Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Experiment POLL: Who supports Marxism-Rodgerism?

Do you support Marxism-Rodgerism

  • Yes

  • No

  • Undecided


Results are only viewable after voting.
After reading that, I was dissapointed. No, I would never want to be cucked like this.
How the fuck is the guy trying to get you from zero pussy to one pussy cucking you? I am literally doing the opposite of cucking you. I am getting you LAID!

I've said multiple times that I'm against polygny. I've asked the Incel community multiple times how they would prefer to assign women - whether by looksmatch or by profession or whatnot.

Are you even reading anything I'm writing here????????????????????????
 
@mlcurrycel - So will you consider the fact that under your scheme, everyone could potentially lend up with a "fat government Goblina"

fat honey boo boo GIF


@wereq
@Pajeetsingh
@Dravidiancel
@Misogynist Curry 卐 @Aam Aadmi Party
@IndianMan
@currycel
@Zer0/∞
@curryboy420
@currycel102
@Transcended Trucel
@Intellau_Celistic
@Indracel (aka Leftist asshole)
@CopingForBrutality
I've literally already said the government would stop women from getting fat. Are you reading ANYTHING of what I'm writing?
 
... and when the People's Republic of Incelistan finally comes up with sexbots, they will fart radioactive fumes like Chernobyl
All the while in Capitalistan, across the border from Incelistan, startups will be churning out replicas of Lyia Silver and Nancy A by the millions for the price of a cheeseburger. They will run on biofuel (you will pee in their mouths and this is the only fuel they will need) while Incelistani sexbots will be powered by old decommissioned nuclear warheads that will leak after a few months of use (hence the farts). They will also ooze radioactive slurry from their vagina and you will get dick-cancer in under 3 months. Half the Incelistani male population will have no dick within a year. Of course, you will not be able to run away to Capitalistan because there will be barbed wire and floodlights and machine-gun towers all along the border which will be manned by secret police guards who will be allocated the few real-life Stacies available.

@Indari @ilieknothing @Savage @Murdoch89 @PoodankMcGee @armis @Gyros_Pretcel @mlcurrycel @IncelKing @Cannibal @Transcended Trucel @Macrocephalus @BlackPill Scholar @Wilfred @LeFrenchCel @Heartless @wei#3959 @BPJ @Rotter @decembrist_kirillov @blackpillednigga @LesscoBlob @Shrek @AsgardTheFatcel @5ft4ropeconnoisseur @subhuman @Nikalas @Pajeetsingh @Incedel @N14 @Cursed one @Spongebozz @30klhlvwizard @Kentuckycel @jeetcel @Spergz @oakhaigh @aspiringnormie

It is always priceless to see idiots fall for a con job.
 
@Indari
@ilieknothing
@Savage
@PoodankMcGee
@armis
@Gyros_Pretcel
@IncelKing
@Cannibal
@Macrocephalus
@Wilfred
@LeFrenchCel
@blackpillednigga
@LesscoBlob
@5ft4ropeconnoisseur
@subhuman
@Pajeetsingh
@Cursed one
@30klhlvwizard
@Kentuckycel
@Spergz


@tankcel
@ordinaryotaku
@MarquisDeSade
@Suicel
@IronsideCel
@Rotter
@Pandaemonium
@Darius L
@Shrek
@Heartless
@wereq
@_meh
@Pillow City Rev
@PotatoTomato
@Michael15651
@rabitter
@PPEcel
@Transcended Trucel
@NoCopeNoHope
@Murdoch89
@Atavistic Autist
@TheGambler2
@78980n
@Dionysus
@Yerberito
@Lv99_BixNood
@Incel_Because_Short
@Legionarivs
@FarCel
@Incelius Savage

@Spongebozz
@Khanivore
@NihilisticSoul
@Govid_Dorious


You're btfo'ing me with facts and logic here


Beta uprising -> everyone gets their looksmatch, enforced monogamy.

