Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

You Will Know Them by Their Fruits - A Response to Sir Silentium

FarangInDaNang

FarangInDaNang

Failed Sex Tourist
-
Joined
May 16, 2026
Posts
860
Online time
19h 17m
IMG 1768

Right off the bat classic ad hominem. mentioning .org and hexum and gray to try invalidate my points. I’ve known about all 3 of the major forums for years now — .is, .net, .org. You are not infallible just because you’re a 2025cel. I was probably lurking before you even made an account. I’ve been an incel my entire life and I’ve known my status as an oppressed individual and disenfranchised man very clearly around 2022, which is when I started lurking. I don’t mention it because appealing to tradition is foolish, and you don’t have any actual counter arguments other than attacking my character. But let’s continue.

Your whole defense is “it’s just hope bro” and semantics about planning vs hoping. But look at your own quotes:

• “Well I plan to marry a girl in my specific church denomination, or a girl from Vanuatu once I move over.”

• Building a house there, “I have a year or so before I move”, transferring uni online, waiting for the 10 year residency visa.

• Specific standards: younger than 18 hopefully, no pierced ears, unwesternized Christian etc.

That’s not vague “someday” cope. That’s set in stone geomaxxing that transcends the territory of just hoping and dreaming, into acctually moving and planning with timelines and money invested. You even said church girls here want nothing to do with you but you have this overseas pipeline ready.

You yourself posted before that if someone has plans to geomaxx and arrange marriage they’re fakecel. You fit that exactly. Volcel/fakecel isn’t “I have a gf right now”. It’s treating ascension as realistic with steps in motion while being picky about age/ears/religion.

Tagging all your friends and saying it’s sad doesn’t erase the screenshots. The blackpill isn’t a popularity contest it isn’t who has the most forum members on their side it’s the irrefutable fact that you won’t even be welcomed here on this forum the time your plans are finished, as you wouldn’t be an incel.

“Now don't get me wrong, I dislike drama and believe it is a feminine concept - but this is something I feel the need to address.”

Another ad hominem.

“Well I plan to marry a girl in my specific church denomination, or a girl from Vanuatu once I move over. Neither of them would be deluded/modernised enough to undergo procedures.”

The biggest thing that can get misconstrued here is you have the word plan. It’s not a matter of discernment when you have active measures in place to ascend. What is someone to make of this statement of where not only are you planning on ascending, but you believe that you have the quantity of women to chose from where they would both not have surgery, that last sentence implies you have women in abundance who have some sort of traditional value, whether it’s hypothetical or not, it’s not blackpilled. How can you call yourself a truecel but believe you can ascend? Either your delirious and don’t understand the core concepts of what it actually entails to be an incel or you are accrual a fakecel who has set plans in motion to ascend, which one is it?

“And having said that, I wouldn't even want to marry someone who has gotten their ears pierced for same reasons as mentioned above. That would be practical in Vanuatu, but I might have to lower the standard for Australia sadly. Not that anything would change if I did haha.”

“I also plan on marrying someone who is a lot younger than me (and they wouldn't have considered it then either). Hopefully younger than 18.”

“Yes well that leads back to the point again - being in the world, but not of the world.
It is hard to go to clubs or parties and not be of the world.”

Such baseline theology too, niggas read ONE CS Lewis book.

“All of this so far is pretty tame, that is until he starts contacting moderators”

If you can read you would know that I said two highly esteemed forum members agree with me, that doesn’t mean moderators, use your discernment. I don’t see how it applies what authority is called into play here either. The rules of this forum still apply and the definition of a truecel, wouldn’t apply to you upon building your house and moving, completing the visa and everything else, and ascending. If you follow that course to its natural conclusion all that would wait you is your islander wife and a permanent.
those being the two you tagged, as in they agreed with if you act out your long term plans and ascend, then you are no longer welcome here, it would be a permanent ban, what else can I say on the matter? You also constantly appeal to authority, appeal to tradition and ad populum, three common fallacies all at play, great points bro!

“That is the end for that thread:
I think it is an IQ thing too, when differentiating between what you hope to accomplish, between what you WILL accomplish. I hope to someday find a worthy wife/ascend just like any other user on the forum, but whether it will happen are 2 very different things. I sure hope it will happen.”

Except you do not make the separation of what you wish to achieve and what are you attempting to achieve.
The keyword again here is plan, you don’t say you hope you will get a life, you say plan, and you also have methods in place that will ensure it goes beyond just basic pipedreams in your Aussie basement,

I’m not gonna address yet another ad hominem, I also don’t believe you are able to speak on any one else’s iq on this forum. We have more fallacies and ad hominems so far than actual arguments at this point but there is a clear discernment needed, one you didn’t make. Your original text doesn’t say “hope to” it says “plan to” you plan to ascend, you plan to geomaxx, your in the process of doing that, yes it may take some time but that doesn’t mean you are not putting the pieces together to attempt to ascend, and have sex, even if it’s with some ugly village idiot, it’s still ascension , no matter how long it takes, no matter your “intent” behind building a house on an untouched island, the message is clear, you will not be an incel in maybe a years time that’s the issue, the issue isn’t discerning the two the issue is that you haven’t been able to separate your hopes and dreams from reality, or making it reality. You’re building a house on vanatu for the sole purpose of sexual exploitation of the locals there, which I’m not against, but you need to name it as what it is: which is geomaxxing. Geomaxxing which may take a year, but Geomaxxing regardless. Case in point. Also I haven’t seen other users talk about their ascension plans whatsoever I don’t think anyone who is truly blackpilled thinks they can ascend so idk what your on.
about. He continues:

“First of all, I want to make clear: wanting to ascend or get married ≠ being fakecel, nor volcel for that matter.”

“Second, Farang (who joined 2 days ago at this point), is calling for fakecels to be exposed, banning of users, etc etc. Like I said, I don't like getting caught up in drama (as it is for females) “

Two fallacies in one here, goldmine. First appealing to tradition and then another ad hominem. How about actually trying to dissect my argument?

