NEETAndTidy
STRIKE FIRST. STRIKE HARD. NO MERCY. COBRA KAIcel
-
- Joined
- May 20, 2018
- Posts
- 15,731
You can thank (((western influence))) for this
It seems to be a way to make people avoid all contact outside of marriage. But "men would be punished worse"I'm guessing it's to prevent infidelity?
If it only applied to women. But it not only applies to met but men would get stiffer penaltiesThis is to prevent degeneracy
The UAE are the last bastion of male freedomIran save us, the Saudis are western pigs.
You can thank (((western influence))) for this
(((SOON)))The West degeneracy is coming. Get ready.
Wtf? Do you really think men arent capable of degeneracy? It should be applied to both with an even punishment. I guess you could call me a feminist when it comes to legal repercussions.If it only applied to women. But it not only applies to met but men would get stiffer penalties
Wtf? Do you really think men arent capable of degeneracy? It should be applied to both with an even punishment. I guess you could call me a feminist when it comes to legal repercussions.
Its cucked to hate how foids always get shorter and easier punishments then men and to advocate for equal punishment for the same crime? And by that logic nothing changes, Chads approach foids and slay we approach and they walk away.
Men are MEN we deserve the ability to flirt with and claim women. Women dont deserve such power.
In a society where women have no power saying no isnt wise.Its cucked to hate how foids always get shorter and easier punishments then men and to advocate for equal punishment for the same crime? And by that logic nothing changes, Chads approach foids and slay we approach and they walk away.
WhoChanty Binx would like it in Saudi Arabia.
I didnt, but my point still stands IM ADVOCATING FOR THE SAME PUNISHMENT.In a society where women have no power saying no isnt wise.
And you clearly didnt read the article. Nen would be charged heavier than women
I'm advocating for women being punished worse.I didnt, but my point still stands IM ADVOCATING FOR THE SAME PUNISHMENT.
Well I dont like the idea of putting my emotions into law. So fair will have to do.I'm advocating for women being punished worse.
You're actually siding with womenI don't see how this is cucked, this is to prevent degeneracy
>Inb4 - "well why isn't it applied to women"
1. Men are more likely to "catcall", "wink", "etc", in fact I have NEVER seen a woman cat call at a man I have seen many men do it however, some forms of degeneracy as to be prevented at the "male end" of the issue.
2. Women in such a community are likely already to afraid to show such public examples of promiscuity like winking because they would be punished for it, especially if they have husbands or fathers present, they could possibly be killed
Seriously anybody arguing that it should be applied to women is retarded, these women are afraid to die, how many winking and cat calling bitches do you even see in the western world where they face no punishment for it.............. exactly.
3. How the fuck can you really tell if a woman is winking when she has a burka on, the entire concept of "winking promiscuously" has to do with an associated facial expression, without seeinig a woman's face, how the fuck do you distinguish winking from blinking, your entire post is grasping for straws, like you were just bored and looking for something to be outraged about and call it "cucked"
You are reaching with this post
You're actually siding with women
"Bluepillpress"
The West degeneracy is coming. Get ready.
Tbh this.TBH the Islamic world is cucked because they still see foids as deserving protection. They’re still bluepilled.
No country in the world is blackpilled. Cope if you think other countries are better than the west.
Women dont wink at menIf it only applied to women. But it not only applies to met but men would get stiffer penalties
Women dont wink at men
This is to prevent degeneracy