Experiment POLL: Who supports Marxism-Rodgerism?

[Darius L]

Just a figure of the speech, a simple, fleeting joke

What time is it in rewssia?

 

[JayGoptri]

some sort of intergenerational PTSD to the word "marxism"

Funny. But it's not the case. Marxism was a failure and it's important to point that out as we try and build something else, you see?

 

[Khanivore]

What time is it in rewssia?

Depends on a region) Moscow got -3 hours from mine, and the most east region got +8 from Moscow

 

[Darius L]

Depends on a region) Moscow got -3 hours from mine, and the most east region got +8 from Moscow

Fucking russia

 

[Khanivore]

Fucking russia

Yeah, pretty much

Damn i took a chill pill, nobody can troll me now

 

[Khanivore]

Cuz i am just better than ya pussy niggazzzz

 

[K9Otaku]

What are you even trying to argue here with these strawmans? What does stalin putting men in gulags has to be with the tenets of marxism rodgerism?

Well, Stalin's face is on the banner at the bottom of @mlcurrycel's posts, for one

If you choose models like that, you have got to own up to the consequences

You appear to have some sort of intergenerational PTSD to the word "marxism" i have never seen someone cope so hard over a ideology that will essentially benefit the sexual proletariat.

Yeah, right. Just like actual Marxism-Leninism actually benefited the economic proletariat the world over?

I know you were not born when the Soviet Union collapsed, but you can read, I guess.

The memories of Soviet times are pretty well kept.

 

[mlcurrycel]

Well, Stalin's face is on the banner at the bottom of @mlcurrycel's posts, for one

If you choose models like that, you have got to own up to the consequences

Yeah, right. Just like actual Marxism-Leninism actually benefited the economic proletariat the world over?

I know you were not born when the Soviet Union collapsed, but you can read, I guess.

The memories of Soviet times are pretty well kept.

My banner is 100% serious and definitely not a joke. I am literally Stalin reincarnated. I died in the USSR and was reborn in curryland. I am here to get revenge on the Chad Beria by formenting an incel revolution.

 

[Chudis Bickle]

Alright, I'll put in my 2 cents, I've been putting off replying because I'm a wage slave. I voted against Marxist-Rodgerism because even if foids in their current state were redistributed to sub5/trucels it would cause resentment. They would find ways to make your life Hell on Earth. To me the obvious counter to this would be to create or reestablish a moral system to shame women into being monogamous. These systems were in place in the west and are back in places like Afghanistan, Iran, etc (read up on the religious revolutions that happened in these places). To me the answer is "white sharia," to steal from the Dissident Right/altright. It is correct to see our problems as inherently political. When a pro-man, pro-cel government is established it must ban social media, dating apps, porn and any material that pumps foids ego though the roof. Ironically as it stands our government already has these powers but chooses not to because we are ruled by simps and foids. In any case there will always be lonely men due to the fact that in younger generations the gender ratio is 105 men to 100 women. However our current predicament is both unsustainable and immoral.

 

[JayGoptri]

Alright, I'll put in my 2 cents, I've been putting off replying because I'm a wage slave. I voted against Marxist-Rodgerism because even if foids in their current state were redistributed to sub5/trucels it would cause resentment. They would find ways to make your life Hell on Earth. To me the obvious counter to this would be to create or reestablish a moral system to shame women into being monogamous. These systems were in place in the west and are back in places like Afghanistan, Iran, etc (read up on the religious revolutions that happened in these places). To me the answer is "white sharia," to steal from the Dissident Right/altright. It is correct to see our problems as inherently political. When a pro-man, pro-cel government is established it must ban social media, dating apps, porn and any material that pumps foids ego though the roof. Ironically as it stands our government already has these powers but chooses not to because we are ruled by simps and foids. In any case there will always be lonely men due to the fact that in younger generations the gender ratio is 105 men to 100 women. However our current predicament is both unsustainable and immoral.