“You are not an incel if you haven’t tried to ascend” wouldn’t it be the opposite? Unless you’re still bluepilled about reality you don’t attempt to ascend, you know your place. You can call me miserable for that but it’s the truth, if you know your a truecel you don’t go out cold approaching 100 women, you don’t build houses to later geomaxx to, you don’t do any of the PUA tactics if you know your truly ugly, and if it’s situational, if you can ascend with any of those methods, than you were never an incel to begin with! It’s not that hard of a concept to grasp

“I was laughing to myself at this point, he quotes me on what I have been telling him the whole time. Regarding planning to get married/ascend some day and that many other users obviously want to as well if they are on incels.is for goodness sake.”

I don’t see what’s humorous about telling users openly that you aren’t even an incel?

There’s a key distinction between wanting to and planning to, again, many users few have a desire to be married, but many users also don’t set up to build a house and move for the sole reason to. It’s bewildering to me we still have this guy here, when do we draw the line? When he finally moves and gets a wife on that island? At this point in time we are just anticipating until that day comes because it’s already set in stone his Geomaxxing plans.

“Once again makes another false allegation, and shifts my version of "planning" to his version of "planning". You can see the context above”

How have I made an allegation against you that doesn’t adhere to what you’re acctually saying? Read between the lines of your own text and look what you are insinuating.

“I would like to add more, but you get the idea anyways. The next few screenshots were just about contacts with the moderators anyways.”
So that’s the end of his actual text and response but here is his final point.

He links a thread posted by the mod Ryo_Hazuki about the playbook of a troll, and the various methods the deploy.

I’ll respond to this but first let’s hear Sir Silentiums own words, shall we?

“I was semi-trolling, as many grays have made up ridiculous allegations towards me in the past.”

“Fooled him with the fake Master screenshot kek:”

IMG 1778


I don’t know how anyone can call me a troll when this guy is sending fabricated screenshots of those who in charge, make it make sense. Now let’s get to the meat and the potato’s of what makes this so ironic, the post he mentions is https://incels.is/threads/the-playb...ause-some-of-you-really-need-to-learn.874160/

Now, you can go and read the post but what are the key points it says?

Fake extreme truecel stats — Claim to be sub-3 (very ugly), extremely short (often <5’4”), with usernames like “@sub5ricemale” for credibility.

He even DMed me a selfie right after I made the initial thread (I won’t post it here because I’m not trying to break the no-selfie / doxxing rules).
Why would a “truecel” who claims sending face pics is dangerous suddenly DM one to the guy calling him out? It doesn’t prove anything — it just shows he’s willing to break his own OPSEC when it helps his reputation. Exactly the kind of inconsistent behavior Ryo warned about in the troll playbook.

2. Use those fake creds to gatekeep — Attack others as “fakecels” from a position of “superior trueceldom.”

This along with the several character attacks and ad hominems he makes against me, makes his intent clear as day, use his supposed deformity to leverage it over real arguments.

6. Leverage sympathy — The fake truecel status makes users defend them.

Now this is the kicker. In the post, Ryo talks about naive users who fall for these trolls and who end up defending them based off their merit of their supposed truecel status. With wonkycliff, He became the textbook example in mod Ryo_Hazuki’s “troll playbook” thread. Ryo then made a point on how gullible users fall for these charlatans. In the mod Ryo_Hazuki’s “troll playbook” thread, Chud Norris72 is explicitly named and screenshot-called out as the poster child for gullible defenders. After Lilwonkycliffy53 (wonkycliff) got permabanned for the obvious height-shrinking + fake grooming story arc, Chud posted “FREE HIM” on the banned user’s profile. Let’s look at who else @Chud Norris72 is defending, shall we?


IMG 1779
IMG 1780


This goes back to Ryo’s point two

2. Use those fake creds to gatekeep — Attack others as “fakecels” from a position of “superior trueceldom.”
Aswell as
6. Leverage sympathy — The fake truecel status makes users defend them.

In the wonkycliff case, Chud posted “FREE HIM” after the obvious height-shrinking troll got banned. Mod Ryo directly tagged him as an example of naive autistic incels who fall for fake extreme truecel claims and defend larpers. Now look at today:

• Chud is jumping in to defend Silentium against me.

• Pushing the “he clearly has incelish features” while shielding Silentium’s geomaxx plans.

This is textbook playbook point 6: Leverage sympathy — the “fellow truecel under attack” framing makes users like Chud rush to defend, even when the quotes (plan to marry + build house in Vanuatu + picky standards + “easy to find a mate there”) scream fakecel / troll behavior. I don’t know how you can take it as anything other than a troll when he has professed already he is a troll and “gray hazer” maybe they do that in the outback but not on .is

It also ties into point 2: Use those fake creds to gatekeep. Silentium built his reputation as a long-time “truecel Christcuck,” which now lets him (and defenders like Chud) dismiss any fakecel scrutiny as “new gray troll drama” instead of addressing the screenshots. Instead of attacking my points and rebutting them he attacks my character and uses his selfies as a way to leverage his supposed deformity to gain sympathy from gullible users


The pattern is repeating live:

• Wonkycliff used fake ultra-truecel stats → Chud defended him.

• Silentium uses long-term reputation + “just hope bro” semantics while having active geomaxx plans → Chud defends him again.

This is exactly why Ryo made that “must-read” thread. The same naive little chud defenders keep falling for it. Users like Norris aren’t malicious — they’re just the easily manipulated type the playbook preys on. They see someone with “truecel cred” getting called out and immediately jump to sympathy mode instead of looking at the actual quotes and actions. Classic example of what Ryo warned of us, but yet we are still here. The biggest irony is him linking that post when the situation is only applicable to him, and not not me, classic projection.

I guess, there isn’t much to say but maybe in this hour we can look to scripture.


