Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Redpillers shame on betabucks but value men based on income and wealth

oldcel

oldcel

Overlord
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 19, 2024
Posts
8,193
Never understood the underlying logic here. All these redpill channels on youtube are all about collecting wealth and money and sport cars but isnt that just more subtle betabucksmaxxing?
Also the idea of being an Alpha male in a consoomer soyciety is just ridiculous :feelshaha:
 
Redpillers are living proof that solipsism is a mental disease. Many of them assume every woman operates on the same transactional logic they invented in their heads (which is not necessarily wrong; women are transactional, just not in the way they think), which must mean there is no difference between chad receiving intimacy, and them paying for it (but there is a massive difference, as chad gets to experience "true" desire). Many of them also refuse to acknowledge chads entirely, and they always find all sorts of ridiculous copes when they get mogged by some broke attractive guy. The whole thing is just glorified betabuxxing and female appeasement.
 
Redpillers are living proof that solipsism is a mental disease. Many of them assume every woman operates on the same transactional logic they invented in their heads (which is not necessarily wrong; women are transactional, just not in the way they think), which must mean there is no difference between chad receiving intimacy, and them paying for it (but there is a massive difference, as chad gets to experience "true" desire). Many of them also refuse to acknowledge chads entirely, and they always find all sorts of ridiculous copes when they get mogged by some broke attractive guy. The whole thing is just glorified betabuxxing and female appeasement.
Should be stickied for all GrAYcels coming here to talk about moneymaxxing or whatever they call it.
 
Redpillers are living proof that solipsism is a mental disease. Many of them assume every woman operates on the same transactional logic they invented in their heads (which is not necessarily wrong; women are transactional, just not in the way they think), which must mean there is no difference between chad receiving intimacy, and them paying for it (but there is a massive difference, as chad gets to experience "true" desire). Many of them also refuse to acknowledge chads entirely, and they always find all sorts of ridiculous copes when they get mogged by some broke attractive guy. The whole thing is just glorified betabuxxing and female appeasement.
Based :yes:
Redpillers are just deluxe betabuxxers. Relationships shouldn't require all this effort, people should naturally slide into relationships because life should just be easier and more efficient together than solo. If a relationship requires going to such lengths like having a business, several side hustles, investments, gymmaxxing, looksmaxxing, basically if you need to dedicate all of your time into the relationship, then it's not worth it. Redpillers are even bigger simps than than the typical redditor. Reddit simps are unaware, so at least they don't consciously choose to support hypergamy and other female malevolence. But redpillers are aware of the female nature, and still they choose to accept it and go along with it. Some of them are aware of chad, they know that they never will trigger that unconditional, carnal desire, and still they choose to compensate, knowing their foid's affection is fake. They know they are getting overpriced sloppy seconds after chad, and they choose to play this game because ":soy: that's what's available, take it or leave it"
 
Redpillers are living proof that solipsism is a mental disease. Many of them assume every woman operates on the same transactional logic they invented in their heads (which is not necessarily wrong; women are transactional, just not in the way they think), which must mean there is no difference between chad receiving intimacy, and them paying for it (but there is a massive difference, as chad gets to experience "true" desire). Many of them also refuse to acknowledge chads entirely, and they always find all sorts of ridiculous copes when they get mogged by some broke attractive guy. The whole thing is just glorified betabuxxing and female appeasement.
755
 
an idiom they use a lot is "high value man".... which translates as "betabuxx"
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top