E
Edmund_Kemper
Disregard my larping efforts. I can’t change it.
-
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2019
- Posts
- 25,309
This is why people protesting the banning of abortion HAS ANGERED ME SO MUCH. This HYPOCRISY. EVERYONE READ THIS ENTIRE THING I DO NOT CARE HOW LAZY YOU ARE!
It's blatant hypocrisy. If you can't get an abortion, take birth control pills, it's 99% effective, yet these same fuckers say birth control can't work 100% of the time but it does 99% of the time if you use it correctly. Besides these same fuckers think sleeping around with 100 people is safe as long as you consistently use condoms because if used correctly, it works 98% of the time, even though some STDs can come from skin-to-skin contact and condoms won't deter those STDs.
Just use birth control or get a vasectomy (unless you're poor ofc). Or move to another state. Or just don't have sex. But when you bring up that LAST argument, these same PATHETIC HUMANS say:
And i remember some dumb fucker on twitter to an incel: "but bruh, the fact that we don't to choose if we have a baby or not if we do have sex shows our rights are being taken away by not getting to choose giving birth or not and we can't have sex because of that right taken away but you guys aren't having any rights taken"
but here's the issue with that argument: I THOUGHT YOU SUPPORT ABORTION RIGHTS SIMPLY BECAUSE YOU THINK WOMEN SHOULD GET TO CHOOSE OR NOT. IF THAT'S ALL IT COMES DOWN TO, YOUR SEX LIFE SHOULD BE THE LEAST OF YOUR PROBLEMS IF SEX IS NOTHING IMPORTANT IN LIFE BECAUSE THE ONLY THING THAT MATTERS IS WHETHER YOU CAN CHOOSE TO HAVE AN ABORTION OR NOT REGARDLESS OF YOUR SEX LIFE. You can still have sex by birth control used correctly or a dude getting a vasectomy or just moving into another state (it doesn't have to be crossing state lines, just airplane to a state far away too). Thus, your sex life isn't being denied that much. But not getting a good sex life should be the least of your issues if it's only about whether you can choose to get abortions or not. It's not like the "my body my choice" was really just a convenient way to justify getting to have a choice to abort or not rather than being about bodies being controlled in any other aspect of life.
And remember this twitter dumbass was moving the goalposts not only because abortion rights were only about right to choose, but also because people said they needed sexual pleasure and to have sex because their sexuality is a "healthy part of their life" and they need "sexual satisfaction", they did NOT at all say: "the fact that we don't to choose if we have a baby or not if we do have sex shows our rights are being taken away by not getting to choose giving birth or not and we can't have sex because of that right taken away but you guys aren't having any rights taken" when explaining why they need a good sex life to maintain.
If abortion rights is simply about the right to choose, YOUR SATISFACTORY SEX LIFE SHOULD NOT BE RELEVANT AND SHOULD BE THE LEAST OF YOUR ISSUES. You do NOT just tell us sex is nothing important in life when we NEVER fucking had it meanwhile you're bitching about worrying about pregnancy while actually having sex which deters pleasure or not being able to have sex despite having it many times in your life because you fear pregnancy.
YOU ARE HYPOCRITES. AND THIS DOES NOT JUST AFFECT WOMEN BUT ALSO MEN BECAUSE MEN have to pay child support, might worry about possibly becoming a dad, might need to provide for them, etc. Men are affected too and could be worried about possibly impregnating her. The reason why people only act only women will be affected is because society views fathers as secondary parents, total benevolent sexism toward women on pro-choicers' part. But apparently an infertile woman or a post-menopausal woman who never has been a mom or a celibate woman can have an opinion but not a man who accidentally impregnated a woman.
If women don't orgasm as much as men, feminists call this inequality and started campaigns and articles about making women orgasm more. but men being more likely to be virgins later in life or suffer involuntary celibacy is ignored. If humans cannot fuck or cannot fuck without worrying about pregnancy at least, this is a tragedy. If a person complains about a bad sex life, we start campaigns, news articles, ads, etc. helping them with erectile dysfunction, men who cannot last long enough, women who cannot orgasm, couples who are sexless or lack sexual compatibility, etc.
but when involuntary celibates complain about never having sex or even a RELATIONSHIP for that matter, society tells us these things are nothing important in life, yet they want birth control free so people don't have to worry about getting pregnant while having sex and can thus enjoy sex or so people don't have to feel they must abstain from sex, and people want birth control free even if abortion was legal and even free, because even if you get an abortion, unwanted pregnancies suck and they wanna be able to enjoy sex because sex is so important now when it suits their narrative or is convenient for their narrative.
but when we complain about our inexperience of NEVER EXPERIENCING IT IN OUR LIFETIME, society doesn't empathize or care and trviailizes our problems. FUCKIN HYPOCRISY. they only empathize with fucker's (i.e.: sexhavers or sexually active people) sex life problems because they can relate to a FUCKER but NOT a virgin. At least these fuckers probably have had good sex at plenty of points in their lifetime. Listening to them complain is like a starving AFrican child hear a rich American kid complain their big mac has no pickles, or a homeless person hearing some billionaire complain about losing pennies.