Matthew 7:15-20

New King James Version

You Will Know Them by Their Fruits​

15 “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. 16 You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? 17 Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Therefore by their fruits you will know them
 
it needs more tags
 
billions must be tagged
 
I hate drama between brocels.
 
don’t worry bro, we are ALL gonna read this huge wall of text!
 
Shit, Im out this one but ill b watching lol:dafuckfeels:
 
@Ryo_Hazuki more food for you
 
literal definition of volcel
Him or me? If your ugly truly ugly you will know no matter of attempts can work, if you still cling to that idea your probably not an incel
 
inb4 op gets banned
 
inb4 op gets banned
for what? I’m not the one planning to have sex anytime soon, such as your dear friend is
 
inb4 op gets banned
:feelskek: :feelskek: op is over here having a dick measuring contest on who’s the biggest incel like it matters jfl if you can’t get sex despite wanting to/trying, then you’re incel, end of story. So tired of these niggas with muh “i’m the biggest truecel on the forum!!! if you can’t abide to my personal beliefs on what’s incel then you’re a hecking fakecel!!”
 
Him or me? If your ugly truly ugly you will know no matter of attempts can work, if you still cling to that idea your probably not an incel
if you don't try to ascend, you don't know whether you have the immediate possibility to get a girlfriend. A lot of people equivocate being an incel with some metaphysical category, but it's just involuntary celibacy. The condition can change for a couple of reasons, such as wealth or geographical location, or simply due to statistical improbable events happening (not talking about NeverGiveUp, "just have a YT video with 17 million views" theory jfl). Again, it's mostly because people tend to not clearly define inceldom. If it's a lack of love then broken marriages should constitute inceldom, if it's a lack of love then dead bedrooms should constitute inceldom. But they don't, because inceldom is INvoluntary CELibacy. It can be a transient condition simply because statistics does not describe outliers, but treats them as though they weren't actually a thing. Most people here aren't disfigured, don't miss body parts, don't have extremely invalidating conditions. That's what commonly is called a "truecel". But incels don't necessarily have to be truecels. Do you think if ER wasn't autistic as fuck, he would've had problems pulling foids? Hell no, he woulda been HTN. A lot of you simply spew shit because you wanna be the truest of truecels or whatever, as if that was anything to flex really, just treating everyone else's suffering as stupid because "of man I am 0/10 and you are 1/10 jfl fakecel".

Also when you say you have 2 reputable members agreeing with you that's kinda of an appeal to perceived authority/village.
Your point about semantics and hope vs plan is good, but the logical implication hope => plan holds, so that people who hope for something to happen in the future may plan ahead. Perhaps his hope is implied as one does not plan ahead without hope.

I don't care about either of you two to the point of attacking/defending, simply pointing out the good and the bad in your response and giving him the benefit of the doubt.
 
if you don't try to ascend, you don't know whether you have the immediate possibility to get a girlfriend. A lot of people equivocate being an incel with some metaphysical category, but it's just involuntary celibacy. The condition can change for a couple of reasons, such as wealth or geographical location, or simply due to statistical improbable events happening (not talking about NeverGiveUp, "just have a YT video with 17 million views" theory jfl). Again, it's mostly because people tend to not clearly define inceldom. If it's a lack of love then broken marriages should constitute inceldom, if it's a lack of love then dead bedrooms should constitute inceldom. But they don't, because inceldom is INvoluntary CELibacy. It can be a transient condition simply because statistics does not describe outliers, but treats them as though they weren't actually a thing. Most people here aren't disfigured, don't miss body parts, don't have extremely invalidating conditions. That's what commonly is called a "truecel". But incels don't necessarily have to be truecels. Do you think if ER wasn't autistic as fuck, he would've had problems pulling foids? Hell no, he woulda been HTN. A lot of you simply spew shit because you wanna be the truest of truecels or whatever, as if that was anything to flex really, just treating everyone else's suffering as stupid because "of man I am 0/10 and you are 1/10 jfl fakecel".

Also when you say you have 2 reputable members agreeing with you that's kinda of an appeal to perceived authority/village.
Your point about semantics and hope vs plan is good, but the logical implication hope => plan holds, so that people who hope for something to happen in the future may plan ahead. Perhaps his hope is implied as one does not plan ahead without hope.

I don't care about either of you two to the point of attacking/defending, simply pointing out the good and the bad in your response and giving him the benefit of the doubt.
I’ve done all the “methods” and everything that would equate to trying, none of it works because my issue is my face, I even tried geomaxxing, hence my name, if you are able to geomaxx successfully it means you aren’t a truecel, also I’m not trying to appeal to authority or do a popularity contest but his plans of ascension are in direct violation of the rules here so if you can call that an appeal to authority than I guess so. It’s also more about hope and it’s more about the actual logistics about him slaying once becoming a full resident after moving, the probability is very high just statistically speaking that he will ascend, off of his own observations and his own reasoning, it’s very likely. So is it not a moral dilemma? We are just waiting on our end for this guy to get laid and THEN we ban him? He’s already setting it up for that to happen, why wouldn’t his defenders disavow if they know of his plans
 
if you don't try to ascend, you don't know whether you have the immediate possibility to get a girlfriend. A lot of people equivocate being an incel with some metaphysical category, but it's just involuntary celibacy. The condition can change for a couple of reasons, such as wealth or geographical location, or simply due to statistical improbable events happening (not talking about NeverGiveUp, "just have a YT video with 17 million views" theory jfl). Again, it's mostly because people tend to not clearly define inceldom. If it's a lack of love then broken marriages should constitute inceldom, if it's a lack of love then dead bedrooms should constitute inceldom. But they don't, because inceldom is INvoluntary CELibacy. It can be a transient condition simply because statistics does not describe outliers, but treats them as though they weren't actually a thing. Most people here aren't disfigured, don't miss body parts, don't have extremely invalidating conditions. That's what commonly is called a "truecel". But incels don't necessarily have to be truecels. Do you think if ER wasn't autistic as fuck, he would've had problems pulling foids? Hell no, he woulda been HTN. A lot of you simply spew shit because you wanna be the truest of truecels or whatever, as if that was anything to flex really, just treating everyone else's suffering as stupid because "of man I am 0/10 and you are 1/10 jfl fakecel".

