Teachers worried their students will learn the truth about our world?
Just wait till they start learning about Israel and the Jews.
Just wait till they start learning about Israel and the Jews.
News Teachers Very Worried About the Influence of Online Misogynists on students
jfl at them thinking we or anyone would want to or have to subjugate foids. foids would do anything for chad and that includes being a tradwife
feminist until Chad breathes
The fact normies cannot understand this proves that dialectically, they have won sadly.
tate is merely someone who is capitalizing upon the failures of the current system, which as you said treats 80% of young males like utter shit who feel disenfranchised.
Kek I should have, saved thoughGreat thread, I wish you'd highlighted more examples of "online misogyny" because some of these are hilarious
View attachment 1401706
Wait, you can make memes like this? I have some ideas
Attacking the cause would be admitting we were right all along more or less
I have been on various "blackpilled" servers which have been ruined by foids.
They do it just to be seen as victims which allow for them to keep their power
Sure, there are some who do see this as a meme/joke, but the majority who do come here -even some fakecels- are blackpilled and also have general resentment towards foids/society in some way
I'd say observing social media oftentimes can serve as a good indicator of current socio-cultural trends & patterns, which can sort of help some become blackpilled
This also
The KAM, false allegations but they’ll blame the ‘Patriarchy’ and wonder why we don’t stand up for Women’s rights anymore
Good thread and high effort for actually reading their fucking innane drivel. I couldn't, would rather bolt myself to the floor with a nail gun than be forced to read these peoples dogshit.
Point 1: What unites these different groups... is a fundamental belief that women are inferior to men...
Outrageous retardation. Virtually all of these groups, incels included, are ultra foid worshippers. All of us have made women the central axis of our entire existence. The only common thing about all these groups is their borderline religious obsession with women. If we actually hated women, why do we fap to them, why do we watch porn with women? Also, manosphere claims regarding how women have massive power in society run contrary to the very claim that these groups think women are inferior. They don't.
It is a classic example of "the golem cries out in pain as it strikes you." Women know that men worship their ass, and that the "hate" is just cope. I have shown clips before where women openly admit that going on "manosphere" podcasts to get roasted just boosted their OF income 10x.
If anything, the manosphere has massively boosted the value of women in society.
The reason that men do not catch onto the fact that women thrive from negative attention is because we are not on the "supplier" side of the attention economy like women. Imagine you are selling apples and half the town openly declares they hate apples. This may see like anti-apple bias on paper, but as a supplier of apples you can see clip-and-clear that people are buying apples at a normal rate. It's just that they sneak into the apple store at night. However, this fact would be invisible to the average apple consumer.
Remember, in order to hate something, you first have to value it. It has to be of personal importance to you. You don't hate splinters until one is stuck in your thumb. Hate/love are two sides of the same coin - "hate is the biggest form of flattery." That all of these groups define themselves in opposition to women via negativa, is proof that they highly value women. Timestamp 16:34 - These women know that men worship them, in spite of what the media or men claim.
Stop thinking of women as an individual. They are a massive hivemind and provably so [1] [2]
Point 3: Calling the manosphere, redpill, blackpill, or whatever a "movement" is ridiculous
Further, women are suppliers of sex and attention, not buyers. Think yourself into the position of a supplier, like a store owner. Think of how they see customers, versus how customers see themselves. The Store owner is way more aware of human psychology and patterns. It's like how casinos see you coming from 10 miles away, because every tom, dick and harry thinks they are unique and have found some new revolutionary way to beat blackjack or something.
From a womans perspective men are pathetic for this very reason. Every guy out there pretending to be a tough guy, going to the gym, competing with other men etc - its like some idiot going into the casino with some "genius strategy to beat the bank," not realizing the casino sees idiots like him everyday, trying the same fucking shit over and over. You can not impress a casino with new tricks, all tricks are already known. You can not impress a woman in a performative way. Only through inherent value. Casinos try to trap rich customers, women try to trap chads and rich men.
Women know men worship them, that they have power. When you go to the gym to impress women, she internally laughs at you. It's like a child trying to impress mom for the 1000th time by doing the same shit. Priviliege like this leads to just-world-fallacy, entitlement and narcissism, which is what we see in women.
You know how adults pretend to be impressed when a child makes a macaroni picture? That's women rewarding men they want something from with sex and attention. They view us like pathetic children. Whenever you have a fantasy about saving a foid or doing anything heroic for a foid, even just lifting a box, keep this in mind - you look like a fucking toddler trying to impress mom. From her perspective this happens every day and she has to pretend to be interested - WOW OMG YOU DID SUCH A GOOOD JOB BOOBOO
Some men kind of realise this and then try to act like an asshole on purpose. This gets the more female attention because its slightly out of the norm, it's more "exciting" for her, even though its also something she has experienced a 1000 times. However, even this is just foid worship at the end of the day. Acting nice, or acting a dick - you are just looking for a way to please women better. If you really really hate women, fucking ignore them. Ignore them when they drown.