Sounds way more reasonable than what @mlcurrycel started with. But can I ask, why Sharia? If there was a way to do a Christian form of berating on them, wouldn't that serve us better in the long run? The Quakers and the Puritans did not get cucked by their women. I like the idea of shaming but it needs to be done all across the board. Chad men who were true Christians usually never let their "Chadness" get out of control and turn into idolatry so in some ways the Christian sort of shaming did work well. And all things like social media and more importantly I feel, things like "Dance" and clubs and disco all need to be banned as well. Even music should be only devotional in the name of God. Basically I do think that Sharia is coming and the world will eventually become Muslim. But honestly you don't even have to believe in God as long as people follow all the Sharia rules. But, unlike with Christianity the problem of Chad-pride will likely still be there and somebody on the bottom will suffer.

All of these things are impossible to try and convince people of now days, but if things get desperate enough, it may just happen. Now that none of the believing in God stuff works anymore, we are in an unsustainable predicament, as you stated.

@K9Otaku thoughts?

 

[Chudis Bickle]

Sounds way more reasonable than what @mlcurrycel started with. But can I ask, why Sharia? If there was a way to do a Christian form of berating on them, wouldn't that serve us better in the long run? The Quakers and the Puritans did not get cucked by their women. I like the idea of shaming but it needs to be done all across the board. Chad men who were true Christians usually never let their "Chadness" get out of control and turn into idolatry so in some ways the Christian sort of shaming did work well. And all things like social media and more importantly I feel, things like "Dance" and clubs and disco all need to be banned as well. Even music should be only devotional in the name of God. Basically I do think that Sharia is coming and the world will eventually become Muslim. But honestly you don't even have to believe in God as long as people follow all the Sharia rules. But, unlike with Christianity the problem of Chad-pride will likely still be there and somebody on the bottom will suffer.

All of these things are impossible to try and convince people of now days, but if things get desperate enough, it may just happen. Now that none of the believing in God stuff works anymore, we are in an unsustainable predicament, as you stated.

@K9Otaku thoughts?

Sharia was merely an example, I used it because many countries in the ME had a backlash against western degenerate culture being introduced

However the solution must be swift, decisive and possibly bloody.

For Clarification I'm a Christian.

 

[JayGoptri]

Sounds way more reasonable than what @mlcurrycel started with. But can I ask, why Sharia? If there was a way to do a Christian form of berating on them, wouldn't that serve us better in the long run? The Quakers and the Puritans did not get cucked by their women. I like the idea of shaming but it needs to be done all across the board. Chad men who were true Christians usually never let their "Chadness" get out of control and turn into idolatry so in some ways the Christian sort of shaming did work well. And all things like social media and more importantly I feel, things like "Dance" and clubs and disco all need to be banned as well. Even music should be only devotional in the name of God. Basically I do think that Sharia is coming and the world will eventually become Muslim. But honestly you don't even have to believe in God as long as people follow all the Sharia rules. But, unlike with Christianity the problem of Chad-pride will likely still be there and somebody on the bottom will suffer.

All of these things are impossible to try and convince people of now days, but if things get desperate enough, it may just happen. Now that none of the believing in God stuff works anymore, we are in an unsustainable predicament, as you stated.

@K9Otaku thoughts?

Sharia was merely an example, I used it because many countries in the ME had a backlash against western degenerate culture being introduced

However the solution must be swift, decisive and possibly bloody.

For Clarification I'm a Christian.

I understand. Thanks for the input brocel. Btw, have you talked with @K9Otaku before?

 

[Chudis Bickle]

I understand. Thanks for the input brocel. Btw, have you talked with @K9Otaku before?

No, not really just seen some of his comments. I'm a graycel but spend a lot of time on 4chan and YouTube.

 

[JayGoptri]

No, not really just seen some of his comments. I'm a graycel but spend a lot of time on 4chan and YouTube.

I see.

Who is that guy in your avi?

