Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Experiment POLL: Who supports Marxism-Rodgerism?

Do you support Marxism-Rodgerism

  • Yes

  • No

  • Undecided


Results are only viewable after voting.
Incelistani resources
And one other thing I missed. Please show me again where you wrote what specifically the "Incelistani resources" include and are available to us?
 
Zeno declared that men and women were equal, and even suggested that they should dress alike. He received criticism for saying that modesty was unnecessary and that “no part of the body should be completely covered.”
Again, this is very far from modern feminism.

This is just a philosopher saying that if everyone follows "reason", everything will be fine, including relationships btw genders. Of course this never works because what constitutes "reason" has never been made clear, neither back then or more recently.

This is just philosophical speculation conducted by tiny groups of educated men with zero impact on society at large, even among the upper classes.

Of course, today people talk about this as if it had been a huge deal back then. But it definitely wasn't. All this was confidential and rather bizarre intellectual masturbation by third rate philosophers. Plato, Aristotle or later mainstream ancient philosophers never mention such topics.
 
Again, this is very far from modern feminism.

This is just a philosopher saying that if everyone follows "reason", everything will be fine, including relationships btw genders. Of course this never works because what constitutes "reason" has never been made clear, neither back then or more recently.

This is just philosophical speculation conducted by tiny groups of educated men with zero impact on society at large, even among the upper classes.

Of course, today people talk about this as if it had been a huge deal back then. But it definitely wasn't. All this was confidential and rather bizarre intellectual masturbation by third rate philosophers. Plato, Aristotle or later mainstream ancient philosophers never mention such topics.
That's how feminism starts. It snowballs from there.
 
I think one of the main things that doomed the USSR was their focus on industrialisation without a proper transition period. But that's one of Communism's faults in general.
From my personal research, it seems like what doomed the USSR is a lack of supercomputers and Kruschev secretly reintroducing capitalism by privatising tractor repair depots.
 
@subhuman @LDARbeforeROPE @Mnnn @Fallenleaves @Michael15651 @My Name Jeff @LeFrenchCel @surreal @etbrute @BlackPilledNeet @ineedassistance @Grim_Reaper @AnotherInsertCel @No_Tears @Pajeetsingh @Goosecel @Pringle @kaang @Pillow City Rev @decembrist_kirillov @ezio6 @Words2_live_bye @turbocuckcel_7000 @watcher @FrothySolutions @based_meme @NirvanaFan1988

@K9Otaku supports hypergamy and opposes monogamy because he wants to continue fucking 10/10 Giga-Staceys.

Look at this bragger:



I'm not necessarily against escortcels. An example of an escortcel thread without bragging would be that of @Incel_Because_Short . But @K9Otaku is a bragger.

This kind of bragging, but I keep coming back to this place.
 
This kind of bragging, but I keep coming back to this place.
I'm trying to convince incels to buy farmland and guns in Russia, find young desperate virgin women, marry them and enforce patriarchy and monogamy. Lock women inside to prevent cheating and divorce.

OP opposes me because he's a rich escortcel and doesn't want monogamy established.

If you think government enforced monogamy is good, vote Yes!
 
@Tarquinius Rome was founded by a bunch of incels who took women from the Sabines.

I think founding an incel community is possible. Vote Yes if you want to establish an androcentric society that abolishes inceldom.
 
@Tarquinius Rome was founded by a bunch of incels who took women from the Sabines.

I think founding an incel community is possible. Vote Yes if you want to establish an androcentric society that abolishes inceldom.
I have no clue what marxist rodgerism is but sure.
Any posts on it?
 
I have no clue what marxist rodgerism is but sure.
Any posts on it?
 
@Tarquinius Rome was founded by a bunch of incels who took women from the Sabines.

I think founding an incel community is possible. Vote Yes if you want to establish an androcentric society that abolishes inceldom.
Italy at the time was composed of small city states. Trying this same thing in a country of millions will likely end your project very quickly.
The Androcentric society must be established at home.
 
Good comedy. However, Stalin was assassinated by Beria. Warfarin, a rat poison.
Stalin was assassinated by his obsession with "The Truth The Truth" Same behavior with many of those around him.
 