Ignore them when they are stuck in a house fire. Fucking give them nothing but take from them everything. Yes, I know foids dont care if one out of a million subhumans ignores them. The point is, for your own sanity, do not give them your energy, they are energy vampires. They love to tease and bully for this reason, any emotional outbursts, violence, tears, frustration - they love that shit. They love to hate, they love to rut, they love to fart, shit and suck. Beasts of burden.
Point 2: The magic "trad" 50's were not real and just another form of foid cuckery
Correct, and it pleases me to see that more high IQ users here are catching on to this. There was never tradiationalism. 1950s traditionalism was already a degenerated form of prior family structures i.e. the multi-generational household. Additionally you can find plenty of degen porn and shit from the 50s and even earlier.
What people mistake for the 50s "trad" lifestyle was literally just a commerical campaign where they tried to sell electronics and shit through the "le hecking wholesome family" meme. Thats why all of these "50s happy family" illustrations feature products - oh wait, you didnt notice?
Exactly. The word movement implies telos, purpose, direction, some unified front and goal directed effort. This is blatantly not the case. All of these communities are very internally diverse, ripe with in-fighting, constant schisms etc. On our little forum here, with barely 300 active members at a time, we already have massive ideological division between races, religious beliefs, political stances and so forth.
The irony is that, everytime they lump these groups together they are exposing themselves as an ideologically driven non-diverse group. The reason is that in-groups define themselves against out-groups. And in order to do that, the in-group has to view its own members as a diverse set of people, while reducing the out-group to an impersonal oppressor/assailant i.e. "them," "the others," "the enemy." So when they label us as a unified blob that hates women, they are operating from an in-group mindset, thus demonstrating they are the ones who are ideologically driven, not us.
Point 4: "Exposure to X"
Crucial. Exposure does not mean anything. We are all exposed since childhood to gratuitous displays of violence through the media. Yet, this has not turned us violent. However, people reading these articles will, because of bias, jump to the conclusion that exposure = effect in real life. However, as @DarkStar quotes later in the OP, they can not establish any IRL effect of exposure:
Close to half of primary school teachers (49%) could not describe a recent incident in which online misogyny had impacted female pupils. 6% of teachers gave responses that were too vague to classify into these categories.
Saying that exposure to violent, anti-female content will turn men more violent is not unlike the silly claims of early 2000s polititicans, regarding how FPS shooters would increase violence among teens. Another instance this happened, this time with focus on incels, was when researchers simply assumed that incels must be more violent than average, due to the hateful nature of their rhetoric (a massive logical jump). And again, reality completely contradicted this, so they simply hypothesized that "video games must have pacified incels."
This is insulting because the implication is that incels are just inherently violent, and if we can not find evidence for this, it means their violence is just not being expressed right now. The idea that we may just not be the violent monsters they want us to be does not even appear on their radar jfl. Also funny: These are the same people that tell us that "the internet is not real life" but when they read our posts, suddenly the internet IS real life
I love this ending, very nicely put
Overall, this highlights to us what we already know about foid nature & manipulation -utilizing their manipulative nature & dialectic- in order to serve as perfect agents of the State & influence discourse here, or simply just ensure they maintain their monopoly on males morality, conscious, and behavior.
Truly, the golem cries out in pain as it strikes you
Very nice way to sum it all up, though I will argue that foids are not inherently superior to males, it's only we have enabled them to do as such.
Men simply pedstalize foids due to the fact that they are the gatekeepers of sex, as well as naturally are manipulative & thus can very easily sway men how they want.
And honestly, the fact you were able to catch that the whole "trad" concept from the 1950s was a Neo-Liberal Capitalist design is a great catch mang.
I think I recall reading, and will try to find some thread explaining how even back when foids were expected to act feminine & we were still governed by the Church, they were expected to help their husbands out in the fields & work, but ofc it was still somewhat skewed towards that of foids natural roles based on their biology.
I also love how you pointed out the fact of the matter that they're more of a movement than we are
. Such a good catch, and when you point it out it completely exposes them & shatters their whole narrative
I once was speaking to a relative as to how the education system panders towards foids, and even she(a boomer conservacuck) agreed soAt this point even small boys are under more scrutiny and seen more negatively than adult women, what the fuck
It's depressing how young boys are treated, and then they wonder why we're the most troubled demographic.
Saved, is there anything else you can share on this?
Something which you & I both wish was studied moreZero problem with that for decades, cross-gender bullying is basically unstudied and the studies we have focus on boys bullying girls, of course
Don't have anything atm but there should be a lot of this in pro-male spaces, it's a somewhat popular topic there.
TrueSomething which you & I both wish was studied more
.Similar threads
Namtriz912
Users who are viewing this thread
