dear god no. this is infinitely worse than foid worshipJust go back to nazi Chad worship, it's also cucked to some degree but not as bad as foid worship.
Hypocrisy (SFcels please explain) A surprising number of online hereditarians/Stormfront types are anti-blackpill
I can at least tolerate it when it's coming from someone who I share beliefs with, because then it's likely done out of misguided virtue rather than blatant contempt ala IT.
They were... (Mostly)
B
I don't know why we're taking these people seriously, tbh.
Fair enough- but myself, other SFcels, as well as other WN i know don’t give a fuck about pol as i explained earlier
SF members are delusional not a surprise
Noe-nazis are goofy feminist people who have weird mommy issues and for some reason like to play into every jewish media stereotype about them, I treat fucking juggalos more seriously then them. Conservatives are even more unhinged as they hold every single belief that leftists had 20 years ago.
That's why as far as right-wing media goes I only read Daily Stomer, because Andrew Anglin is a nigga who keeps it real on woman question and everything else.
That's why as far as right-wing media goes I only read Daily Stomer, because Andrew Anglin is a nigga who keeps it real on woman question and everything else.
It’s like being a 6’2 ricecel and being like “at least I’m not short I mog zach efron and damian kater hehe”
"america vs russia"
he's controlled opposition
Is he really
? I just checked his recent tweets out of curiosity and it reminded me of you guys saying this.
I no longer have patience for these racial bullshits from the past decade
I agree with the fact that women care less about looks than men. But he missed very critical nuance that literally every single woman makes at least one dick hard, but probably billions of dicks hard. Men's standards are virtually nonexistent. To find a truly unattractive women that no men would fuck, you'll have to search for days, and the woman you'd possibly find would have to look like a man.only for it to be quickly shown that he's an anti-blackpill creator who genuinely tried to repudiate the blackpill by claiming that women care less about looks than men and that male attractiveness peaks at 40-50 years old
Basically, as long as no browbone develops, it's really likely the woman is at least a 6/10
Men don't consider a woman's job or status. Men don't care if a woman works at Burger King or can speak Chinese backwards. Men's attraction to women is 100% looks. So it's a really good thing that men will fuck anything that barely looks female. Not only fuck, but LOVE anything that looks female.
Women consider a man's job, housing, car. Not that it will provide the man the lustful love that only a sexy skeleton/body can evoke in her, but she will somewhat consider those things.
The nuance is in the statement of "men care more about looks than women" super important to get right.
His second assertion about male attractiveness peaking when men are fat, beer-bellied, and greying and balding, is galactic cope. He wants to believe, and if you can provide evidence that it does not in fact peak with a foot in the grave, he'll deny it and get really mad, because how will he cope at 40 without faith that "it gets better bro." He will cope.
Last edited:
I've noticed it.
I find it very funny. Because the alt-right are in this state of like cognitive dissonance where they dislike the degeneracy and race-mixing that White women partake in, but they need their own White women to fuck them, so their cope is enjoyable to watch. White women, like all woman, have loyalty to only what a man looks like, so they will and do fuck attractive ethnic men. There's nothing SFcels can do to stop it.
I find it very funny. Because the alt-right are in this state of like cognitive dissonance where they dislike the degeneracy and race-mixing that White women partake in, but they need their own White women to fuck them, so their cope is enjoyable to watch. White women, like all woman, have loyalty to only what a man looks like, so they will and do fuck attractive ethnic men. There's nothing SFcels can do to stop it.
White women still racemix the least but yeah, women of all races are mostly cringe when they aren't being told what to do.
And of course most women, even many white nationalist women, would rather racemix than be with a sub5.
It doesn't beat physical attraction of course, but there's actually some proof that men do value job, money and status of women when it comes to relationships, and that they just underrate how much they care about it, similarly to how women downplay how much they care about looks:
A worldwide 2024 study showing the differences between what people say they want and what they actually want in a partner
So, I just noticed this chart on Twitter, showing the differences between how much people SAY they want in a partner, and what they ACTUALLY want: View: https://x.com/Noahpinion/status/1814349987276538030#m Obviously, this intrigued me, since I'm always looking for more stuff that confirms...
incels.is
Apologies if I seem arrogant by linking a thread you've probably already seen, it's just to prove my point
.Exactly
.Reminder that in this street harrassment study, women in their 30s were even more disgusted by a harrasser being older than by him being ugly:
They're still normies. Obviously, those with a normie lens cannot comprehend the black pill fully (even if they claim to fully accept it, which is usually false).
Funnily, I remember coming across one guy that views himself as "third positionist" (a fascist variant ideology). When someone asked him of how male loneliness or inceldom will be dealt with, the third positionist guy said it doesn't matter because there are already plenty of people having sex and that could still contribute to raising the birthrates. If no man was left with anything, obviously, he'd become frustrated. There were situations like this in the middle-ages, that led to villages even getting burnt over this sort of stuff.
There's a chunk of that view women as possibly allies and they don't want to seperate or delineate women from their movement.
A lot of them are just frauds that don't know what they're talking about. It's best if they just leave the topic alone, they won't understand or get it anyway.
Funnily, I remember coming across one guy that views himself as "third positionist" (a fascist variant ideology). When someone asked him of how male loneliness or inceldom will be dealt with, the third positionist guy said it doesn't matter because there are already plenty of people having sex and that could still contribute to raising the birthrates. If no man was left with anything, obviously, he'd become frustrated. There were situations like this in the middle-ages, that led to villages even getting burnt over this sort of stuff.
There's a chunk of that view women as possibly allies and they don't want to seperate or delineate women from their movement.
A lot of them are just frauds that don't know what they're talking about. It's best if they just leave the topic alone, they won't understand or get it anyway.
Last edited:
Good answer
.Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