Also when you say you have 2 reputable members agreeing with you that's kinda of an appeal to perceived authority/village.
Your point about semantics and hope vs plan is good, but the logical implication hope => plan holds, so that people who hope for something to happen in the future may plan ahead. Perhaps his hope is implied as one does not plan ahead without hope.

I don't care about either of you two to the point of attacking/defending, simply pointing out the good and the bad in your response and giving him the benefit of the doubt.
You say inceldom can be transient (geo, wealth, etc.). Fine. But this forum has always drawn a line on detailed ascension pipelines, especially geomaxxing. That’s why he made his own threads saying people who plan to geomaxx and arrange marriage should be banned as fakecels. He fits his own standard.
 
I’ve done all the “methods” and everything that would equate to trying, none of it works because my issue is my face, I even tried geomaxxing, hence my name, if you are able to geomaxx successfully it means you aren’t a truecel, also I’m not trying to appeal to authority or do a popularity contest but his plans of ascension are in direct violation of the rules here so if you can call that an appeal to authority than I guess so. It’s also more about hope and it’s more about the actual logistics about him slaying once becoming a full resident after moving, the probability is very high just statistically speaking that he will ascend, off of his own observations and his own reasoning, it’s very likely. So is it not a moral dilemma? We are just waiting on our end for this guy to get laid and THEN we ban him? He’s already setting it up for that to happen, why wouldn’t his defenders disavow if they know of his plans
I'll speak for myself.

I really don't think of inceldom in teleological or ontological terms. To me, it is a way to categorize men and nothing more. The pills don't define inceldom, is what I'm trying to say, they're simply schools of thought regarding the world, people, and concepts such as success, failure, morality, responsibility, etc...

This, coupled with my own personal thoughts regarding life, people, knowledge and existence (which I will summarize with "existence is a contradiction, we're monads isolated within our bodies, we can only know through logic and first hand experience" so as to not bore you with too much unnecessary talk), makes me think that, assuming everyone here who self-reports is 100% faithful and honest (a necessary evil for a forum such as this one, unless you wanna do some verification method with a team of mods rating candidates' pics, and if so nobody will stick around anymore), I don't have a way to determine whether someone is an actual incel or not. It's not about belief but absence of disbelief, I don't have any way to confirm nor deny one's inceldom, so it may as well be that they are incels. If it turns out they ascended, good for them, life as an incel sucks. If it turns out they lied, well, not much for me to get angry at, it says a lot about their need for attention and feeling of moral superiority over others.

When I read that someone "plans to marry", it's either because they are engaged already, or will propose shortly. So indeed semantically in my experience if you use that word, you're either using it incorrectly or gave yourself away. But again, what do I have at my disposal to doubt? Is it worth it to start up drama over those words? Personally, I'd rather converse about other topics with people, and leave the checking to the moderators.

But I understand that I am just one person in here. This is just my opinion. As I said, I don't care about either of you two to attack or defend anyone, I'm just saying that it is kinda worthless in my eyes. If you wanted my opinion, Silentium seems to me to be here solely to preach the Gospel and proselytize, which I dislike.
 
But this forum has always drawn a line on detailed ascension pipelines
I'm not sure how I can verify this claim, since the rules don't state that geomaxxing talks are forbidden.
 
I'll speak for myself.

I really don't think of inceldom in teleological or ontological terms. To me, it is a way to categorize men and nothing more. The pills don't define inceldom, is what I'm trying to say, they're simply schools of thought regarding the world, people, and concepts such as success, failure, morality, responsibility, etc...

This, coupled with my own personal thoughts regarding life, people, knowledge and existence (which I will summarize with "existence is a contradiction, we're monads isolated within our bodies, we can only know through logic and first hand experience" so as to not bore you with too much unnecessary talk), makes me think that, assuming everyone here who self-reports is 100% faithful and honest (a necessary evil for a forum such as this one, unless you wanna do some verification method with a team of mods rating candidates' pics, and if so nobody will stick around anymore), I don't have a way to determine whether someone is an actual incel or not. It's not about belief but absence of disbelief, I don't have any way to confirm nor deny one's inceldom, so it may as well be that they are incels. If it turns out they ascended, good for them, life as an incel sucks. If it turns out they lied, well, not much for me to get angry at, it says a lot about their need for attention and feeling of moral superiority over others.

When I read that someone "plans to marry", it's either because they are engaged already, or will propose shortly. So indeed semantically in my experience if you use that word, you're either using it incorrectly or gave yourself away. But again, what do I have at my disposal to doubt? Is it worth it to start up drama over those words? Personally, I'd rather converse about other topics with people, and leave the checking to the moderators.

But I understand that I am just one person in here. This is just my opinion. As I said, I don't care about either of you two to attack or defend anyone, I'm just saying that it is kinda worthless in my eyes. If you wanted my opinion, Silentium seems to me to be here solely to preach the Gospel and proselytize, which I dislike.
It’s interesting you mention Monads, are you a gnostic by chance? That’s a lot of words but I have my convictions against those who lie about their status as an oppressed person, it’s quite strange, especially for someone who preaches the gospel of love, for someone like to be a deceiver of sorts, doesn’t suprise me.
 
I'm not sure how I can verify this claim, since the rules don't state that geomaxxing talks are forbidden.
It’s a bannable offense we can verify with the mods, but if you were to successfully get laid wouldn’t that make you no by definition: no longer incel
 
I'll speak for myself.

I really don't think of inceldom in teleological or ontological terms. To me, it is a way to categorize men and nothing more. The pills don't define inceldom, is what I'm trying to say, they're simply schools of thought regarding the world, people, and concepts such as success, failure, morality, responsibility, etc...

