This is a lie. Romulus and Remus were two teenage chads, and the founding story may not be wholly true. See Evander of Pallantium.
The Marxism-Rodgerism FAQ
What is Marxism Rodgerism? Marxism Rodgerism is the belief that incels should create a government that takes on the responsibility of abolishing lonliness, inceldom, cheating, and paternity fraud by any means necessary, including state assigned wives. Why is it called Marxism Rodgerism? I...
incels.is
The delusions of a Marxist.
Can you name any published Marxists who advocate for androcentric neo-patriarchy and government enforced monogamy? A single one?
To clarify, the Rape of Sabine occurred because they did not have women, not because they lacked in looks. They weren't incels.
It was warrior tradition back in Bronze-Age civilizations from the Mediterranean, to the Eurasian-Steppe, and to the Northern hinterlands for young boys to leave the village or farm and join a "wolf pack" where they lived as beasts and learned the ways of men. What likely happened is that the city-state or village that Romulus's wolf pack originated from was destroyed or enslaved during a raid and they had no choice but to flee to new lands by themselves.
After they settled on the Palantine hill, they realized they needed women if they wanted to create a truly self-sustaining city and start over, hence the Rape of Sabine. It didn't occur because they lacked in looks. They were Chads, hardened by years of living in the wilderness, and seized what they wanted.
It was warrior tradition back in Bronze-Age civilizations from the Mediterranean, to the Eurasian-Steppe, and to the Northern hinterlands for young boys to leave the village or farm and join a "wolf pack" where they lived as beasts and learned the ways of men. What likely happened is that the city-state or village that Romulus's wolf pack originated from was destroyed or enslaved during a raid and they had no choice but to flee to new lands by themselves.
After they settled on the Palantine hill, they realized they needed women if they wanted to create a truly self-sustaining city and start over, hence the Rape of Sabine. It didn't occur because they lacked in looks. They were Chads, hardened by years of living in the wilderness, and seized what they wanted.
They might have gotten Sabine women by being high-T, but they didn't get Sabine women by being good looking. Even if they were, for which there is no evidence I am aware of, that's not what got them women.
Where is the proof that they lacked in looks? The Sabine women defended their new Roman husbands after their fathers came looking for them. It's right there in the Wikipedia article that he cites for the rest of his video, but overlooks this point.
The Rape of the Sabine Women - Wikipedia
That could be explained by hybristophilia.Where is the proof that they lacked in looks? The Sabine women defended their new Roman husbands after their fathers came looking for them. It's right there in the Wikipedia article that he cites for the rest of his video, but overlooks this point.
The Rape of the Sabine Women - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Also, these women were no longer virgins and were pregnant or had given birth. In the Ancient world, what opportunities were left for them after losing Roman men?
A Roman woman opened the gates for the Sabines and their jewellery. Does that mean the Sabines were Chads and the Romans were ugly?
Both are plausible reasons for their behaviour.
Still no proof for incel looks. Basing your entire cause around an event for which you have to stretch the historical facts to fit your views is setting yourselves up for disaster.
You're the one stretching facts by claiming the Romans were good looking, even though they were rebuffed when nicely asking other tribes for wives, despite the Romans having land to feed children with.
Where is the proof that they lacked in looks? The Sabine women defended their new Roman husbands after their fathers came looking for them. It's right there in the Wikipedia article that he cites for the rest of his video, but overlooks this point.
The Rape of the Sabine Women - Wikipedia
Doesn't prove they had lack of looks, just proves they lacked in wealth. They were negotiating with the the fathers, after all.
Fathers choose looks over intelligence when choosing a husband for their daughter (PATRIARCHY WON'T HELP US)
It HAS to be the government assigning women, because if you let fathers choose for their daughter, they will go for looks just like the mother and daughter. Although daughters and their parents rated ambition and intelligence as the most important qualities of a husband for daughters, in the...
incels.is
You've convinced me. Let's give all of our power to the state. Nothing can go wrong.Fathers choose looks over intelligence when choosing a husband for their daughter (PATRIARCHY WON'T HELP US)
It HAS to be the government assigning women, because if you let fathers choose for their daughter, they will go for looks just like the mother and daughter. Although daughters and their parents rated ambition and intelligence as the most important qualities of a husband for daughters, in the...
Who should have power? Nature? Normies? They're the ones who made us incel.
Using power for state-provided wives is not the answer, for it does not cure the root problem, only perpetuates it.
The true solution is to use technology to eliminate incel genetics once and for all, combined with a regiment of looksmaxxing in one's teenage years.
Ok but do you realize that you are behaving exactly like a bluepiller rabble-rouse talking to his NPC crowd?
Look at this NY DA Alvin Bragg with his Trump indictment. Legally, it makes no sense at all. He did not even spell out what crime he exactly accuses Trump of (and so the indictment violates the 6th Amendment to the US constitution). But it does not matter because he is playing to his NPC crowd and they love it. As a result, he is having the best day of his life even though none of what he is doing is real (it has no chance of leading to a conviction)
Now look at you. You are pushing a nonsensical mash-up of Marxism and Incel ideology, even though Marxism has always been a feminist ideology, especially today (Frankfurt School). But it does not matter because you are playing to your (much smaller) NPC crowd and they love it. As a result, you are having the best day of your life even though the chances of achieving what you are promoting irl is zero.
ego-gasm + cheering NPCs
That is all we are capable of today, both bluepillers and us.
@suigintwo is right obviously. The "rape of the Sabine women" is a legend anyways.
