disinformation spread by intellectually dishonest Redditors as part of a desperate and ultimately failed campaign to deplatform us.
Nathan Larson himself was married twice, and inceldom was never a criteria for membership there—just sheer depravity. In fact, one of the first individuals convicted for their role on that despicable website was a femoid.
Meet Ashley Nichole Kolhoff:
Last year, the U.S. Department of Justice announced:
The press release, in fact, is a sanitized version of the events that led to her conviction. That's because, based on more detailed court records, the minor victim was Kolhoff's own infant daughter. On September 12th, 2020, Kolhoff registered for an account at Rapey./su, and in the "Femoid discussion" section of the forum, posted a thread titled, "Anyone want pics?"
Nathan Larson, the degenerate fakecel that he is, responded "Do it." So Kolhoff DM'd him with five media files of an infant, with the caption "Here's some pics hope you like them." Here's how an affidavit from Homeland Security Investigations Special Agent Brandon Smock described two of the files:
Excerpt from arrest warrant affidavit (p. 6).
Yeah, pretty nasty stuff. Unfortunately for Kolhoff, after Larson's own arrest and the subsequent seizure of Rapey./su's database files, federal agents were able to retrieve user information. According to HSI SA Smock, she used two email accounts with her actual name to sign up for Rapey. Seriously, how retarded do you have to be?
Woman moment right here:
Excerpt from arrest warrant affidavit (p. 7).
While the affidavit (dated June 2021) does not refer to Rapey./su by name, the most plausible explanation is that federal agents didn't want to jeopardize their investigation into other users. The site is mentioned by name in later filings. You can read the whole affidavit here.
Long story short, Kolhoff was arrested, and convicted after a bench trial overseen by Judge Leonie M. Brinkema. The 15-year sentence she received is, in fact, the statutory minimum for producing child pornography. According to the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Kolhoff currently resides at FCI Hazelton in West Virginia.
Apparently, the clown show is still ongoing. Kolhoff appealed her conviction to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, arguing that the images she produced weren't child pornography because they weren't "lascivious" under the meaning of the federal child pornography statute. The U.S. government's response brief argues, in essence, that Kolhoff's intent and the context in which the images were produced—that is, to satisfy the perversion of other Rapey users—meant that they were "lascivious".
Yeah, if you enjoy arguments over statutory construction, you can read the filings for yourself. We'll see how the Fourth Circuit resolves the issue, but in my view, the government is highly likely to prevail on this question.
To me, the funniest aspect of this entire case is how thoroughly it disproves the idea that Rapey was an "incel forum". Maybe the government should devote its resources to investigating single moms instead of harmless virgins venting on the interwebz.
As we all know, the notion that Rapey constituted an incel forum was disinformation spread by intellectually dishonest Redditors as part of a desperate and ultimately failed campaign to deplatform us.
Nathan Larson himself was married twice, and inceldom was never a criteria for membership there—just sheer depravity. In fact, one of the first individuals convicted for their role on that despicable website was a femoid.
Meet Ashley Nichole Kolhoff:
Last year, the U.S. Department of Justice announced:
The press release, in fact, is a sanitized version of the events that led to her conviction. That's because, based on more detailed court records, the minor victim was Kolhoff's own infant daughter. On September 12th, 2020, Kolhoff registered for an account at Rapey./su, and in the "Femoid discussion" section of the forum, posted a thread titled, "Anyone want pics?"
Nathan Larson, the degenerate fakecel that he is, responded "Do it." So Kolhoff DM'd him with five media files of an infant, with the caption "Here's some pics hope you like them." Here's how an affidavit from Homeland Security Investigations Special Agent Brandon Smock described two of the files:
Excerpt from arrest warrant affidavit (p. 6).
Yeah, pretty nasty stuff. Unfortunately for Kolhoff, after Larson's own arrest and the subsequent seizure of Rapey./su's database files, federal agents were able to retrieve user information. According to HSI SA Smock, she used two email accounts with her actual name to sign up for Rapey. Seriously, how retarded do you have to be?
Woman moment right here:Excerpt from arrest warrant affidavit (p. 7).
While the affidavit (dated June 2021) does not refer to Rapey./su by name, the most plausible explanation is that federal agents didn't want to jeopardize their investigation into other users. The site is mentioned by name in later filings. You can read the whole affidavit here.
Long story short, Kolhoff was arrested, and convicted after a bench trial overseen by Judge Leonie M. Brinkema. The 15-year sentence she received is, in fact, the statutory minimum for producing child pornography. According to the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Kolhoff currently resides at FCI Hazelton in West Virginia.
Apparently, the clown show is still ongoing. Kolhoff appealed her conviction to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, arguing that the images she produced weren't child pornography because they weren't "lascivious" under the meaning of the federal child pornography statute. The U.S. government's response brief argues, in essence, that Kolhoff's intent and the context in which the images were produced—that is, to satisfy the perversion of other Rapey users—meant that they were "lascivious".
Yeah, if you enjoy arguments over statutory construction, you can read the filings for yourself. We'll see how the Fourth Circuit resolves the issue, but in my view, the government is highly likely to prevail on this question.
To me, the funniest aspect of this entire case is how thoroughly it disproves the idea that Rapey was an "incel forum". Maybe the government should devote its resources to investigating single moms instead of harmless virgins venting on the interwebz.
Last edited:
