NIGGA BANBAN
IQcel |⚠️⚠️ This user is a banban nigga⚠️⚠️
★★★★★
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2025
- Posts
- 8,226
- Online time
- 7d 4h
Where I found this post
Og post:
Nature cope is hilarious. By your own logic, stuff like grape and and senseless murder is justified as it's part of the nature as well.
Just because men overrate women, doesn't mean they're actually hot.
No they're not. They're gonna create the same average male which you complain about.
Og post:
Skip to main contentThere's no such thing as a "looksmatch". Don't let ugly men make you feel bad about your high standards or shame you into dating them! : r/FemaleDatingStrategy
Go to FemaleDatingStrategy
r/FemaleDatingStrategy6y ago
wolfthewoman
But when it's a man with the same mindset, he's told to shut the fuck up and scramble for what he could get. That he doesn't deserve to get a better looking woman.There's no such thing as a "looksmatch". Don't let ugly men make you feel bad about your high standards or shame you into dating them!
Most women are really short, ugly, neurotic and fat. 80% of women should have not reproduced AT ALL either. They're also ironically ones who created these "Incels" with their dysgenic looks. Most of them were one chromosome away from becoming the said Incels they complain about. What does that say about your genetics? If you were truly as genetically blessed as you implied yourself to be, you would've been both good looking as a male and a woman.MGTOWs, incels, and other low value males always complain about women being hypergamous and dating outside of their league. They claim that average looking and below average looking women should not chase after "Chads" and should instead date their looksmatches. The thing is, however, that a looksmatch does not exist!
A large percentage of men are genetic garbage that should NEVER pass on their genes.
I know that sounds harsh, but don't blame me, blame mother nature! In nature, only a small percentage of males get to pass on their genes. This can be examined throughout most species of animals, and humans are no exception. Women are biologically programmed to only be attracted to a small percentage of men. Meanwhile, men are biologically programmed to be attracted to most women.
Nature cope is hilarious. By your own logic, stuff like grape and and senseless murder is justified as it's part of the nature as well.
What kind of retarded nonsense is this? Looks aren't subjective. They are objective. Just because you don't find an objectively average looking male attractive does not mean he's ugly or a genetic defect. It means you're a fucking narcissist who thinks she's better than anyone and justified her shitty behavior by using nature. Oh yeah, but when it comes to things opposing your interests like not giving women rights, controlling them, and all other things which were part of our evolution, then it's something that needs to reform and not an excuse to justify your behavior. I remember scrolling through TikTok and seeing women fix racist art and shit, crying how it's not justified to be a racist, but being heighteist, lookist totally A-Ok and not immoral because it's part of "muh nature".Different studies confirm this. Women rate 80% of men as being below average looking, while men rate about 60% of women as attractive. Therefore, men and women can never be truly looksmatched.
Just because men overrate women, doesn't mean they're actually hot.
Yes, but that is because men are lenient and don't have self respect. Again, looks are objective. Nature created perfect ratios for us to follow. All of us, by our own biology, can identify a good looking face form a bad one in less than a millisecond.Men and women cannot be compared by their 1-10 ratings since a low rated woman will always have a higher SMV than a low rated man. Men and women can only be compared by their SMVs. Since 60% of women are considered attractive by most men, this means that they can be compared to the top 20% of men that women find attractive.
This is why it's not uncommon to see "Chads" dating women that are less attractive than them. This is because men are attracted to most women and are therefore likely to rate women higher than we rate them.
That is literally the problem. Cucks and simps letting bitches like you run around thinking you deserve everything because you can get passed through by different good looking men. And no, that's not a justification. Just because men are willing to sleep with you, doesn't mean your genes are pass worthy. Men have higher libidos so of course they'd fuck anything that moves. Having sex on it's own does not mean everytime that a person is fit to pass on their genes, otherwise there wouldn't have been this many incels running around. Do you think a rapist, a low IQ thug, child molester, a criminal and others are then fit to pass on their genes if they can easily have access to sex?For example, I've had many male friends rate completely average looking women as being 9's or 10's. Most men have no idea what a true "10" is. A 6/10 woman who is relatively young, fit, and well put together will get a man's dick just as hard as a 10/10 woman. So in the Chad's eyes, a 6/10 woman has just as much value as a more attractive woman.
Because of this, there is nothing wrong with women being hypergamous and trying to date better looking men.
If an average looking woman can get a good looking man aroused, then they are compatible. If an average or ugly male cannot get an average looking woman aroused, they are incompatible. It's that simple.
No they're not. They're gonna create the same average male which you complain about.
Cope. It's all about looks. No one lowers down their standards, unless they want money or fame.Now what does this mean? Should women never give average or below average looking males a chance? Not necessarily. Looks aren't the only thing that matters. More important factors also come into play such as personality, common interests, intelligence, financial success, etc. Whether a woman decides to give a less attractive man a chance, however, is entirely up to her. If a woman chooses to lower her physical standards, it should be because she likes a man's personality and feels he has other good traits that make up for his looks. It shouldn't be because she was shamed or guilted into it. It shouldn't be because she has low self esteem and thinks that's the best she can do. It shouldn't be because she feels bad for a man and wants to be charitable.
High value man=has money to support your leech lifestyle.If you're going to give an average or ugly man a chance, do it because YOU WANT TO and because he is a HIGH VALUE MALE who has everything else going for him besides his looks.
But always remember: your standards are valid and you are entitled to them! Never feel obligated to give a man a chance for any reason!
Last edited:





