Discussion Should users offsite activities count against them?

[Fat Link]

Or should we be against that kind of gross invasion of privacy here and only judge users by what they do here?

Note: Your answers will be tallied up and the majority sentiment will be reflected in our updated 2022 rules set.

Thank you.

 

[FrothySolutions]

That's a tough one. I know a few people here lying about their inceldom right now.

If you look at a ban as a "punishment," it seems unfair, because the fakecel didn't really do anything wrong. Well, not much wrong. The only thing he didn't do was share every aspect of his private life.

So maybe don't look at it as a punishment. It's just simply a matter of the issue that this is a place for incels, and the fakecel is not an incel. But at the same time, these fakecels, they don't wanna let go of the bonds they've built in the community.

Bonds that might not survive the knowledge that they aren't really incel. So even if we say "Go ahead, let us catch you slipping. Just as long as its on another forum," how welcome would that guy be here anyway? That's the real question. If a blackpilled sex haver would even be welcomed by people.

 

[Draestyn]

no, other sites have much different rules than this one

 

[Animecel2D]

If someone admits they are a fakecel cuck on another site then they shouldn’t be welcome here any longer

 

[ilieknothing]

No, I always thought that rule was retarded. This is like some communist shit. Why should the rules of this website extend beyond this website?

 

[Despondent Dreamer]

I think it would depend upon the nature of the activity. However if someone essentially admits to not being an incel somewhere other than this forum, then I can't see a reason not to ban them, as this simply isn't the place for them.

 

[ilieknothing]

I think it would depend upon the nature of the activity. However if someone essentially admits to not being an incel somewhere other than this forum, then I can't see a reason not to ban them, as this simply isn't the place for them.

Other places on the internet are hostile to incel. I lied about not being incel and having a girlfriend so I don’t get banned from there.

 

[Deleted member 35171]

Depends on the activity.
Getting laid is an offsite activity that should warrant a ban

 

[Despondent Dreamer]

Other places on the internet are hostile to incel. I lied about not being incel and having a girlfriend so I don’t get banned from there.

What I mean is admitting to having unpaid sexual experiences, or admitting to the blatantly obvious opportunity for them. Whether or not you call yourself incel on other sites isn't what matters in this regard.

 

[JestER]

Yes. We need a zero-tolerance policy on fakeceldom admissions regardless of where they are confessed, many faggots here have already gotten exposed through Discord and other forums.

 

[based_meme]

I don't think that matters tbh. We have NEETs, wageslaves, careercels, richcels, and everything in between. We have broken messes who LDAR all day and we have high IQ achievers who pursue business and higher education. That's going to encompass a wide range of activities from going to the convenience store to have an inkling of human interaction and maintain your sanity, all the way to making a reservation at a Michelin restaurant and booking a new top tier whore for afterward. Should the latter's activities count against them, because we sympathize with the former's? If we're saying yes, then I've just described CCPcel in the latter.

 

[Deleted member 39301]

I think the only ban worth outside activity to consider is if a user is actually incel or not. I don't think the forum should ban people for having different beliefs than the ones commonly associated with inceldom, cause then we'll end up like Reddit. We need this to be open for any type of discussion concerning being incel, and I think having multiple perspective on it helps a lot. While we are have share similar experiences, we all came to inceldom in a different way and all have our own ways of trying to handle it, so I think we should be open to all incels, regardless of how they act anywhere else. But if a person on here is known as a infiltrator or a non incel person trying to push bluepill rhetoric down everyone's throats, then they can probably be banned.

 

[Restart80]

No.

 

[Lv99_BixNood]

Yes. We need a zero-tolerance policy on fakeceldom admissions regardless of where they are confessed, many faggots here have already gotten exposed through Discord and other forums.

 

[PPEcel]

Yes.

 

[AsianKungFao]

No, I always hated that shit in school.

What I mean is admitting to having unpaid sexual experiences, or admitting to the blatantly obvious opportunity for them. Whether or not you call yourself incel on other sites isn't what matters in this regard.

He's saying he lied about having those along with gf because outside forums are hostile against incels

But then again I dont think I've ever had to lie about that ever, maybe he got into "lolololol ur a virgin loser" Argument

 

[erenyeager]

Yes. We need a zero-tolerance policy on fakeceldom admissions regardless of where they are confessed, many faggots here have already gotten exposed through Discord and other forums.

 

[cucksaar]

I know a few people here lying about their inceldom right now.

What the hell kind of response is this. Why would you not report these people to the mods?

 

[BrettyBoy]

Depends what it is the person is doing.

 

[cucksaar]

Yes. We need a zero-tolerance policy on fakeceldom admissions regardless of where they are confessed, many faggots here have already gotten exposed through Discord and other forums.

This

 

[based_meme]

What the hell kind of response is this. Why would you not report these people to the mods?