This, coupled with my own personal thoughts regarding life, people, knowledge and existence (which I will summarize with "existence is a contradiction, we're monads isolated within our bodies, we can only know through logic and first hand experience" so as to not bore you with too much unnecessary talk), makes me think that, assuming everyone here who self-reports is 100% faithful and honest (a necessary evil for a forum such as this one, unless you wanna do some verification method with a team of mods rating candidates' pics, and if so nobody will stick around anymore), I don't have a way to determine whether someone is an actual incel or not. It's not about belief but absence of disbelief, I don't have any way to confirm nor deny one's inceldom, so it may as well be that they are incels. If it turns out they ascended, good for them, life as an incel sucks. If it turns out they lied, well, not much for me to get angry at, it says a lot about their need for attention and feeling of moral superiority over others.

When I read that someone "plans to marry", it's either because they are engaged already, or will propose shortly. So indeed semantically in my experience if you use that word, you're either using it incorrectly or gave yourself away. But again, what do I have at my disposal to doubt? Is it worth it to start up drama over those words? Personally, I'd rather converse about other topics with people, and leave the checking to the moderators.

But I understand that I am just one person in here. This is just my opinion. As I said, I don't care about either of you two to attack or defend anyone, I'm just saying that it is kinda worthless in my eyes. If you wanted my opinion, Silentium seems to me to be here solely to preach the Gospel and proselytize, which I dislike.
Yeah I hear you but this just reads as centric talking points tbh like there’s a lot of proof this guy is at worst a fakecel and at best using his supposed truecel status to defend his geomaxxing potential sex tourism, which if followed to its natural conclusion is banworthy
 
It’s interesting you mention Monads, are you a gnostic by chance? That’s a lot of words but I have my convictions against those who lie about their status as an oppressed person, it’s quite strange, especially for someone who preaches the gospel of love, for someone like to be a deceiver of sorts, doesn’t suprise me.
no, I know nothing about gnosticism. I use the term monads to mean that we are something trapped in the body, and we cannot connect to others neither in a physical nor in a mental way.

It's not that I like those who lie, I'm mostly indifferent towards them. But that's because I am indifferent towards most things that once angered me, I find it more peaceful to live.
 
no, I know nothing about gnosticism. I use the term monads to mean that we are something trapped in the body, and we cannot connect to others neither in a physical nor in a mental way.

It's not that I like those who lie, I'm mostly indifferent towards them. But that's because I am indifferent towards most things that once angered me, I find it more peaceful to live.
I respect that you know, in theory. When it comes to having set rules it’s always good to take a firm stance against those who deceive. Being a Buddhist or any other faith that lets go of anger, let’s go of emotion, is fine and dandy until a point of sedation, where you don’t care who comes in or out of this forum. What if a foid joined? Would you not care? Are you to immune to such emotion? Detached? Do you see the issue when it comes to eastern philosophy and maintaining a civil message board, things will end in anarchy if we don’t uphold some basic rules, maybe you don’t care, but I do
 
Tldnr, based on his height and skin tone he's atleast a nearcel if ugly. In case mods have doubts, he can send more evidence to them.
 
It’s a bannable offense we can verify with the mods, but if you were to successfully get laid wouldn’t that make you no by definition: no longer incel
I don't know man, you should for all intents and purposes align yourself with the official rules. I'm still in the process of drafting up the bases of a coherent system of thought to live by, for now I think if you have sex you don't necessarily ascend inceldom (rape, betabuxxing, whores) but even being married won't guarantee love, appreciation, devotion, which is (from what I can observe, I may be wrong about it) more important than sex to many here (not saying sex is not important, sex is a fundamental need of humans, but love seems to be even more important). That would definitely enlarge the definition of inceldom which I don't think is a good thing because if everyone is an incel, then no one is, but I really cannot find a way to reconcile people in relationships with women that don't love them, don't respect them, and don't care about them, people who pay for sex because they can't get it otherwise, and incels. I think that even if we aren't the same technically, fundamentally we all lack that one thing. you can call me gray, stupid or crazy.
 
I respect that you know, in theory. When it comes to having set rules it’s always good to take a firm stance against those who deceive. Being a Buddhist or any other faith that lets go of anger, let’s go of emotion, is fine and dandy until a point of sedation, where you don’t care who comes in or out of this forum. What if a foid joined? Would you not care? Are you to immune to such emotion? Detached? Do you see the issue when it comes to eastern philosophy and maintaining a civil message board, things will end in anarchy if we don’t uphold some basic rules, maybe you don’t care, but I do
well I didn't say that I'd allow people who are not incels into the forum, if I had the power. I said that if any one of the members here was exposed as not being an incel, I wouldn't be angry, just slightly confused because who in the world would want to larp as an incel? I also understand pragmatism, I don't want to reform the forum, those are just my personal opinions and views. Also I'm not a Buddhist, nor do I have faith in anything. Maybe what I feel is apathy, or maybe not, because I still feel sadness, nostalgia, grief, loneliness, and sometimes envy, but also joy in the hobbies and projects I partake in. But I genuinely don't have faith in anything, I try to apply logic and reason to guide me in my life, so I guess in a way you could call me a stoic, but I have some qualms with stoic metaphysics, I'd say I'm closer to Lucretian Epicureanism in that regard, I do think ataraxia and apoenia are things to strive for and reach in our lifetimes, and the lathe biosas is certainly better than jestermaxxing and whatnot. But I also wouldn't say I adhere strictly to one school of thought, I instead try to mix my own observations with other currents and find out if adding some thing or another allows my system to remain coherent or not.

Excuse the wordiness.
 
Tldnr, based on his height and skin tone he's atleast a nearcel if ugly. In case mods have doubts, he can send more evidence to them.
TL;DR yourself.


Height and skin tone don’t erase the screenshots. Silentium openly said,
And I quote:

“Well I plan to marry a girl… or a girl from Vanuatu once I move over.”

Building a house there. “I have a year or so before I move.” Visa timeline. Younger than 18 hopefully. No pierced ears. Whites get treated better and it would be easy.”