 

[subhuman]

@Indari @ilieknothing @Savage @Murdoch89 @PoodankMcGee @armis @Gyros_Pretcel @mlcurrycel @IncelKing @Cannibal @Transcended Trucel @Macrocephalus @BlackPill Scholar @Wilfred @LeFrenchCel @Heartless @wei#3959 @BPJ @Rotter @decembrist_kirillov @blackpillednigga @LesscoBlob @Shrek @AsgardTheFatcel @5ft4ropeconnoisseur @subhuman @Nikalas @Pajeetsingh @Incedel @N14 @Cursed one @Spongebozz @30klhlvwizard @Kentuckycel @jeetcel @Spergz @oakhaigh @aspiringnormie

You will notice that @mlcurrycel a.k.a. Stalin's Reincarnation, did not answer the following exchange:

I will add that The Titan and Atlas programs were started under Eisenhower (who was the first to use the term "Military-Industrial complex" and voice his opposition to it), and later allowed McNamara, in the next administration to slash countless expensive programs that had by then become useless because of the new ICMBs. Notable among these was the Convair B-58 Hustler, the North American XB-70 Valkyrie and the XF-108 Rapier from the same company. Some of the biggest capitalist aerospace firms were very pissed at McNamara and so were the Air Force top brass (LeMay).

By contrast, in the USSR the civilian government was never able to resist the military's pressure for more spending because they were their only real political support. As a result, military spending kept ballooning and civilian spending shrinking.

America spends more on their military than every other country in the world combined. They start all these pointless wars for the sole sake of creating demand for armaments companies and funnel billions in taxpayer money to companies like boeing and lockheed martin.

 

[Michael15651]

ROLL OUT

 

[Chudis Bickle]

I see.

Who is that guy in your avi?

Travis Bickle from Taxi Driver.

 

[blackpillednigga]

You really want to be cucked by this guy the way Russians were for 74 years?

russia became a superpower with advanced technology, while the russian empire was a feudalist shithole. it was the only country that became just as powerful as the JewSA, and the same goes for china

 

[ElTruecel]

Holy fuck almost 900 replies

 

[Nikalas]

I will add that The Titan and Atlas programs were started under Eisenhower (who was the first to use the term "Military-Industrial complex" and voice his opposition to it), and later allowed McNamara, in the next administration to slash countless expensive programs that had by then become useless because of the new ICMBs. Notable among these was the Convair B-58 Hustler, the North American XB-70 Valkyrie and the XF-108 Rapier from the same company. Some of the biggest capitalist aerospace firms were very pissed at McNamara and so were the Air Force top brass (LeMay).

By contrast, in the USSR the civilian government was never able to resist the military's pressure for more spending because they were their only real political support. As a result, military spending kept ballooning and civilian spending shrinking.

Stop fucking pinging me mang

 

[mlcurrycel]

Alright, I'll put in my 2 cents, I've been putting off replying because I'm a wage slave. I voted against Marxist-Rodgerism because even if foids in their current state were redistributed to sub5/trucels it would cause resentment. They would find ways to make your life Hell on Earth. To me the obvious counter to this would be to create or reestablish a moral system to shame women into being monogamous. These systems were in place in the west and are back in places like Afghanistan, Iran, etc (read up on the religious revolutions that happened in these places). To me the answer is "white sharia," to steal from the Dissident Right/altright. It is correct to see our problems as inherently political. When a pro-man, pro-cel government is established it must ban social media, dating apps, porn and any material that pumps foids ego though the roof. Ironically as it stands our government already has these powers but chooses not to because we are ruled by simps and foids. In any case there will always be lonely men due to the fact that in younger generations the gender ratio is 105 men to 100 women. However our current predicament is both unsustainable and immoral.

Hey, absolutely. We will do all of that in Incelistan.

Only virgin women will be allowed to be wives. All the whores that resent us would have their hair shaven and would become disposable concubines for incels.

We will force concubines to only have daughters to fix the 105 to 100 ratio.