Last edited:
Stalin was assassinated by his obsession with "The Truth The Truth" Same behavior with many of those around him.
His guards were changed without his input. It was an assassination. Just research it.
 
His guards were changed without his input. It was an assassination. Just research it.
Yes. And why do you think that happened? I'm saying it was due to this type of thinking: "The Truth", "protecting the truth". It's what they were all doing in one way or the other.
 
Italy at the time was composed of small city states. Trying this same thing in a country of millions will likely end your project very quickly.
The Androcentric society must be established at home.
Both Rome and Sabine were villages. I'm not advocating for 100 incels to grab guns and trying to take over a city. That would be retarded of me. I don't even think we'll need kidnapping.

Islamic terrorist groups and South Sudanese militias are already doing this. My plan's unoriginality is what makes it realistic.

The third world countries I'm suggesting already have poor rule of law and are generally not very feminist.

Upcoming economic collapse makes it even easier.

Why don't we establish androcentrism at home? The dark truth is Male Mother Need. Even many blackpilled incels wouldn't support locking their own female family members inside, let alone bluepilled incels, normies, and Chads.

Just look at how many incels are still looking for sympathy and acknowledgement from gynocentric society. Still looking for recognition of their humanity.

Men would rather cope with race and kill each other than reestablish patriarchy, including the alt-right mayocels who talk a big game but simp for white single mothers because of birth rates. Lauren Southern, etc etc.
 
Yes. And why do you think that happened? I'm saying it was due to this type of thinking: "The Truth", "protecting the truth". It's what they were all doing in one way or the other.
Enjoy being a cuck NPC who follows trends and doesn't think for himself
 
@HueyLong A chicken in every pot, and a virgin wife in each man's bedroom. If that sounds good, vote Yes!
 
Enjoy being a cuck NPC who follows trends and doesn't think for himself
See. And you cried that I was dismissing you, YET you don't recall that you began saying these sort of rude, nasty and ad hominem statements first. And yet you were upset that K9 was ruining your "fun"
 
See. And you cried that I was dismissing you, YET you don't recall that you began saying these sort of rude, nasty and ad hominem statements first. And yet you were upset that K9 was ruining your "fun"
Have fun rewriting history, anybody can go through this thread and see the truth for themselves

Your replies to Khanivore show you have reading comprehension, so the only reason I can imagine that you continue to either misunderstand me or strawman me is to troll me. Heck, you've admitted that you've been posting flippant replies as "comedy"

I'm resorting to comedy because you keep going with an idea or set of ideas which have (again) been thoroughly debunked. It's not the best behavior, I'll admit, but you're slowly becoming a clown so you get a clown in return.
 
Again, this is very far from modern feminism.

This is just a philosopher saying that if everyone follows "reason", everything will be fine, including relationships btw genders. Of course this never works because what constitutes "reason" has never been made clear, neither back then or more recently.

This is just philosophical speculation conducted by tiny groups of educated men with zero impact on society at large, even among the upper classes.

Of course, today people talk about this as if it had been a huge deal back then. But it definitely wasn't. All this was confidential and rather bizarre intellectual masturbation by third rate philosophers. Plato, Aristotle or later mainstream ancient philosophers never mention such topics.

 
Again, this is very far from modern feminism.

This is just a philosopher saying that if everyone follows "reason", everything will be fine, including relationships btw genders. Of course this never works because what constitutes "reason" has never been made clear, neither back then or more recently.

This is just philosophical speculation conducted by tiny groups of educated men with zero impact on society at large, even among the upper classes.

Of course, today people talk about this as if it had been a huge deal back then. But it definitely wasn't. All this was confidential and rather bizarre intellectual masturbation by third rate philosophers. Plato, Aristotle or later mainstream ancient philosophers never mention such topics.
Plato was a massive feminist, what are you talking about???
 
Have fun rewriting history, anybody can go through this thread and see the truth for themselves.
Look, here he goes again "The Truth"

Your replies to Khanivore show you have reading comprehension, so the only reason I can imagine that you continue to either misunderstand me or strawman me is to troll me. Heck, you've admitted that you've been posting flippant replies as "comedy"
After a while, yes but even then my replies were decent and contrite. You made yourself into a meme. And you insulted first, several times actually. I didn't troll you, K9 tagged me, you did as well, you also PM'd me saying "Why you vote No, change to yes, change etc etc"...