That’s not “nearcel coping.” That’s active geomaxxing logistics with money and time already invested. You yourself got called out by Ryo for defending the wonkycliff troll with the same “but he looks truecel tho” You clearly haven’t learnt from your past mistake, your exactly what @Ryo_Hazuki warned of
 
well I didn't say that I'd allow people who are not incels into the forum, if I had the power. I said that if any one of the members here was exposed as not being an incel, I wouldn't be angry, just slightly confused because who in the world would want to larp as an incel? I also understand pragmatism, I don't want to reform the forum, those are just my personal opinions and views. Also I'm not a Buddhist, nor do I have faith in anything. Maybe what I feel is apathy, or maybe not, because I still feel sadness, nostalgia, grief, loneliness, and sometimes envy, but also joy in the hobbies and projects I partake in. But I genuinely don't have faith in anything, I try to apply logic and reason to guide me in my life, so I guess in a way you could call me a stoic, but I have some qualms with stoic metaphysics, I'd say I'm closer to Lucretian Epicureanism in that regard, I do think ataraxia and apoenia are things to strive for and reach in our lifetimes, and the lathe biosas is certainly better than jestermaxxing and whatnot. But I also wouldn't say I adhere strictly to one school of thought, I instead try to mix my own observations with other currents and find out if adding some thing or another allows my system to remain coherent or not.

Excuse the wordiness.

This is a metaphysical crime scene at this point.

Your wordiness is excused. What isn’t is your fence-sitting position that refuses to take a side.

You said: “If any one of the members here was exposed as not being an incel, I wouldn’t be angry, just slightly confused because who in the world would want to larp as an incel?”

Exactly. Your mere indifference is what allows the larpers and fakecels that plague this forum day by day.

I don’t think you’re stupid, gray, or whatever — you’re just indifferent to the real issues we face as a community. This place was founded on pragmatism. Without enforced rules and standards it devolves into chaos and degeneracy. There’s a reason foids and gays aren’t allowed. There’s a reason fakecels shouldn’t be either. This is a small subculture corner for actual incels. Fakecels have the whole world to exploit — we only have this.

You don’t have faith in anything? Fair. But that just makes you a fence-sitter who can’t commit to any ideology or take a real stance when it matters. Indifference might bring you personal peace, but it weakens the forum. His geomaxxing treachery is still present, whether your indifferent or plain angry, being pseudo philosophical about it doesn’t change the facts of the matter, and another thing, where do you have your presuppositions of what should or shouldn’t be allowed if you have no faith in anything at all!







How do you know all of this is infallible or if your logic or reason make sense, you don’t know what to believe in as you lack genuine faith in anything, th philosophy you DO believe in your only In halfway, this is the issue, spineless centrism. Spinelessness which if you were allowed to use as a moderator would destroy the forum and usher in the gates of hell, a hellish hordes of fakecels, foids, gays and the like. We HAVE to be pragmatic about these things
 
This is a metaphysical crime scene at this point.

Your wordiness is excused. What isn’t is your fence-sitting position that refuses to take a side.

You said: “If any one of the members here was exposed as not being an incel, I wouldn’t be angry, just slightly confused because who in the world would want to larp as an incel?”

Exactly. Your mere indifference is what allows the larpers and fakecels that plague this forum day by day.

I don’t think you’re stupid, gray, or whatever — you’re just indifferent to the real issues we face as a community. This place was founded on pragmatism. Without enforced rules and standards it devolves into chaos and degeneracy. There’s a reason foids and gays aren’t allowed. There’s a reason fakecels shouldn’t be either. This is a small subculture corner for actual incels. Fakecels have the whole world to exploit — we only have this.

You don’t have faith in anything? Fair. But that just makes you a fence-sitter who can’t commit to any ideology or take a real stance when it matters. Indifference might bring you personal peace, but it weakens the forum. His geomaxxing treachery is still present, whether your indifferent or plain angry, being pseudo philosophical about it doesn’t change the facts of the matter, and another thing, where do you have your presuppositions of what should or shouldn’t be allowed if you have no faith in anything at all!







How do you know all of this is infallible or if your logic or reason make sense, you don’t know what to believe in as you lack genuine faith in anything, th philosophy you DO believe in your only In halfway, this is the issue, spineless centrism. Spinelessness which if you were allowed to use as a moderator would destroy the forum and usher in the gates of hell, a hellish hordes of fakecels, foids, gays and the like. We HAVE to be pragmatic about these things
erm, have you read my messages? Your entire message implies heavily that one cannot have bases for thoughts without adhering to an ideology, ergo act tribalistic and without capability for detached analysis. Sad that something as promising as "scientific blackpill" gets hijacked by some gray and interpreted to mean "act tribal or you're a fence-sitter". Furthermore, you greatly misrepresent my words. As I said already, I don't want to allow outsiders, I merely state the obvious: I have no power over who joins in, so once people are exposed for not being incels and lying, I move on as if nothing happened. I never even implied to be indifferent to the real pain incels feel, however I do think you do the moment you try to witch-hunt people for a few sentences they've typed up which may be indicators of them not being an incel, by your arbitrary metric, which again, doesn't appear to be explicitly corroborated by the forum rules.

Not having faith doesn't mean I'm a "fence-sitter" that can't take stances, simply I am not guided by tribalistic ideologies that use their adherents as marionettes, but I am guided by logic and rationality. I try to live life by primarily thinking, not feeling. Committing to ideologies isn't a sign of intellectual superiority, or pragmatic superiority, if anything it's a sign that one does not wish to live by oneself, outsourcing one's thought processes to pre-established, cookie cutter, unidimensional modalities of interpreting reality.

As I said already, twice I believe, I don't make the rules, and for all intents and purposes, one should abide by the forum rules. However, that does not preclude me from thinking about things. You seem to take the blackpill as a dogma of sorts, when in reality it is nothing but some very real empirical observations, backed by "research" in social """sciences""" (I have many qualms with social """sciences"""), but that is it. I don't have presuppositions, as you correctly point out, because having presuppositions is in direct contradiction with cold analysis through logic.

