IncelCatechumen
Self-banned
-
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2021
- Posts
- 1,332
There is no structural difference. Sexual dynamics are not outside of power dynamics and sex is not a sacrosanct enigma that shouldn't be analyzed. Pure anti-intellectualism.
lol he’s probably a retarded manlet broOk and? Could you better explicate your argument, I am not percieving a pattern between your claim about sex being absolved from analysis and sexual/power dynamics.
What are you arguing for exactly, and what against?
The handsome ones get girls, stop copping ugly fuckThere is no structural difference. Sexual dynamics are not outside of power dynamics and sex is not a sacrosanct enigma that shouldn't be analyzed. Pure anti-intellectualism.
high iqyour analogy is shit, my friend. there's no equivalent to affirmative action in dating. no one throws pussy at manlets simply because they're manlets. fuck your analogy, fuck jannies fuck trannies and fuck *******
More apt analogy would be autistic males getting dates
If theyre not too autistic, its easier, or if theyre more facially attractive its easier
The same way short men get more dates if theyre not too short, or if they have good feautures
Neither are likely to do well in dating
Like i said, if theyre more facially attractive its easier. But i would say that autism is definitely a deficit in dating, depending on severitywomen really doesn't care whether you have deficits to properly assess fine-tuned micro-mannerisms and alike social-cues or not.
It can be extended to incels, I used manlet bc i was drunk.there are manlets that are facially attractive though, so I'm not understanding your line of reasoning.
It can be extended to incels, I used manlet bc i was drunk.
I´m referring to the typical response towards incel "i know this ugly guy who´s a slayer"