Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

TeeHee "There's no such thing as a "looksmatch". Don't let ugly men make you feel bad about your high standards or shame you into dating them!"

NIGGA BANBAN

NIGGA BANBAN

IQcel |⚠️⚠️ This user is a banban nigga⚠️⚠️
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 6, 2025
Posts
8,226
Online time
7d 4h
Where I found this post


Og post:


Skip to main contentThere's no such thing as a "looksmatch". Don't let ugly men make you feel bad about your high standards or shame you into dating them! : r/FemaleDatingStrategy












Go to FemaleDatingStrategy
r/FemaleDatingStrategy6y ago
wolfthewoman


There's no such thing as a "looksmatch". Don't let ugly men make you feel bad about your high standards or shame you into dating them!​

But when it's a man with the same mindset, he's told to shut the fuck up and scramble for what he could get. That he doesn't deserve to get a better looking woman.
MGTOWs, incels, and other low value males always complain about women being hypergamous and dating outside of their league. They claim that average looking and below average looking women should not chase after "Chads" and should instead date their looksmatches. The thing is, however, that a looksmatch does not exist!
A large percentage of men are genetic garbage that should NEVER pass on their genes.
Most women are really short, ugly, neurotic and fat. 80% of women should have not reproduced AT ALL either. They're also ironically ones who created these "Incels" with their dysgenic looks. Most of them were one chromosome away from becoming the said Incels they complain about. What does that say about your genetics? If you were truly as genetically blessed as you implied yourself to be, you would've been both good looking as a male and a woman.

I know that sounds harsh, but don't blame me, blame mother nature! In nature, only a small percentage of males get to pass on their genes. This can be examined throughout most species of animals, and humans are no exception. Women are biologically programmed to only be attracted to a small percentage of men. Meanwhile, men are biologically programmed to be attracted to most women.

Nature cope is hilarious. By your own logic, stuff like grape and and senseless murder is justified as it's part of the nature as well.
Different studies confirm this. Women rate 80% of men as being below average looking, while men rate about 60% of women as attractive. Therefore, men and women can never be truly looksmatched.
What kind of retarded nonsense is this? Looks aren't subjective. They are objective. Just because you don't find an objectively average looking male attractive does not mean he's ugly or a genetic defect. It means you're a fucking narcissist who thinks she's better than anyone and justified her shitty behavior by using nature. Oh yeah, but when it comes to things opposing your interests like not giving women rights, controlling them, and all other things which were part of our evolution, then it's something that needs to reform and not an excuse to justify your behavior. I remember scrolling through TikTok and seeing women fix racist art and shit, crying how it's not justified to be a racist, but being heighteist, lookist totally A-Ok and not immoral because it's part of "muh nature".

Just because men overrate women, doesn't mean they're actually hot.
Men and women cannot be compared by their 1-10 ratings since a low rated woman will always have a higher SMV than a low rated man. Men and women can only be compared by their SMVs. Since 60% of women are considered attractive by most men, this means that they can be compared to the top 20% of men that women find attractive.
This is why it's not uncommon to see "Chads" dating women that are less attractive than them. This is because men are attracted to most women and are therefore likely to rate women higher than we rate them.
Yes, but that is because men are lenient and don't have self respect. Again, looks are objective. Nature created perfect ratios for us to follow. All of us, by our own biology, can identify a good looking face form a bad one in less than a millisecond.
For example, I've had many male friends rate completely average looking women as being 9's or 10's. Most men have no idea what a true "10" is. A 6/10 woman who is relatively young, fit, and well put together will get a man's dick just as hard as a 10/10 woman. So in the Chad's eyes, a 6/10 woman has just as much value as a more attractive woman.
Because of this, there is nothing wrong with women being hypergamous and trying to date better looking men.
That is literally the problem. Cucks and simps letting bitches like you run around thinking you deserve everything because you can get passed through by different good looking men. And no, that's not a justification. Just because men are willing to sleep with you, doesn't mean your genes are pass worthy. Men have higher libidos so of course they'd fuck anything that moves. Having sex on it's own does not mean everytime that a person is fit to pass on their genes, otherwise there wouldn't have been this many incels running around. Do you think a rapist, a low IQ thug, child molester, a criminal and others are then fit to pass on their genes if they can easily have access to sex?