Check out the FAQ : https://incels.is/threads/the-marxism-rodgerism-faq.474458/post-10946061

If you like it please vote Yes!,

 

[mlcurrycel]

Sounds way more reasonable than what @mlcurrycel started with. But can I ask, why Sharia? If there was a way to do a Christian form of berating on them, wouldn't that serve us better in the long run? The Quakers and the Puritans did not get cucked by their women. I like the idea of shaming but it needs to be done all across the board. Chad men who were true Christians usually never let their "Chadness" get out of control and turn into idolatry so in some ways the Christian sort of shaming did work well. And all things like social media and more importantly I feel, things like "Dance" and clubs and disco all need to be banned as well. Even music should be only devotional in the name of God. Basically I do think that Sharia is coming and the world will eventually become Muslim. But honestly you don't even have to believe in God as long as people follow all the Sharia rules. But, unlike with Christianity the problem of Chad-pride will likely still be there and somebody on the bottom will suffer.

All of these things are impossible to try and convince people of now days, but if things get desperate enough, it may just happen. Now that none of the believing in God stuff works anymore, we are in an unsustainable predicament, as you stated.

@K9Otaku thoughts?

I've debunked Christianity as a solution to inceldom in another thread

 

[mlcurrycel]

I see.

Who is that guy in your avi?

How the fuck do you not know Travis Bickle

 

[mlcurrycel]

America spends more on their military than every other country in the world combined. They start all these pointless wars for the sole sake of creating demand for armaments companies and funnel billions in taxpayer money to companies like boeing and lockheed martin.

All to get beaten by goat herders

 

[bimmercel]

communism=marxism=jews=frankfurter schule= woman rights= feminism

Dont get fooled guys.

 

[JayGoptri]

I've debunked Christianity as a solution to inceldom in another thread.

It's not by itself, no. I didn't say it is the solution. Nobody believes in the things which made it work anymore, it's impossible. But using parts of it along with other things like the type of stuff you are trying to come up with now might help.

How the fuck do you not know Travis Bickle

I asked without carefully looking. And dude. Taxi Driver? kek. Been a LONG time since I've seen a young Di Niro.

 

[JayGoptri]

All to get beaten by goat herders.

Not beaten by goat herders. Beaten by their own white man vs white man infighting.

boeing and lockheed martin.

Good companies. Glad they exist.

 

[Zhou Chang-Xing]

Hell yeah, the only justice we can get out of an unjust world is the justice we create for ourselves.

 

[JayGoptri]

Hell yeah, the only justice we can get out of an unjust world is the justice we create for ourselves.

Whose that? Nelson Mandela + Tyrion Lannister

 

[Chudis Bickle]

communism=marxism=jews=frankfurter schule= woman rights= feminism

Dont get fooled guys.

 

[mlcurrycel]

communism=marxism=jews=frankfurter schule= woman rights= feminism

Dont get fooled guys.

Explain to me how locking women inside and assigning them to incels is women's rights

 

[mlcurrycel]

Hell yeah, the only justice we can get out of an unjust world is the justice we create for ourselves.

Damn straight!

 

[LeFrenchCel]

837 posts, wtf is going on

 

[K9Otaku]

Hey, absolutely. We will do all of that in Incelistan.

Only virgin women will be allowed to be wives. All the whores that resent us would have their hair shaven and would become disposable concubines for incels.

We will force concubines to only have daughters to fix the 105 to 100 ratio.

Check out the FAQ : https://incels.is/threads/the-marxism-rodgerism-faq.474458/post-10946061

If you like it please vote Yes!,

Promises are cheap

 

[mlcurrycel]

837 posts, wtf is going on

THE FIRE RISES!


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vo1bJFVw4vw

 

[mlcurrycel]

Promises are cheap

Literally the laziest argument yet from you. This is an admission of defeat from you. The Yes side hit 46% for a little while. Once I convince @PPEcel and a few others, we will cross 50%.

 

[mlcurrycel]

@spasticbuddy I'll answer any and all questions you have

 

[mlcurrycel]

@NoPussyNoTaxes I'm guessing by your username that you would be inclined to vote Yes. What do you think?

 

[spasticbuddy]

@spasticbuddy I'll answer any and all questions you have

Comment on my most recent post about the economics of white women as mating partners for successive generations of ethnics and whites alike and I will also then write what I feel about Marxist rodgerian doctrine

 

[K9Otaku]

Literally the laziest argument yet from you. This is an admission of defeat from you. The Yes side hit 46% for a little while. Once I convince @PPEcel and a few others, we will cross 50%.