Assuming that foids and young men are paired up by the government in strictly monogamous couples, what would be the best criteria to use when assigning partners?
A few options are:
  1. Sorting people by their facial attractiveness and pairing people with their looksmatch
  2. Sorting people by their IQ and pairing people with their brainmatch
  3. Sorting people by their OCEAN personality type and pairing people with the most compatible partner
  4. Assigning the smartest teenage boys with the most attractive women
  5. Assigning the hardest working teenage boys with the most attractive women
  6. Measuring the penis size and vagina size of people and pairing physically compatible pairs together
  7. Assigning the most honourable teenage boys with the most attractive women (how would this be measured?)
  8. Sorting people by heritable diseases and preventing pairings that could result in disabled offspring
Thoughts?

I've created many threads, floating ideas and asking for feedback and criticism. Some possibilities are:
  1. A Blackpill department objectively rating looks and assigning people by looksmatch
  2. Psychometric analysis and tests to determine personality traits and compatibility
  3. Genetic tests to screen for recessive genes that may cause deformities
  4. Etc etc
There's lots of possibilities and we can choose one, none, or all of them.

It is cruel to let women have access to Chad when they can't keep him. We should protect women by enacting Marxism Rodgerism and locking them inside under enforced monogamy with their looksmatch.
 
Last edited:
I've literally already said the government would stop women from getting fat. Are you reading ANYTHING of what I'm writing?
That is just not credible. The USSR made many promises to its citizens which it never kept. Why should you be taken at your word while your models never kept theirs?
 
All the while in Capitalistan, across the border from Incelistan, startups will be churning out replicas of Lyia Silver and Nancy A by the millions for the price of a cheeseburger. They will run on biofuel (you will pee in their mouths and this is the only fuel they will need) while Incelistani sexbots will be powered by old decommissioned nuclear warheads that will leak after a few months of use (hence the farts). They will also ooze radioactive slurry from their vagina and you will get dick-cancer in under 3 months. Half the Incelistani male population will have no dick within a year. Of course, you will not be able to run away to Capitalistan because there will be barbed wire and floodlights and machine-gun towers all along the border which will be manned by secret police guards who will be allocated the few real-life Stacies available.

@Indari @ilieknothing @Savage @Murdoch89 @PoodankMcGee @armis @Gyros_Pretcel @mlcurrycel @IncelKing @Cannibal @Transcended Trucel @Macrocephalus @BlackPill Scholar @Wilfred @LeFrenchCel @Heartless @wei#3959 @BPJ @Rotter @decembrist_kirillov @blackpillednigga @LesscoBlob @Shrek @AsgardTheFatcel @5ft4ropeconnoisseur @subhuman @Nikalas @Pajeetsingh @Incedel @N14 @Cursed one @Spongebozz @30klhlvwizard @Kentuckycel @jeetcel @Spergz @oakhaigh @aspiringnormie

It is always priceless to see idiots fall for a con job.
The capitalists would never legalise sex robots (not sex dolls) because women drive 80% of consumerism.
 
That is just not credible. The USSR made many promises to its citizens which it never kept. Why should you be taken at your word while your models never kept theirs?
There's some promises that the USSR successfully delivered on and others that it couldn't because of repeated wars such as WW1, Russian Civil War, American Polar Bear Expedition, Soviet-Polish War, World War 2, Cold War, Soviet-Afghan War, Cuban Missle Crisis, etc.
 
@Kentuckycel sorry for forgetting the second k in your username, I'm not from America
 
The capitalists would never legalise sex robots (not sex dolls) because women drive 80% of consumerism.
Never say never. Sexbot manufacturing will become a huge industry. There will always be Elon Musks to want a piece of the action.
 
Then change your vote. Uncuck yourself
At 46%, the side for Incelistan has been the most popular that it's ever been. You can't stop this.
 