Seriously. What the hell? On one hand he's complaining about incels getting female attention when even people with autism would realize it isn't genuine and only done to gain repeat business. And on the other, he's admittedly protecting fakecels himself as if he's some Jew sympathizer hiding Jews from Gestapo patrols in 1940s Germany.

Fucking clown world never relents, I swear to God.

 

[evilguy]

Fakecels are usually trolls begging to be fed by IT. IT still hasn't learned to not give trolls attention, cause IT cucks and sucks.

 

[FuRed]

No, I always thought that rule was retarded. This is like some communist shit. Why should the rules of this website extend beyond this website?

Found the fakecel

 

[WatchfulObserver]

No.

 

[Deleted member 36910]

idk, seems like it could be used to frame users but if someone admits to being a fakecel then why let them stay here.

 

[Massimo The Koala]

No.

 

[Caesercel]

Difficult question. But I say ban fakecels, even if their fakeceldom is revealed on other sites. They can only subvert this forum with their bullshit since their experiences do not align with ours

 

[Deleted member 9758]

No. If they say they have sex on looksmax and don’t mention it here but also don’t pretend to be virgins then they shouldn’t be banned.

 

[based_meme]

If they say they have sex on looksmax and don’t mention it here but also don’t pretend to be virgins then they shouldn’t be banned.

That's the very definition of fakecel. Of course, you would say something like this. JFL

 

[Sparrow's Song]

I think if you asked a bunch of older truecels, most of them would say that having a few low-tier failed normies how got lucky once but are still invisible/disgusting to foids is much preferred to having cucks, glowies, foids, and soyfiltrators. I mean if someone is based and blackpilled, if they are indeed a low status males and the want to be part of the cause then let them.

Most people don't want their activity off of the forum policed liked they have some gang stalkers after them from within inceldom. If someone is found out to be a chad who is LARPing as an incel or something like that then they should be banned. Same goes with glowies, agecucks, organizing off of the forum to do malicious things to specific forum members. Like if a "normie fakecel" gets "exposed" and has his face doxxed in a thread, a lot of people who are KHHV and mog him slightly will say he is probably KHHV because normies are often incel theses days, there could also be a truecel who fucked a few fatties in the early 2,000's who sees a regular incel. I think organizing off of the forum or on it to leak an obvious non-chad loser's face pictures should be bannable tbh, should be considered worse than bragging.

As a truecel myself, I'd prefer a post-incel community of low smv males. We'd be a way bigger threat to society if we had a name that represented all bottom of society males and focused on a liberation theology against the yoke of chad.

 

[Deleted member 9758]

That's the very definition of fakecel. Of course, you would say something like this. JFL

I’m an incel. And I do think blackpilled normies should be allowed here as long as they’re not narcy lookism-tier posters.
No reason why you should get banned here for something you did elsewhere.

 

[trying to ascend]

Only to fakecels (also apply to infiltrators).

People worshipping foids, denying the blackpill or doing any kind of stuff that would result in a ban on this forum, shouldn't be banned if they did it on other forums

 

[lemon21]

If they admit their fakecelness on another forum then ban no questions asked, other than that who gives a shit. We should be Open minded to be honest, lately this form seems more of an echo chamber where the postmaxxers promote their low iq takes as facts and it becomes kind of annoying. If someone says something that irks someone outside of here it should not warrant a ban, other than having a gf and getting laid ofc

 

[I want to believe]

Fuck those fakecels. So, yes.

 

[FuRed]

Another very polarising topic, just like the escortcel one

fascinating

 

[AsianKungFao]

I’m an incel. And I do think blackpilled normies should be allowed here as long as they’re not narcy lookism-tier posters.
No reason why you should get banned here for something you did elsewhere.

I find this very werid tbh, I thought this was incel forum, not blackpill forum nor whatever movement forum

 

[cucksaar]

No. If they say they have sex on looksmax and don’t mention it here but also don’t pretend to be virgins then they shouldn’t be banned.

Wtf so people should be allowed to larp as incels?

 

[rottingricecel]

privacy must be protected, with one exception.

this is incel.is, and incel only. for example pedocels ITcels trollcels should be protected if their offense are strictly offsite, but fakecels should not.

ban all fakecels

 

[cucksaar]

Another very polarising topic, just like the escortcel one

fascinating

I wanna hear your take on this one

People worshipping foids, denying the blackpill or doing any kind of stuff that would result in a ban on this forum, shouldn't be banned if they did it on other forums

I mean why not? We shouldn’t enable larpers

I’m an incel. And I do think blackpilled normies should be allowed here

Why not have two separate forums instead, one exclusive to incels, and another open to anyone (regardless if incel or chad) who wants to discuss the blackpill & related content. It’s important for incels to have a safe-space where we don’t get exposed to people who mog us hard.

 

[Deleted member 38579]

this is not difficult question , i don't even know why it's brought up.

Fakecels literally get banned for admitting they are larping, faggots, infiltrators or trolling outside the forum and that is soppused to not be a a valid reason for ban?

