Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Saudi "FUCKING" ARABIA becoming cucked. (Potential jail for winking at the opposite gender)

NEETAndTidy

NEETAndTidy

STRIKE FIRST. STRIKE HARD. NO MERCY. COBRA KAIcel
-
Joined
May 20, 2018
Posts
15,731
THE SIMULATION IS IN ITS FINAL DAYS


93384
 
You can thank (((western influence))) for this
 
Based. It is banned but not for bad reason. :feelsthink::feelsthink::feelsthink:
 
I'm guessing it's to prevent infidelity?
 
I'm guessing it's to prevent infidelity?
It seems to be a way to make people avoid all contact outside of marriage. But "men would be punished worse"
 
This is to prevent degeneracy
If it only applied to women. But it not only applies to met but men would get stiffer penalties
 
Iran save us, the Saudis are western pigs.
 
The West degeneracy is coming. Get ready.
 
TBH the Islamic world is cucked because they still see foids as deserving protection. They’re still bluepilled.

No country in the world is blackpilled. Cope if you think other countries are better than the west.
 
If it only applied to women. But it not only applies to met but men would get stiffer penalties
Wtf? Do you really think men arent capable of degeneracy? It should be applied to both with an even punishment. I guess you could call me a feminist when it comes to legal repercussions.
 
Wtf? Do you really think men arent capable of degeneracy? It should be applied to both with an even punishment. I guess you could call me a feminist when it comes to legal repercussions.
:bluepill::soy::bluepill::soy::bluepill::soy:
Men are MEN we deserve the ability to flirt with and claim women. Women dont deserve such power.
 
:bluepill::soy::bluepill::soy::bluepill::soy:
Men are MEN we deserve the ability to flirt with and claim women. Women dont deserve such power.
Its cucked to hate how foids always get shorter and easier punishments then men and to advocate for equal punishment for the same crime? And by that logic nothing changes, Chads approach foids and slay we approach and they walk away.
 
Its cucked to hate how foids always get shorter and easier punishments then men and to advocate for equal punishment for the same crime? And by that logic nothing changes, Chads approach foids and slay we approach and they walk away.
In a society where women have no power saying no isnt wise.

And you clearly didnt read the article. Men would be charged heavier than women
 
Chanty Binx would like it in Saudi Arabia.
 
In a society where women have no power saying no isnt wise.

And you clearly didnt read the article. Nen would be charged heavier than women
I didnt, but my point still stands IM ADVOCATING FOR THE SAME PUNISHMENT.
 

I don't see how this is cucked, this is to prevent degeneracy

>Inb4 - "well why isn't it applied to women"

1. Men are more likely to "catcall", "wink", "etc", in fact I have NEVER seen a woman cat call at a man I have seen many men do it however, some forms of degeneracy as to be prevented at the "male end" of the issue.

2. Women in such a community are likely already to afraid to show such public examples of promiscuity like winking because they would be punished for it, especially if they have husbands or fathers present, they could possibly be killed

Seriously anybody arguing that it should be applied to women is retarded, these women are afraid to die, how many winking and cat calling bitches do you even see in the western world where they face no punishment for it.............. exactly.

3. How the fuck can you really tell if a woman is winking when she has a burka on, the entire concept of "winking promiscuously" has to do with an associated facial expression, without seeinig a woman's face, how the fuck do you distinguish winking from blinking, your entire post is grasping for straws, like you were just bored and looking for something to be outraged about and call it "cucked"

You are reaching with this post

I can fully understand why the men get harsher punishments in this case:

A man winks at another man's wife, he might just beat and/or kill her out of shame/spite or because he suspects she knows him and is cheating

Its a different dynamic, women winks at a man, nothing really happens to that man, and she gets beaten and/or killed, man winks at a woman aaaaaaand notice the trend, she gets beaten and/or killed and nothing happens to him, this law ensures that Chads (good looking men) keep their self in check.
 
Last edited:
I don't see how this is cucked, this is to prevent degeneracy

>Inb4 - "well why isn't it applied to women"

1. Men are more likely to "catcall", "wink", "etc", in fact I have NEVER seen a woman cat call at a man I have seen many men do it however, some forms of degeneracy as to be prevented at the "male end" of the issue.