I suppose it's better than the current thing or you could go with straight ortho ML or Stalinism, and restricting sexual freedoms (which was already restricted in Stalin's time to some degree).

In terms of Elliot Rodger (probably a little irrelevant), I just see him as a failed normie. The guy just wanted a Stacy gf, he could've gotten with a low tier Normie gal or escortceled (since he came from a rich family. I do remember his father even offering it to him). Generally, I'd prefer to go with a different label than "Rodgerism." I consider BlackOPs2cel to be the prophet of the Incel community more than Elliot Rodger.
 
There's some promises that the USSR successfully delivered on and others that it couldn't because of repeated wars such as WW1, Russian Civil War, American Polar Bear Expedition, Soviet-Polish War, World War 2, Cold War, Soviet-Afghan War, Cuban Missle Crisis, etc.
Excuses
 
Never say never. Sexbot manufacturing will become a huge industry. There will always be Elon Musks to want a piece of the action.
All the companies are owned by the same capitalists. You think Jeff Bezos is going to allow men to have a sex robot that doesn't constantly pester them to buy shit on Amazon?????
 
I suppose it's better than the current thing or you could go with straight ortho ML or Stalinism, and restricting sexual freedoms (which was already restricted in Stalin's time to some degree).

In terms of Elliot Rodger (probably a little irrelevant), I just see him as a failed normie. The guy just wanted a Stacy gf, he could've gotten with a low tier Normie gal or escortceled (since he came from a rich family. I do remember his father even offering it to him). Generally, I'd prefer to go with a different label than "Rodgerism." I consider BlackOPs2cel to be the prophet of the Incel community more than Elliot Rodger.
I was considering Marxism-Houellebecqism.
 
At 46%, the side for Incelistan has been the most popular that it's ever been. You can't stop this.
Russians also voted massively for "Socialism" in 1918 (only free election in the USSR's history). They regretted it instantly
 
All the companies are owned by the same capitalists. You think Jeff Bezos is going to allow men to have a sex robot that doesn't constantly pester them to buy shit on Amazon?????
If there is enough competition, yes. Amazon does an excellent job of providing you with all sorts of stuff very affordably. I have no complaints against Amazon.
 
I believe any system that depends on humans distributing anything will be subjected to biases and nepotism, so those who don't have the power will be assigned transgender mtf or literal subhumans foids, and those with power and connections will be given stacies, maybe it can work if an Ai that is programmed to be fair is handling the distribution idk.
 
If there is enough competition, yes. Amazon does an excellent job of providing you with all sorts of stuff very affordably. I have no complaints against Amazon.
If you don't hate Amazon as a customer, not even a worker, but as a consumer, then you are a low IQ cuck. Amazon literally deleted copies of 1984 from people's Kindles.
 
Never say never. Sexbot manufacturing will become a huge industry. There will always be Elon Musks to want a piece of the action.
And also, if sexbots become popular, foids will lose a lot of their buying power because men will no longer need their sexual services.
 
I believe any system that depends on humans distributing anything will be subjected to biases and nepotism, so those who don't have the power will be assigned transgender mtf or literal subhumans foids, and those with power and connections will be given stacies, maybe it can work if an Ai that is programmed to be fair is handling the distribution idk.
I'm okay with an AI distributing foids. Beauty is objective anyways. Men will have their faces scanned and put in their preferences. An AI could find the looksmatch that most closely matches the man's preferences.

If that sounds good to you, vote Yes!
 
I believe any system that depends on humans distributing anything will be subjected to biases and nepotism, so those who don't have the power will be assigned transgender mtf or literal subhumans foids, and those with power and connections will be given stacies, maybe it can work if an Ai that is programmed to be fair is handling the distribution idk.
Please vote
 
If you don't hate Amazon as a customer, not even a worker, but as a consumer, then you are a low IQ cuck. Amazon literally deleted copies of 1984 from people's Kindles.
Bullshit
 
And also, if sexbots become popular, foids will lose a lot of their buying power because men will no longer need their sexual services.
And capitalism won't allow men to buy a single sex robot and quit the system. Firstly, companies fund feminism and they will get feminism to ban sex robots. Secondly, if any sex robots get released, Amazon or Apple will constantly push updates that make it worse until you're forced to buy a new model.

