Anybody else noticed this as well
?
Some of you have seen this thread where I linked a Twitter thread by Emil Kirkegaard, who's a very well-known "Human Biodiversity"/hereditarianism/alt-right type of a guy. Well, checking his new tweets, I found him reposting a "metastudy" proving that height almost completely doesn't matter in attracting women.
There's something inherently, absolutely hilarious about him reposting that study right after reposting a map of national IQs. He and his types are 100% convinced of hereditarianism and that most, if not all differences between nations, which nations are poor, which are advanced and so on, can be explained by national IQs, which they will fight to the death to convince you is mostly genetic and heritable on a personal basis.
And then, when you ask him about whether looks matter in dating and whether women are visual creatures, you're sure to get the typical soy, "Silly inkwell, of course not, just hit the gym and improve your personality" response.
Because that's what you'd get if you asked Sebastian Jensen, the author of the IQ map Kirkegaard reposted there. Mofo managed to write an entire essay on "Why incels should exist," while almost completely managing to not even mention looks so much as once, except to say that women care about them less than men, and only talking about le toxic personalities.
Even he himself seems to have realized that h was talking bullshit, so at the beginning he said that, when talking about "incels", he's not talking about people who can't find a partner, but those with bad relationships:
Then, there's Anatoly Karlin, a former alt-righter and Russian nationalist, currently a transhumanist only concerned with genes, intelligence, and "Elite Human Capital", who shat on basically everyone and everything on the far-right internet political scene, in his current magnum opus, "The Soypill Manifesto":
Except one group. While he shits on absolutely everyone on the right as being stupid, thugs, cucks and so on... he praises PUAs and thinks that more young men need their help now than ever before to help them with low "charisma", just like it helped him:
This is a guy who, not even when writing something called "Soypill Manifesto" is capable of denouncing hereditarianism and genes-based racial differences in IQ, and whose Twitter posts in a great part consist of shitting on third worlders dreams of having developed countries, saying that they are genetically incapable of and too stupid for that, and simping over the US and saying that it will forever dominate the world because America's whites are just so genetically superior.
And yet, when you ask him about inceldom, he either mocks non-Americans who consider themselves that, for some to me frankly unfathomable reason, not all non-Americans are slayer Chads, or he just uses it as an insult.
And, finally, when we had the Race and IQ debate thread here, UBERSOY was mentioned, specifically his hour-long video disproving an anti-hereditarian take on racial differences in intelligence... only for it to be quickly shown that he's an anti-blackpill creator who genuinely tried to repudiate the blackpill by claiming that women care less about looks than men and that male attractiveness peaks at 40-50 years old.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hq_V70cFZk&embeds_referring_euri=https%3A%2F%2Fincels.is%2F&feature=emb_title
Sure, four guys might not seem to be that many, but I haven't even been actively looking for them and those takes of theirs. For some reason, those comically mismatched beliefs of near-total genetic determinism at group level and not a single peep about the effects of looks on dating and life in general seem to be so prevalent in those hereditarian circles that you can just so happen to stumble into multiple guys saying it. Any SFcels here can give their opinion on this?
?Some of you have seen this thread where I linked a Twitter thread by Emil Kirkegaard, who's a very well-known "Human Biodiversity"/hereditarianism/alt-right type of a guy. Well, checking his new tweets, I found him reposting a "metastudy" proving that height almost completely doesn't matter in attracting women
.There's something inherently, absolutely hilarious about him reposting that study right after reposting a map of national IQs. He and his types are 100% convinced of hereditarianism and that most, if not all differences between nations, which nations are poor, which are advanced and so on, can be explained by national IQs, which they will fight to the death to convince you is mostly genetic and heritable on a personal basis.
And then, when you ask him about whether looks matter in dating and whether women are visual creatures, you're sure to get the typical soy, "Silly inkwell, of course not, just hit the gym and improve your personality
" response.Because that's what you'd get if you asked Sebastian Jensen, the author of the IQ map Kirkegaard reposted there. Mofo managed to write an entire essay on "Why incels should exist," while almost completely managing to not even mention looks so much as once, except to say that women care about them less than men
, and only talking about le toxic personalities.
Even he himself seems to have realized that h was talking bullshit, so at the beginning he said that, when talking about "incels", he's not talking about people who can't find a partner, but those with bad relationships
:Then, there's Anatoly Karlin, a former alt-righter and Russian nationalist, currently a transhumanist only concerned with genes, intelligence, and "Elite Human Capital", who shat on basically everyone and everything on the far-right internet political scene, in his current magnum opus, "The Soypill Manifesto":
Except one group. While he shits on absolutely everyone on the right as being stupid, thugs, cucks and so on... he praises PUAs and thinks that more young men need their help now than ever before to help them with low "charisma", just like it helped him:
This is a guy who, not even when writing something called "Soypill Manifesto" is capable of denouncing hereditarianism and genes-based racial differences in IQ, and whose Twitter posts in a great part consist of shitting on third worlders dreams of having developed countries, saying that they are genetically incapable of and too stupid for that, and simping over the US and saying that it will forever dominate the world because America's whites are just so genetically superior.
And yet, when you ask him about inceldom, he either mocks non-Americans who consider themselves that, for some to me frankly unfathomable reason, not all non-Americans are slayer Chads
, or he just uses it as an insult.And, finally, when we had the Race and IQ debate thread here, UBERSOY was mentioned, specifically his hour-long video disproving an anti-hereditarian take on racial differences in intelligence... only for it to be quickly shown that he's an anti-blackpill creator who genuinely tried to repudiate the blackpill by claiming that women care less about looks than men and that male attractiveness peaks at 40-50 years old
.View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hq_V70cFZk&embeds_referring_euri=https%3A%2F%2Fincels.is%2F&feature=emb_title
Sure, four guys might not seem to be that many, but I haven't even been actively looking for them and those takes of theirs. For some reason, those comically mismatched beliefs of near-total genetic determinism at group level and not a single peep about the effects of looks on dating and life in general seem to be so prevalent in those hereditarian circles that you can just so happen to stumble into multiple guys saying it. Any SFcels here can give their opinion on this
?@DarkStarDown @based_meme @Uggo Mongo @Confessor @Chudpreet @Pancakecel @Ron.Belgrade @anandkonda @comradespiderman29 @Azaylias @NorthernWind @SociallyStupid @SocialzERo @BlackCel_from_ZA @Made in Heaven @Friezacel @KillNiggers @Jason Voorhees @Biowaste Removal @supersoldier @Epedaphic