Moron, this is the best argument. From the beginning, it is what I have been saying.

My argument has always been this from the start: "because of the track record of Marxism in the past, your promises are not credible". I have just been illustrating this argument with a variety of examples.

It seems that you are struggling with the notion of credibility. I am not doubting your intentions. I am just saying that the promises you make based on those intentions are not credible. What do you think makes the promises of Marxism-Rodgerism credible? Why should we believe them while ALL past Marxist attempts have lead to disaster? The only tolerable "Communist" government today is China's, precisely because they are no longer Marxists.

 

[K9Otaku]

America spends more on their military than every other country in the world combined. They start all these pointless wars for the sole sake of creating demand for armaments companies and funnel billions in taxpayer money to companies like boeing and lockheed martin.

What matters is what percentage of its GDP it spends. Throughout the Cold War, the USSR had a consistently higher ratio of military spending that the US.

 

[K9Otaku]

russia became a superpower with advanced technology, while the russian empire was a feudalist shithole. it was the only country that became just as powerful as the JewSA, and the same goes for china

So you want to be a slave to a regime that provides you with inferior living standards (and fat goblinas as wives) just for the sake of feeling: "Yay! I live in a superpower!"

Ok

 

[K9Otaku]

To me the obvious counter to this would be to create or reestablish a moral system to shame women into being monogamous. These systems were in place in the west and are back in places like Afghanistan, Iran, etc (read up on the religious revolutions that happened in these places).

Yes. The only way to solve the problem is to re-establish a strong religion, like what the West had, on average, until 200 years ago and the US until WWII.

I do not think that Christianity is capable of this in its traditional form. Its vocabulary and imagery is obsolete. What I have been trying to do (with some modest successes) over the past 10 years is to develop a kind of Christianity 2.0 which keeps the same spiritual belief structure but expresses it in a new vocabulary that is adapted to our time. My AVI pic is the symbol of this new denomination. The white part of it represents the path of the Logos (in John's sense) within space-time. The horizontal segment is His human nature (or incarnation) and the white circle around it is His divine nature. The crucifixion is the bump in the horizontal segment. I believe that the dogma of the Trinity is basically correct and my AVI is an attempt to represent it.

To me the answer is "white sharia," to steal from the Dissident Right/altright. It is correct to see our problems as inherently political.

Politics follow religion. It is impossible, in my view, to have sound politics if you don't have sound religion. Before thinking about politics, we need to restart religion.

When a pro-man, pro-cel government is established it must ban social media, dating apps, porn and any material that pumps foids ego though the roof. Ironically as it stands our government already has these powers but chooses not to because we are ruled by simps and foids. In any case there will always be lonely men due to the fact that in younger generations the gender ratio is 105 men to 100 women. However our current predicament is both unsustainable and immoral.

Totally agree. The problem today is that the majority (including on this Forum) worships the Whore of Babylon. As long as this is the case, there is no hope of improvement.

 

[NoPussyNoTaxes]

@NoPussyNoTaxes I'm guessing by your username that you would be inclined to vote Yes. What do you think?

Seems too complicated and it will probably end up with a few (((people))) getting rich again or getting all women. I would prefer just allowing all objectively ugly, non-nt, and manlets to get universal basic income(if they want) so they can rot in peace.

 

[mlcurrycel]

Moron, this is the best argument. From the beginning, it is what I have been saying.

My argument has always been this from the start: "because of the track record of Marxism in the past, your promises are not credible". I have just been illustrating this argument with a variety of examples.

It seems that you are struggling with the notion of credibility. I am not doubting your intentions. I am just saying that the promises you make based on those intentions are not credible. What do you think makes the promises of Marxism-Rodgerism credible? Why should we believe them while ALL past Marxist attempts have lead to disaster? The only tolerable "Communist" government today is China's, precisely because they are no longer Marxists.