....So again and to quote:

[So, this is a cope, with obviously no prospects of ever becoming reality. It is just to "have fun" being just as "Marxist" as bluepiller SJWs but in an "incel way"]
 
Last edited:
Look, here he goes again "The Truth"


After a while, yes but even then my replies were decent and contrite. You made yourself into a meme. And you insulted first, several times actually. I didn't troll you, K9 tagged me, you did as well, you also PM'd me saying "Why you vote No, change to yes, change etc etc"...

....So again and to quote:

[So, this is a cope, with obviously no prospects of ever becoming reality. It is just to "have fun" being just as "Marxist" as bluepiller SJWs but in an "incel way"]
Your only problem with the system is that you won't accept your looksmatch. Standardcel volcel fakecel.
 
Your only problem with the system is that you won't accept your looksmatch. Standardcel volcel fakecel.
Or: Maybe my problem is that I would accept my Looksmatch and instead of getting a skinny gal (cause I'm skinny) I would (under you system) be given a fatty bao. A Goblina! Because your system doesn't know how to make distrubution work, it's only a "the promise of" system.

But honestly, you are truly the most fiesty relentless curry Aussie ever. I guess its an Assuie thing idk.

Even still, I don't dislike you or plot against you, we are all here together. You on the other hand call me names constantly..
 
Or: Maybe my problem is that I would accept my Looksmatch and instead of getting a skinny gal (cause I'm skinny) I would (under you system) be given a fatty bao. A Goblina! Because your system doesn't know how to make distrubution work, it's only a "the promise of" system.

But honestly, you are truly the most fiesty relentless curry Aussie ever. I guess its an Assuie thing idk.

Even still, I don't dislike you or plot against you, we are all here together. You on the other hand call me names constantly..
Australians are passive aggressive low IQ animals who either run away from debate or shame intelligence as if it's a bad thing
 
Or: Maybe my problem is that I would accept my Looksmatch and instead of getting a skinny gal (cause I'm skinny) I would (under you system) be given a fatty bao. A Goblina! Because your system doesn't know how to make distrubution work, it's only a "the promise of" system.

But honestly, you are truly the most fiesty relentless curry Aussie ever. I guess its an Assuie thing idk.

Even still, I don't dislike you or plot against you, we are all here together. You on the other hand call me names constantly..
I've already talked about face scanning AI, Blackpill departments, accountability, etc, over and over and over again. But it glances off your brain. Then you repeat the same point I've repeatedly answered.


You argue like a FOID.
 
Australians are passive aggressive low IQ animals who either run away from debate or shame intelligence as if it's a bad thing
True probably. Same with most Indian-American Brahmins. And Indian in the upper castes. Either that or they harass you about such nonsensical things. Almost like a monkey trying to steal something...kek.

Car Stealing GIF
 
Or: Maybe my problem is that I would accept my Looksmatch and instead of getting a skinny gal (cause I'm skinny) I would (under you system) be given a fatty bao. A Goblina! Because your system doesn't know how to make distrubution work, it's only a "the promise of" system.

But honestly, you are truly the most fiesty relentless curry Aussie ever. I guess its an Assuie thing idk.

Even still, I don't dislike you or plot against you, we are all here together. You on the other hand call me names constantly..
Because the assignment of foids will be an impersonal, objective, and unbiased function of the state created by incels for incels.

Fathers working in the assignment department will be legally required to recuse themselves from the assignment of their own daughters. Sons too.

The formula or process to assign women will be enshrined in law and explanations for every assignment with reference to these laws will be required in writing.

Accountability for assignment department bureaucrats will be ensured by multiple safeguards, such as:
  • Internal reviews
  • Whistleblower protections and rewards
  • Undercover investigators
  • Independent corruption watchdogs
  • Publicly available records for citizens, journalists, activists, etc
  • Periodical reports on processes tabled to Parliament
  • Legal right to dispute assignment in court
  • Political accountability from periodical elections
If members of the assignment department or people related to those in the assignment department are found to have better than average outcomes, the Federal Bureau of Incels will have the power and responsibility to investigate the matter and even make mass arrests.

