I made a thread few weeks ago about how modern society brought back shame-based culture, now I want to pivot to something that I thought about for a while, how women have evolved to to fit in shame-Based cultures and why they actually hate the idea of a true guilt-based society.
A shame-based culture becomes obvious during the agricultural revolution, because the environment was unpredictable and the staple crops were usually lacking in complete nutrition. People began relying on religion and the need to make a socially stable environment, this involved turning people, particularly men, into roles rather than individuals. However, woman already had this" DNA" within them during the times of the Paleolithic. Their best survival strategy involve them fitting into a role rather than being an individual, a man with a personality, and willpower usually past his genes on, the feisty woman would likely want to hold the group back, and likely be rejected. To so women had to evolve to be agreeable and have more biased towards other women, and Morris accepting being a role rather than a individual. During the agricultural or revolution, the reason it was so successful is because women were accepting of the dehumanization of their labor and sharing a single partner in the Polo gami that was common during that time. We put negative traits towards men subconsciously because we know that they can have different traits, we usually put positive traits on women because we can't expect the level of agreeableness and predictability from their mentality. Okay, a guilt-based culture believes in personal morals, your ability to make a decision that is independent from your communities. Communities worldview and it doesn't really involve an abrahamic, faith, or any Faith other than your ability to make decisions for yourself. The reason women hate this is because messes with their evolve nature to pander to hierarchy in a true guilt-based society. There would be low levels of inequality due to law, social welfare, etc. This essentially means at low value men aren't easily cast aside or kept in their parents houses like what usually happened. Many couldn't get married during the early agricultural era because they have. However, they have the ability to influence a community and will use that power to forced women to not hold as much privilege as they would. In an unequal society. You hear a woman being liberal, socialist that or progressive, but we should know that that's mostly a facade, their ideology is very ingrained into being hierarchical, this is why they have strong ink group bias and why they like to adopt in identity for the perceived status on rather than adopting an identity for the sake of it. Woman might be for something like social democracy, but they are usually the minority, they're fine with the systems in place as long as they feel a sense of security. Men have the ability to change a social system, and they usually face opposition from women.
What a white piller can take out from. This is that we need to disassociate women from our political views, mainly because they pollute all of them. Ideology is pro men or anything like that, really. We should be focusing on minimizing male inequality. Things like social programs or lowering taxes. Generally economic stuff because mostly men dominate economics, the woman will just have to follow suit as they are programmed to. We have to like not focus on things that involve identity politics because that's really a feminine position to take because they are focused on hierarchy and stuff like that. Women can be extremely conservative, but they are also completely harmless in that they can't really understand the ideology on a deeper level as some conservatives feel they do.
A shame-based culture becomes obvious during the agricultural revolution, because the environment was unpredictable and the staple crops were usually lacking in complete nutrition. People began relying on religion and the need to make a socially stable environment, this involved turning people, particularly men, into roles rather than individuals. However, woman already had this" DNA" within them during the times of the Paleolithic. Their best survival strategy involve them fitting into a role rather than being an individual, a man with a personality, and willpower usually past his genes on, the feisty woman would likely want to hold the group back, and likely be rejected. To so women had to evolve to be agreeable and have more biased towards other women, and Morris accepting being a role rather than a individual. During the agricultural or revolution, the reason it was so successful is because women were accepting of the dehumanization of their labor and sharing a single partner in the Polo gami that was common during that time. We put negative traits towards men subconsciously because we know that they can have different traits, we usually put positive traits on women because we can't expect the level of agreeableness and predictability from their mentality. Okay, a guilt-based culture believes in personal morals, your ability to make a decision that is independent from your communities. Communities worldview and it doesn't really involve an abrahamic, faith, or any Faith other than your ability to make decisions for yourself. The reason women hate this is because messes with their evolve nature to pander to hierarchy in a true guilt-based society. There would be low levels of inequality due to law, social welfare, etc. This essentially means at low value men aren't easily cast aside or kept in their parents houses like what usually happened. Many couldn't get married during the early agricultural era because they have. However, they have the ability to influence a community and will use that power to forced women to not hold as much privilege as they would. In an unequal society. You hear a woman being liberal, socialist that or progressive, but we should know that that's mostly a facade, their ideology is very ingrained into being hierarchical, this is why they have strong ink group bias and why they like to adopt in identity for the perceived status on rather than adopting an identity for the sake of it. Woman might be for something like social democracy, but they are usually the minority, they're fine with the systems in place as long as they feel a sense of security. Men have the ability to change a social system, and they usually face opposition from women.
What a white piller can take out from. This is that we need to disassociate women from our political views, mainly because they pollute all of them. Ideology is pro men or anything like that, really. We should be focusing on minimizing male inequality. Things like social programs or lowering taxes. Generally economic stuff because mostly men dominate economics, the woman will just have to follow suit as they are programmed to. We have to like not focus on things that involve identity politics because that's really a feminine position to take because they are focused on hierarchy and stuff like that. Women can be extremely conservative, but they are also completely harmless in that they can't really understand the ideology on a deeper level as some conservatives feel they do.