CLOWN WORLD MAN CLOWN WORLD
It's blatant hypocrisy. If you can't get an abortion, take birth control pills, it's 99% effective, yet these same fuckers say birth control can't work 100% of the time but it does 99% of the time if you use it correctly. Besides these same fuckers think sleeping around with 100 people is safe as long as you consistently use condoms because if used correctly, it works 98% of the time, even though some STDs can come from skin-to-skin contact and condoms won't deter those STDs.
Just use birth control or get a vasectomy (unless you're poor ofc). Or move to another state. Or just don't have sex. But when you bring up that LAST argument, these same PATHETIC HUMANS say:
But hey wait a minute? I thought you fucking humans said sex is nothing important and that there's more to life than sex. I THOUGHT YOU GODDAMN FUCKERS SAID THAT WE SHOULD FOCUS ON OTHER THINGS IN LIFE TO FIND HAPPINESS. I THOUGHT YOU SAID THAT YOU FUCKING HYPOCRITICAL HUMANS!!!But WE NEED TO HAVE SEX!!!!11 Sexuality is a big part of who we are and we need to assert our sexuality and its not fair we can't have sexual pleasure because we can't have sex if we wanna avoid pregnancy but will worry about becoming pregnant if we do have sex!!!!11
And i remember some dumb fucker on twitter to an incel: "but bruh, the fact that we don't to choose if we have a baby or not if we do have sex shows our rights are being taken away by not getting to choose giving birth or not and we can't have sex because of that right taken away but you guys aren't having any rights taken"
but here's the issue with that argument: I THOUGHT YOU SUPPORT ABORTION RIGHTS SIMPLY BECAUSE YOU THINK WOMEN SHOULD GET TO CHOOSE OR NOT. IF THAT'S ALL IT COMES DOWN TO, YOUR SEX LIFE SHOULD BE THE LEAST OF YOUR PROBLEMS IF SEX IS NOTHING IMPORTANT IN LIFE BECAUSE THE ONLY THING THAT MATTERS IS WHETHER YOU CAN CHOOSE TO HAVE AN ABORTION OR NOT REGARDLESS OF YOUR SEX LIFE. You can still have sex by birth control used correctly or a dude getting a vasectomy or just moving into another state (it doesn't have to be crossing state lines, just airplane to a state far away too). Thus, your sex life isn't being denied that much. But not getting a good sex life should be the least of your issues if it's only about whether you can choose to get abortions or not. It's not like the "my body my choice" was really just a convenient way to justify getting to have a choice to abort or not rather than being about bodies being controlled in any other aspect of life.
And remember this twitter dumbass was moving the goalposts not only because abortion rights were only about right to choose, but also because people said they needed sexual pleasure and to have sex because their sexuality is a "healthy part of their life" and they need "sexual satisfaction", they did NOT at all say: "the fact that we don't to choose if we have a baby or not if we do have sex shows our rights are being taken away by not getting to choose giving birth or not and we can't have sex because of that right taken away but you guys aren't having any rights taken" when explaining why they need a good sex life to maintain.
If abortion rights is simply about the right to choose, YOUR SATISFACTORY SEX LIFE SHOULD NOT BE RELEVANT AND SHOULD BE THE LEAST OF YOUR ISSUES. You do NOT just tell us sex is nothing important in life when we NEVER fucking had it meanwhile you're bitching about worrying about pregnancy while actually having sex which deters pleasure or not being able to have sex despite having it many times in your life because you fear pregnancy.
YOU ARE HYPOCRITES. AND THIS DOES NOT JUST AFFECT WOMEN BUT ALSO MEN BECAUSE MEN have to pay child support, might worry about possibly becoming a dad, might need to provide for them, etc. Men are affected too and could be worried about possibly impregnating her. The reason why people only act only women will be affected is because society views fathers as secondary parents, total benevolent sexism toward women on pro-choicers' part. But apparently an infertile woman or a post-menopausal woman who never has been a mom or a celibate woman can have an opinion but not a man who accidentally impregnated a woman.
If women don't orgasm as much as men, feminists call this inequality and started campaigns and articles about making women orgasm more. but men being more likely to be virgins later in life or suffer involuntary celibacy is ignored. If humans cannot fuck or cannot fuck without worrying about pregnancy at least, this is a tragedy. If a person complains about a bad sex life, we start campaigns, news articles, ads, etc. helping them with erectile dysfunction, men who cannot last long enough, women who cannot orgasm, couples who are sexless or lack sexual compatibility, etc.
but when involuntary celibates complain about never having sex or even a RELATIONSHIP for that matter, society tells us these things are nothing important in life, yet they want birth control free so people don't have to worry about getting pregnant while having sex and can thus enjoy sex or so people don't have to feel they must abstain from sex, and people want birth control free even if abortion was legal and even free, because even if you get an abortion, unwanted pregnancies suck and they wanna be able to enjoy sex because sex is so important now when it suits their narrative or is convenient for their narrative.
but when we complain about our inexperience of NEVER EXPERIENCING IT IN OUR LIFETIME, society doesn't empathize or care and trviailizes our problems. FUCKIN HYPOCRISY. they only empathize with fucker's (i.e.: sexhavers or sexually active people) sex life problems because they can relate to a FUCKER but NOT a virgin. At least these fuckers probably have had good sex at plenty of points in their lifetime. Listening to them complain is like a starving AFrican child hear a rich American kid complain their big mac has no pickles, or a homeless person hearing some billionaire complain about losing pennies.
CLOWN WORLD MAN CLOWN WORLD