If that answered your question, please vote Yes. If you have any more questions, please articulate them to me so I can answer them for you and anyone else who may be thinking the same thing.
 
I've already talked about face scanning AI.
Okay. But...that depends on software made by us. How does that not give me a fat girl?
Blackpill departments, accountability, etc, over and over and over again.
Okay. I don't know. I'm weary that the people in these departments will begin to desire and lust more and more and then sabotage one another.
But it glances off your brain. Then you repeat the same point I've repeatedly answered.
See you need to learn how to stop doing this shit !
You argue like a FOID.
I argue like the exact opposite of the typical foid. You argue like the foid who wants her jewelry in the window and is being told "no" so you resort to calling me names and shit.
 
Okay. But...that depends on software made by us. How does that not give me a fat girl?

Okay. I don't know. I'm weary that the people in these departments will begin to desire and lust more and more and then sabotage one another.

See you need to learn how to stop doing this shit !

I argue like the exact opposite of the typical foid. You argue like the foid who wants her jewelry in the window and is being told "no" so you resort to calling me names and shit.
 
You'd need to somehow many the pairing mechanism anonymous also, I'd guess.
... what? Make anonymous in what way?

We'd work like a quality government department, with privacy laws, and tracking record access to make sure interested parties don't secretly open and manipulate ongoing assignment.

Information would be made available to male applicants in layers, in steps, in gradations, etc. Generic info in step 1, name and family info in the last step. This is to prevent detective work by male applicants to select daughters of powerful men.
 
Okay. But...that depends on software made by us. How does that not give me a fat girl?
Men will be allowed to refuse the women allocated to them if they refuse before marriage. The woman will be given to the next person on the list.
 
Okay. But...that depends on software made by us. How does that not give me a fat girl?
Accountability for assignment department bureaucrats will be ensured by multiple safeguards, such as:
  • Legal right to dispute assignment in court
If that answered your question, please vote Yes. If you have any more questions, please articulate them to me so I can answer them for you and anyone else who may be thinking the same thing.
 
... what? Make anonymous in what way?

We'd work like a quality government department, with privacy laws, and tracking record access to make sure interested parties don't secretly open and manipulate ongoing assignment.

Information would be made available to male applicants in layers, in steps, in gradations, etc. Generic info in step 1, name and family info in the last step. This is to prevent detective work by male applicants to select daughters of powerful men.
Okay. But then why not just omit family details? I mean, if they don't have any family information then how can they select the daughters of powerful men?

Also, this speaks to your other question above, this is why it would have to be a completely anonymous process from your employees to the customers (low smv men and I guess all men?)
 
Last edited:
Okay. But then why not just omit family details? I mean, if they don't have any family information then how can they select the daughters of powerful men?

Also, this speaks to your other question above, this is why it would have to be a completely anonymous process from your employees to the customers (low smv men and I guess all men?)
This is a ridiculous nitpick. How is the woman going to be physically transferred between households? Obviously at some point, details would have to be shared. Preferably at the last stage.

This is textbook gish galloping.

You've literally shaken my faith in democracy. Every time I read one of your comments, I feel the need to bang my head against the wall.

I bet you're going to reply with some stupid inane retarded shit like "why doesn't the government just wordlessly take the girl without saying anything and deliver her without a word".
And if I had suggested this, you would have nitpicked by saying "how do we know who's working for the government and how do we know they won't fuck her and how do we know they'll deliver her to the right address and how do we know the drivers won't get bribed and how do we know the guy who receives her will understand she's supposed to be his wife and how do we know" blah blah blah


I bet you'll pretend that I'm seriously advocating for anonymous delivery and reply "but those are good questions and the fact you didn't answer them proves your idea is flawed"

Or maybe you'll do the typical juvenile normie response "u mad bro?" Or the concern trolling "geez you're clearly too invested in this" , oh wait you already did the latter ages ago

Did somebody ask you to troll me? Did some friend of yours asked you on discord to troll me? Or are you an asshole yourself instead of an asshole proxy?
 