If an average looking woman can get a good looking man aroused, then they are compatible. If an average or ugly male cannot get an average looking woman aroused, they are incompatible. It's that simple.

No they're not. They're gonna create the same average male which you complain about.
Now what does this mean? Should women never give average or below average looking males a chance? Not necessarily. Looks aren't the only thing that matters. More important factors also come into play such as personality, common interests, intelligence, financial success, etc. Whether a woman decides to give a less attractive man a chance, however, is entirely up to her. If a woman chooses to lower her physical standards, it should be because she likes a man's personality and feels he has other good traits that make up for his looks. It shouldn't be because she was shamed or guilted into it. It shouldn't be because she has low self esteem and thinks that's the best she can do. It shouldn't be because she feels bad for a man and wants to be charitable.
Cope. It's all about looks. No one lowers down their standards, unless they want money or fame.

If you're going to give an average or ugly man a chance, do it because YOU WANT TO and because he is a HIGH VALUE MALE who has everything else going for him besides his looks.
High value man=has money to support your leech lifestyle.

But always remember: your standards are valid and you are entitled to them! Never feel obligated to give a man a chance for any reason!
 
Last edited:
No words tbh and this was 6 years ago
Foids entitlement nowadays is the same, if not worse
 
No words tbh and this was 6 years ago
Foids entitlement nowadays is the same, if not worse
They haven't changed at all. You could travel back in time to the Babylon or Egypt, translate the scripture, and they'd tell you the same thing they're talking about RN on TikTok and Twitter.
 
Where I found this post


Og post:





But when it's a man with the same mindset, he's told to shut the fuck up and scramble for what he could get. That he doesn't deserve to get a better looking woman.

Most women are really short, ugly, neurotic and fat. 80% of women should have not reproduced AT ALL either. They're also ironically ones who created these "Incels" with their dysgenic looks. Most of them were one chromosome away from becoming the said Incels they complain about. What does that say about your genetics? If you were truly as genetically blessed as you implied yourself to be, you would've been both good looking as a male and a woman.



Nature cope is hilarious. By your own logic, stuff like grape and and senseless murder is justified as it's part of the nature as well.

What kind of retarded nonsense is this? Looks aren't subjective. They are objective. Just because you don't find an objectively average looking male attractive does not mean he's ugly or a genetic defect. It means you're a fucking narcissist who thinks she's better than anyone and justified her shitty behavior by using nature. Oh yeah, but when it comes to things opposing your interests like not giving women rights, controlling them, and all other things which were part of our evolution, then it's something that needs to reform and not an excuse to justify your behavior. I remember scrolling through TikTok and seeing women fix racist art and shit, crying how it's not justified to be a racist, but being heighteist, lookist totally A-Ok and not immoral because it's part of "muh nature".

Just because men overrate women, doesn't mean they're actually hot.

Yes, but that is because men are lenient and don't have self respect. Again, looks are objective. Nature created perfect ratios for us to follow. All of us, by our own biology, can identify a good looking face form a bad one in less than a millisecond.

That is literally the problem. Cucks and simps letting bitches like you run around thinking you deserve everything because you can get passed through by different good looking men. And no, that's not a justification. Just because men are willing to sleep with you, doesn't mean your genes are pass worthy. Men have higher libidos so of course they'd fuck anything that moves. Having sex on it's own does not mean everytime that a person is fit to pass on their genes, otherwise there wouldn't have been this many incels running around. Do you think a rapist, a low IQ thug, child molester, a criminal and others are then fit to pass on their genes if they can easily have access to sex?



No they're not. They're gonna create the same average male which you complain about.

Cope. It's all about looks. No one lowers down their standards, unless they want money or fame.


High value man=has money to support your leech lifestyle.

Why do women hate blackpill and incels :waitwhat: they literally agree with us
 
Foids always trying to excuse the fact of why they are Chad only.
 