1. Why are you talking about economic systems? This is about enforced monogamy
2. You're pointing at societies led by communist parties not performing up to your standards as an argument. If I point out that America is a decaying shithole that got beat by goat herders and rice farmers, is that an argument in my favour? What about the
   1. Iceland bank collapse?
   2. Greek economic suicide?
   3. Lebanon falling apart?
   4. Argentina economic collapse?
   5. British poverty?
   6. The failure of Brexit?
   7. Asian banking recession?
   8. Inceldom and poverty in South Korea?
   9. Japanese Lost Decade(s)?
3. Everything that fails the first time is stupid?
   1. Lightbulbs?
   2. Planes?
   3. Rockets?
   4. Ships?
   5. Democracy?
      1. Athens?
      2. Rome?
      3. Cromwell's England?
      4. French Revolution?
      5. Haiti Revolution? @lifefuel
      6. South Korea?
      7. 1848 Revolutions?
      8. Paris Commune?

This is retarded. I could go on all day. Just give up.

 

[mlcurrycel]

So you want to be a slave to a regime that provides you with inferior living standards (and fat goblinas as wives) just for the sake of feeling: "Yay! I live in a superpower!"

Ok

You're a fucking fakecel if you think no pussy is better than pussy

 

[mlcurrycel]

Yes. The only way to solve the problem is to re-establish a strong religion, like what the West had, on average, until 200 years ago and the US until WWII.

I do not think that Christianity is capable of this in its traditional form. Its vocabulary and imagery is obsolete. What I have been trying to do (with some modest successes) over the past 10 years is to develop a kind of Christianity 2.0 which keeps the same spiritual belief structure but expresses it in a new vocabulary that is adapted to our time. My AVI pic is the symbol of this new denomination. The white part of it represents the path of the Logos (in John's sense) within space-time. The horizontal segment is His human nature (or incarnation) and the white circle around it is His divine nature. The crucifixion is the bump in the horizontal segment. I believe that the dogma of the Trinity is basically correct and my AVI is an attempt to represent it.


Politics follow religion. It is impossible, in my view, to have sound politics if you don't have sound religion. Before thinking about politics, we need to restart religion.


Totally agree. The problem today is that the majority (including on this Forum) worships the Whore of Babylon. As long as this is the case, there is no hope of improvement.

So you want to try a modified form of Christianity even though Christianity failed to control hypergamy again and again? And you're attacking me for using Marxism in the name as a meme? You're the fucking meme here

 

[mlcurrycel]

Yes. The only way to solve the problem is to re-establish a strong religion, like what the West had, on average, until 200 years ago and the US until WWII.

I do not think that Christianity is capable of this in its traditional form. Its vocabulary and imagery is obsolete. What I have been trying to do (with some modest successes) over the past 10 years is to develop a kind of Christianity 2.0 which keeps the same spiritual belief structure but expresses it in a new vocabulary that is adapted to our time. My AVI pic is the symbol of this new denomination. The white part of it represents the path of the Logos (in John's sense) within space-time. The horizontal segment is His human nature (or incarnation) and the white circle around it is His divine nature. The crucifixion is the bump in the horizontal segment. I believe that the dogma of the Trinity is basically correct and my AVI is an attempt to represent it.


Politics follow religion. It is impossible, in my view, to have sound politics if you don't have sound religion. Before thinking about politics, we need to restart religion.


Totally agree. The problem today is that the majority (including on this Forum) worships the Whore of Babylon. As long as this is the case, there is no hope of improvement.

Your AVI is the fucking Rebellion standard from Star Wars turned sideways! Do you think this forum is full of idiots?

 

[mlcurrycel]

Seems too complicated and it will probably end up with a few (((people))) getting rich again or getting all women. I would prefer just allowing all objectively ugly, non-nt, and manlets to get universal basic income(if they want) so they can rot in peace.

How would enforcing monogamy cause some men to get all the pussy? This isn't Islam.

 

[mlcurrycel]

Incelistan will be the only safe place for scientists to research artificial wombs and genetic editing. Marxism Rodgerism will make this technology accessible to all instead of only Jeffrey Epstein or Jeff Bezos. What race of women are grown in these artificial wombs is of no interest to me.

@spasticbuddy