However, the fact that Indo-European tribes when colonizing Italy (much earlier than the founding of Rome) had been following some variant of the Ver Sacrum ritual (or the even older Kóryos routine) is quite probable. They also probably practiced some kind of "marriage by kidnapping" on occasion, especially when they met people from a different ethnicity, but this has nothing to do with whether or not they were "ugly". handsomeness had nothing to do with who you were going to marry, back then.
Arguing that fathers choose handsome men for their daughters today, is irrelevant. In our world, with the bombardment of male Handsomeness which everyone is being subjected to, of course, even fathers, who want men of prestige for their daughters, will choose handsome men because of the prestige associated with handsomeness today. Back then, male prestige had nothing to do with handsomeness. It came from martial prowess and how many cattle one owned.
Last edited:
Thanks, I was trying to remember the name of those rites of passage. The later Spartan agōgē was a renewal of some of those earlier rituals.
@No Longer Human
Please vote Yes to support Government Enforced Monogamy
Please vote Yes to support Government Enforced Monogamy
Are you going to answer this @mlcurrycel
Why would I waste energy when I've already written the FAQ
It is not about MR, it is about you.
Imagine if we could harvest sluts clits and use them to create new foreskins for incels
Yes, only Marxism-Rodgerism can free us from the chains of inceldom.
May St. Oreoman bless you with big booty bitches
join the ghost squad.
Marxism is a foid ideology tbh ngl
B
Sorry for the bump, but 23 fucking pages for a Goddamn meme vote? Holy fucking shit. JFL
Marxism = no Louis Vitton handbags, no fakeup, no fashion stores, no Instagram Chads flying women to them and alpha widowing them
Rodgerism guarantees virgin pussy, mandatory paternity testing, and punishment for cheaters. What man could turn that down?
OP started tagging his buddies and I responded in kind.
I literally spent day and night, 24 hours a day for several days, no sleep, in order to turn the yes crowd from losing to winning
OP honestly sounds like the NPCs hes complaining about. just repeating (((CIA))) propaganda about communism and trying to diverge incels away from a common ideology
I'm not gonna be surprised if OP supports ukraine and calls russia "ruzzians" on reddit
I'm not gonna be surprised if OP supports ukraine and calls russia "ruzzians" on reddit
B
Was it worth it?
Winning felt great, but like all things, the joy slowly faded away while the exhaustion remained. I overdosed on this forum and now log in very rarely.
Every empire fell in the same way. How can they blame Marxists for the fall of empires even before Rome? Feels>Reals propaganda designed to unite mayocels against their own best friends, other incels and povvos.
OP is a rich guy who flies internationally to eacortmaxx.
I loved your posts and I heard about Marxist Rodgerism because of you. Ngl the idea of Inceldia or whatever you want to call it is one of the only hopes I have in this life.
You are an idiot. Marxism is the foundation of the Bluepill. The CIA itself is Marxist these days, dumbass. They are the new KGB, along with the rest of the feds. If you believe anything that comes from the left (like "muh CIA propaganda against commies; muh commies good"), you are the most laughable cuck
The CIA, responsible for the deaths of millions of Marxists, is Marxist? Are you fucking insane?
Institutions change. They can be infiltrated and co-opted. At the time of J. Edgar Hoover, in the 50s and 60s, sure, the CIA was anti-Marxist. Today, it is like the FBI. The feds have become super Normie enforcers. They are ultra-woke anti-deplorable cultural Marxists on the take from Hillary's secret DNC funds.
Good news, right? Glowies and their Fed overlords are on your side!
nstitutions change. They can be infiltrated and co-opted. At the time of J. Edgar Hoover, in the 50s and 60s, sure, the CIA was anti-Marxist. Today, it is like the FBI. The feds have become super Normie enforcers. They are ultra-woke anti-deplorable cultural Marxists on the take from Hillary's secret DNC funds.
Good news, right? Glowies and their Fed overlords are on your side!
there is no "cultural marxism"
it's neoliberalism and neoliberalists aren't interested in class war but to create identity politics that is created by corporations
not a single thing to do with communism, or socialism, or what not
you hate neoliberalism, not marxism
also the CIA is anti-communist still because look at how they're trying to ban the community party in ukraine and take down the communist party in china. they also fought the soviet union which collapsed in 1991. CIA is neoliberalist not really marxist
What about the Frankfurt school? Weren't they Marxist? Weren't they the origin of the Woke stuff that the establishment, including the CIA, now supports?
That is bc it is allied with Russia. Stalin also liquidated communist parties in other countries when it suited him
The CIA and the US establishment today are rivals of the CCP. It does not mean they are not on the same side ideologically. The USSR and China had a border war after the Sino-soviet split. Yet they were both Marxists
The Democrat party has been Marxist since at least the Carter years. After Vietnam, the Boomers turned the Democrat party into a Marxist front organization. The CIA (and the rest of the feds) are just the enforcement arm of the Democrat Party.
No I don't
I haven't read much about that but even then I don't see how the modern western establishment is in any shape or form linked to marxism
they do have different ideologies that contradict each other though. the US believes in liberalism and capitalism while the chinese believe in a hybrid economy with an authoritarian government. they're not similar at all
until I see they change their icon to red with a hammer-sickle they're not marxist. also again, neoliberalism isn't marxism
The elites created the EU because they were jealous of how easily the poor were controlled in multi-ethnic America. By having the underclass be Romanian or Polish, any working class movement dies instantly because of racism.
Wokeness exists because the white elites won and no longer need the white poor to conquer the world. Now the world is a playground for white and chinese billionaires. Wokeness defends immigration because immigration balances falling birth rates caused by rampant female conspicuous consumerism
He thinks Bill "Bomb Serbs" Clinton is a Marxist lmao
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