2. Women in such a community are likely already to afraid to show such public examples of promiscuity like winking because they would be punished for it, especially if they have husbands or fathers present, they could possibly be killed

Seriously anybody arguing that it should be applied to women is retarded, these women are afraid to die, how many winking and cat calling bitches do you even see in the western world where they face no punishment for it.............. exactly.

3. How the fuck can you really tell if a woman is winking when she has a burka on, the entire concept of "winking promiscuously" has to do with an associated facial expression, without seeinig a woman's face, how the fuck do you distinguish winking from blinking, your entire post is grasping for straws, like you were just bored and looking for something to be outraged about and call it "cucked"

You are reaching with this post
You're actually siding with women
"Bluepillpress"
 
Nah, they aren't cucked. You are looking at the country from the feminist worldview, where men live in a happy paradise while women are constantly opressed. Men get harsh punishments for adultery as well.
 
You're actually siding with women
"Bluepillpress"

I'm siding with a logical laws of a patriarchal society, you are grasping fro straws. I would create a version of your name to indicate your lack of intelligence but "NEETandTidy" already fits. You idiots think you are going to solve degeneracy by attacking the problem only on the "female end", Chad has to be restricted too, and even more so in some cases where the women already have pre-existing restrictions.

You didn't address one point in my post you retard.

How does one distinguish a wink from a blink with a person wearing a burka, you can't see their facial expression to tell if there were sexual implications behind it. Not only that a woman winking is likely to be beaten and/or killed by male family members/husbands to begin with, there is not punishment for Chad winking so he's more likely to do it.
 
Wow. Mere words cannot describe my dissappointment. Just wow. It's truly game over gentlemen. The Jews,Feminists,Elites have won. If they can take Islamic states then it's over. It's fucking over. All I hope for is by the time the Islamic world is fully cucked is the time we're already dead, and seeing I'll have no sons, they don't have to feel the full brunt of the brutality of the west and it's influence. It's game over guys,
93397
.
 
TBH the Islamic world is cucked because they still see foids as deserving protection. They’re still bluepilled.

No country in the world is blackpilled. Cope if you think other countries are better than the west.
Tbh this.
 
Women dont wink at men

My point exactly, and even in the cases where a woman did, in saudia arabia she would be beaten and/or killed for being promiscuous. All the risk is on the woman if men (Chad's looking to fuck) are going around acting promiscuously with women.

If a woman flirts she gets beaten and/or killed
if a man flirts the woman he targeted will likely get beaten and/or killed

So doesn't it make sense to have the law target the only group who doesn't seem to be feeling any risk or fear for their actions, attractive men. This law does not affect average/below average men, its a patriarchal society, men like that have to court women the way we used to in the past.

Seriously at some point I may go muslim, if I can get into Saudi Arabia by wealthmaxxing efficiently I don't care if I have to take on a new religion and stop eating pork, those places are the last paradise for average/below average looking men who want quality wives and don't just want to settle for Chad's scraps.

You can't just attack the problem of degeneracy at the "female end" of the problem, all the idiots agreeing with this thread don't seem to get that, the women in Saudi Arabia are already under control with various laws and social norms to keep their hypergamy relatively "in check" and keep them submissive, the only enemy who can stir women up and uproot the current order in their society is attractive men, so it makes sense the government is now attacking these men to maintain the stability of their patriarchal systems.

I support this law 100%, fuck all these attractive men trying to piick up women in public with their looks, you have to play by the same rules as average and below average men, court women the traditional way, else get arrested, bravo Saudi Arabia, approach her father and get his consent to date her, stop trying to circumvent the patriarchy and attacking the holes directly :feelskek:
 
Last edited:
Saudi Arabia is a patriarchy, and a patriarchies promote equality when it comes to prohibiting degeneracy.
 

Similar threads

stalin22
Replies
56
Views
13K
Left4DeadKoala
Left4DeadKoala
YuiStillMyCope
Replies
22
Views
6K
ElTruecel
ElTruecel
GeckoBus
Replies
306
Views
122K
Jud Pottah
Jud Pottah

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top