This is a ridiculous nitpick. How is the woman going to be physically transferred between households? Obviously at some point, details would have to be shared. Preferably at the last stage.
What are you talking about "between households?
This is textbook gish galloping.
No. Stop using this phrase. You have no idea what you are even saying. Answer the questions or put down the Marxism-Rogerism torch.
You've literally shaken my faith in democracy.
Democracy? You think Democracy really works? Now this is Top Kek !
Every time I read one of your comments, I feel the need to bang my head against the wall.
Great! Then you know how I feel about many of your comments !
I bet you're going to reply with some stupid inane retarded shit like "why doesn't the government just wordlessly take the girl without saying anything and deliver her without a word".
This is a damn good question actually Wish I had thought of it. "Is full Silenced delivery of Marxism concubine possible" ? :feelsthink:
And if I had suggested this, you would have nitpicked by saying "how do we know who's working for the government and how do we know they won't fuck her and how do we know they'll deliver her to the right address and how do we know the drivers won't get bribed and how do we know the guy who receives her will understand she's supposed to be his wife and how do we know" blah blah blah.
sci-fi signs GIF

I bet you'll pretend that I'm seriously advocating for anonymous delivery and reply "but those are good questions and the fact you didn't answer them proves your idea is flawed".
Delivery from your Foid warehouse to my door, of course my address has to be known to the courier. Come on...:feelsugh:
Or maybe you'll do the typical juvenile normie response "u mad bro?" Or the concern trolling "geez you're clearly too invested in this" , oh wait you already did the latter ages ago.
animation sunday GIF


Did somebody ask you to troll me? Did some friend of yours asked you on discord to troll me? Or are you an asshole yourself instead of an asshole proxy?
Well I'd really like it if you thought of me as I accomplished being an "asshole all by myself" but truly I'm grateful to receive any title?
:feelsaww:
 
Last edited:
Islamic terrorist groups and South Sudanese militias are already doing this. My plan's unoriginality is what makes it realistic.
I don't know about South Sudan, but ISIS had a coalition composed of dozens of nations who stopped it.
The third world countries I'm suggesting already have poor rule of law and are generally not very feminist.

Upcoming economic collapse makes it even easier.
Yes, that's why it's even less likely. Conservative countries generally don't take kindly to foreigners kidnapping their women.
Also, there will be no economic collapse. What we're currently experiencing is just 2008 2.0.
Why don't we establish androcentrism at home? The dark truth is Male Mother Need. Even many blackpilled incels wouldn't support locking their own female family members inside, let alone bluepilled incels, normies, and Chads.
These countries probably have some incels as well, even if they don't know it. How do you think they would feel about this?
 
This thread has converted half the forum to Marxism Rodgerism. This is the biggest success of my life.
I haven't slept for multiple days because of this thread
Admittedly it started as a meme that I started taking more and more seriously
Do you realize what you admitted to in these 3 posts?

Basically that you bulshitted 60 odd simpletons into voting yes to a meme, and that this was the best day of your life (so much so that you couldn't sleep)

I don't think you realize it but this is what everyone is doing these days: bulshitting people over memes. The idiots at IT, the trans activists, the Global Warming Earth savers, The "anti-racist" SJWs, the cancelers of celebrities, every politician, every TV anchor, every pundit. Everyone is having an ego-gasm by promoting memes and no one is doing anything else.

Could we try to talk about something real for a change?
 
Do you realize what you admitted to in these 3 posts?

Basically that you bulshitted 60 odd simpletons into voting yes to a meme, and that this was the best day of your life (so much so that you couldn't sleep)

I don't think you realize it but this is what everyone is doing these days: bulshitting people over memes. The idiots at IT, the trans activists, the Global Warming Earth savers, The "anti-racist" SJWs, the cancelers of celebrities, every politician, every TV anchor, every pundit. Everyone is having an ego-gasm by promoting memes and no one is doing anything else.

Could we try to talk about something real for a change?
I was spreading Marxism Rodgerism seriously even before Braincels was banned.
 
I don't know about South Sudan, but ISIS had a coalition composed of dozens of nations who stopped it.

Yes, that's why it's even less likely. Conservative countries generally don't take kindly to foreigners kidnapping their women.
Also, there will be no economic collapse. What we're currently experiencing is just 2008 2.0.

These countries probably have some incels as well, even if they don't know it. How do you think they would feel about this?
Yeah, these are understandable views and I thought them myself.