Amazon will also spy on you 24/7 using your sex robot. If you say anything bad about Jeff Bezos, he will get his sex robot to assassinate you like a Cyberpunk videogame.
 
I would love to but I am not sure about what you mean
Don't bother, it is useless - even if one of us is in wrong, we wouldn't accept defeat

Stop fighting with this marxist, just stopped fighting with Uggo, and went on this now
 
The Amazon Swindle has a back door that can erase books. We found out about this when Amazon remotely erased thousands of copies of 1984. In response to criticism, Amazon promised it would never do this again unless ordered to by the state, which I find not very comforting.

 
Don't bother, it is useless - even if one of us is in wrong, we wouldn't accept defeat

Stop fighting with this marxist, just stopped fighting with Uggo, and went on this now
We are not fighting each other, we are fighting for the souls of people who are seeing this thread. This is worth doing. It is called open debate
 
Ok, what about after that?
You mean the period after suffering the biggest losses in the War, where they rebuilt the biggest Dam in the world, became a world superpower, sent the first satellite to space, the first dog to space, the first man to space, the first woman to space, the first rover on Venus, etc etc? You talking about that time period?
 
The Amazon Swindle has a back door that can erase books. We found out about this when Amazon remotely erased thousands of copies of 1984. In response to criticism, Amazon promised it would never do this again unless ordered to by the state, which I find not very comforting.

You believe Richard Stallman?
 
We are not fighting each other, we are fighting for the souls of people who are seeing this thread. This is worth doing. It is called open debate
It's a dishonest debate where you're strawmanning me, selectively quoting me, twisting my words, gish galloping me
 
We are not fighting each other, we are fighting for the souls of people who are seeing this thread. This is worth doing. It is called open debate
More like "damn your beliefs are stupid no u no u"
 
  1. Abolish inceldom.
  2. Guarantee a virgin wife for every man.
  3. Mandatory paternity testing.

That's the non-negotiables. I will ask the incel community to vote on the following:
  1. If we become rich, free HGH for short teenagers and free cosmetic surgery or orthodontics for truecels
  2. Public executions for cheating men and women caught red handed / sufficient proof
  3. Government surveillance of women to track their movement and prevent cheating
  4. If a woman cuckolds her husband and gives birth to another man's daughter, the daughter becomes the cuckolded man's wife or concubine
  5. Any man who wants to work genuinely will be guaranteed a job. Only the lazy and the incompetent should be fired
  6. Reduce and hopefully eliminate lookism by using government policies based on scientific studies. Such as studying pay disparity between ugly and good looking men and punishing lookist managers
  7. Create AR glasses that make it impossible for women to see the face of anyone other than their husband and family members
  8. Use propaganda, education, indoctrination, hypnosis, psychological conditioning, or even brain implants to condition women into loving their husbands
  9. Genetically engineer lookism and hypergamy out of humanity
  10. Genetically engineer ugliness out of humanity
  11. Genetically engineer unnecessary suffering out of humanity
Holy based
 
You mean the period after suffering the biggest losses in the War, where they rebuilt the biggest Dam in the world, became a world superpower, sent the first satellite to space, the first dog to space, the first man to space, the first woman to space, the first rover on Venus, etc etc? You talking about that time period?
Yeah, exactly. The time when they were spending like crazy on propaganda stunts (all the space stuff) and an oversized military while being unable to provide basic goods and services for their own population.