I never stated anything is infallible. If anything, I was very careful to explain how this forum cannot be infallible as it is set up in a way that allows anyone to conjure up stories and be admitted. You can only know if others are incels based on faith and faith alone.

You have run a great deal of semantic analysis in your OP, only to fall short here. Me not having faith in anything implies that I do not believe in philosophical ways of thinking, neither fully nor half-way. I have expressed my opinions on two of the major post-Alexander hellenistic schools of thought, based on my observations and logic derived from my position in the social ladder.

It is not that I do not know what to believe in, as you say; rather, I choose to not believe in order to develop my own thoughts based on analysis and logical deduction, and not be limited by ideologies or as such. Faith is not a prerequisite for thought, nor for existence.

A shame that you turn out to be just another gray: uninterested in arriving closer to truth, repeating slogans, and here just to sow division.
 
erm, have you read my messages? Your entire message implies heavily that one cannot have bases for thoughts without adhering to an ideology, ergo act tribalistic and without capability for detached analysis. Sad that something as promising as "scientific blackpill" gets hijacked by some gray and interpreted to mean "act tribal or you're a fence-sitter". Furthermore, you greatly misrepresent my words. As I said already, I don't want to allow outsiders, I merely state the obvious: I have no power over who joins in, so once people are exposed for not being incels and lying, I move on as if nothing happened. I never even implied to be indifferent to the real pain incels feel, however I do think you do the moment you try to witch-hunt people for a few sentences they've typed up which may be indicators of them not being an incel, by your arbitrary metric, which again, doesn't appear to be explicitly corroborated by the forum rules.

Not having faith doesn't mean I'm a "fence-sitter" that can't take stances, simply I am not guided by tribalistic ideologies that use their adherents as marionettes, but I am guided by logic and rationality. I try to live life by primarily thinking, not feeling. Committing to ideologies isn't a sign of intellectual superiority, or pragmatic superiority, if anything it's a sign that one does not wish to live by oneself, outsourcing one's thought processes to pre-established, cookie cutter, unidimensional modalities of interpreting reality.

As I said already, twice I believe, I don't make the rules, and for all intents and purposes, one should abide by the forum rules. However, that does not preclude me from thinking about things. You seem to take the blackpill as a dogma of sorts, when in reality it is nothing but some very real empirical observations, backed by "research" in social """sciences""" (I have many qualms with social """sciences"""), but that is it. I don't have presuppositions, as you correctly point out, because having presuppositions is in direct contradiction with cold analysis through logic.

I never stated anything is infallible. If anything, I was very careful to explain how this forum cannot be infallible as it is set up in a way that allows anyone to conjure up stories and be admitted. You can only know if others are incels based on faith and faith alone.

You have run a great deal of semantic analysis in your OP, only to fall short here. Me not having faith in anything implies that I do not believe in philosophical ways of thinking, neither fully nor half-way. I have expressed my opinions on two of the major post-Alexander hellenistic schools of thought, based on my observations and logic derived from my position in the social ladder.

It is not that I do not know what to believe in, as you say; rather, I choose to not believe in order to develop my own thoughts based on analysis and logical deduction, and not be limited by ideologies or as such. Faith is not a prerequisite for thought, nor for existence.

A shame that you turn out to be just another gray: uninterested in arriving closer to truth, repeating slogans, and here just to sow division.
Spiritual pride final boss
 
@Sir Silentium @deleted dude @Chud Norris72 Still in shambles! And yet to reply. Pack it up
 
Tldnr, based on his height and skin tone he's atleast a nearcel if ugly. In case mods have doubts, he can send more evidence to them.
It’s a bannable offense we can verify with the mods, but if you were to successfully get laid wouldn’t that make you no by definition: no longer incel
literal definition of volcel
@Sir Silentium @deleted dude @Chud Norris72 Still in shambles! And yet to reply. Pack it up

Ok contact the mods and ban me then XD

I have already made the thread that wasted 2 hours of my night because all my long time friends were leaving me for the false allegations.

But hey if you want to take it further we can have a chat with the mods through VC or DMs. This is laughable
 
erm, have you read my messages? Your entire message implies heavily that one cannot have bases for thoughts without adhering to an ideology, ergo act tribalistic and without capability for detached analysis. Sad that something as promising as "scientific blackpill" gets hijacked by some gray and interpreted to mean "act tribal or you're a fence-sitter". Furthermore, you greatly misrepresent my words. As I said already, I don't want to allow outsiders, I merely state the obvious: I have no power over who joins in, so once people are exposed for not being incels and lying, I move on as if nothing happened. I never even implied to be indifferent to the real pain incels feel, however I do think you do the moment you try to witch-hunt people for a few sentences they've typed up which may be indicators of them not being an incel, by your arbitrary metric, which again, doesn't appear to be explicitly corroborated by the forum rules.

Not having faith doesn't mean I'm a "fence-sitter" that can't take stances, simply I am not guided by tribalistic ideologies that use their adherents as marionettes, but I am guided by logic and rationality. I try to live life by primarily thinking, not feeling. Committing to ideologies isn't a sign of intellectual superiority, or pragmatic superiority, if anything it's a sign that one does not wish to live by oneself, outsourcing one's thought processes to pre-established, cookie cutter, unidimensional modalities of interpreting reality.

As I said already, twice I believe, I don't make the rules, and for all intents and purposes, one should abide by the forum rules. However, that does not preclude me from thinking about things. You seem to take the blackpill as a dogma of sorts, when in reality it is nothing but some very real empirical observations, backed by "research" in social """sciences""" (I have many qualms with social """sciences"""), but that is it. I don't have presuppositions, as you correctly point out, because having presuppositions is in direct contradiction with cold analysis through logic.