Foids love to discriminate and dehumanize men.
 
She went from looksmatches don't exist to I am not obligated to date my looksmatch, what a fucking retard
 
Where I found this post


Og post:





But when it's a man with the same mindset, he's told to shut the fuck up and scramble for what he could get. That he doesn't deserve to get a better looking woman.

Most women are really short, ugly, neurotic and fat. 80% of women should have not reproduced AT ALL either. They're also ironically ones who created these "Incels" with their dysgenic looks. Most of them were one chromosome away from becoming the said Incels they complain about. What does that say about your genetics? If you were truly as genetically blessed as you implied yourself to be, you would've been both good looking as a male and a woman.



Nature cope is hilarious. By your own logic, stuff like grape and and senseless murder is justified as it's part of the nature as well.

What kind of retarded nonsense is this? Looks aren't subjective. They are objective. Just because you don't find an objectively average looking male attractive does not mean he's ugly or a genetic defect. It means you're a fucking narcissist who thinks she's better than anyone and justified her shitty behavior by using nature. Oh yeah, but when it comes to things opposing your interests like not giving women rights, controlling them, and all other things which were part of our evolution, then it's something that needs to reform and not an excuse to justify your behavior. I remember scrolling through TikTok and seeing women fix racist art and shit, crying how it's not justified to be a racist, but being heighteist, lookist totally A-Ok and not immoral because it's part of "muh nature".

Just because men overrate women, doesn't mean they're actually hot.

Yes, but that is because men are lenient and don't have self respect. Again, looks are objective. Nature created perfect ratios for us to follow. All of us, by our own biology, can identify a good looking face form a bad one in less than a millisecond.

That is literally the problem. Cucks and simps letting bitches like you run around thinking you deserve everything because you can get passed through by different good looking men. And no, that's not a justification. Just because men are willing to sleep with you, doesn't mean your genes are pass worthy. Men have higher libidos so of course they'd fuck anything that moves. Having sex on it's own does not mean everytime that a person is fit to pass on their genes, otherwise there wouldn't have been this many incels running around. Do you think a rapist, a low IQ thug, child molester, a criminal and others are then fit to pass on their genes if they can easily have access to sex?



No they're not. They're gonna create the same average male which you complain about.

Cope. It's all about looks. No one lowers down their standards, unless they want money or fame.


High value man=has money to support your leech lifestyle.

it's like the saying "once u go black u never go back* these bitches think they are worthy of a chad just because u got fucked buy one good looking guy. you are on there verge of sub human i think it's time for u to settle down with ur looksmatch
 
Where I found this post


Og post:





But when it's a man with the same mindset, he's told to shut the fuck up and scramble for what he could get. That he doesn't deserve to get a better looking woman.

Most women are really short, ugly, neurotic and fat. 80% of women should have not reproduced AT ALL either. They're also ironically ones who created these "Incels" with their dysgenic looks. Most of them were one chromosome away from becoming the said Incels they complain about. What does that say about your genetics? If you were truly as genetically blessed as you implied yourself to be, you would've been both good looking as a male and a woman.



Nature cope is hilarious. By your own logic, stuff like grape and and senseless murder is justified as it's part of the nature as well.

What kind of retarded nonsense is this? Looks aren't subjective. They are objective. Just because you don't find an objectively average looking male attractive does not mean he's ugly or a genetic defect. It means you're a fucking narcissist who thinks she's better than anyone and justified her shitty behavior by using nature. Oh yeah, but when it comes to things opposing your interests like not giving women rights, controlling them, and all other things which were part of our evolution, then it's something that needs to reform and not an excuse to justify your behavior. I remember scrolling through TikTok and seeing women fix racist art and shit, crying how it's not justified to be a racist, but being heighteist, lookist totally A-Ok and not immoral because it's part of "muh nature".

Just because men overrate women, doesn't mean they're actually hot.

Yes, but that is because men are lenient and don't have self respect. Again, looks are objective. Nature created perfect ratios for us to follow. All of us, by our own biology, can identify a good looking face form a bad one in less than a millisecond.