The US was initially "behind" in the space race because they were not spending money on useless stunts. They were spending on missiles (the Titan and Atlas programs) which promised to reduce military spending because ICBMs are cheaper than planes and tanks for an equivalent deterrent effect. Titan and Atlas were deployed way before any comparable system was available in the Soviet Union. The only thing they had was the vastly oversized R-7 Semyorka which was useless as a missile (too big, too expensive, too slow to launch) but was indeed used for the various space stunts, i.e. mere propaganda.

As a result, throughout the 60s, the USSR was forced to spend vast amounts on conventional weaponry that was obsolete from the start (look at how they performed in the Israeli wars) and could not satisfy civilian needs properly. You have to read the fine print if you want to understand what is really going on.
 
More like "damn your beliefs are stupid no u no u"
He is doing that, not me.

It is a huge ego trip for him, while I am quoting history and making high-effort posts
 
It's a dishonest debate where you're strawmanning me, selectively quoting me, twisting my words, gish galloping me
I am quoting history back to you.

You chose Lenin, Stalin and Mao as models. These guys have a track record. I am just reminding people of it.
 
He is doing that, not me.

It is a huge ego trip for him, while I am quoting history and making high-effort posts
Sure you do, westerner. Just don't quote russians here, please
 
It's a dishonest debate where you're strawmanning me, selectively quoting me, twisting my words, gish galloping me
Yeah, sure. Paint yourself as the victim. That is credible!

You mean the period after suffering the biggest losses in the War, where they rebuilt the biggest Dam in the world, became a world superpower, sent the first satellite to space, the first dog to space, the first man to space, the first woman to space, the first rover on Venus, etc etc? You talking about that time period?
Yeah, exactly. The time when they were spending like crazy on propaganda stunts (all the space stuff) and an oversized military while being unable to provide basic goods and services for their own population.

The US was initially "behind" in the space race because they were not spending money on useless stunts. They were spending on missiles (the Titan and Atlas programs) which promised to reduce military spending because ICBMs are cheaper than planes and tanks for an equivalent deterrent effect. Titan and Atlas were deployed way before any comparable system was available in the Soviet Union. The only thing they had was the vastly oversized R-7 Semyorka which was useless as a missile (too big, too expensive, too slow to launch) but was indeed used for the various space stunts, i.e. mere propaganda.

As a result, throughout the 60s, the USSR was forced to spend vast amounts on conventional weaponry that was obsolete from the start (look at how they performed in the Israeli wars) and could not satisfy civilian needs properly. You have to read the fine print if you want to understand what is really going on.
Are you going to answer that, reincarnation of Stalin?
 
Last edited:
Still a westerner, not a russian
I don't get it. What do you mean?

I haven't quoted any Russians yet but what if I was quoting Solzhenitsin or Steven Kotkin. What would be wrong with that?
 
Yeah, exactly. The time when they were spending like crazy on propaganda stunts (all the space stuff) and an oversized military while being unable to provide basic goods and services for their own population.

The US was initially "behind" in the space race because they were not spending money on useless stunts. They were spending on missiles (the Titan and Atlas programs) which promised to reduce military spending because ICBMs are cheaper than planes and tanks for an equivalent deterrent effect. Titan and Atlas were deployed way before any comparable system was available in the Soviet Union. The only thing they had was the vastly oversized R-7 Semyorka which was useless as a missile (too big, too expensive, too slow to launch) but was indeed used for the various space stunts, i.e. mere propaganda.

As a result, throughout the 60s, the USSR was forced to spend vast amounts on conventional weaponry that was obsolete from the start (look at how they performed in the Israeli wars) and could not satisfy civilian needs properly. You have to read the fine print if you want to understand what is really going on.
CIA reports said that Soviets not only ate the same calories as Americans, but also had more nutritious diets.
 

Similar threads

SupremeAutist
Replies
34
Views
835
Qizarate
Qizarate
Samurai
Replies
35
Views
443
PolskiKartofel
PolskiKartofel
comradespiderman29
Replies
21
Views
460
Todd Thundercock
Todd Thundercock

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top