South Sudan has no limit on the number of wives you have. Some men literally have 100+ wives. You can imagine the effects on society:


ISIS declared war on the entire world. Even without getting into morality, those idiots.got what they deserved from a game theory perspective.

Conservatives don't like it when foreigners kidnap their women. 100% . My plan works better if we DON'T kidnap women. Dead serious.

I advocate going to a country with more young girls than boys and moneymaxxing together to marry some of the excess. Kazakhstan has excess females AND polygamy/polygyny.

Lotsh of third worlders are fine with their daughters marrying a foreigner if he's rich

We can eventually recruit locals and foreigners by promising monogamy. There's bluepilled incels in Kazakhstan who would join us if we offered them a wife.

I'm trying my best to plan for every contingency, even nuclear war. Please feel free to hit me with anything and I'll respond as long as you are a good faith actor.
 
ISIS declared war on the entire world. Even without getting into morality, those idiots.got what they deserved from a game theory perspective.
Not really, they just happened to threaten the interest of some regional players. The same thing would probably happen to this hypothetical state.
I advocate going to a country with more young girls than boys and moneymaxxing together to marry some of the excess
Are you going to moneymaxx within those countries? They lack job opportunities and I doubt the elites there will just stand by while you try to acquire these resources.
In the Philippines, for example, they are already trying to stop the practice of foreigners taking women. If you get enough women to start a nation, that will definitely draw the ire of the government and locals.
 
Do you realize what you admitted to in these 3 posts?

Basically that you bulshitted 60 odd simpletons into voting yes to a meme, and that this was the best day of your life (so much so that you couldn't sleep)

I don't think you realize it but this is what everyone is doing these days: bulshitting people over memes. The idiots at IT, the trans activists, the Global Warming Earth savers, The "anti-racist" SJWs, the cancelers of celebrities, every politician, every TV anchor, every pundit. Everyone is having an ego-gasm by promoting memes and no one is doing anything else.

Could we try to talk about something real for a change?
I couldn't sleep because I was making good faith replies to everyone who brought up a point. Until I realized that escortcels are bad faith debaters. And biased against monogamy.
 
Not really, they just happened to threaten the interest of some regional players. The same thing would probably happen to this hypothetical state.

Are you going to moneymaxx within those countries? They lack job opportunities and I doubt the elites there will just stand by while you try to acquire these resources.
In the Philippines, for example, they are already trying to stop the practice of foreigners taking women. If you get enough women to start a nation, that will definitely draw the ire of the government and locals.
Russia is giving free land to foreigners. Not all incels, but some of them are high IQ, educated, have seed capital of their own.

Creating a community that enforces monogamy isn't going to be a walk in the park. When have good things ever been? Western elites, right now, are making it harder and harder to ascend. #MeToo, female quotas, welfare for single mothers, etc.

It's literally easier to make our own country with all the danger that entails than ascending in our home country.
 
The 12% lead seems pretty consistent for the last few days.
 
A Marxist-Rodgerist future will be a short-lived, schizoid-narcissist meat grinder and will give the Chad-Traditionalists exactly the pretext they need to further their plans. Marxists of every flavor are useful idiots. Unfortunately, our world is teeming with such idiots.
 
Fyi, getting a state mandated wife isn't going to cure your lack of looks or small dick. It does nothing to solve the root problem, if anything it will cause things to worsen greatly through dysgenic collapse.
 
A Marxist-Rodgerist future will be a short-lived, schizoid-narcissist meat grinder and will give the Chad-Traditionalists exactly the pretext they need to further their plans. Marxists of every flavor are useful idiots. Unfortunately, our world is teeming with such idiots.
Rome was founded by incels. Stayed around for what, 500 years? Came back again with the Renaissance, Unification of Italy, etc.
 

Similar threads

comradespiderman29
Replies
20
Views
225
Vlarke
Vlarke
comradespiderman29
  • Poll
Replies
19
Views
339
wastedcodeine
wastedcodeine
turbosperg
Replies
2
Views
478
IronsideCel
IronsideCel
Gorogorogoro-chan
Replies
26
Views
457
TheCatMan
TheCatMan
proudweeb
Replies
112
Views
4K
RegularManlet
RegularManlet

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top