I never stated anything is infallible. If anything, I was very careful to explain how this forum cannot be infallible as it is set up in a way that allows anyone to conjure up stories and be admitted. You can only know if others are incels based on faith and faith alone.

You have run a great deal of semantic analysis in your OP, only to fall short here. Me not having faith in anything implies that I do not believe in philosophical ways of thinking, neither fully nor half-way. I have expressed my opinions on two of the major post-Alexander hellenistic schools of thought, based on my observations and logic derived from my position in the social ladder.

It is not that I do not know what to believe in, as you say; rather, I choose to not believe in order to develop my own thoughts based on analysis and logical deduction, and not be limited by ideologies or as such. Faith is not a prerequisite for thought, nor for existence.

A shame that you turn out to be just another gray: uninterested in arriving closer to truth, repeating slogans, and here just to sow division.
Everybody has presuppositions you goober tard, also your whole theory falls through via TAG arguement, maybe look into it. I would debate you further but it’s obvious your a pseudo intellectual who’s arguing in bad faith to begin with.
 
Ok contact the mods and ban me then XD

I have already made the thread that wasted 2 hours of my night because all my long time friends were leaving me for the false allegations.

But hey if you want to take it further we can have a chat with the mods through VC or DMs. This is laughable
lol it’s “laughable” please go ahead tag the mods, I don’t see why we have to conceal our chats, it’s all out in the open anyhow, your a soon to be fakecel and everyone who defends you have a short amount of time before they HAVE to disavow due to your geomaxxing endeavors, wow good job spending 2 hours refuting NOTHING I said btw. Good job, go and tag whatever mods you wish, I already have with @Ryo_Hazuki.
 
Ok contact the mods and ban me then XD

I have already made the thread that wasted 2 hours of my night because all my long time friends were leaving me for the false allegations.

But hey if you want to take it further we can have a chat with the mods through VC or DMs. This is laughable
When are you gonna try to refute my claims?
Nigga went from a big defense thread + tagging all his long-time friends to “just ban me” in one night, wild work.
Still zero actual response to the shit YOU said

“I plan to marry a girl in my specific church denomination, or a girl from Vanuatu once I move over.”

“I have been working on the build of my house in Vanuatu since July last year. I am moving here permanently once I get my work/10-year residency.”

More of your own words:


• “I have been working on the build of my house in Vanuatu since July last year. Moving permanently once I get 10-year residency.”


• “One of the chiefs said I should marry one of their girls.”


• “Whites are held highly there and it would be easy to find a mate.”
 
More of your own words:


• “I have been working on the build of my house in Vanuatu since July last year. Moving permanently once I get 10-year residency.”


• “One of the chiefs said I should marry one of their girls.”


• “Whites are held highly there and it would be easy to find a mate.”
1. Yes I have been building my house with the help of my father, and wish to move over once I get my 10yr visa approved with immigration

2. I don't know any of the chiefs lol this isn't africa it's harder than that, but still possible

3. Yes it would be heaps easier there since they are less westernised

When are you gonna try to refute my claims?
Nigga went from a big defense thread + tagging all his long-time friends to “just ban me” in one night, wild work.
Still zero actual response to the shit YOU said
I already spent 2 hours writing up my response last night if you have read it you would have understood.

Just tag the mods so they can ban me if you aren't happy with me
 
1. Yes I have been building my house with the help of my father, and wish to move over once I get my 10yr visa approved with immigration

2. I don't know any of the chiefs lol this isn't africa it's harder than that, but still possible

3. Yes it would be heaps easier there since they are less westernised


I already spent 2 hours writing up my response last night if you have read it you would have understood.

Just tag the mods so they can ban me if you aren't happy with me
I have read it and it doesn’t refute anything + your a sexhaver in the making, admit it
 
I have read it and it doesn’t refute anything + your a sexhaver in the making, admit it
Admit what haha, ask one of the mods to ban me then.

Not to be a prick, but I believe I am one of the few true KHHVs on .is - that has actually tried for years to improve their situation but have failed.
 
1. Yes I have been building my house with the help of my father, and wish to move over once I get my 10yr visa approved with immigration

2. I don't know any of the chiefs lol this isn't africa it's harder than that, but still possible

3. Yes it would be heaps easier there since they are less westernised
Do we disavow you now or after you slay?


Because your own words just now make it crystal clear:


• “Yes I have been building my house with the help of my father, and wish to move over once I get my 10yr visa approved”


• “Yes it would be heaps easier there since they are less westernised”


• “I don’t know any of the chiefs… but still possible”


This isn’t “just hope bro” or some vague someday cope. By your OWN standards you should be banned. You are actively investing time and money into a multi-year geomaxxing project. You openly believe the market will be heaps easier there, that ascension is still possible, and you’re literally building the house to make it happen.


That is the textbook definition of a fakecel / nearcel with a backup plan.


Truecels don’t build houses overseas while saying “it would be heaps easier there.” Truecels accept it’s over everywhere, universally hated and reviled by all. You’re treating your inceldom as situational (Western foids are too hypergamous, but island girls + white privilege will work). Str8 failed normie behavior with a detailed escape hatch, not blackpilled determinism.

So the real question for your defenders
( @deleted dude @elephant man @Chud Norris72 ) is

Do we disavow you now, while the pipeline is still under construction… or do we wait until you move, get the visa, and actually slay?

Because once you ascend via geomaxxing, even you said in your own threads that you should be permanently banned. The quotes are piling up. “Just ban me XD” doesn’t refute facts so I don’t know what to say about this other than it will inevitably get you banned
If you wish me to tag mods send a list, it’s like you said, I don’t know who is mod or who isnt
 

Similar threads

Rick prime
Replies
72
Views
1K
Mohamedömar
Mohamedömar
FarangInDaNang
Replies
18
Views
1K
PLS HALP ME
PLS HALP ME
L
Replies
21
Views
1K
UndeadDeadMan
UndeadDeadMan
Esoteric7
Replies
29
Views
1K
senegambianbro
senegambianbro

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top