 

[nice_try]

Yes. We need a zero-tolerance policy on fakeceldom admissions regardless of where they are confessed, many faggots here have already gotten exposed through Discord and other forums.

This.
Not counting a users offsite activities against him is literally the definition of accepting larps and trolls.
I want this community to be made of genuine incels, not troll larpers who just pretend and show a completely different face as soon as they leave this site.

Wtf so people should be allowed to larp as incels?

Many people say yes, because they're already larping here.
They use this site only as a meme and a fun hobby. They're not incels and not interested in serious discussion about inceldom.
I would ban anyone who supports this idea, it's basically admitting that they're dishonest users who just pretend to be something they're not.

 

[Circle]

If it's done off-site then what business do you have to prosecute it here? Usually with off-site content you actually have to seek the user out rather than it being a straightforward rule that is broken. Incels are almost accepted nowhere, so it makes sense that someone would act "normie" on another site by saying he has a gf or whatever. Ultimately, I go by the idea of: no pics, no care.

Someone saying "haha yeah bro i have a gf" on some other site is a retarded reason to ban. You don't have enough information to tell if they're even being serious. Also, It's obviously stupid to brag about being a fakecel to someone you know is on the forum, so how many of these people are actual fakecels or do they just want the attention from trolling? Similar to how people used to literally self-ban just to have people talk about them in the Ban Discussion Thread.

To the people who don't agree I feel like they're just trying to gatekeep the incel community to the point where you have to act a certain way everywhere you go which is something you would read in George Orwell's 1984.

 

[trying to ascend]

I mean why not? We shouldn’t enable larpers

Why would they be larpers? Expressing opinions that might get you in trouble here isn't the same as larping.

That's why I added infiltrators and fakecels to the ones who should be banned for behaviour outside here, those guys are the ones who should be banned for larping, since they are claiming to be incel by joining this forum

 

[ThoughtfulCel]

This question should be pretty obvious


The whole reason this site was in the gutter besides its original administration is that Serge was too lenient and allowed trolls/fakecrls to fuck around here.

Your actions 100% should count. If you talk about fucking someone you should be perma banned into oblivion. Anyone who says otherwise is clearly a fakecel

 

[JoeBruhcel]

Depends on the activity.
Getting laid is an offsite activity that should warrant a ban

 

[based_meme]

Depends on the activity. Getting laid is an offsite activity that should warrant a ban

This goes without saying. If you're on looksmaxx and bragging about your weekend sexcapade in detail or whatever, then yeah, burn in hell if you're posting here.

 

[Selbsthass]

Yes. We need a zero-tolerance policy on fakeceldom admissions regardless of where they are confessed, many faggots here have already gotten exposed through Discord and other forums.

Many people say yes, because they're already larping here.
They use this site only as a meme and a fun hobby. They're not incels and not interested in serious discussion about inceldom.
I would ban anyone who supports this idea, it's basically admitting that they're dishonest users who just pretend to be something they're not.

This and nothing less. There should be stricter rules against retards who promote idiotic concepts like that dumbass few posts above advocating larpers aS LoOng As TheY Don"t MeNtion HaviNG SeX HerE. Same for other tool in this thread who admits to protecting fakecels. From what I've noticed most exposed fakecels are just postmaxxer trash who don't contribute in any meaningful way to the community whatsoever, just turn it into some hangout spot for a bunch of circlejerkers.

 

[based_meme]

I’m an incel. And I do think blackpilled normies should be allowed here as long as they’re not narcy lookism-tier posters.
No reason why you should get banned here for something you did elsewhere.

If you're a regular sexhaver who posts about it on looksmaxx or where ever, but then comes here and behave like a good goy, you absolutely, 100% don't belong here. Literally fucking why would you be here? To feel better about yourself that "it's fine that stacy rejected me this weekend, I'll fuck her best friend becky at next week's kegger"?

It's abject mockery and humiliation of every incel here to be even entertain the idea of letting such users post here. Fucking kys if you were even being serious about that.

The whole thread is about whether or not we should care about the activities of other INCELS. Not normies. Not chadlites. Not temporarily embarrassed chads. INCELS.

 

[Wellington]

They should be banned [UWSL]if they brag about getting laid on other websites.[/UWSL]

[UWSL]Fakecels and faggots (like Gripmaxxing) got banned in the past because of off-site activities. [/UWSL]

Yes. We need a zero-tolerance policy on fakeceldom admissions regardless of where they are confessed, many faggots here have already gotten exposed through Discord and other forums.

Absolutely

all the way to making a reservation at a Michelin restaurant and booking a new top tier whore for afterward.

I’m an incel. And I do think blackpilled normies should be allowed here as long as they’re not narcy lookism-tier posters.
No reason why you should get banned here for something you did elsewhere.

What? Then what's the point of having an incel forum if its open to normie men? What next, allowing foids?

 

[Deleted member 21821]

What the hell?

hiding Jews

clown world