That is literally the problem. Cucks and simps letting bitches like you run around thinking you deserve everything because you can get passed through by different good looking men. And no, that's not a justification. Just because men are willing to sleep with you, doesn't mean your genes are pass worthy. Men have higher libidos so of course they'd fuck anything that moves. Having sex on it's own does not mean everytime that a person is fit to pass on their genes, otherwise there wouldn't have been this many incels running around. Do you think a rapist, a low IQ thug, child molester, a criminal and others are then fit to pass on their genes if they can easily have access to sex?



No they're not. They're gonna create the same average male which you complain about.

Cope. It's all about looks. No one lowers down their standards, unless they want money or fame.


High value man=has money to support your leech lifestyle.

WELL SAID
 
The thing is, however, that a looksmatch does not exist!
A large percentage of men are genetic garbage that should NEVER pass on their genes. […] I know that sounds harsh, but don't blame me, blame mother nature! In nature, only a small percentage of males get to pass on their genes. This can be examined throughout most species of animals, and humans are no exception. Women are biologically programmed to only be attracted to a small percentage of men. Meanwhile, men are biologically programmed to be attracted to most women.
does the foid realize that men are so supposedly unattractive cuz of the genes they inherit from their hypergamous mom that was sub5?… they basically admit that they willingly perpetuate something which doesn’t have to be this way: they literally birth humans with a 50/50 chance of being desired - how vile can u be?

also to them reading this: if few men :chad:have many women - why r u mad when he cheats on u? why don’t u just accept human nature that he has to reproduce with many women, sis? :feelskek:
 
Last edited:
Women are hypocrites and entitled whores. Plain and simple.
 
On practical terms, there is no such thing as a looksmatch on 2026. Women always date at least one point higher on the PSL scale. So yeah she is right there. Not rocket science, it's water level knowledge for incels, and honestly for most people who are not detached from reality.
Nature cope is hilarious. By your own logic, stuff like grape and and senseless murder is justified as it's part of the nature as well.
If foids have standards, then evolution is doing its job. If men have standards, it's sexism and it's wrong because of gender debt or some feminist shit like that.

The funny thing about the reasoning she made is that it subtly accepts women are animals uncapable of going against their natural instincts.
 
Last edited:
FDS foids are some of the most ugly looking foids on the planet, It's insane that they believe they are genetical superior to us.
 
FDS is like the patient zero of blackpill
 
Why do women hate blackpill and incels :waitwhat: they literally agree with us
Because they hate subhumans no matter what. It's not about what we say, it's about what we are.
 
this will only get worse as time goes on. those statistics you showed will become even more exaggerated too
 
She does know that the man and women carry the almost the same genes regardless of their gender?
Also the real crime here is reading anything that a woman said/typed. Idk what i was expecting.
 
She does know that the man and women carry the almost the same genes regardless of their gender?
Also the real crime here is reading anything that a woman said/typed. Idk what i was expecting.
Redditors have a subhuman intelligence level, just as low of an iq as the person in my avi jfl.
 
it's like the saying "once u go black u never go back* these bitches think they are worthy of a chad just because u got fucked buy one good looking guy. you are on there verge of sub human i think it's time for u to settle down with ur looksmatch
Redditors have a subhuman intelligence level, just as low of an iq as the person in my avi jfl.
 
"Femcels" aren't real. All women are prostitutes.

Ref: that one who wrote all that.
 
femcels are fake.

foids are chadsexual.
 
FDS is a toxic cespool subreddit. half the members aint even real foids. but yeah water is wet, most foids cant even see their looksmatch. he literally doesnt physically exist to them.
 
FDS is a toxic cespool subreddit. half the members aint even real foids. but yeah water is wet, most foids cant even see their looksmatch. he literally doesnt physically exist to them.
99% of Reddit isn’t Women, It’s Men or Trooned out Men.

Edit: as for post, I like how they talk about Looksmatching not being real but will actively state that a Woman is out of a guys league, it’s the same shit.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top
×
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →